Skip to main content

Tag Team

Game ID: GID0313096
Collection Status
Description

A new 2-player fighting game has entered the arena!

Inspired by classic arcade fighting games, Tag Team is an auto battler combined with a deckbuilding game. Make your team of 2 Fighters and build an unbeatable synergy by combining their 2 unique decks! Each character has their own techniques and special moves.

You start off with a deck of only 2 cards, and the Fight unfolds automatically: flip your cards one at a time and apply their effects. At the end of each round, you get to turn up the heat on the opposing team: Program your deck by strategically adding new cards without reordering the ones already there. Out-think your opponent to deal the decisive blow!

Find out what makes your Tag Team tick, play devastating combos, and dominate your Opponent by deftly blocking their attacks. Timing is everything if you want to emerge victorious and Knock Out your foe!

Round 1... FIGHT!

— WIP description from the publisher

Year Published
2025
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 27
This page: 27
Sentiment: pos 26 · mix 0 · neu 1 · neg 0
Mentions per page
Top
Showing 1–27 of 27
Video hVo60DURFLw Cardboard Herald discussion at 10:38 sentiment: positive
video_pk 13702 · mention_pk 39995
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 10:38
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • very fun
  • good game
Cons
  • may not be for everybody
  • has some elements that might push people away
Thematic elements
  • superhero
  • competitive
Comparison games
  • Sky Team
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • It is legitimately one of my favorite cooperative games, not just for being a game that uses a standard deck of playing cards, but it's just one of my favorite cooperative games, period.
  • For a game that costs $100 is a pretty big let down
  • There's an okay game here with a really interesting but unfulfilled promise out of the gimmick
  • Board games facilitate a level of safe conflict
  • It felt very wide without being deep
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video EszBCH8y3ZU Our Family Plays Games holiday_gift_guide at 42:29 sentiment: positive
video_pk 13781 · mention_pk 40267
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 42:29
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • arcade vibe
  • easy to teach
  • compact
Cons
  • two-player only
Thematic elements
  • Two-player arcade fighting
  • Arcade fighter theme
  • Fast-paced head-to-head competition
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • deck-building — Two players build and refine decks to fight.
  • two-player head-to-head — Direct competition between two players.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • We are talking about our holiday gift guide and we’ve got the Battle List.
  • Two Amanda — Town 77.
  • Is it Cake? we watched the Halloween one and the Christmas special.
  • Is this the Christmas talk? Yes, we are talking about Christmas.
  • We’re going to have a con in Omaha next year.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video VoueHTR24Us Jimmy's Board Games top_10_list at 23:11 sentiment: positive
video_pk 13120 · mention_pk 38356
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 23:11
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • tight two-player gameplay with strong theme
  • high thematic payoff for short sessions
  • potential for expansion into more characters/roles
Cons
  • motion toward expansion could dilute core experience
  • sound effects and theming may overshadow some mechanical depth
Thematic elements
  • heroic teamwork with asymmetric character design
  • two-hero duo, thematic battles; cartoonish yet tactical
  • light, punchy, comic-book vibes with deck-building underpinnings
Comparison games
  • Marvel Champions
  • King Arthur expansions
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • asymmetric heroes — each hero has unique abilities; synergy emerges from combining cards.
  • short, tactical bouts — games typically run around 10-15 minutes per session with quick rounds.
  • two-player deck-building/battle — each player controls a hero duo; cards are combined into a shared sequence that auto-resolves fights.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is the epitome of like first round very short not a lot going on. Last round much much longer.
  • You look bougie. Speak Easy is the new hot Euro game from Vital Lecerda.
  • This is my number one game of the year: Covenant.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video hJuqBrJc1lY Going Analog interview at 13:43 sentiment: positive
video_pk 11850 · mention_pk 34708
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 13:43
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • One versus one combat
  • Team battle arena
  • Competitive game
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Battle resolution — Watch battle resolve based on card order
  • card selection — Choose one card to place
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • It's sort of like war with actual decisions
  • It'll take two minutes
  • That was amazing. I wonder if that game is like that every time
  • It turns out that it was
  • So many card games following it have been inspired by that obviously
  • The coolest combo you can make in Mystic Veil is like here. The coolest combo you can make in Mystic Lands is like here, right? And the average is like there
  • What I made, right? Even if you didn't win, right?
