Skip to main content

Deckers

Game ID: GID0089721
Game Info
Year
2025
Collection
Rating
Mechanic profile
Percentile rank vs. all games
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description

As Deckers, you will hack into a network of five servers, either solo or cooperatively as a team of up to four, winning or losing together.

The network is operated by one of the available Super-Massive Computers (SMCs), each with a different level of complexity and its own unique style of defenses that you will need to overcome.

Once jacked into the servers, you will assume Decker profiles, each with a special ability, moving across the server's spaces and uploading Decker pieces onto the network to expand your control while removing as many of the SMC's pieces as possible. Each round you get a new objective you try to fulfill to gain the upper hand. If you manage to complete the final objective, you ultimately claim victory.

Description

As Deckers, you will hack into a network of five servers, either solo or cooperatively as a team of up to four, winning or losing together.

The network is operated by one of the available Super-Massive Computers (SMCs), each with a different level of complexity and its own unique style of defenses that you will need to overcome.

Once jacked into the servers, you will assume Decker profiles, each with a special ability, moving across the server's spaces and uploading Decker pieces onto the network to expand your control while removing as many of the SMC's pieces as possible. Each round you get a new objective you try to fulfill to gain the upper hand. If you manage to complete the final objective, you ultimately claim victory.

Ask a Rules Question
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 22
This page: 22
Sentiment: pos 17 · mix 3 · neu 2 · neg 0
Mentions per page
Showing 1–22 of 22
Video cIc_b2lALUg Preview at 0:05 sentiment: positive
video_pk 68985 · mention_pk 165283
Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:05 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Lots of asymmetry in abilities and decks.
  • Programs can be flipped to change their abilities.
  • Programs can be upgraded to installations with upgraded effects.
  • Objectives scale in difficulty from copper to gold.
  • SMCs act as bosses with multiple versions to increase difficulty.
  • End game bosses act like end-level bosses in video games.
  • Deck building allows for a stronger deck and presence on the network as the game progresses.
  • Card market acts as an extension of the hand.
  • Each player has a slightly different starting deck favoring their color.
  • Different colored cards have distinct functions.
  • Purple cards act as wild cards.
  • Variants like fragmented servers and packet tokens add replayability.
  • Each decker has its own special ability.
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • hacking
  • a network of servers
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • cooperative play — Players work together to achieve objectives and defeat the final boss, with play for one to four players.
  • Deck building — Players start with a basic deck of 15 cards and upgrade it by acquiring new cards from a market, replacing them one-for-one. The deck remains 15 cards throughout the game.
  • Modular board — The game board, representing the network, is made up of modular server tiles.
  • Objective Completion — Players must complete a series of objectives (copper, silver, gold) to progress and eventually win the game.
  • set collection — Three of a kind of one program type can be used to upgrade it into an installation with upgraded effects.
  • variable difficulty — SMCs (bosses) have different versions (2.0, 2.1) and star ratings, and end-game bosses can be added to increase difficulty.
  • Variable player powers — Each player character has a unique ability and a starting deck that favors certain card colors, leading to asymmetry.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • So there's a lot of asymmetry in this game, not just in their ability, but also in their decks.
  • So, your deck is starts at 15 cards and you're going to end the game with a deck of 15 cards.
  • So, the network's made of five servers, this big tile. There's a green tile. This is a modular board. Green, red, purple, yellow, blue. Each one of these is a is a server and they make up the whole network.
  • So, blue helps you move your avatar around. Red helps you infect and fight these counter measures. Yellow helps you. It's kind of a a a trickery um suit.
  • Purple is like a wild card and can act as any color, yellow, red, green, or blue.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video z1VKhNrUp6M Playthrough at 0:01 sentiment: positive
video_pk 68952 · mention_pk 165253
Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:01 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Can be an easy victory with the base SMC.
  • Good introduction for new players.
  • Strategic depth with multiple ways to achieve goals.
Cons
  • Lack of planning can lead to difficult situations.
  • White sparks and guardians are dangerous.
  • Playing against upgraded versions (2.0) is significantly harder.
