Skip to main content

The Resistance

Game ID: GID0344874
Collection Status
Description

The Empire must fall. Our mission must succeed. By destroying their key bases, we will shatter Imperial strength and liberate our people. Yet spies have infiltrated our ranks, ready for sabotage. We must unmask them. In five nights we reshape destiny or die trying. We are the Resistance!

The Resistance is a party game of social deduction. It is designed for five to ten players, lasts about 30 minutes, and has no player elimination. The Resistance is inspired by Mafia/Werewolf, yet it is unique in its core mechanics, which increase the resources for informed decisions, intensify player interaction, and eliminate player elimination.

Players are either Resistance Operatives or Imperial Spies. For three to five rounds, they must depend on each other to carry out missions against the Empire. At the same time, they must try to deduce the other players’ identities and gain their trust. Each round begins with discussion. When ready, the Leader entrusts sets of Plans to a certain number of players (possibly including himself/herself). Everyone votes on whether or not to approve the assignment. Once an assignment passes, the chosen players secretly decide to Support or Sabotage the mission. Based on the results, the mission succeeds (Resistance win) or fails (Empire win). When a team wins three missions, they have won the game.

Rule Correction:

For first printing (2010 purchases), the expansion rules should read: "Games of 5-6 players use 7 plot cards, games with 7+ players use all 15 Plot Cards." and "...each Round, the leader draws Plot cards (1 for 5-6 players, 2 for 7-8 players, and 3 for 9-10 players)" - This has been corrected in the subsequent printings.