  • The most unique way that I have ever encountered an engine builder
  • An unbelievably satisfying gameplay experience to destroy
  • Betting is like a way to make people care about an outcome
  • Poker is a terrible game if you're just playing it right? Uh but the second you're betting with money and you care, right?
  • Why do we root for sports teams, right? Like our the day after go Dodgers
  • The sitting back and then seeing what happens - yeah there is a really fun aspect to that
  • Train making time. When all the technology moves to a certain thing, everybody is making trains, right?
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video zfIvPhvsHhw Tantrum House general_discussion at 2:12 sentiment: positive
video_pk 11156 · mention_pk 32820
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 2:12
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • compact two-player duel with meaningful choices
  • asymmetric character design adds variety
  • tactical deck-building twist that stays readable after a few plays
Cons
  • some players may find the depth of card placement and deck-building a bit steep
  • designer and year details are not clarified in the episode
Thematic elements
  • dueling combat with deck-building and positioning
  • fantasy arena with asymmetric fighters
  • dynamic, combat-focused card drafting with top/bottom/middle placement
Comparison games
  • Sky Team
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • asymmetric_roles — each character has unique powers and a personal deck shaping how they fight
  • Card placement — the order of added cards affects timing and power; placement options influence outcomes during combat
  • deck-building — draft cards, add to your fight deck; cards are not shuffled once in the fight deck and can be placed on top, bottom, or somewhere in the middle
  • round-based combat — rounds proceed by playing all cards in your fight deck, with progression dependent on deck construction
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • The art is super cute.
  • This game is built as a programming deck building game with a twist.
  • From the couch to the table and back again.
  • We did choose games today that we're going to be quick to switch around and do things.
  • The show is on camera, so we're put on the spot.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video qcMDkNNldTs Adam Porter top_10_list at 22:04 sentiment: positive
video_pk 10840 · mention_pk 31982
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 22:04
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Slick presentation and vibrant art
  • Promising synergies and replayability with combined characters
Cons
  • Gameplay risk with prototype balance; potential 'rushed' feel
  • No fixed order of added cards; may impact balance
Thematic elements
  • dueling auto-battler in a card-driven arena
  • Two knights/fighters building teams with asymmetric powers
  • competitive dueling with character synergies
Comparison games
  • Smashup
  • Aeg
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • auto battler deck-building — players construct teams by combining two decks with evolving synergies
  • Simultaneous reveal — powers resolve in rounds with deck sequencing deterministic by insertions
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is your permission to click away now.
  • I won't be including games that I designed myself.
  • The steady flow of games should continue for at least another year or two.
  • It's time for my end-of-year roundup.
  • The algorithm is not loving my content at the moment.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video JnQ8R6ygy08 OneStop Co-op Shop solo_playthrough sentiment: positive
video_pk 10743 · mention_pk 31704
Video thumbnail
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Quick gameplay
  • Interesting character mechanics
  • Unique combat system
Cons
  • Limited decision points
  • Potentially unbalanced solo variant
Thematic elements
  • Tag team combat
  • Fighting game
  • Character-based combat
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • auto battler — Characters have automatic progression and combat mechanics
  • Deck building — Players build decks by adding cards during the game
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Mistakes were made. I should have leaned into their strengths instead of just trying to go ham on them.
  • If he becomes a bear, usually that's a bad sign for how things are going for you
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 9gH9snRBGss Tabletop Turtle game_review at 3:30 sentiment: positive
video_pk 10506 · mention_pk 30915
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 3:30
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Quick gameplay (10-15 minutes)
  • Unique character abilities
  • Interesting drafting mechanic
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Character battling
  • Arcade fighting
Comparison games
  • Dota
  • League of Legends
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Character drafting — Players select and draft unique fighters
  • Deck building — Players build a back-to-back deck of moves
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • You can't take it with you when you die.