Thematic elements
  • Removing a hackman
Comparison games
  • Alpha Moby 2.0
  • Viking 2.0
  • Loi 2.0
  • Sentinel 2.0
  • Glom
  • Viking
  • Loi
  • Sentinel
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card cycling/deck manipulation — Players can put cards on the bottom of their deck and draw new cards to strategize for future turns.
  • die manipulation — A card allows changing a rolled die to any face of choice.
  • Ghost abilities — The ghost is a special unit that is not relocated by the hackman and can be used to perform actions remotely.
  • Ghosting actions — The ability to perform actions from a different space using a ghost, often facilitated by specific installations or abilities.
  • Guardian interaction — White guardians, including the hackman, have special rules like preventing avatar entry and kicking players out of their space.
  • Hackman movement — The hackman relocates to the active decker's space and can cause trouble by removing programs or kicking players out.
  • Infect action — An action used to defeat powerful entities like Mother's Ghost, involving accumulating red programs and commands, influenced by installations.
  • Installation placement — Players can install new components onto the network.
  • Program removal — The hackman's presence can lead to the loss of programs on a player's space.
  • Spark interaction — Sparks can be removed or replaced with contaminants, and can also delete captured programs.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Let this be a lesson to you.
  • You led that thing around the network and took advantage like a pro.
  • Hopefully you got a good introduction to the game.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video B0twZKZ7n6A Review at 0:06 sentiment: positive
video_pk 68100 · mention_pk 164428
Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:06 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Nice thick tokens.
  • Good quality components.
  • Well-designed tuck boxes for organization.
  • Cards are good, strong quality.
  • Visually appealing components.
  • Convenient setup with trays.
Cons
  • Standies were not quite right in the pre-production sample.
Thematic elements
Comparison games
  • Zul
  • Wingspan
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • action selection — The discussion of 'commands and actions' and 'ghosting your actions' points to players selecting and executing actions.
  • Area Control — The mechanics involving installations on spaces and ending actions on spaces with alerts suggest control or influence over board areas.
  • card drafting — The description of drawing cards to randomly set up a network ('you draw one. Okay, I'll place the blue tile.') suggests a drafting or random element for setup.
  • Deck building — The host discusses changing the makeup of decks and mentions 'double the number of cards in your color,' implying a deck construction element.
  • set collection — Objective cards are mentioned with different tiers ('Copper, silver, gold.'), indicating a goal to collect sets.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Hi everyone. This is exciting. Well, exciting for me. Anyway, we've got the pre-production sample of Deckers. So, let's crack this open, have a look, and we'll see.
  • Nice thick tokens. Happy with this.
  • Man, they look so good.
  • Good thickness. Fantastic. Yeah, these are good, strong cards.
  • Wow, everything looks so good.
  • The idea is you just pull this out and you're ready to go. Right. Minimum setup.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Jtz31U_nIlU Rules Teach at 0:02 sentiment: positive
video_pk 67954 · mention_pk 164263
Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:02 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
Positive, with acknowledgment of complexity and potential for strategic blunders.
Pros
  • Offers strategic depth with deck building and card combos.
  • Rebalancing and new elements make it fresh.
  • Modular map adds replayability.
  • Can be played cooperatively.
  • Clear objectives allow for planning.
Cons
  • Can be easy to make strategic blunders.
  • Requires careful management of multiple threats.
  • New player might forget setup steps.
Thematic elements
  • Cyberpunk, fighting corporations and AIs
  • Digital network
  • Direct, objective-focused
Comparison games
  • Renegade
  • Mage Knight
  • Pandemic
  • Crisis
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • action selection — Blue cards let you move. Green cards let you push things around called shifting them. Yellow and red cards are used to attack the sparks. Purple is a wild. (2.03)
  • Area movement — When you move uh you can move one per blue command played. (8.86)
  • Card drafting/upgrading — you have these advanced action cards, four at a time in an offer from this huge deck here. And one of the main actions you can take is to upgrade the cards in your hand and replace them with the advanced cards which immediately go to your hand and replace one of the cards in your deck. (17.32)
  • cooperative play — one to four players are cooperatively moving around this digital network (4.96)
  • Crisis Management/Threat Management — sparks are being put out consistently by the main enemy and if too many of them go out you lose the game. (7.52)
  • Deck building — the game is very much a deck builder and a card-based game. (15.20)
  • hand management — You can hold on to one card at the end of your turn. (65.21)
  • Modular board — each of these these are six hex little tiles here. And you can randomize where they start out and kind of build the map differently each time. (23.32)
  • Objective Fulfillment — The gold is really your victory condition. If you can fulfill that, then you win the game. (12.24)
  • set collection — If you have three of the same color, you can put out a program of that color. (4.96)
  • Variable player powers — each color of player starts with a unique deck with basic cards, but a heavy bent towards their main color. (16.48)
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • So, like I said, this is a new iteration, a new version of an older game, Renegade, which we have covered on the channel previously, but that's a older game.
