Collection Status
Your Rating
Description
The Moonrakers are on the brink.
They have thrown off the oppressive yoke of the Utopian Alliance, but they are in a constant struggle to stay independent and find their identity. Alliances are formed and factions arise as the Moonrakers agree to turn their focus outward instead of squabbling over what little they have. Captains push out into unknown corners of the system in attempt to gain resources, influence, and power. The tenuous alliances will only last so long and soon someone must emerge to lead or they will fall.
Brink is a worker placement, trading, and hidden voting game that brings the world of Moonrakers to a new genre. It combines the strategy and planning of a worker placement game with the negotiation and “above the table” play found in Moonrakers and Fractured Sky.
Each turn, players will place one of three different sized ships (workers) onto a grid of hexes. Each hex will gain the player resources and actions, but even more importantly, it will give them power within a faction based on the color of the hex. At the end of each round, players will vote on which faction will score points, which is then multiplied by the amount of power each player has in that factions color on the board.
Players will upgrade their ships, hire ambassadors, explore new systems, and spend influence to complete faction objectives, granting them new abilities. Each game, the map will reveal in a totally new way as regions are explored, presenting new strategies as well as strengths and weaknesses to existing strategies. The player with the most prestige points at the end of 3 rounds wins!
—description from the publisher
Year Published
2025
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 12
This page: 12
Sentiment:
pos 9 ·
mix 1 ·
neu 0 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–12 of 12
Video mrmyW9PMW5s
Heavy Cardboard general_discussion at 55:54
video_pk 13160 · mention_pk 38490
Click to watch at 55:54 · YouTube ↗
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I'm vocalizing what's going on in my head.
- Gen Con is not a convention that I ever foresee myself going back to.
- This is going to be a very long stream if I'm going to take this much time going through each of these.
- We are going to do a BG auction cuz I imagine everybody that watches this is on BGG.
- The designer is going to send it to you. He's going to pay the shipping and y'all are going to pay us and we get to keep the money.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 4jHhiaThPMs
The Dice Tower game_review at 1:10 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 12673 · mention_pk 36997
Click to watch at 1:10 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
- Engaging worker placement with three ships per player
- Balanced interlocking systems with limited runaway leaders
- Satisfying and quick trading mechanic
- High player interaction and solid pacing
- Useful two-player variant via bag-trading
- Deluxe edition feels premium, though not strictly necessary
Cons
- Rulebook readability and layout — black background with small white text
- Voting phase not intuitive and hard to teach
- Ambassador cards look similar and hard to differentiate visually
- Deluxe components increase box size and cost without essential value
- Ambassador card icons may be hard to distinguish in some seating positions
Thematic elements
- Resource management, space trading, and political voting
- Space exploration and planetary governance in a shared universe
- Procedural, modular map exploration, with player-driven advancement
Comparison games
- Moon Rakers
- Sidereal Confluence
- Whistle Mountain
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- action cards and riders — Action cards grant extra options; riders influence end-of-round voting.
- ambassador cards — Ambassadors provide bonuses and enable special actions, influencing strategy.
- power-driven scoring — Power icons determine actions and end-game scoring, including ambassador bonuses.
- public/private resource management — Cubes are stored in a personal tray with a shield; some cubes are hidden while others are public for trading.
- scoring cards and sets — End-game scoring based on color sets and ambassador sets; special scoring cards exist.
- ship upgrades and power — Actions upgrade ships with cargo/power, affecting scoring.
- tile drafting and resource cubes — Cubes of various colors are gained from tiles; white-bordered tiles must be traded to use.
- trading and diplomacy — Trade cubes with other players to set up color sets and power; in 2-player, trade with a bag as a stand-in third player.
- voting phase — End-of-round voting uses colored tokens; two colors or more may score differently.
- worker placement — Each player places three ships on hexes to collect cubes and trigger actions.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- The core of this game is a worker placement game.
- Ambassadors give you bonuses.
- Voting is a pretty important thing.
- The game itself is actually fairly simple.
- I think it's very well balanced. I have not seen a lot of runaway leader issues.
- Push your luck is a perfect element to have.
- Two-player version is a nice, functioning simplification of the game.
- You don't need the deluxe stuff by any means.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video fRlKVR5MU44
Board Game Co top_10_list at 28:53
video_pk 12033 · mention_pk 35241
Click to watch at 28:53 · YouTube ↗
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- worker placement / tableau building — Space-themed worker placement with resource trading and space fleet management, balanced by negotiation.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- This is 10 through 1. This is not easy.
- Logic and Lore is a two-player logical game with tons of variants.
- Shout out to Puerto Rico. That would have been my number one.
- Flamecraft DS is a two-player head-to-head where you are placing out these different dragon tile chips.
- Zenith is absolutely delightful.