  • We don't need all these games.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video g2UDvKFMsbs Unknown Channel top_40_list at 3:51 sentiment: positive
video_pk 10169 · mention_pk 29916
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 3:51
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Unstoppable is my number one of 2025.
  • Is it as good as Exceed? Heck no. But it's good enough that we'll play it sometimes.
  • The core card play is so good. The combos and cooperation are great.
  • My son and I have really enjoyed the 1v1 mode in Yomi 2.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video s3htrl_xJtU Tantrum House top_10_list at 29:12 sentiment: positive
video_pk 10084 · mention_pk 29706
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 29:12
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Unique two-player fighting game
  • Twelve different fighters with unique decks
  • Interesting deck programming mechanic
  • Multiple character abilities and strategies
  • Fun simultaneous play mechanic
  • Strategic depth in card ordering
  • Appealing to those who don't normally play fighting games
  • Expandable system with future fighters planned
Cons
  • Two-player only game, not typical for group preferences
Thematic elements
  • Head-to-head fighter battle game
  • Fighting arena
  • Competitive combat
Comparison games
  • Sky Team
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card Ordering Strategy — Players strategically place cards in their deck to control the order of play
  • Deck Building/Programming — Players mix fighter decks together and select cards to create their fight deck
  • deck manipulation — Between rounds, players add another card to the top, bottom, or middle of their deck without reshuffling
  • fighter selection — Players choose two fighters from 12 available, each with unique decks
  • Simultaneous card play — Players fight by flipping cards simultaneously, like the game War
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I love cards that score off of other cards and trying to create combos and synergies
  • if I turn this, then this wheel's turning
  • I love tile lane games
  • that is definitely a different kind of theme that you don't see in board games
  • We're big fans of The Crew
  • is something better going to come or or do I take what's here
  • There hasn't been any deduction games that I know of. Um, I mean, there probably are. Our Gen Con release, but this is the one that really stood out to me
  • it's more about the journey than the destination
  • pleasantly surprised with how I much I enjoyed uh this two-player fighting game
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 6MJLYHzIhCM Dice Tower top_12_list at 9:27 sentiment: positive
video_pk 8885 · mention_pk 26195
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 9:27
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Simple core idea with rapid play
  • Supports ongoing expansion additions
Cons
  • Depth relies on chosen synergies; may require optimization to feel meaningful
Thematic elements
  • team-based combat
  • Two-player head-to-head with two characters per side
  • fast-paced, competitive
Comparison games
  • Smash Up
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Auto-battler card ordering — Players order their cards to determine attack/defense sequences.
  • Fast rounds with expansions — Rapid rounds that support ongoing expansion content.
  • Two-character synergy — Like Smash Up; you pair two characters for a combined effect.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is going to be a wild venture.
  • It's an adorable setting with these little animals that are going out on their adventure.
  • The endgame scoring is really unique as well as the scoring is just going to be a multiplier of your completed cards.
  • It is fast. There's multiple scenarios. You can quickly set it up and play through it.
  • Duel for Cardia is a really interesting clever play in which you'll be playing a card simultaneously revealing that card and see how you affect each other.
  • Leaders you are drafting and every single one plays so differently.
  • you can also remove one. If there's one character that you simply hate playing against, you're like, 'No, you can't use him.'
  • Tag Team surprised me because it's a very simple auto battler where you're putting the cards in the order you want them to flip.
  • six different tug-of-wars going on any moment.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video P3wzYN2P2k0 Board Stupid top_5_list at 13:04 sentiment: positive
video_pk 8648 · mention_pk 25479
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 13:04
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Strong multiplayer flow
  • Good value for price
  • Depth for a party game
Cons
  • May be a bit much for casual players
Thematic elements
  • team coordination, duel-style competition
  • Two-versus-two team-based play
  • enthusiastic, conversational
Comparison games
  • Sky Team
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • autobattler/deck-building — deck-building with auto-battle style interactions between teams.
  • Card Synergy — cards combine to build team-wide abilities and effects.
