Skip to main content
Brink box art

Brink

Game ID: GID0053696
Collection Status
Description

The Moonrakers are on the brink.

They have thrown off the oppressive yoke of the Utopian Alliance, but they are in a constant struggle to stay independent and find their identity. Alliances are formed and factions arise as the Moonrakers agree to turn their focus outward instead of squabbling over what little they have. Captains push out into unknown corners of the system in attempt to gain resources, influence, and power. The tenuous alliances will only last so long and soon someone must emerge to lead or they will fall.

Brink is a worker placement, trading, and hidden voting game that brings the world of Moonrakers to a new genre. It combines the strategy and planning of a worker placement game with the negotiation and “above the table” play found in Moonrakers and Fractured Sky.

Each turn, players will place one of three different sized ships (workers) onto a grid of hexes. Each hex will gain the player resources and actions, but even more importantly, it will give them power within a faction based on the color of the hex. At the end of each round, players will vote on which faction will score points, which is then multiplied by the amount of power each player has in that factions color on the board.

Players will upgrade their ships, hire ambassadors, explore new systems, and spend influence to complete faction objectives, granting them new abilities. Each game, the map will reveal in a totally new way as regions are explored, presenting new strategies as well as strengths and weaknesses to existing strategies. The player with the most prestige points at the end of 3 rounds wins!