  • But the actual game play is a little bit mage knighty.
  • And it's also a little bit pandemic or crisis management in that these sparks are being put out consistently by the main enemy and if too many of them go out you lose the game.
  • So you have to be managing them putting out fires while also trying to fulfill your objectives.
  • The gold is really your victory condition. If you can fulfill that, then you win the game. If you fail that, then you lose.
  • Hey everybody, Mike from the future here. I'm going to pop in a few times in this video because I made major strategic blunders in several spots, and I want to kind of explain how I could have played a lot better.
  • You have won.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video u33O7f2Sqes Preview at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 67919 · mention_pk 164199
Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Engaging solo gameplay with a clear objective of survival.
  • Variety in hero actions and monster abilities.
  • Adjustable difficulty levels cater to different player preferences.
  • Clear explanation of setup and turn structure.
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Survive until dawn by playing through multiple turns and fighting off monsters attacking a campfire.
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Combat — Monsters attack heroes, and players must defend or manage the damage, with mechanics for monster movement and attack resolution.
  • Deck building — The core gameplay involves managing a deck of cards representing heroes, monsters, and events.
  • hand management — Players draw cards into their hand and use them for actions like defending and foraging.
  • Modular board — The game uses cards arranged in a specific layout to represent camp, wild, and tent spaces, which can change based on gameplay.
  • set collection — Collecting certain cards or resources might be part of the game's objective, implied by foraging and defending actions.
  • Variable player powers — Different hero cards have unique actions and abilities, such as 'defend', 'forage', 'bolster', and passive abilities like 'stoke'.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • All right, and again, this is just going to be an overview, but we have all 18 cards out right now.
  • So, in terms of gameplay, you have to survive until dawn by playing through multiple turns.
  • If the location has a hero, the monster spends one of its movement points to step one space clockwise.
  • Each hero in the camp space can spend up to two action points on their listed actions.
  • So, the next step is the resolving of monster attacks. You resolve attacks one location at a time and in any order of my choice.
  • If you have fewer than four heroes in camp, which I currently do, we only have three. I choose a level one hero in a tent that was not placed there this turn and place them in an empty location.
  • If you reveal the night card showing 1 hour until dawn, you set it aside and survive the current turn to win the game. Simple as that.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video KhDCIhsihS8 Review at 0:02 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 67907 · mention_pk 164184
Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:02 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • The positional puzzle of how to use actions and fight is interesting and fun.
  • The game is quick to play.
  • Thematically cool.
Cons
  • The game can be too easy, sometimes feeling straightforward.
  • The difficulty can be swingy due to events and monster spawns.
  • Concerns about game balance and consistent challenge.
  • The core rules, as prototyped, may not offer enough consistent challenge.
Thematic elements
  • Surviving against ravenous beasts while protecting a dwindling fire.
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Action Point Allowance — Each hero gets to take two actions in any order.
  • cooperative play — You are a band of adventurers trying to survive.
  • Deck building — The fire deck is represented by cards that are sputtering out. Players can forage to add cards back to the fire deck.
  • Modular board — There are eight spaces in the game where heroes and beasts are placed.
  • Push Your Luck — If your fire ever runs out completely, you lose. Events can also make the game harder.
  • set collection — Defeated beasts and foraged cards are shuffled together and placed at the bottom of the deck.