Year Published
2009
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 12
This page: 12
Sentiment: pos 11 · mix 0 · neu 1 · neg 0
Mentions per page
Top
Showing 1–12 of 12
Video s3AqIGzPBcQ Actualol top_10_list at 7:24 sentiment: positive
video_pk 13703 · mention_pk 40012
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 7:24
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Intense, dramatic climaxes with betrayals that feel earned
  • High replayability due to hidden roles and discussion dynamics
  • Excellent for larger groups and livestream-style play
Cons
  • Can be frustrating if players are not engaged or skilled at deduction
  • Thematic tension may not be suitable for all groups
Thematic elements
  • trust, suspicion, and role deception
  • A resistance movement within a dystopian regime
  • tense, drama-filled, with a lot of social interaction
Comparison games
  • The Downton Resistance
  • Coup
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • hidden roles — Some players are loyal resistance members, others are imperial spies; the identities are concealed.
  • social deduction and discussion — Much of the game is spent arguing, deducing, and bluffing to identify spies.
  • voting and mission assignment — Players vote to approve or sabotage mission teams, influencing outcomes.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • In Sheriff of Nottingham you have to work out when your friends are lying to you and Try to smuggle goods past each other.
  • The twist is everyone plans their actions before anything happens
  • In Colt Express you're vying to be the best outlaw in the West by running around this 3d train Robbing passengers and shooting each other.
  • The island is sinking into the ocean
  • We’re so in sync that we finish each other's Dignitas applications
  • Pandemic is the best dickhead you'll ever meet.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video DohetcCl3R8 Adam Porter analysis at 6:59 sentiment: positive
video_pk 12646 · mention_pk 36926
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 6:59
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • highly engaging social dynamics; strong hook for groups
  • clear, repeatable core loop
Cons
  • some players dislike the reliance on player interaction rather than complex mechanics
Thematic elements
  • trust, deception, hidden agendas
  • resistance vs. spy infiltrators; futuristic/spy-fiction vibe
  • social deduction with minimal fluff; emphasis on logic and misdirection
Comparison games
  • Werewolf
  • The Resistance
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • hidden roles; mission voting — players are assigned factions and attempt to complete successful missions while deducing others' alignments
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • the game was twisted
  • Cards Against Humanity is not to my taste, but it's the reason that every popular party game now has to have an after Dark Edition
  • it's a safe space to indulge some of the darker aspects of human interaction
  • one of the best hooks in the history of the industry
  • the Ouija board appears to have emerged from American spiritualist camps
  • Werewolf also known as Mafia
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 4jQzgGcfxz4 Actual Lowell general_discussion at 24:05 sentiment: positive
video_pk 11955 · mention_pk 35075
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 24:05
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • High replayability with different roles
  • Strong group dynamics
Cons
  • Requires a social environment; can be rough for newcomers
Thematic elements
  • trust, deception, and group dynamics
  • Social deduction in an undercover resistance scenario
  • short, high-stakes social interaction
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Social deduction / hidden roles — Players try to identify the loyalists and spies through discussion and voting on missions.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Las Vegas is probably my top one, and it's just everyone's involved.
  • New York Slice is one that I really like—the I split you choose thing; it's just simple rules but I really dig that.
  • Skull and Cockroach Poker are two really great bluffing games.
  • This is like my sweet spot—these are the games that I love to introduce to new people.
  • I love board games because they allow me to have incredible social experiences with friends.
  • The biggest barrier to board games being huge is just that so many people won't play them.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video QUbeYwcOy8k Phenomena analysis at 18:37 sentiment: positive
video_pk 11035 · mention_pk 32478
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 18:37
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Tense, quick to teach
  • Great for parties and larger groups
Cons
  • Requires many players for best effect
  • Can feel repetitive across sessions
Thematic elements
  • trust, deception, infiltration
  • Dystopian resistance movement fighting an oppressive regime
  • dialogue-based deduction with public and private information
Comparison games
  • Avalon
  • Mafia
  • Werewolf
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • hidden roles — Players have secret allegiances; some know more than others.
  • Mission outcomes (success/fail) — Teams attempt missions; failures indicate infiltration.
  • Mission team selection — A subset of players select a team to attempt a mission.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • the godfather of social deduction games dmitry davidov probably described it best he said that at their core social deduction games are about an informed minority versus an uninformed majority
  • these are the rules in their simplest form
  • social deduction is addictive
  • it's a safe space to be really sneaky in a way that i find so enjoyable
  • my granny was really sneaky and my grandad when he turned out to be the wealth and he won
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video _91V_wy7AJI Board Games 4K top_100_list at 4:13 sentiment: positive
video_pk 8338 · mention_pk 24536
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:13
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • engaging social interaction
  • replayability with different player counts
Cons
  • bluffing can cause distrust
  • game can run long with many players
Thematic elements
  • hidden roles
  • spies vs resistance
  • social deduction
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • hidden roles — players are split into resistors and spies with secret goals
  • missions and voting — team selection and mission outcomes reveal spies
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • "a dice placement game"
  • "game-breaking special ability"
  • "elevate this game above its competition"
  • "dexterity game"
  • "timer on an app or on a watch"
  • "fantastic dexterity game"
  • "left for dead the board game"
  • "never lost a game"
  • "best played with more players of the six seven players"
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video QZdfsHU9OfI Actual top_10_list at 1:24 sentiment: positive
video_pk 7454 · mention_pk 22063
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:24
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Tense social interaction
  • Simple gameplay
  • Encourages discussion
  • Creates suspense
Cons
  • Requires right player group
  • Can be chaotic
Thematic elements
  • Spies vs Resistance
  • Social deduction
  • Hidden roles
Comparison games
  • One Night Ultimate Werewolf
  • Blood on the Clock Tower
  • Secret Hitler
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • hidden roles — Players are either spies or resistance, trying to complete or sabotage missions
  • Voting — Players vote on mission teams
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Finding a board game that you absolutely adore is life-changing
  • I would play this game every day of my life if I could
