Skip to main content

Mandala

Game ID: GID0200812
Collection Status
Description

The Mandala: the symbol of an ancient and sacred ritual. Colored sand is laid to create a symbolic map of the world before the pattern is ceremonially destroyed and the sand cast into the river.

In the two-player game Mandala, you are trying to score more than your opponent by collecting valuable cards — but you won't know which cards are valuable until well into the game! Over the course of the game, players play their colored cards into the two mandalas, building the central shared mountains and laying cards into their own fields. As soon as a mandala has all six colors, the players take turns choosing the colors in the mountain and adding those cards to their "river" and "cup". At the end of the game, the cards in your cup are worth points based on the position of their colors in that player's river. The player whose cup is worth more points wins.

The linen playmat shows two circular mandalas, with each being divided by a horizontal space (the mountain) to create one "field" for each player. The playmat has seven spaces in front of each player to hold their river of single face-up cards and their cup: the stack of face-down cards which they score at the end of the game.

To begin, each player receives a hand of six cards. Each player receives two random cards face down in their cup, then two random cards are dealt face up into the central mountain strip of each mandala.

On your turn, you may play either a single card into one of mountains, or one or more matching cards into one of your fields. All cards played into a mandala must follow the "Rule of Color": Once a color has been played into one of the three areas of a mandala, then later cards of the same color can be played only into that same area. Thus, once your opponent has played red cards into their field, then you can't play red cards in your field, and neither you nor your opponent can play red cards into the central mountain. If you played a card into a mountain, draw three new cards from the deck at the end of your turn; if you played cards into one of your fields, do not draw new cards.

A mandala is completed once it contains all six colors of cards. When this happens, the players "destroy" the mandala, taking turns to choose a color present in the mountain and claim all cards of that color. Whoever played more cards in their field chooses first; if tied, the player who did not complete the mandala chooses first. The first time you claim cards of a specific color, lay one of these cards in the lowest-valued empty space in your river, then place the rest into your cup. The spaces in your river are valued 1-6 in order, so cards of the first color you claim will be worth 1 point each, cards of the second color you claim worth 2 points each, and so on.

Once a mandala has been destroyed and all the colors in the mountain claimed, cards played in the fields are discarded, two new cards are dealt face up into the mountain, and the game continues.

The end of the game is triggered either when the deck is exhausted or when one player adds a sixth color to their river. Both players then tally the value of all the cards in their cup, based on the position of the colors in their river, and whoever has the higher score wins!

Contents:

