Game Info
Collection
Mechanic profile
Not enough video data yet
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description
No description available.
Featured Videos
Ask a Rules Question
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 3
This page: 3
Sentiment:
pos 2 ·
mix 1 ·
neu 0 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–3 of 3
Video LNCCigPXRuM
people University Review at 6:05 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 67764 · mention_pk 164025
Click to watch at 6:05 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
- Clever concept
- Different from other word/drawing games
- Pitches the difficulty well to not make it just solvable
Cons
- Can be frustrating sometimes
- Not as fun as drawing or traditional wordplay games
- Making cards unreadable by being too efficient
- The 'half' word was smart but not guessable
Thematic elements
- spelling words in a creative way
Comparison games
- Telestrations
- Drawing games
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- cooperative deduction — Players try to guess the words their neighbors have spelled, and their neighbors try to guess theirs.
- hand management — Players start with a certain number of cards and can discard and draw new ones to improve their ability to spell words.
- Objective Fulfillment — The aim is to spell as many words as possible from a given list within three rounds.
- Word Spelling — Using letter cards to spell out words creatively, often by rotating or interpreting cards as different letters.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- the biggest issue in the games we've played has been these um these landmarks because you basically build your game around them you draw three at the start of the game you keep two and it's not very hard to leave a space for them and kind of build towards their objective but they did not feel balanced
- it felt felt incredibly imbalanced to me so that was my biggest criticism of this game
- this could be a brutal game especially in two players or brutal to each other yeah it's a fun little fun little brutal game
- it's a very attack the leader sort of game
- my the second time around onwards the first one was like what's going on when this is brutal you are so mean
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video _kS4frGTZsI
Review at 0:12 sentiment: positive
video_pk 66495 · mention_pk 162041
Click to watch at 0:12 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Incorporates rummy elements with some take that.
- Fast-paced game with lots of chaos.
- Special cards add strategic choices and interaction (e.g., using a spark for protection or destruction, deciding how to use wind).
Cons
- The goal 'six sticks and a spark' is hard to say.
- Some card effects can be tough choices (e.g., spark for protection or destruction).
Thematic elements
- Collecting sticks and a spark
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Action points — On your turn, you're going to take two actions, which is playing these cards or playing the special cards.
- Destruction — Cards like 'Firestorm' destroy up to three sticks, 'Ice storm' destroys one stick containing water, and 'Rainstorm' destroys one stick containing fire.
- hand limit — You have a hand limit of six cards.
- hand manipulation — The 'Tsunami' card makes everyone pass their hand to the player on their left.
- Protection — Cards like 'Kindling' protect a stick, 'Spark' can protect a stick or be needed to win, and 'Lightning' protects up to three sticks.
- set collection — The goal is to get six sticks, where a stick is three cards of all the same element, three cards of all the same number, or three cards in number order.
- take that — There's a good amount of take that, so it's not so straightforward. Special cards allow players to interfere with others' progress.
- wild card — There is a helper card that is a wild card, and it's whatever you want it to be.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Hello. Are you looking for a card game that you can play with a decent amount of players, plays up to six, plays most ages, and incorporates rummy elements with some take that.
- The goal is to get six sticks and a spark.
- This is a fast-paced game. Lots of chaos, lots going on.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video sV-sERkUryw
Watch It Played Discussion at 3:33 sentiment: positive
video_pk 64843 · mention_pk 158411
Click to watch at 3:33 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Can be very creative with how letters are arranged.
- Can be played online (Zoom/Skype) if everyone has a copy.
Cons
none
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- deduction — Players are trying to get their opponents to guess words.
- Letter Laying — Players arrange letters to create messages.
- Word Game — Players have a list of words and are trying to get opponents to guess them.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I don't know I just I'm kind of attached to it it's the it's live live show I just like that I don't know this could be hard to sway me from that one
- it is fascinating too and everyone else is dreadfully boring
- I don't know that there is a game that I'm best at I have to imagine that's a pretty common answer from people who play lots of games maybe maybe it's a common game amongst people who play a lot of different games because I never go so deep as to get particularly good at any one game
- I love when a card can be used in multiple different ways particularly if you're holding it in your hand and you're like I want to use these for everything and I can't I have to make difficult choices
- if you try to please everyone there's no there's no there's no way you can do that you just can't and if you fail to please yourself in the middle of that that has a cost too you know at the end of the day
- I feel like this is probably not giving you much to work with
- I remember I said it was gonna be like it would be two minutes it might be three three minutes now
- I found it to be very good and basically you have to memorize a few patterns
- I was over 40 years old and I've learned how to solve a Rubik's Cube something I was not able to do since childhood or ever you know so that was that was fun
- Thanks everyone for jumping in and not ignoring and being a part of this little test to run it gives me confidence that tomorrow if I try to run its live live show things will go relatively smoothly
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–3 of 3