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video aYtay691ASI Unknown general_discussion at 2:16 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 7335 · mention_pk 21661
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 2:16
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
  • strong social interaction
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • trust, deception, and deduction
  • social deduction in a resistance-themed scenario
  • hidden roles and bluffing
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • hidden roles — players have declared or concealed identities with agendas
  • vote and persuade — discussions and votes determine success of missions
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • cartographers that's got a solo mode doesn't it
  • I'd like to play the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Shadows of the Past I've got that game it works brilliantly for five players
  • Twilight Struggle there we go
  • Fantasy Realms nice little portable card game simple to teach lots of nice strategy
  • this dragon's gold now
  • that game is the meanest game I think I've got
  • Power Grid plays with six and it's quite good with bigger numbers but I'm rubbish at it
  • Pitch Out flicking game really good totally overlooked
  • self-serving because it is my own design but would play a nice three-player game of Doodle Rush
  • rock paper wizard that's what I'd go for
  • I've changed a lot over the years didn't enjoy killer bunnies
  • Ticket to Ride is very predictable isn't it
  • Identic that's what I'd go for duplic or identic it's the same game
  • the most complex games that I have are Dominant Species and Poseidon
  • Poseidon that's a heavy economic game an introductory 18xx game
  • I could easily imagine a bunch of six to eight year olds asking to play Monopoly that would ruin my day
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ivL9dAk5OhY unknown top_10_list at 4:02 sentiment: positive
video_pk 6626 · mention_pk 19684
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:02
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • great with large groups
  • engaging social deduction experience
Cons
  • requires a sizeable player count to shine
Thematic elements
  • social deduction
  • secret mission team vs spies
  • high-tension intrigue and bluffing
Comparison games
  • Codenames
  • One Night Ultimate Werewolf
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • discussion and deduction — players infer loyalties through missions and voting
  • hidden roles — players secretly belong to resistance or spies
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • all the interactions between players are positive
  • this list is designed around people just getting into the Hobby
  • easy to learn and once some people know the game you can mix them up
  • Forbidden Island teaches the basics of cooperative gaming and can be used as a launching point to other games in the Forbidden series
  • the Resistance is probably the best of them
  • Seven Wonders scales incredibly well from three to seven players
  • One worker mechanic is an awful lot of fun
  • Memoir 44 is the most accessible of them mostly because it feels like playing with toy soldiers
  • Small World looks really dinky and inviting but it's a mercenary and brutal game
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video zHFbsVk5q5c Unknown top_15_list at 5:11 sentiment: positive
video_pk 3570 · mention_pk 10620
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 5:11
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • tight, tense social deduction
  • works well with larger groups
Cons
  • perceived as unfair by some groups
  • scales unevenly with players
Thematic elements
Comparison games
  • Spyfall
  • Werewolf
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • hidden roles / mission-based — Groups embark on missions with suspected traitors; players secretly vote on team composition and mission outcomes.
  • social deduction — Players discuss, mislead, and try to identify spies through conversation.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's absolutely hilarious
  • it's absolutely astonishing
  • we've got three rounds in the first round
  • it's a fantastic party game
  • the neighbors called the police because I thought we were having a riot
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 1du26wfPm4k Going Analog interview at 13:17 sentiment: positive
video_pk 3405 · mention_pk 10074
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 13:17
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • sleek, fast, and highly replayable
  • scales well with group size
Cons
  • heavy reliance on player psychology and bluffing
Thematic elements
  • hidden roles and social deduction within a factional struggle
  • covert resistance vs. government agents
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • hidden roles / social deduction — Players are assigned secret roles; success depends on group dynamics and logical deduction while avoiding betrayers.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • we're not here to make friends we're here to break people
  • one of the biggest personalities in a board game space
  • it's a good investment
  • the idea and it's it's mostly illegal now I believe
  • this version is a ton of fun
  • the table presence is terrific
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video brAlFgpGAXk Stonemire Games general_discussion at 4:19 sentiment: positive
video_pk 2933 · mention_pk 8572
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:19
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • rich social interaction
  • two-layer dynamic (on-table vs above-table play) that engages different players
Cons
  • can stretch long and tense in groups
  • some players dislike quarterbacking or watching mistakes
Thematic elements
  • trust and deception, social deduction
  • secret missions, two teams with hidden information
  • parliamentary intrigue and bluffing atmosphere
Comparison games
  • Avalon
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Hidden Information — information about players' identities is not shared openly
  • social deduction — players have hidden roles and must deduce who is on which team
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • the on the table game versus the above the table game were both very good and they were both drawing in different people
  • I wrote a 40-page Avalon guide
  • luck and skill are two very different axes
  • the wake up system of Fresco is definitely the standout
  • it has to be fun to lose
  • stay humble
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video KNh5hc1kdvs Unknown Channel analysis at 3:55 sentiment: positive
video_pk 959 · mention_pk 2700
Video thumbnail
Click to watch at 3:55
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Introduces non-elimination and moderator-free play
  • Strong entry point into social deduction
Cons
  • Can become repetitive in longer campaigns
  • Relies on group dynamics for tension
Thematic elements
  • trust, information gathering, resistance
  • Dystopian resistance scenario
  • mission-based social deduction
Comparison games
  • Avalon
  • Secret Hitler
  • Feed the Kraken
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Mission-based gameplay — Group votes to send a team on a mission; team members secretly vote to help or fail.
  • No player elimination — Players remain in the game for the full duration.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • The Resistance and Avalon retain all that paranoia of werewolf, but everyone gets to play the whole game without the need of a moderator or any player elimination.
  • Blood on the Clock Tower is a gigantic step forward in this genre.
  • It's the board game equivalent of Carcination.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–12 of 12
View on BoardGameGeek