  • Variable player powers — Heroes have different abilities, especially when promoted to their level two side.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • And as always, we take no money from publishers or doing previews. We just want to help you make an informed decision.
  • If your fire ever runs out completely, you have no cards left except for the night card in the deck, then you lose.
  • And if you can survive until you see the one side and then uh survive that turn, the round that the one is revealed, then you win the game.
  • So, I do win on the hardest difficulty. I would say 50% of the time has been my win rate so far.
  • The positional puzzle of like how to use your actions and how to fight with your people is really interesting and really fun.
  • The game can be swingy how challenging or not challenging it goes.
  • It's so quick. I've played it like 10 times since getting the prototype, I don't know, a day or two ago.
  • I think that would do the trick and make the game to the place where I would be consistently challenged, which is really all I'm looking for because everything else about the game is fun and thematically cool.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 2ltk5Ha3T44 Getting Games Rules Teach at 0:31 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 63423 · mention_pk 156829
Getting Games - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:31 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
  • Powerful equipment options (e.g., vintage driver) that dramatically increase yardage/credits
  • Progressive deck growth and discard mechanics that expand options over time
  • Regulation putt is a strong option compared to other putters
  • Bullseye/bonus mechanics reward precise yardage and add strategic depth
  • Luck and crew cards add variety and periodic favorable outcomes
Cons
  • Duff cards are mandatory and impose penalties
  • Hole completion often requires a putter, which can slow early rounds if players don't draw one
  • Luck cards can introduce negative outcomes (bad luck) that disrupt planning
  • Pro shop can stagnate if players stop purchasing, affecting pacing
Thematic elements
  • golf competition with deck-building and card-driven actions
  • golf course with holes, yardage, and a pro shop
  • tutorial-style rules explanation with a live playthrough
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • bullseye bonus — Completing a hole by exact yardage may grant a bonus, such as trashing or drawing benefits.
  • caddy and crew bonuses — Crew/crew-like bonuses stay on the board and can modify ongoing rules, such as increasing hand size or enabling card trashing for credits.
  • Card/Chit Market — A market of cards is available to purchase from the pro shop; when slots are empty, new cards are drawn to refill.
  • Compound Scoring — Certain cards provide stroke reductions or credit-based bonuses that affect final scores (e.g., Broken Tee, Titanium Tee).
  • deck-building / discard mechanic — Each player starts with a small deck, adds new cards to their discard pile, and reshuffles when the deck is exhausted.
  • duff cards — Some starting cards are 'duff' and must be played; they generally penalize yardage and increase strokes.
  • endgame scoring and penalties — After endgame conditions, uncompleted holes incur double par penalties; special cards can modify final stroke totals.
  • final scoring adjustments — Certain cards provide stroke reductions or credit-based bonuses that affect final scores (e.g., Broken Tee, Titanium Tee).
  • hole completion and putter requirement — Holes require meeting a yardage target and usually require a putter; penalties accrue for unfinished holes.
  • luck deck — Certain yardage actions trigger luck cards with random positive or negative effects (lucky breaks or bad luck).
  • pro shop deck and restocking — A market of cards is available to purchase from the pro shop; when slots are empty, new cards are drawn to refill.
  • yardage vs credits choice — On a turn, players may play cards for yardage to complete holes or for credits to buy more cards from the pro shop.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • welcome to the junkets games tutorial
  • please go to johngetsgames.com
  • the regulation putt is nice it's certainly better than the three putt
  • this vintage driver right here is a pretty awesome card
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video jKAKnktd3_g DaniCha Playthrough at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 60830 · mention_pk 153273
DaniCha - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Small footprint and easy to manage
  • Feels thematic with the campfire setting
  • Good solo puzzle and action economy depth
Cons
  • Can get thinky and complex in later rounds
  • Deck can run thin, impacting options and planning
  • Requires forward planning to avoid suboptimal outcomes
Thematic elements
  • Array
  • campfire survival
  • Solo narration
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Character Promotion / Leveling — Heroes/defenders can be promoted to higher levels to gain more powerful abilities.
  • Deck building — The game uses a managed deck of campfire cards that are drawn, shuffled, and cycled back into the deck.