  • two-player teams — teams of two players work together against another team.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's a very fun game for £29.50
  • there's a lot in that box
  • a cool little combo element if you like to be a little bit more board gamey
  • it's a cooperative card game that you can play with people that are not board gamers that will get it immediately, but you're having a lot of fun
  • you can just keep playing it until you get bored
  • Just One is the ultimate Christmas party family. It is incredibly enjoyable with the simplest rule set that you can explain in 30 seconds
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video kVUrAL6P7Vg Cardboard Herald convention_recap sentiment: positive
video_pk 7768 · mention_pk 22936
Video thumbnail
Overall sentiment (raw)
very positive
Pros
  • Elegant design
  • Quick turns
  • Engaging gameplay
  • Minimal rules
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Hero Combat
  • Auto-battler
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Deck building — Players place cards in a specific order without shuffling
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Oh, they're probably expendable.
  • Let it ride, baby!
  • I am full of games.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ucInP6lxwH4 Board Stupid top_10_list at 6:29 sentiment: positive
video_pk 6523 · mention_pk 19335
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 6:29
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Highly interactive, fast-paced
  • Expansions expected to deepen the system
  • Coherent auto-battler feel in a two-player format
Cons
  • May rely on fan familiarity with arcade vibes
  • Balance nuances could emerge with future expansions
Thematic elements
  • Fighting game sims, two-player competitive
  • Arcade-fighting aesthetic with modern deck-building
  • Light, thematic flavor rather than heavy story
Comparison games
  • The Mind
  • Street Fighter/Marvel vs. Capcom arcade vibes
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Deck-building with auto-battler vibe — Two players draft and play autonomously resolving combat interactions
  • Interactive vs. solo deck manipulation — Each fighter builds a synergetic deck to trigger combos against the opponent
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This year was brutal for making a top 10; the quality was that high.
  • This game will stay in the collection for the foreseeable future.
  • It's a banger, mate. Absolutely a standout.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ml6UnlAE71s Board Game Co general_discussion at 4:22 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5890 · mention_pk 17439
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:22
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Simple, accessible, quick play
  • Fun in short sessions
Cons
  • May lack depth for longer sessions
Thematic elements
  • cooperative vs quick deck-building
  • two-character, fast-paced auto-battler
  • short, arcade-like action
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • deck-building, two-character pairing, auto-battler — Two characters and auto-battle with light deck-building twists; ~10 minute play
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I really like the simplicity and elegance of the gameplay mechanism.
  • Blood Rage Valhalla ... it's Blood Rage, but with tweaks and changes that make it first of all, fresh.
  • Journeys of Far ... a good exploration story game, sandbox kind of feeling with a humorous cards.
  • Tag team is fun.
  • Waddle is a lot of fun.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video U24Cqyxcxes Bo Stupid game_review at 1:39 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5696 · mention_pk 16934
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:39
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • fast, 15-minute rounds
  • clear iconography and readable cards
  • distinct, flavorful character kits
  • strong two-player duel with deep synergy
  • compact components with expansion potential
  • competitive draft mode via team selection
Cons
  • not beginner-friendly; more middle-ground complexity
  • deck-depth depends on the number of character combos; longevity relies on expansions
  • no sleeves included and cards are non-standard size
Thematic elements
  • arcade fighting game crossover with deck-building mechanics
  • Two fighters duel in an arcade-inspired arena; players assemble two-character teams from 12 fighters
  • minimalist, abstract; emphasizes character synergy and tactical sequencing
Comparison games
  • Sky Team
  • Dice Throne
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • auto_battler — Fights unfold automatically; players flip cards to resolve effects each round.
  • card_ordering — Players arrange their starting two cards; during rounds you add a new card to the top, middle, or bottom of the playing deck, preserving the rest.
  • character_abilities — Each fighter has unique abilities and tokens; some are aggressive, some supportive, some tanky; synergy drives combat.
  • deck_building — End of round: choose one card from a three-card Smash Build to add to your deck; insertion position is fixed (top, middle, or bottom) and existing order cannot be rearranged.
  • memory_and_timing — Front-to-back sequencing and memory of card order influences defense and offense; players anticipate and react to the opponent's deck.
  • smash_builder — Start by merging two starter decks into a single deck representing the chosen two characters.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • inspired by classic arcade fighting games, Tag Team is an auto battler combined with a deck building game.