—description from the publisher

Year Published
2025
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 11
This page: 11
Sentiment: pos 7 · mix 2 · neu 0 · neg 0
Mentions per page
Top
Showing 1–11 of 11
Video H9qN9ra4cOg Shide game_review at 0:00 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 60628 · mention_pk 153015
Shide - Brink video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • Excellent cube-management and tactile components
  • Strong end-of-round voting tension
  • High replayability with many Ambassador and Rider cards
  • Beautiful sci-fi aesthetic and consistent component design
  • Rich player interaction and negotiation moments
Cons
  • Prototype rulebook clarity issues and small, hard-to-read text
  • Color-coding and color palette can be confusing (orange/yellow, purple with white outlines)
  • Exploration can feel swingy and disrupt the tightness of worker placement
  • Trading can feel forced and time-consuming, increasing playtime
  • Rider system can feel too swingy or forced to use
  • Three- to four-player length can be lengthy; 3p is preferable but still long
Thematic elements
  • Array
  • Spacefaring science fiction
  • analytical, enthusiastic, and opinionated review
Comparison games
  • The Godfather
  • Moon Rakers
  • Katon
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • ambassador cards — Ambassador cards grant temporary or ongoing effects; players can buy or activate them, affecting voting or resources.
  • Area Control — Players place ships on hexes to gain resources and influence outcomes with a round-end voting mechanic.
  • Cube Management / Trading Economy — Cubes function as hidden-money resources; players trade them to advance upgrades, influence voting, or buy objects like ambassadors.
  • End-game Score Tension — Voting shenanigans and endgame scoring create climactic tension as players try to maximize color wins and cube values.
  • End-of-Round Hidden Vote — At the end of each round players secretly spend cubes to influence color-voting outcomes, which determine end-round points.
  • Exploration / Tile Drawing — Exploration lets you place a ship to draw and place a new hex tile, granting rewards from adjacent hexes.
  • Faction Objectives — Faction objectives can modify endgame scoring and cube values, tying specific colors or card effects to points.
  • Progression / Map Growth — The map expands over time, increasing decision density and amplifying strategic options late in the game.
  • Revolt / Resource Shortage Crisis — When a color’s cube supply runs low, a revolt forces players to discard half of that color, impacting voting and scoring.
  • Rider Cards — Riders are drawn and played to modify voting outcomes; they influence round dynamics and can swing votes.
  • Ship Upgrades / Upgrade Tracks — Upgrading ships by spending cubes; some upgrades unlock new actions or increased power.
  • Tile/Map Shifting — Exploration lets you place a ship to draw and place a new hex tile, granting rewards from adjacent hexes.
  • Track advancement — Upgrading ships by spending cubes; some upgrades unlock new actions or increased power.
  • worker placement — Three distinct ships act as workers; they scale in resource yield and end-of-round points, and can be placed in different orders.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • this is Brink a game that kind of looks like a Sci-Fi area control but is also kind of actually a worker placement
  • it's about 1 and 1 half to 2 hours as listed on the box for two to five players
  • the cubes are hidden all the time and they're basically types of money in the game
  • the main way to get points is to do well in the hidden vote at the end of each round
  • we're all originally in Outlaw faction in a space fairing universe and in brink we're once again figuring out who will emerge Victorious
  • Brink is a totally enjoyable experience for me
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 3pPPJHbZLmE Unknown Channel top_5_list at 3:35 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 59491 · mention_pk 152046
Unknown Channel - Brink video thumbnail
Click to watch at 3:35 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • Interesting negotiation angle with potential depth
  • Ties the Moon Rakers world to a new gameplay experience
Cons
  • Long playtime in larger groups
  • Negotiation-heavy design may polarize players
Thematic elements
  • negotiation, trading, hidden voting
  • Moon Rakers-related universe; a trading, negotiation-driven environment
  • negotiation-focused with a world built from Moon Rakers'
Comparison games
  • Moon Rakers
  • Root
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • hidden_voting — Outcomes are decided via hidden voting, influencing governance and scoring.
  • Trading — Resource-for-resource exchanges among players to gain advantages.
  • Voting — Outcomes are decided via hidden voting, influencing governance and scoring.
  • worker placement — Core workforce action area mechanic driving resource acquisition and setup.
  • worker_placement — Core workforce action area mechanic driving resource acquisition and setup.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • the five most viral games right this second
  • it's absolutely beautiful
  • my hype level is a 7 out of 10
  • the consensus at eight it's not a topheavy distribution
  • I backed it so you know I think this will be widely available at retail
  • hype level it's honestly it's a 10 out of 10
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video mrmyW9PMW5s Heavy Cardboard general_discussion at 55:54
video_pk 13160 · mention_pk 38490
Heavy Cardboard - Brink video thumbnail
Click to watch at 55:54 · YouTube ↗
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I'm vocalizing what's going on in my head.
  • Gen Con is not a convention that I ever foresee myself going back to.
  • This is going to be a very long stream if I'm going to take this much time going through each of these.
  • We are going to do a BG auction cuz I imagine everybody that watches this is on BGG.
  • The designer is going to send it to you. He's going to pay the shipping and y'all are going to pay us and we get to keep the money.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video fRlKVR5MU44 Board Game Co top_10_list at 28:53
video_pk 12033 · mention_pk 35241
Board Game Co - Brink video thumbnail
Click to watch at 28:53 · YouTube ↗
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • worker placement / tableau building — Space-themed worker placement with resource trading and space fleet management, balanced by negotiation.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is 10 through 1. This is not easy.
  • Logic and Lore is a two-player logical game with tons of variants.
  • Shout out to Puerto Rico. That would have been my number one.
  • Flamecraft DS is a two-player head-to-head where you are placing out these different dragon tile chips.
  • Zenith is absolutely delightful.
  • Amber Leaf is my number one game from 2025.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video sF73ZAGqkTk Before You Play playthrough at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 8674 · mention_pk 25547
Before You Play - Brink video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Deep strategic negotiation and trading
  • Engaging two-player rival mechanic
  • Rich asymmetrical upgrade paths
  • Large set of ambassadors and faction objectives
  • High replayability potential
Cons
  • Prototype copy with evolving graphics and color distinctions (orange vs yellow)
  • High complexity and potential learning curve for new players
  • Asymmetry may require longer setup and familiarization
  • Two-player mode hinges on rival mechanic, which may feel less dynamic than multiplayer
Thematic elements
  • political influence and elections among space factions
  • Moon Rakers Universe galaxy
  • card-driven, negotiation-heavy, asymmetric upgrade paths
Comparison games
  • Moon Rakers Universe
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Ambassador recruitment — Ambassadors grant ongoing abilities and affect faction costs.
  • Card-driven actions and rider cards — Action and rider cards modify voting, scoring, and board effects.
  • Council vote and scoring — End of round council vote determines round winners and power-based scoring multipliers.
  • Endgame scoring via sets and objectives — Ambassador sets, faction objectives, and endgame cards contribute to final points.