  • Event Card / Encounter Card Handling — Event cards influence actions and outcomes, with some events ignored based on exclamation marks.
  • Events — Event cards influence actions and outcomes, with some events ignored based on exclamation marks.
  • hand management — Players hold and use cards from their hand to perform actions (defend, bolster, move).
  • Monster Spawning / Encounter Phase — Monsters are drawn and spawned in different locations with phases for attacks and reinforcements.
  • Movement / Maneuver — Characters maneuver or slide between spaces to engage monsters or reposition.
  • Resource management — Flame/the forge pile is managed as a resource to fuel actions and survivability.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Very fun game.
  • it's really just managing this flame
  • I like that it's not it's a pretty small footprint. You do have like the eight different locations around the fire. But easy to manage.
  • If you're into solo games, this one's for you.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Vi3RGk5DoH4 Shelfside Analysis at 0:41 sentiment: positive
video_pk 60660 · mention_pk 153062
Shelfside - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:41 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Easy entry for players to understand the timer concept
  • Low setup and quick rounds make it suitable as a warm-up
Cons
  • Very light, may not stress-test timing for longer games
  • Limited complexity could underutilize timer features
Thematic elements
  • Array
  • abstract
Comparison games
  • Patchwork
  • Brass Birmingham
  • Monolith Arena
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Capture — capturing opponent pieces by jumping over them
  • Movement — players move pieces across the board on their turns
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I love playing with the chess timer
  • it's addicting
  • my final say is to at least try using a chest timer for one of your two player games
  • we could finish brass Birmingham under 75 minutes
  • this chest timer is My Little Secret Weapon to use with a handful of friends to get through our favorite games faster
  • I definitely think we could do it more games less time
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video uo1oCNr4eNM Meet Me at the Table Playthrough at 0:06 sentiment: positive
video_pk 39843 · mention_pk 120399
Meet Me at the Table - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:06 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Excellent art upgrades over the Renegade version; clearer rulebook
  • Deep and variable gameplay with strong deckbuilding and upgrade feel
  • High replayability with multiple SMCs and boss-like Mother Ghost mechanics
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for new players
  • Complex interactions with guardians and upgraded sparks can be punishing
  • Dice luck can heavily influence outcomes in key battles
Thematic elements
  • digital intrusion, infection, guardians, ghosts, and boss-level AI adversaries
  • Cyberpunk network hacking against super massive computers (SMCs) within a modular network of servers
  • procedural playthrough with live commentary and strategic explanation
Comparison games
  • Renegade
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Command Cards — Players use a hand of 15 command cards to perform actions; upgrades replace cards; you discard paid cards to upgrade.
  • Deck building — Upgrades are purchased from a visible upgrade deck and added to the hand; upgrading cards improves capabilities and reduces clutter.
  • deckbuilding/upgrade deck — Upgrades are purchased from a visible upgrade deck and added to the hand; upgrading cards improves capabilities and reduces clutter.
  • Engine Building: Triggered/Cascading — Sparks spawn, guardians can trigger explosions, and cascades can affect large areas, creating high-stakes moments.
  • ghost installations and greens — Green installations allow actions to be ghosted from anywhere within a server, enabling flexible, long-range plays.
  • infection and combat — Infect actions use red programs and dice to defeat Sparks and the SMC; outcomes determine removal of sparks or loss of programs.
  • network and servers layout — The board is a network of server tiles; spaces are open or closed; movement and placement depend on adjacency and openings.
  • sparks, guardians, and cascade effects — Sparks spawn, guardians can trigger explosions, and cascades can affect large areas, creating high-stakes moments.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This game is absolutely a brain burner.
  • The art is so much better in this game.
  • The rule book is way better than the original one.
  • It's a brain burner; I love it.
  • I can't wait to see what it's like going against level two.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video gm2k7rRpLKs One Stop Co-op Shop Playthrough at 0:03 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 34479 · mention_pk 102692
One Stop Co-op Shop - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:03 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • Core action system and hero-movement variety remain engaging.
  • New Guard expansion adds new hero options and unlocks, increasing replayability.
  • Core deck-building/tower-defense puzzle remains fun and accessible.