  • The game itself is an absolute gem.
  • it's a pretty excellent example of the auto battler genre.
  • this is a certified banger
  • Sky Team is the same kind of complexity; the expansion will add lots of characters
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 6Yh4oY6qFxo Unknown Channel game_review at 0:21 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5601 · mention_pk 16646
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:21
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Infinite deck-building potential by pairing two character decks
  • Fast, accessible setup and a quality filler for two players
  • Dynamic, emotional flips and tense standoffs
  • Low barrier to entry; easy for mobile players and non-gamers
  • Explicit tension and excitement through timing and placement decisions
Cons
  • Limited depth; most decisions revolve around three cards and placement
  • Luck can dramatically influence outcomes, reducing skill impact
  • Some character pairings may not synergize effectively
  • Memory pressure can be a drawback for some players
Thematic elements
  • team-based character duels with deck-combat mechanics
  • Two-player duel where each player controls two characters with unique decks in a head-to-head arena
  • tabletop card-driven combat with emphasis on timing and deck manipulation
Comparison games
  • Challengers
  • Mindbog
  • Mindbind
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Character-driven abilities and tokens — Characters bring tokens or special rules and unique cards to alter strategy.
  • Deck cycling without shuffling — When the combined deck runs out, players flip a card to rebuild without changing the existing order.
  • End condition and scoring — Reduce opponent life points to zero to win.
  • Fast playtime as a feature — Typical playtime is around 5-10 minutes per match, making it a quick filler.
  • Luck-driven draw and deck refresh — At refresh, players pick from three new cards, introducing luck into the payoff.
  • Post-round deck placement choice — After a round, players decide where to insert new cards into their deck, affecting future draws.
  • Simultaneous card play with timing — Cards are played to damage, defend, or activate powers; players must time plays to counter attacks.
  • Two-character pairing — Each player selects two characters whose decks are combined for use in the match.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is the perfect filler.
  • Getting those life points to zero is a really quick endeavor.
  • the most important thing is the timing.
  • you can build almost what feels like infinite options for yourself.
  • It's not deep at all.
  • Flipping the card is super fun.
  • Great emotions.
  • for me, it's the perfect warm-up before something bigger.
  • This is just great.
  • It's so simple.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video JlI3seYzywk Dice Tower discussion at 8:16 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5572 · mention_pk 16581
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 8:16
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Fantastic game
  • Unique card ordering mechanic
  • Memory and outsmarting opponent
  • Lightweight rules
  • Quick setup with limited starting cards
Cons
  • Some players selling copies indicate mixed reception
Thematic elements
  • combat
  • battling
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • When the leaves won't, Vegas will. That's the official slogan of Dice Tower West
  • Heliocentrism
  • This game is broken and it can just go off the rails, but that's the fun
  • Pocket Galactic
  • I would love to watch this one and not play it
  • Card counting is a valid strategy in Happy Salmon
  • This is like crypto on speed
  • Dead on, pun intended
  • You would be surprised to see just how much strategery would come out
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video OOKz8HkGI8o Unknown Channel top_10_list at 5:55 sentiment: positive
video_pk 3783 · mention_pk 11103
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 5:55
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • team-based engagement with crunchy decisions
  • strong baseline for a two-team or multi-player skirmish
Cons
  • depends on group preference for conflict-heavy play
  • fear of repetitive card interactions over time
Thematic elements
  • team-based card-combat skirmish
  • fantasy combat arena with rival teams
  • light to moderate theme with tactical combat
Comparison games
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • card_combat_and_counterplay — Each round you resolve and counter opponent cards to win duels
  • hand_management_and_card_order — After each round you reorder your deck for the next cycle
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • The coldest hot board game out there right now is Ory. So, Orly is actually a quite heavy Euro game from the looks of it alone, right?
  • Decorus is the new cooperative and hot board game from Pegasus.
  • The looks are not that great. Yeah, it it looks unique, but it's a really tough and heavy cooperative board game about hacking.
  • The Hobbit? Then you know what's coming.
  • This is a deck building game.
  • The board is actually very clean, yet at the same time detailed.
  • The pieces pop. I love the contrast of black and white background and then having colorful pieces.
