Skip to main content

Die Macher

Game ID: GID0095217
Collection Status
Description

Die Macher is a game about seven sequential political races in different regions of Germany. Players are in charge of national political parties, and must manage limited resources to help their party to victory. The winning party will have the most victory points after all the regional elections. There are four different ways of scoring victory points. First, each regional election can supply one to eighty victory points, depending on the size of the region and how well your party does in it. Second, if a party wins a regional election and has some media influence in the region, then the party will receive some media-control victory points. Third, each party has a national party membership which will grow as the game progresses and this will supply a fair number of victory points. Lastly, parties score some victory points if their party platform matches the national opinions at the end of the game.

The 1986 edition featured four parties from the old West Germany and supported 3-4 players. The 1997 edition supports up to five players in the re-united Germany and updated several features of the rules as well. The 2006 edition also supports up to five players and adds a shorter five-round variant and additional rules updates by the original designer.

Year Published
1986
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 7
This page: 7
Sentiment: pos 3 · mix 3 · neu 0 · neg 1
Mentions per page
Top
Showing 1–7 of 7
Video BWRnm9ZuVSg The Dice Girls playthrough at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 12255 · mention_pk 35790
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Strong character-driven moments and witty banter
  • Dynamic possession mechanic creates tense, funny, and surprising play
  • Engaging use of talents and backstory to drive plot
  • Effective DM pacing with escalating threats (ghostly possession, eerie morphs)
Cons
  • Live-rule clarification friction during fast play
  • Homebrew rules occasionally require quick internal arbitration
  • Some players lean on improvisation rather than strict mechanics, which can confuse newcomers
Thematic elements
  • Exploration, possession, artifact retrieval, moral ambiguity, and redeeming past actions
  • Fantasy world with forest ruins, haunted box, and a covey of gemstones that unlocks spectral threats
  • Improvisational, episodic, comedic with moments of high tension and dramatic backstory reveals
Comparison games
  • Dungeons & Dragons (generic framework)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Ability checks and skill checks — Investigation, perception, and saving throws drive exploration and danger resolution
  • Combat system mechanics — Attack rolls, hit points, damage calculations, and access to unarmed and weapon-based attacks
  • Homebrew inspiration mechanics — Bartok-inspired inspiration as a resource to modify saves, checks, or actions
  • Invisibility and stealth — Temporary invisibility to reposition and act without being seen, affecting initiative and opportunities
  • Saving throws and death fate rules — Wisdom saves and consequences for failing a frightful or horrific encounter, including aging or other effects
  • Teleportation and movement — Magic items (staff of teleportation) and movement across terrain to collect gemstones
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Jazz fingers would shatter him
  • Bartok inspiration to your saving throw
  • I'm invisible, so I can move up and scoop up the gems
  • This ghost is terrifying and possesses me
  • I aged up to forty years if I fail this save by five or more
  • I like this a lot
  • The ghost kind of eats the gemstones
  • Becca DM here to say thank you for listening
  • I reach in and grab the box of gemstones
  • Rock is terrified, I’m trying to punch a ghost
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video yOKIc0vTnvU The Command Zone analysis at 0:00 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 7563 · mention_pk 22467
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • More decision points and player engagement
  • Encourages creativity and personalization
  • Extends deck longevity and player enjoyment
Cons
  • Less predictability and potential for feels-bad when deck struggles
  • May lengthen games or complicate play for new players
  • Some changes may reduce overall power or consistency
Thematic elements
  • Strategic deckbuilding, customization, and interaction
  • Multiplayer casual games centered on Commanders and the deck-building process
  • N/A
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Activated abilities — Using activated abilities to create meaningful choices on turns.
  • Card draw — Strategies to increase options and decision points through drawing more cards.
  • Modal / multi-mode spells — Spells with multiple modes to increase flexibility.
  • Redundancy management — Limiting overly similar cards to encourage variety.
  • Tutor removal / restriction — Reducing or restricting tutoring to avoid repetition.
  • Variance / chaos — Introducing randomness or divergent paths to keep play fresh.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Power and consistency is sort of the enemy of intrigue.
