Collection Status
Your Rating
Description
Netrunner is a cyberpunk-themed collectible card game. The two players are the Corp (who wins by completing Agendas) and the Runner (who wins by infiltrating the Corp and liberating Agendas).
Each side has a limited number of both actions and bits (money) to spend per turn; bits are gone once used, and actions must be spent to gain more.
An important thing when evaluating the power of cards is to see the Bit per action ratio.
One unique feature of this game is that the Runner physically moves on the "board" created by facedown Corp cards. It has the feel of a "capture the flag" game, with the Runner moving in dataforts to steal Agendas from the Corp.
Another unique feature is that the Cards are NOT the primary strategy of the game; in fact, players can win by simply "playing with the rules" itself (a concept difficult to understand if you've never played Netrunner).
Both players play as both Corp and Runner in a game, one after the other, with each player's Runner going against the opponent's Corp. A winning match provides 10 points and the loser scores points equal to the number of agenda points scored/liberated. The winner of the game is the one who has the most points in the 2 submatches.
Though Netrunner is traditionally a two-player duel, there are formats that allow for more players (called "The Big Sell Out").
Year Published
1996
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 7
This page: 7
Sentiment:
pos 5 ·
mix 0 ·
neu 2 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–7 of 7
Video iJNxPRfs2kM
Rolling Dice and Taking Names interview at 2:10:05 sentiment: positive
video_pk 13770 · mention_pk 40244
Click to watch at 2:10:05
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Pioneered asymmetric card play and meta-developer engagement
- Deep strategic depth and community-driven evolution (expansions)
Cons
- Complex learning curve; large memory requirement
Thematic elements
- hackathon of information vs. security
- Cyberpunk corporate warfare
- asymmetric, two distinct sides (Runner vs. Corporation)
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Asymmetric play — Runner vs. Corp have different goals and mechanics
- deck-building + hand management — Unique terms and multiple decks for each side; dynamic meta evolves with expansions
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- bam that's a quote, baby, quotable
- it's one of those things that you should always feel like there's no chance for you to win on both sides simultaneously
- easy like sunday morning
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video GsuMEmi7Lsg
Board Game Coffee general_discussion at 6:51 sentiment: positive
video_pk 13626 · mention_pk 39810
Click to watch at 6:51
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- deep, fast-paced head-to-head
- great for two players
Cons
- complex ecosystem, can be intimidating
- deck management can be finicky
Thematic elements
- one-on-one hacking duel
- cyberpunk, corporate espionage
Comparison games
- KeyForge
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- deck-building — pre-made and customizable decks with strategic choices
- hand-management — careful resource management and timing
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- "Netrunner is a fabulous game now I used to play this all the time"
- "it's the best of those"
- "it's so good I can't emphasize how good this is"
- "Claustrophobia is a must-have for your collection if you're a Dungeon Crawler"
- "Gardenbau sponsored by 25th Century Games"
- "you buy one of these packs and you're good to go"
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video cLOrxog8Yk4
Board Game Hangar general_discussion at 10:38 sentiment: positive
video_pk 8530 · mention_pk 25167
Click to watch at 10:38
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- deep strategic layers for two players
- highly thematic and iconic
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- cyberpunk intrigue and corporate warfare
- near-future bluffing and hacking duel
Comparison games
- Watergate
- Root
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- deck-building / bluffing — asymmetric corps vs. hackers with strategic HQ/DN rules
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I guarantee that 90 of the games here I think you will enjoy
- this shelf is like this any game you pull out you know you can immediately play even if you don't remember all the rules
- I want it as well
- you have to move with the culture next to the wine I think he's a fan of me
- two players two player versus games exactly
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video t3P4rCAPp90
Roll Dice Take Names general_discussion at 0:23 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 8062 · mention_pk 23743
Click to watch at 0:23
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
- Influential design that popularized asymmetric gameplay
- Deep cyberpunk theme with competitive tension
Cons
- Complex rules and learning curve
- Availability and print status can affect access
Thematic elements
- asymmetric competition between a Runner and a Corporation
- Cyberpunk near-future corporate espionage
- asymmetric strategy with hidden information
Comparison games
- Dominion
- Katan
- Carcassonne
- Terraforming Mars
- Wingspan
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Asymmetric play — Runner and Corporation have different goals, abilities, and action sets
- deck-building — Players utilize constructed decks to execute actions and counterplay
- hand management — Managing a hand of cards to maximize effects and timing
- Resource management — Credits and cards as resources to play and install using the network
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- does tabletop gaming suck now
- I don't care I don't give a rats behind
- I want something that I can enjoy I don't need all that fluff
- I love gaming with people that aren't like me
- we're not a community it's just because you play board games doesn't mean that you're going to want to play with everybody else that plays a board game
- there's always something for someone
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video tTa3MQtacsE
Rolling Dice and Taking Names general_discussion at 15:44 sentiment: positive
video_pk 6112 · mention_pk 18110
Click to watch at 15:44
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Iconic design and deep strategic potential
- Nostalgic appeal with legacy status among hobbyists
Cons
- Complex and heavy; aging system can be less accessible to new players
Thematic elements
- High-stakes information warfare with asymmetrical roles
- Near-future cyberpunk; corporate espionage and hacking
- Cyberpunk-flavored, highly strategic and dense
Comparison games
- Android: Netrunner
- Terraforming Mars
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Asymmetric play (Runner vs Corporation) — Two sides with different goals, decks, and pacing; each side builds its own engine
- Card-based engine building — Decks build up capabilities and interactions to win access/control
- Resource and tempo control — Managing clicks, credits, and installs to advance threats or defenses
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- this thing was a beast
- five actions five cards
- I love the action selection mechanism and I love how they vary in power from one to five
- the rondelle portion of this game did not disappoint at all
- it's a compact game; it's a small box
- the art is absolutely stunning
- Oceans digital upgrade
- Netrunner would be a great revisit
- this is not the same game as the Thing infection at Outpost 31
- the ritual boards have dual layer boards
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 1WM9qMtE_BU
Our Family Plays Games top_10_list at 27:50 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 3912 · mention_pk 11455
Click to watch at 27:50
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
none
Cons
- Lynette doesn't play it - Dan has to find others
Thematic elements
- Corporation vs Runner
- Cyberpunk hacking
- Asymmetric card game
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Once we discovered how to really play Azul we started playing 8 times
- If someone ask me to give a favorite I have to give you a list
- It all depends on if you're learning the game the right way
- Fossilis is truly underrated
- This is Phil Walker-Harding y'all you know one of the 3,000 games he made in like one day
- We want the whole family we want them all
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video xPgDmQ9UJp4
Unknown Channel general_discussion at 14:59 sentiment: positive
video_pk 3233 · mention_pk 9494
Click to watch at 14:59
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Brilliant thematic synthesis with asymmetric play
- Rich strategic depth through card interactions
Cons
- As a collectible/LCG style game, it can escalate costs and complexity
Thematic elements
- Dystopian hacking with cyberpunk flavor
Comparison games
- Android: Netrunner (FFG reimagining)
- DC Deck-Building
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- my taste in games over the past 20 years has changed
- the length of time a game can last has changed
- it's not the theme so much as the mechanics that keep me coming back
- I like the idea of changing history in games like Cuba Libre or Watergate
- Ark Nova is the example where the theme meshed with mechanics
- I want to have fun and my window of fun is kind of narrow to what I see on the shelf
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–7 of 7