  • First and hottest game this month is Vampire Lords, which is right now on Game Found.
  • Second hottest board game out there right now is The Old King's Crown.
  • Number three in our hotness list is Tigris and Euphrates.
  • Fourth hottest board game right now is Covenant.
  • Fifth hottest game on our list is Terramystica.
  • Number seven on the hottest games of the month is Tag Team.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video PpYOMW3_hAM Checkpoint general_discussion at 24:05 sentiment: positive
video_pk 3191 · mention_pk 9388
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 24:05
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Very flavorful and highly replayable due to hero combos
  • Strong thematic feel and tactical depth
Cons
  • Learning curve to master all hero interactions
Thematic elements
  • Strategic duos with distinct powers
  • Two-hero battle arena
  • Buddy-cop flavor within a head-to-head battler
Comparison games
  • Gwent
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • deck_building_and_hero_synergy — Each player selects two heroes; their combined decks produce unique interaction patterns.
  • two_hero_tag_teams — Switching strategic emphasis each turn as teams complement or counter the opponent.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is the game for gamers for sure.
  • I love that Gen Con can provide things like that.
  • The art is fantastic.
  • The figures are the dice.
  • I’m buying this game just for how it looks.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 2fX2NqJ_W9Q The Dice Tower multi_topic_live_stream at 4:26:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 3227 · mention_pk 9467
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:26:00
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Fresh two-player take on auto-battler vibe
  • Solid tactical head-to-head with meaningful decisions
  • Mechanics synergize well with theme
Cons
  • May require a learning pass to grasp sequencing
  • Dependent on players valuing the programming puzzle
Thematic elements
  • Team-based, duel-driven combat planning
  • Two-person robotic / auto-battler arena
  • Miniature combat with strategic programming
Comparison games
  • Flip Tunes
  • Iliad
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • auto-battler style resolution — Cards reveal and resolve in lockstep; opponent cards resolve simultaneously.
  • programming and predictability — You try to anticipate opponent’s moves to maximize outcomes.
  • two-hero drafting — Each player selects two heroes and then programs their order of activation.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is a roll and right or flipping right game.
  • Energy bars let you duplicate actions.
  • It's Christmas. This is Christmas.
  • Chop chop till you drop.
  • Undersea theme. Isn't it just calming?
  • Orbit is a new Riner Knizia game.
  • Azul Duel is a really engaging version of Azul.
  • Tag Team is almost like an auto battler, but you program the order.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video edOg33w2ugY Dice Tower top_10_list at 0:23 sentiment: positive
video_pk 2672 · mention_pk 7858
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:23
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Really fun
  • Vibrant presentation
  • Engaging programming mechanic
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Head-to-head combat
  • Generic combat arena
  • Abstract action
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card programming — Program your cards to create your actions
  • Head-to-head combat — Two players engage in direct combat
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I love two-player games. It's one of my favorite player counts
  • Bruno Catala who is a fantastic designer excels even more when it comes to two-player games
  • I tend to like this designer's games. They're always just a little bit outside the box, just a little bit strange and quirky, and I love that
  • I love comboorific card games in which you uh in this one you have a shared deck of cards
  • I want it to have some teeth. I want it to be a player interactive combat hitting each other kind of game
  • one of the ones I am the most interested in
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video J7VfTkBAcAg Unknown Channel game_review at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 2519 · mention_pk 7347
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Positive first impression of Tag Team
  • Clear enthusiasm from host about the game
Cons
  • Lack of detailed gameplay information in the transcript
Thematic elements
  • Not specified in transcript
  • Not specified in transcript
  • Array
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • unknown — Details not provided in transcript.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Today we're taking a look at a new game from Scorpion Mask called Tag Team.
  • I love everything about this game.
  • I'm done.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video xSdEfO9evIs Going Analog general_discussion at 20:10 sentiment: positive
video_pk 2086 · mention_pk 6092
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 20:10
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Easy to learn; quick head-to-head duels
  • Varied strategies from different character pairings
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Character duel with evolving power through card order
  • Two-player head-to-head combat
Comparison games
  • Smash Up
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card ordering duels — First card vs first card, then add cards and adjust order for later rounds
  • Deck-building + order management — Two chosen characters' decks are shuffled together; you set an order and play without shuffling again
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • "It's so simple, but it's really clever."