  • Paint with a wider brush.
  • Decks are living documents like bonsai trees.
  • Add variance/chaos to your game to keep it interesting.
  • No two decks overlap except for basic lands.
  • Chaos drafts are fun; open an old pack and see what happens.
  • Paint with pastels vs watercolor contrasts.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video SJ39fnLUpkQ Adam's Board Game Wales general_discussion at 0:18 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 7353 · mention_pk 21722
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:18
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • Culturally iconic and familiar, with deep negotiation potential.
  • Rich array of house rules and variants over the years reflect adaptability.
  • Strong social interaction and memorable moments.
Cons
  • Lengthy playtime and player elimination can stall the game.
  • Heavily luck-driven early stages can feel unfair.
  • Monetary chaos and design fatigue with numerous editions.
Thematic elements
  • Monopolizing property ownership and wealth accumulation through negotiation, rent, and bankruptcy.
  • Early 20th-century Atlantic City-inspired board with streets and properties.
  • Cautionary economic satire with competitive player elimination dynamics.
Comparison games
  • Landlord's Game
  • Prosperity (early alternative rules)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • auctions and strategic timing — Properties can be auctioned; decisions around when to spend vs. hold money.
  • Rent collection and building houses/hotels — Rent increases as sets are completed; housing/hotels boost rents.
  • Roll-and-move with dice — Players roll dice to move around a fixed board.
  • trading and negotiation — Players trade properties to complete color sets and maximize rents.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • there's nothing very constructive about it
  • it's a mean-spirited game you know it's all about trying to bankrupt your opponents
  • the great thing about Monopoly Millionaire is that brilliant tile money now that is a huge improvement over the cash the paper money
  • in monopoly gamer everyone is competing for points rather than money
  • you build monopoly is a real step forward
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video j8FtcDd9wbc Game Nights playthrough at 0:21 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5167 · mention_pk 15288
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:21
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • High-power, dynamic interactions among four players
  • Robust commander-based synergies and recursion loops provide deep strategic tools
  • Celebrity guest adds entertainment value and broad appeal
  • Nostalgia and classic commander-leaning archetypes with modern reprints
Cons
  • Potential for overwhelming board states and lengthy turns
  • Reliance on high-moise combos can slow the game for casual viewers
  • Some content sections are sponsor-driven, which may affect pacing
Thematic elements
  • Power, control, resource orchestration, and political dynamics in a four-player commander environment
  • Planeswalker-driven clashes across multiple planes; token generation and graveyard recursion feature prominently
  • Array
Comparison games
  • Rise of the Dark Realms
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is old school
  • Let's do this old school
  • What a cool commander
  • Rise of the Dark Realms is back in play
  • I win the game, I promise Josh it's not going to be a dab
  • Oh boy this might be one of the best cards in post deck
  • This is incredible—the board state is crazy
  • I can't believe this is happening on stream
  • What a line to re-growth back that rise of the dark realms
  • Rise of the Dark Realms and the card draw engine
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video E13sz-l9B54 Foster the Meeple top_10_list at 8:15 sentiment: positive
video_pk 3773 · mention_pk 11080
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 8:15
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Rich political theme with depth
  • Engaging auction/influence interplay
Cons
  • Heavy/rules-dense
  • Long playtime may deter casual players
Thematic elements
  • Political influence and campaigning
  • Germany, contemporary political landscape
  • Strategic, deep simulation of political processes
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Auction / Bidding — Bidding to influence campaigns and outcomes.
  • influence / area control — Distribute influence across regions to gain power.
  • Resource management — Manage limited resources to run campaigns.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • "we are going back in time to before Y2K"
  • "starting with games from 2000 the year 2000 and before we call those the before times"
  • "I am obsessed with that theme like making movies"
  • "I just think it looks really really neat"
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video j8nHxk-446o Unknown Channel playthrough at 0:06 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 3031 · mention_pk 8854
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:06