  • Resource management with influence cubes and favors — Cubes of different colors represent resources; favors are traded or used for actions.
  • Rival system for two players — A rival deck simulates opponents; trading with the rival influences votes and bag contents.
  • Upgrades and asymmetric upgrade tracks — Ships upgrade along asymmetric tracks; cargo and rail guns affect power and scoring.
  • worker placement — Players place ships on hexes to gain influence and activate hexes.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is a worker placement and Resource Management game with a heavy emphasis on trade and negotiation.
  • In a two-player game we must use a card driven rival.
  • This is a prototype copy of the game so things are subject to change in the future.
  • There are five different factions and in this game they are each vying for power.
  • The game has played over the course of three rounds and ends with a council vote.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ovBi-cXr9Zg Tabletop Turtle top_10_list at 12:31 sentiment: positive
video_pk 8041 · mention_pk 23671
Tabletop Turtle - Brink video thumbnail
Click to watch at 12:31 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • high interaction and tight coupling of actions
  • strong player engagement with voting and council mechanics
Cons
  • trading can slow play at times
  • board complexity can be intimidating
Thematic elements
  • interstellar politics and ship technology
  • Spacefaring faction dynamics with council governance
  • tightly coupled, highly interactive
Comparison games
  • Kinfire Council
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • ship parts upgrades — build and upgrade ships with limited actions
  • Worker placement with trading and hidden voting — trade, negotiate, and influence endgame scoring through votes
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is the kind of game you play when you want to feel smart.
  • Everything feels like a good decision.
  • The card play in this game is absolutely stellar.
  • A lot of little things come together to feel cohesive and satisfying.
  • You reap what you sew, you know, you need to be strategic and methodical about it.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ZcZBLQLLnbk Board Game Co top_15_list at 11:21 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5927 · mention_pk 17577
Board Game Co - Brink video thumbnail
Click to watch at 11:21 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Strong worker-placement feel
  • Engaging player interaction
Cons
  • Complex decisions can be heavy for some tables
Thematic elements
  • medieval/market economy
  • worker-placement with trading/negotiation
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • trading / bartering — Negotiate with other players for resources and goals
  • worker placement — Smart placement with multiple options per site
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • My number one is God of War.
  • Circle the Wagons will get tabled, the second edition of it, more content to mix it in.
  • Onward is the spiritual successor to Sky Tier.
  • Lands of Evershade was neck and neck with past tread and the more I played it, the more I’m excited.
  • The Dead Keep was excellent, though boss battles could use polishing.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Ca0BW6tYNFo Dice Tower review at 1:57 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5535 · mention_pk 16457
Dice Tower - Brink video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:57 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Nice game from IV Studios
  • Good negotiation elements
  • Works well at two-player
  • Good bot system
  • Trading mechanics integrated well
Cons
none
Thematic elements
none
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • It's really lightning fast
  • The expansion is fantastic
  • Just tremendous card game
  • I quite enjoyed Brink
  • Real great production, very solid game
  • Absolutely fabulous game
  • Eight great characters
  • The expansion that we always needed but didn't know we wanted
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 6rga2FEKCjM Chairman of the Board top_10_list at 10:48 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5319 · mention_pk 122519
Chairman of the Board - Brink video thumbnail
Click to watch at 10:48 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • massive player-count suitability (4-6 players common)
  • high-stakes feel with opportunities for big scores
  • fun bluffing and misdirection moments
Cons
  • not as widely known as other party/heuristic games
  • might rely on player interaction to shine
Thematic elements
  • betting and bluffing across a round-based rondelle
  • Las Vegas-style gambling atmosphere
  • live-action casino feel with risk and reward
Comparison games
  • Poker-style wagering games
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Catch-up — lead players influence turn order and information flow for balance
  • catch-up and misdirection — lead players influence turn order and information flow for balance
  • differentiated card effects — double cards, traps, and bluff cards change table outcomes
  • Multi-use cards — double cards, traps, and bluff cards change table outcomes
  • round-based betting and tables — cards assign to tables; tables determine money value and traps
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • an absolute blast to play
  • this is up there with those classics
  • clearly elegant and tightly designed
  • it’s a pure two-player gem that should hit higher on the radar
  • the box art is a little bit misleading and it makes it look boring, but the gameplay is far from that
  • the game hits so many checkpoints
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video t9n6NpaYq9k Unknown Channel top_10_list at 25:54 sentiment: positive
video_pk 2457 · mention_pk 7185
Unknown Channel - Brink video thumbnail
Click to watch at 25:54 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • brings a new genre to the Moonrakers ecosystem
  • hidden voting adds intrigue and negotiation
  • tight, table-ready box with strong component quality
Cons
  • may be heavy for casual players
  • requires buy-in from Moonrakers fans to appreciate setting
Thematic elements
  • work/resource trading with hidden voting
  • Moonraker-esque universe
  • strategy with social deduction elements
Comparison games
  • Moonrakers
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • hidden voting — vote outcomes are concealed from opponents
  • Trading — exchange and manage resources to optimize actions
  • worker placement — allocate workers to take actions
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I am so excited about that
  • I love that world
  • it's a small box game
  • Point Galaxy is the next iteration of Point Salad
  • the world of The Great Gatsby
  • Layer is two-player with dungeon-building
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video sroUH8dVxws Our Family Plays Games general_discussion at 45:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 2056 · mention_pk 5911
Our Family Plays Games - Brink video thumbnail
Click to watch at 45:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Intriguing combination of bidding, diplomacy, and exploration
  • High production quality from IV Games
Cons
  • May require group buy-in for smooth play
  • Can be complex for new players
Thematic elements
  • diplomacy, conflict, and corporate scheming
  • near-future space/faction conflict in a Moon Rakers-like universe
  • diplomatic intrigue with negotiation
Comparison games
  • Moon Rakers (thematic link)
  • Suburbia (city-building overlap)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • hidden voting — secret voting influences outcomes
  • trading/negotiation — trade and negotiate with other players for advantage
  • worker placement — assign agents to gather resources and influence
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • "Brass Pittsburgh is a standalone take on Martin Wallace's system set in America's Gilded Age."
  • "Bruce Lee returns with a new mini and two new Battlefields."
  • "float like a butterfly, sting like a bee."
  • "Dark Quarter is heavy. It’s a noir-ish detective game with occult overlays."
  • "Deep Regrets. We love this game."
  • "The best part of worker placement is the satisfaction of putting out your worker and getting something in return."
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–11 of 11
View on BoardGameGeek