Cons
  • Hard to get level-two heroes active consistently; balance can be swingy.
  • Hard mode can feel punishing; the event system can create inconsistent difficulty.
  • Some balance and design choices may allow snowballing and less tension in non-hard modes.
Thematic elements
  • Survival and cooperative defense against invading monsters, with a focus on positioning and resource cycling.
  • A small camp surrounded by eight attack zones with monsters spawning from a central deck; players defend the camp across a night cycle.
  • Abstract, puzzle-like with a timer/deck-management mechanic rather than a narrative-heavy story.
Comparison games
  • The Last Lighthouse
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Combat and foraging — Heroes can attack, forage, bolster, or level up. Attacking uses a single action; foraging pulls from a forage pile; bolstering grants a teammate an extra action; leveling up improves survivability and unlocks new abilities.
  • Deck cycling and the knight timer — Defeated or forged cards are placed on the bottom of the deck; a knight card acts as a timer that flips to higher values as the game progresses, giving players more time if more cards are drawn.
  • Event effects and difficulty modifiers — Events on top of the deck can alter rules for the round (e.g., increasing forge limits, restricting maneuvering, or applying special effects).
  • Events — Events on top of the deck can alter rules for the round (e.g., increasing forge limits, restricting maneuvering, or applying special effects).
  • Expansion-driven objectives — The New Guard expansion adds three new level-two heroes unlocked via battlecry quests, introducing new ways to tune difficulty and deck cycling.
  • Monsters spawn per turn — At the start of each round, spawn a monster for each surviving hero based on the top card of the deck and its eight-space indicator.
  • Movement and positioning — Heroes move according to unique movement patterns (e.g., war dancer diagonal, forager through empty spaces until adjacent to another hero, fire tender jumping across fire).
  • Turn-based hero actions — Each hero gets two actions per turn; players must finish one hero's actions before starting the next.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Embers is awesome
  • New Guard is a good addition
  • Three more heroes with new powers and new movement is really cool
  • the core combat is fun
  • not a full recommend
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video XXogAYt8r0E Board Stupid Discussion at 3:58 sentiment: positive
video_pk 33800 · mention_pk 100579
Board Stupid - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 3:58 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • strong cyberpunk vibe and theme
  • cooperative deck-builder with teamwork emphasis
  • modular scenarios and evolving mainframe arc
  • conceptually appealing, jack-in theme worthy of Netrunner fans
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • cyberpunk, hacking, cooperative deck-building
  • cyberpunk hacking mainframe environment
  • thematic, action-driven cooperation against a central system
Comparison games
  • Renegade
  • Netrunner
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Cooperative Game — players work together to push back against the mainframe guardians
  • cooperative play — players work together to push back against the mainframe guardians
  • Deck building — players build and customize hacker decks to perform actions
  • deck-building — players build and customize hacker decks to perform actions
  • Modular board — a modular mainframe map with scenarios provides replayability
  • modular map / mainframe framework — a modular mainframe map with scenarios provides replayability
  • upgrades / character progression — players acquire upgrades to their hacker, enabling stronger abilities
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • a 3D tile placement environment. Very lovely.
  • cozy Japanese style
  • each turn, you're going to be meditating
  • it's a deck building cooperative game.
  • we love a deck builder and deck builder doing like cooperative sounds super cool.
  • Let's jack in.
  • this is a deck building dice allocation rally game like racing game
  • the action cards and the dice allocation is going to tell you how good your pilot is going to be
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video DqP7qDDWkxM Gaming Rules! Playthrough at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 13168 · mention_pk 38519
Gaming Rules! - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Rich, puzzle-driven gameplay with deep strategic options
  • Dynamic scaling based on number of players
  • Engaging asymmetrical decker mechanics and ghosting
  • Exciting, tense play sessions with meaningful decisions
Cons
  • Steep learning curve and heavy rule-set
  • Occasional risk of analysis paralysis during setup
  • Complex interactions can be overwhelming for new players
Thematic elements
  • Hacking, infiltration, and cooperative puzzle solving against a hostile AI (Glom)
  • Cyberpunk hacking networks and server installations
  • Puzzle-driven, objective-based with asymmetric roles
Comparison games
  • Mother
  • Sentinel
  • Tempest
  • Viking
  • Spider
  • Tsunami
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • ghosting/movement — Program avatars move by ghosting through installations to other servers.
