Skip to main content

Chocolate Factory

Game ID: GID0067029
Collection Status
Description

Set in the early 20th century of entrepreneurs and chocolatiers experimenting with new ways to create and market chocolates, YOU are assigned the task of chief chocolate maker! Chocolate Factory is a euro game of literal factory building and moving (using a pushable conveyer belt component) chocolates you must complete the largest number of chocolates required by retailers for the best value. The game also features wooden chocolate pieces and a movable conveyer belt making the physicality blended with euro mechanics a unique experience.

Gameplay overview:
Players are each given a starting player board which will have two Factory parts which apply to a physical conveyer belt. The conveyer belt part of the player board contains long slot with an empty region in which to push square tiles along. The tiles will house the chocolate pieces players will manipulate throughout the game.

During the game players will initially draft new factory parts (to add to their player board) and specialists (one time use cards with special powers).

Then each player will “push” three times cocoa into their machines. During each “push” players will be able to use fuel and their factory parts to manipulate their Chocolate pieces. Careful consideration will be required for the spatial element of the game as Chocolate pieces can only be manipulated during a push by the Factory part that is adjacent to their tile.

Players score points by creating chocolates for public and personal objectives. The player with the most points at the end wins.

Year Published
2019
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 3
This page: 3
Sentiment: pos 2 · mix 1 · neu 0 · neg 0
Mentions per page
Top
Showing 1–3 of 3
Video cOD9uqRB2eo Chairman of the Board top_10_list at 18:59 sentiment: positive
video_pk 10910 · mention_pk 32133
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 18:59
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Engine-building is fantastic
  • Clear progression toward contracts and scoring
Cons
  • Drafting can feel generic
  • Some tension between drafting and engine payoff
Thematic elements
  • Engine-building + drafting
  • Chocolatier factory with conveyor belts
  • Polished, thematic production line
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Drafting + conveyor belt engine — Draft in order to activate machines along a belt and convert resources
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • this game is the definition of elegance in the game and there's zero bloat
  • the engine building part I thought was pretty damn fantastic
  • a filler that works; it's smooth and it's fun
  • one of the best two-player games out there
  • embrace the carnage
  • the final product is better than the sum of its parts
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video UFqEpkNNnYo Foster the Meeple top_10_list at 14:38 sentiment: positive
video_pk 6538 · mention_pk 19364
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 14:38
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • friendly theme for all ages
  • engaging production puzzle
Cons
  • may require clarifying rules for newcomers
Thematic elements
  • production planning and resource management
  • Whimsical confectionery factory
  • light, colorful
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Resource management — managing ingredients to fulfill production goals
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • 1,198 games it's too many
  • 768 that's I don't care what people say that's really good
  • we have 394
  • we're still playing games and taking names
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Nqqj4Lijrp4 Beon Soliter interview at 4:34 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 3232 · mention_pk 9473
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:34
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • Led to a refined system that worked well within the game's design space
  • Grew into a distinct, well-regarded solo variant (Distilled was later inspired by the approach)
Cons
  • Early version was somewhat random depending on setup
  • Some flaws identified to be addressed in a later distillation
Thematic elements
  • Light industry/economy with a solo mode variant
  • Multiplayer board game about factory optimization and production lines
  • Analytical/iterative design discussion
Comparison games
  • Distilled
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Resource management — Players manage production resources to optimize outputs.
  • Setup variability — Initial setup can lead to different runs, influencing difficulty.
  • Solo mode design — Designer created and iterated a dedicated solo system for the game.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • the solo mode has to be right for the game in terms of balancing what they want and what you want
  • I've got a theory that's called complexity budget
  • we were able to do both extremes
  • I want solo games to be interactive; I want the game to be a challenge without it being too aligned to my typical negative experience of co-op games
  • I'm not the best person to be doing this anymore; I'll crack on
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–3 of 3
View on BoardGameGeek