1 linen playmat
108 mandala cards (18 in each of 6 colours)
2 reference cards

Year Published
2019
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 9
This page: 9
Sentiment: pos 9 · mix 0 · neu 0 · neg 0
Mentions per page
Top
Showing 1–9 of 9
Video 3dGZTX_OyGE Chairman of the Board general_discussion at 5:55 sentiment: positive
video_pk 11314 · mention_pk 33248
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 5:55
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • One of the best two-player experiences
  • Highly replayable with strong balance
Cons
  • Not every player will enjoy the abstract mechanics
Thematic elements
  • Pattern matching and scoring rhythm
  • Pattern drafting and color card management
  • Abstract/analytic
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • pattern/hand management — collect and play cards to achieve mandala patterns
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • mandala still utterly fantastic
  • one of the best two player games i've made
  • it's so so good and repeated plays are not changing that at all
  • my god is this game fantastic even better than i remembered it
  • it's got that real novelty factor and that physicality to a party game that does make people remember it
  • the scoring does feel a bit too tight
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video zJqdKED3NmM Board Games Hitting My Table general_discussion at 15:14 sentiment: positive
video_pk 8380 · mention_pk 24681
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 15:14
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Smooth as silk
  • Tough decisions in a light framework
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Aesthetic card arrangement and placement
  • Two-player set collection/mandala framework
  • Tight, elegant abstract-like experience
Comparison games
  • Delicious
  • Floriferous
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • set collection / mandalas — Draft and place cards into mandalas to maximize points
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • one of the coolest initiative mechanisms that I've ever seen
  • this is like an essential because it is that good
  • an absolute blast playing these couple of games
  • the two-player card game on the market
  • Mandala is absolutely smooth as silk
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video lBIo3mE_yLM Chairman of the Board top_10_list at 15:31 sentiment: positive
video_pk 8272 · mention_pk 24249
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 15:31
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Deep decisions for a two-player game
  • Flows well and remains engaging from start to finish
Cons
  • Rules can feel subtle; learning curve is modest
  • May be too lightweight for some heavy euro players
Thematic elements
  • Pattern collection and strategic card play
  • Two-player abstract duel
  • Elegant, color-coded strategy
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • center-card drafting — Place cards into the center for later collection by both players
  • hand management — Manage and time card plays for future rounds
  • scoring by collected varieties — First card values and later cards gain value depending on type collected
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's a very smooth game and very little complication
  • it's a lovely example of catering to a wide and versatile audience
  • it's a fantastic example of a bidding game and a racing game
  • this game is one of the most tense games I've ever played
  • I cannot praise this game enough it's amongst my favorite games of all time
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video VF2_KIaKRaI Chairman of the Board top_10_list at 20:06 sentiment: positive
video_pk 7640 · mention_pk 22632
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 20:06
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Deep and balanced card drafting with flexible paths to victory
  • Dynamic hand management and bidding creates tension
  • The two-mandala mechanic adds layer and depth
Cons
  • Production aesthetics may polarize; board feels like a tea towel
Thematic elements
  • card-driven, color-based market with two mandalas
  • Cultural/artistic theme focused on mandalas and color-driven bidding
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Bid for cards via color groups — Two mandalas where players bid to acquire cards; first choice affects future availability
  • Two mandalas in play — Balance two scoring tracks with cascading values; restrict opponent access
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • the tension from start to finish is fantastic
  • i love the plate spinning aspect
  • one player is going to be the editor of the kind of free press and one person is going to be president nixon
  • the split you choose mechanism as you take cards from your hand
  • loads of different ways you can win this game
  • the thing i love the most about this game on top of all that really cool manipulation and card play
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video EIiUSBj15xE Jungles Games general_discussion at 32:24 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5382 · mention_pk 16011
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 32:24
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Strong abstract puzzle
  • Accessible to many players
Cons
  • Abstract may not appeal to all
Thematic elements
  • Colorful pattern building / pattern intersection
  • Abstract strategy
  • Abstract
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Pattern drafting / mosaic-style placement — Players draft and create patterns for scoring
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's a euro style game that plays up to six
  • it's fully simultaneous
  • Concordia Venus ... brings in team play and that lets you play two on two which is a four player game and it also lets you play two versus two which is a six player game
  • not a euro game really it's more of a deduction style game where it's one versus many
  • I started to work on that video and I'm hoping to make it happen
  • Miniatures don't do anything for me
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video zgPVVoQl_VU Chairman of the Board analysis at 1:41 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5259 · mention_pk 15549
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:41
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • simple, card-driven abstract that yields deep strategic tension
  • early vs late card collection creates interesting scoring trajectories
Cons
none
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Mandala blew me away this year
  • Chinatown is the best negotiation game out there
  • barrage is a 10 out of 10 game for me
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video clf0DGfjWW4 Chairman of the Board general_discussion at 6:44 sentiment: positive
video_pk 3172 · mention_pk 9333
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 6:44
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • fantastic two-player puzzle
  • highly regarded by the reviewer
Cons
  • thinkier for casual players
Thematic elements
  • artistic mandalas and bidding
  • two-player bidding and set-collection
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • bidding — players bid on center-drawn cards to claim sets
  • set collection — collect cards to form sets with point values
  • shared card pool — cards are drawn from a common pool, affecting both players
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • this is definitely one of those games with a bit of laborious start but great payoff after you get your head around it
  • it's a wonderful family-friendly filler, a puzzly style game
  • one of my favorite games that i played last year
  • it's essential if you like your two-player games
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video zAVCQ8r3BlI Board Games Hitting My Table general_discussion at 10:52 sentiment: positive
video_pk 947 · mention_pk 2672
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 10:52
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • fast play, interesting end-game triggers
  • tight competition despite light components
Cons
  • the pacing can feel abrupt for some players
Thematic elements
  • color and shape collection with set collection
  • two-player abstract card drafting game
  • fast, strategic, and occasionally tactical
Comparison games
  • Jaipur
  • Twilight Struggle (via drafting pacing)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • set collection — collecting different card types to complete objectives
  • two-player dynamics — tight interaction and strategic sequencing
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • this game is a masterpiece
  • infinitely replayable
  • an absolute Masterpiece
  • this is such a cool game
  • an absolute joy to play
  • seven and a half out of ten
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video IszlYvzL5TI Board Games Hitting My Table game_review at 4:08 sentiment: positive
video_pk 111 · mention_pk 268
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:08
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • tight two-player experience
  • clear, elegant bidding dynamics
Cons
  • may require practice to optimize bidding
  • some players may prefer more interaction
Thematic elements
  • bid for central cards to maximize points across rounds
  • two-player card bidding within a card-drafting framework
  • slick, classic card game feel
Comparison games
  • Mandala: The following patterns (sequel)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • bidding / auction — bid for cards in the center to determine next picks
  • set collection / card order — the order in which you collect cards impacts points
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's such a wonderfully implemented tug-of-war game, and I love the way you do not have to focus 100% on the tug-of-war
  • the replayability and just the elegance of this brilliant dice-driven Euro
  • this is Mandala, the original one here
  • it's so quick and it's just a delight to play
  • Captain Flip, evergreen family style game
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–9 of 9
View on BoardGameGeek