  • "This is a two-player head-to-head card combat game."
  • "We are the aliens."
  • "Bot or Not has me laughing a lot more."
  • "Gen Con party game of the show, Bot or Not, unanimous."
  • "Flip Tunes is my Gen Con game of the year."
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video bKcwl9HCxVI Cardboard Herald game_review at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 1367 · mention_pk 3995
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Bold, fresh asymmetry that remains the core draw and design vitality
  • Distinct, visually striking hero decks with meaningful strengths and weaknesses
  • Rippling consequences from early deck placement create satisfying long-term strategy
  • Art direction communicates power and abilities effectively, enhancing thematic immersion
  • Strong fit for dedicated two-player play with meaningful decisions and tension
  • Potential for ongoing expansion and new hero integrations that extend the mechanics
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for players who are less comfortable with asymmetric design
  • Per-round choices can feel restrictive, reducing immediate agency for some players
  • Pacing can be inconsistent; the game may end too soon or drag if matches don’t ramp smoothly
  • Not ideal as a casual, teachable gateway game for players who prefer simpler rule sets
Thematic elements
  • Superhero conflict and synergy explored through explicit character asymmetry and predictive play; the theme is reinforced by artwork and card cues that signal abilities, protections, and combos.
  • Two superheroes duel using asymmetric, deck-based action sequences; players draft, assemble, and deploy cards across a shared battleground in a tight two-player duel.
  • Abstract, cinematic, and comic-book inspired; there is a faint narrative through character identities and powers, but the game emphasizes mechanical flavor and strategic interaction over a continuous story.
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • asymmetric hero decks — Each player controls a unique hero with a distinct deck and gimmick; asymmetry drives decision-making and matchup strategies.
  • attack, defense, support, and burst interactions — Cards can attack, protect allies, defend, or trigger high-damage bursts; the variety of card effects supports dynamic combat and comeback opportunities.
  • deck placement economy — At the end of a round, players draw three cards from their shared deck, pick one to add to their action deck, and place it strategically. Placement choices ripple through future rounds.
  • draft and assemble action deck — Players draft a starting card for each hero, then shuffle the two hero decks together and arrange the starting cards into an action deck. The action deck is never shuffled, so placement has long-term impact.
  • predictive play — Players infer the opponent’s likely actions based on hero pairings and observed patterns; correct predictions amplify the sense of mastery and timing.
  • ramp-based endgame pacing — As decks grow, rounds accelerate or intensify; the ramp can create satisfying comebacks or abrupt endings depending on hero matchups.
  • round-based card resolution — Each round consists of flipping the first and then the second card, resolving effects in sequence, which creates a predictable yet tense cadence.
  • two-character drafting and synergy — The pairing of two heroes each game creates a synergy plane; the balance and interaction between the pair determines how well the engine can ramp and respond.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Tag Team isn't there yet, but it is surprisingly close.
  • It's not. It is a great game, but it has its flaws.
  • The asymmetry feels great and it brings a bright freshness to every game as you play with a different cast of characters.
  • If you're looking for a game that you can just pick up and play with just about anybody without having to teach multiple, sometimes complex characters, this probably ain't going to be it.
  • There is nothing that nails the niche that Tag Team does.
  • The sense of power each character possesses oozes with every new piece of art you see of them.
  • The art is also fantastic. Every card subtly or not so subtly shows what your superhero is doing in this battle in a way that I really enjoyed.
  • If you can look past the hyperfocused player decisions and handsoff gameplay, there is nothing that nails the niche that Tag Team does.