- Amber Leaf is my number one game from 2025.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 2m5YWZm1ShA
Meeple Mountain playthrough at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 9498 · mention_pk 28095
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Deep negotiation-based gameplay with emergent strategy
- Rich interaction through trading and alliances
- Clear space theme integration into mechanics
Cons
- Prototype components and color readability can be challenging
- High negotiation load can slow early rounds for new players
- Complex scoring can be daunting for beginners
Thematic elements
- Space exploration, negotiation, governance, and resource management
- Space exploration, space frontier colonies with hex-based exploration
- table-driven negotiations shaping outcomes
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Card play / upgrade actions — draw and play action cards, upgrade cards to modify actions and scoring.
- Set collection / ambassadors — players collect ambassador tokens of different colors to score sets.
- trading / negotiation — players trade cubes and colors to influence voting outcomes.
- Voting / council phase — end-of-round voting where power and color influence scoring.
- worker placement — players place ships as workers to hexes to gather resources and powers.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Brink a new space exploration worker placement with a heavy emphasis on negotiation
- This is our first playthrough of this game, so we may get things wrong
- It's thinky and it's fun
- We had a blast playing it
- It's a co-op game guys, we all win together
- The cube economy and ambassadors create deep strategy
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video sF73ZAGqkTk
Before You Play playthrough at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 8674 · mention_pk 25547
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Deep strategic negotiation and trading
- Engaging two-player rival mechanic
- Rich asymmetrical upgrade paths
- Large set of ambassadors and faction objectives
- High replayability potential
Cons
- Prototype copy with evolving graphics and color distinctions (orange vs yellow)
- High complexity and potential learning curve for new players
- Asymmetry may require longer setup and familiarization
- Two-player mode hinges on rival mechanic, which may feel less dynamic than multiplayer
Thematic elements
- political influence and elections among space factions
- Moon Rakers Universe galaxy
- card-driven, negotiation-heavy, asymmetric upgrade paths
Comparison games
- Moon Rakers Universe
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Ambassador recruitment — Ambassadors grant ongoing abilities and affect faction costs.
- Card-driven actions and rider cards — Action and rider cards modify voting, scoring, and board effects.
- Council vote and scoring — End of round council vote determines round winners and power-based scoring multipliers.
- Endgame scoring via sets and objectives — Ambassador sets, faction objectives, and endgame cards contribute to final points.
- Resource management with influence cubes and favors — Cubes of different colors represent resources; favors are traded or used for actions.
- Rival system for two players — A rival deck simulates opponents; trading with the rival influences votes and bag contents.
- Upgrades and asymmetric upgrade tracks — Ships upgrade along asymmetric tracks; cargo and rail guns affect power and scoring.
- worker placement — Players place ships on hexes to gain influence and activate hexes.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- This is a worker placement and Resource Management game with a heavy emphasis on trade and negotiation.
- In a two-player game we must use a card driven rival.
- This is a prototype copy of the game so things are subject to change in the future.
- There are five different factions and in this game they are each vying for power.
- The game has played over the course of three rounds and ends with a council vote.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ovBi-cXr9Zg
Tabletop Turtle top_10_list at 12:31 sentiment: positive
video_pk 8041 · mention_pk 23671
Click to watch at 12:31 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- high interaction and tight coupling of actions
- strong player engagement with voting and council mechanics
Cons
- trading can slow play at times
- board complexity can be intimidating
Thematic elements
- interstellar politics and ship technology
- Spacefaring faction dynamics with council governance
- tightly coupled, highly interactive
Comparison games
- Kinfire Council
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- ship parts upgrades — build and upgrade ships with limited actions
- Worker placement with trading and hidden voting — trade, negotiate, and influence endgame scoring through votes
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- This is the kind of game you play when you want to feel smart.
- Everything feels like a good decision.
- The card play in this game is absolutely stellar.
- A lot of little things come together to feel cohesive and satisfying.
- You reap what you sew, you know, you need to be strategic and methodical about it.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ZcZBLQLLnbk
Board Game Co top_15_list at 11:21 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5927 · mention_pk 17577
Click to watch at 11:21 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Strong worker-placement feel
- Engaging player interaction
Cons
- Complex decisions can be heavy for some tables
Thematic elements
- medieval/market economy
- worker-placement with trading/negotiation
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- trading / bartering — Negotiate with other players for resources and goals
- worker placement — Smart placement with multiple options per site
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- My number one is God of War.
- Circle the Wagons will get tabled, the second edition of it, more content to mix it in.
- Onward is the spiritual successor to Sky Tier.
- Lands of Evershade was neck and neck with past tread and the more I played it, the more I’m excited.
- The Dead Keep was excellent, though boss battles could use polishing.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Ca0BW6tYNFo
Dice Tower review at 1:57 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5535 · mention_pk 16457
Click to watch at 1:57 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Nice game from IV Studios
- Good negotiation elements
- Works well at two-player
- Good bot system
- Trading mechanics integrated well
Cons
none
Thematic elements
none
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- It's really lightning fast
- The expansion is fantastic
- Just tremendous card game
- I quite enjoyed Brink
- Real great production, very solid game
- Absolutely fabulous game
- Eight great characters
- The expansion that we always needed but didn't know we wanted
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video VXziiuYj-wg
Foster the Me a Channel playthrough at 0:39 sentiment: positive
video_pk 3980 · mention_pk 11602
Click to watch at 0:39 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Engaging theme with a strong space frontier vibe.