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • Innovative mash-up that reimagines Monopoly through a satirical zombie apocalypse lens
  • Energetic, humorous player interaction with lots of improvisation
  • Rich narrative devices and mutations boost replayability and story depth
  • Clear critique of landlord capitalism embedded in game fiction
Cons
  • Can become overly complex and difficult to track for casual players
  • Balance shifts with mutations may slow progress or create chaotic swings
  • Darker, violent humor may not suit all audiences
Thematic elements
  • satirical zombie apocalypse meets property trading; counters capitalism with chaos
  • Central London, 2100, during a zombie outbreak
  • meta, satirical, mockumentary-style mutation of a classic game
Comparison games
  • Monopoly (base game)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Bottle-cap currency — Traditional Monopoly money is replaced by bottle caps; currency is negotiated and exchanged during trades.
  • Dramatic Narrative Devices — Dictaphone messages and on-screen narration reveal twists and plot beats (e.g., Margerie, monkey wrenches in the plan).
  • Escape Routes & Board Variants — New win routes appear (Park Lane, Mayfair, hidden helipad) enabling potential city-wide exits for humans.
  • Mutations & Special Abilities — Characters acquire mutations (e.g., extra legs, time travel, clones) that alter movement, combat, and turn order.
  • Quarantine and Cure — Quarantine spaces trigger medical events; cures can heal or mutate players; Doctor has a unique win condition.
  • Time/Space Shifts — Mutations can teleport or reconfigure when certain dice conditions are met (Quantum Leap-like effects).
  • Trade & Resource Bufoonery — Barter system with bottle caps; sharing of weapons and resources is negotiated under volatile conditions.
  • Zombie Horde & Combat — Zombies do not collect rent; players use dice-based combat (D4, D6, D10, D12) to fight zombies and protect positions.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I've done it I've created the perfect game the perfect Monopoly
  • it's just Monopoly in it it's just regular Monopoly
  • the game has mutated into something wonderful
  • we're playing a normal fun game of Monopoly
  • two Escape Routes from the city
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 6LYqAgxLhXo No Rolls Bard top_10_list at 0:00 sentiment: negative
video_pk 18 · mention_pk 31
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00
Overall sentiment (raw)
negative
Pros
  • Iconic status and broad cultural familiarity
  • Accessible entry point for casual play and social interaction
  • Memorable aesthetic and recognizable branding
Cons
  • Takes too long and can stretch for hours
  • Negotiation is often unproductive or unbalanced
  • Mean-spirited mechanics that can hurt families and relationships
  • Downtime between turns can be excessive (long pauses between actions)
  • Rule variations ruin consistent play and fairness
  • Player elimination can leave others disengaged
  • Luck strongly drives outcomes, muting strategic skill
  • Certain properties may linger without sale, stalling progress
  • High emotional cost, particularly for younger players under stress
Thematic elements
  • Wealth accumulation, capitalism, property speculation, and social maneuvering amid luck and economy.
  • A stylized American city where players buy properties, collect rents, and attempt to bankrupt opponents through property ownership and rent generation.
  • Satirical, critical, and humorous depiction of financial games and family dynamics centered on negotiation and luck.
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Auction — Unpurchased properties may go to the highest bidder when not bought outright.
  • Banking and money flow — Currency management, mortgages, and bankruptcy govern the in-game economy.
  • Building houses/hotels — Investing in properties increases rent, creating economic pressure and potential for victory or bankruptcy.
  • Dice rolling — Players move around the board, triggering property interactions and rent collection based on random outcomes.
  • Jail and release mechanics — Players can be sent to jail, affecting pace and opportunities to acquire properties.
  • Loss aversion and elimination — The prospect of bankruptcy shifts player behavior toward risk and strategic concession or withdrawal.
  • Mortgaging and liquidating assets — Players can mortgage properties to raise cash, impacting long-term growth.
  • Passing Go and salary collection — Receiving a fixed income when passing Go influences cash flow and auction dynamics.
  • Property trading — Players negotiate trades to complete color sets and gain strategic control.
  • Rent collection — Landing on owned properties yields rent, rewarding property accumulation.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • monopoly is rubbish
  • it sucks
  • it sucks it sucks
  • it's too long
  • trading is almost impossible because so few trades are actually worth it
  • the cruelty of a single dice roll bankrupting a small child
  • 20 minutes between turns—too long
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–7 of 7
View on BoardGameGeek