  • At the moment, this is my favorite game of the year so far.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video E8-cD7BDiU0 Good Time Society playthrough at 30:23 sentiment: positive
video_pk 1312 · mention_pk 3878
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 30:23
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • fast, highly lean two-player combat with clear flavor
  • distinct art and character asymmetry make each fighter feel unique
  • compact loop (fight, build, fight) is quick and satisfying
Cons
  • rules can be dense for first-timers
  • some content relies on knowing external discusions about token interactions
Thematic elements
  • two-character, tag-team combat inspired by classic arcade brawlers
  • Fantasy, arena-style dueling
  • punchy, high-energy spectacle with heroic avatars
Comparison games
  • Challengers
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • concentration tokens and power management — Tokens indicate targeting and activations; power cubes determine attack strength; certain cards modify power or trigger special effects.
  • deck-building/ordering during build phase — After each fight, players select and order new cards to customize their next fight deck; no shuffling between fights.
  • two-character team duels — Players control a team of two distinct fighters, switching between them via card-driven turns.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Goats and Goblins, a quick fun game of greedy goblins
  • This is not Scrabble for sure
  • Two-player games are the jam
  • Ink and Gold style push your luck, but with bidding
  • The colors are beautiful
  • Defenders of the Dictionary. We love a good word game
  • It's rethemed for the Lord of the Rings. And Allies
  • Go ahead and pre-order now online, I believe, and maybe the folks from Scorpion Masque can let us know if you can pre-order and pick up at Gen Con
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Ta4hUfsB2ao Unknown Channel rules_teach at 0:00 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 662 · mention_pk 1923
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
  • Clear two-player duel with immediate setup and approachable deck-building entry point for fans of card games.
  • Character pairing introduces meaningful synergy; players must think about which pairings maximize power curves and matchups.
  • The non-shuffling deck mechanic adds a tactile, strategic layer by letting players influence upcoming draws through ordering choices.
  • Short, punchy rounds support quick play sessions and easy repeatability for testing different pairings.
Cons
  • Potential cognitive load from managing two Character decks and their combined interactions, which can be intimidating for newer players.
  • Balancing concerns may arise when arbitrary two-character pairings create uneven power or synergy gaps.
  • Limited randomness due to no in-round shuffles could reduce variability and chance elements that some players enjoy.
  • Ambiguity around late-game pacing and victory conditions without broader context or additional rules could hinder immediate comprehension.
Thematic elements
  • Team-based combat through character synergies and strategic deck manipulation; the core idea is to exploit the interaction between paired characters to outplay the opponent.
  • An abstract, head-to-head duel between two players who each bring two distinct character options whose decks are merged into a single dueling payload. The setting emphasizes fast, tactical back-and-forth rather than sprawling thematic storytelling, allowing focus on optimization of pairings and sequencing.
  • Compact, tactical, and instructional. The focus is on how to play rather than a rich fictional world; the narration leans toward explaining rules and strategic choices rather than storytelling.
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • card_ordering — At the end of a round, players choose one card from their played cards and place it either on the top, bottom, or between two other cards. This mechanic creates a layer of meta-dynamic planning, as players shape the upcoming draws without shuffling, allowing for deliberate sequencing and bluff-like tactics.
  • character_powers — Each character carries unique powers that influence combat outcomes, damage, defense, or special actions. The combination of two character powers in a hand creates a broader, more nuanced strategic space, as players must anticipate how the paired abilities interact during reveals and resolutions.
  • deck_merge — Players select two distinct characters and then shuffle their individual decks together to form a unified, merged deck that both players draw from during the duel. This creates new synergy opportunities based on the chosen pair and forces players to manage a combined resource pool rather than two separate, character-specific pools.
  • hand_draw_and_refresh — After each round, players draw three new cards to replenish their hand. This keeps the pacing brisk and ensures ongoing decision-making pressure, while the lack of mid-round shuffles keeps the deck structure more predictable and deterministic.
  • two_player_duel — The core gameplay loop is a direct confrontation between two players. Each round consists of simultaneous or sequential reveals and resolution of cards from the merged deck, culminating in damage or effects that push toward victory conditions. The duel structure emphasizes quick adaptation and strategic forecasting rather than long-term planning.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Tag Team is a new game from Scorpion Masque.
  • It's two players programming, deck building with a twist.
  • You'll choose two different characters, combine their decks by shuffling them together, and then face off against an opponent.
  • We'll each reveal a card and resolve.
  • You never shuffle in this deck
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–27 of 27
View on BoardGameGeek