- Deep strategic options via upgrades, voting, and ambassador/rider cards.
- Solid potential for high replayability through faction/objective diversity.
- Energetic, interactive playthrough with real-time negotiation and negotiation tactics.
Cons
- Prototype status introduces potential balance issues and evolving rules.
- Rule complexity could present a steep learning curve for new players.
Thematic elements
- space exploration, faction power dynamics, resource negotiation and governance
- Moon Raker's World / lunar frontier
- procedural, negotiation-driven, with hidden voting and strategic tension
Comparison games
- Moon Rakers
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Action cards and negotiation dynamics — Action cards trigger at specific times and enable various strategic moves; negotiation and trades (favors vs influence) are central to gameplay.
- Ambassadors and Rider cards — Ambassadors provide ongoing voting or scoring benefits; Rider cards grant temporary actions that affect voting or resource flow.
- Council voting with influence tokens — A hidden voting phase uses influence tokens to determine which factions gain power; some colors carry extra votes and wildcard behavior.
- End-game scoring and prestige multipliers — Prestige is scored in rounds, with multipliers depending on color dominance and round outcomes; end-game scoring emphasizes diversity of ambassadors and color sets.
- Exploration and map development — Unoccupied hexes can be explored when adjacent to a discovered hex, revealing resources and upgrade opportunities.
- Resource management (favors and influence) — Resources (favors and influence) are earned, traded, or spent to perform actions, upgrade ships, or influence council votes.
- Ship upgrades and cargo/guns (rail guns) — Ships can be upgraded with cargo space or rail guns, altering resource generation and combat/power dynamics.
- Worker placement with bidding — Players place ships to perform actions and gain resources, with a bidding-like influence economy shaping who gets priority and power.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Brink is a worker placement kind of like bidding style game.
- the upgrades are huge.
- sweet rail guns.
- prototype.
- the game is set in the Moon Raker's World.
- the final score: yellow power, blue voting, green influence.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video t9n6NpaYq9k
Unknown Channel top_10_list at 25:54 sentiment: positive
video_pk 2457 · mention_pk 7185
Click to watch at 25:54 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- brings a new genre to the Moonrakers ecosystem
- hidden voting adds intrigue and negotiation
- tight, table-ready box with strong component quality
Cons
- may be heavy for casual players
- requires buy-in from Moonrakers fans to appreciate setting
Thematic elements
- work/resource trading with hidden voting
- Moonraker-esque universe
- strategy with social deduction elements
Comparison games
- Moonrakers
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- hidden voting — vote outcomes are concealed from opponents
- Trading — exchange and manage resources to optimize actions
- worker placement — allocate workers to take actions
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I am so excited about that
- I love that world
- it's a small box game
- Point Galaxy is the next iteration of Point Salad
- the world of The Great Gatsby
- Layer is two-player with dungeon-building
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video sroUH8dVxws
Our Family Plays Games general_discussion at 45:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 2056 · mention_pk 5911
Click to watch at 45:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Intriguing combination of bidding, diplomacy, and exploration
- High production quality from IV Games
Cons
- May require group buy-in for smooth play
- Can be complex for new players
Thematic elements
- diplomacy, conflict, and corporate scheming
- near-future space/faction conflict in a Moon Rakers-like universe
- diplomatic intrigue with negotiation
Comparison games
- Moon Rakers (thematic link)
- Suburbia (city-building overlap)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- hidden voting — secret voting influences outcomes
- trading/negotiation — trade and negotiate with other players for advantage
- worker placement — assign agents to gather resources and influence
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- "Brass Pittsburgh is a standalone take on Martin Wallace's system set in America's Gilded Age."
- "Bruce Lee returns with a new mini and two new Battlefields."
- "float like a butterfly, sting like a bee."
- "Dark Quarter is heavy. It’s a noir-ish detective game with occult overlays."
- "Deep Regrets. We love this game."
- "The best part of worker placement is the satisfaction of putting out your worker and getting something in return."
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video we9psUPwiYI
The Brothers Murphy playthrough at 0:15 sentiment: positive
video_pk 353 · mention_pk 1030
Click to watch at 0:15 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Interesting ship placement mechanics
- Negotiation and trading elements
- Dynamic voting system
- Multiple strategic paths
Cons
- Complex resource management
- Potential for analysis paralysis
- Revolt mechanics can disrupt strategy
Thematic elements
- Space exploration and influence
- Moon Rakers Universe
- Strategic resource management
Comparison games
- Moon Rakers
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Council Voting — Players vote on color factions to score points each round
- Resource Trading — Players can trade resources with each other and a rival
- Ship Placement — Players place three classes of ships in different hex locations to activate resources and actions
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I'm on the brink of space time Oh Glory
- We are in the Moon Rakers Universe once again ready to explore
- Look everybody wins this is trash this is trash this space trash man not not trash at all delicious space trash for me
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–12 of 12