  • Hidden movement — Program avatars move by ghosting through installations to other servers.
  • installations and ghost paths — Installations enable moving/ghosting, with Monty's green-program special rules.
  • objective scaling and deckers — Objectives scale with number of deckers, altering requirements per objective.
  • program upgrades and modifications — Upload and modify programs using yellow/green/red tokens to create better tools.
  • sparks, guardians, and explosions — Sparks accumulate on open spaces; guardians defend spaces; explosions propagate hazards.
  • spawn and SMC attack phases — Cycle-based turns with spawn steps, end-of-turn moves, and a final SMC attack to determine success.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This game is very much a a puzzle and learning the puzzle.
  • To win the game, you need to complete gold.
  • First spawn step is skipped.
  • Green is safe.
  • We managed to have no sparks on the same space as programs.
  • You have won.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video EnOMKLo9kOM BoardGameGeek Top List at 5:49 sentiment: positive
video_pk 11196 · mention_pk 32929
BoardGameGeek - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 5:49 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • strong deep-paint/production value
  • liked as a deep print collaboration; solid fit for Spiel origins
  • engages with solo and group play well
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • cyberpunk / matrix-like intrusion into mainframes
  • infiltration of a digital network as hackers
  • techno-noir, high-stakes hacking
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • co-op / solo play with asymmetric powers — players take on roles of hackers with unique abilities to complete objectives.
  • mission-based objectives with evolving rules — each round has new objectives and the final objective determines the win.
  • network navigation / hacking theme — you explore a network and interact with various supercomputers as you progress.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is a fun one. It's cozy. It's relaxing but there is strategy and stuff like that and it looks like super beautiful.
  • I love this game so much. It's a perfect big group family game.
  • Inish is back in hotness and that's because there is a big box version with a new expansion that's on crowdfunding right now.
  • The art and the production value seems so top tier.
  • It's a solo campaign now, and that makes me color me more intrigued.
  • Fate of the Fellowship is so good. We played a four-player game and it was freaking incredible, y'all. Epic, man.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video TvVeSW1Zdxs Box of Delights Discussion at 1:06 sentiment: positive
video_pk 10868 · mention_pk 32052
Box of Delights - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:06 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • clear rulebook presentation and readability
  • strong thematic flavor with immersive cyberpunk world
  • high component quality and readable texts on SMC cards
  • significant asymmetry and deck-building depth
  • upgrade area expands strategic options and planning
  • modular board and boss variety support replayability
Cons
  • learning curve due to new terminology and rule changes from Renegade lineage
  • early setup can be verbose and may slow initial play
  • some players may find initial card-color taxonomy complex
Thematic elements
  • Cybersecurity, hacking, network infiltration, and boss battles
  • Cyberpunk network environment where hackers battle a series of SMC bosses
  • Tech-noir flavor with flavor text that enriches worldbuilding
Comparison games
  • Renegade
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • asymmetric boss fights — each SMC boss has unique setup, difficulty (stars indicate how hard it is), and rules that affect gameplay.
  • color-coded command cards — cards are color-coded (red, yellow, blue, green, purple) with distinct roles and interactions; purple is a wildcard that can substitute for other colors.
  • deck upgrading and program deployment — upgraded cards replace basic cards in the deck; players install and operate programs on the network to perform actions.
  • deck-building — each deck has 15 base cards; players upgrade cards to replace or augment their hand, creating asymmetry and progressional power.
  • hand management — the upgrade area acts as an extension of the hand; players must consider cards in hand and in the upgrade area together.
  • modular board / setup variability — board is composed of five server tiles with different layouts; each SMC boss presents different setup conditions.
  • objective cards / countermeasures — gold objectives end the game upon success; copper and silver objectives provide rewarded outcomes or penalties, affecting endgame strategy.
  • token spawning and progression — rounds spawn black circle tokens (sparks) that scale by copper, silver, and gold levels; tokens can flip to white and have different spawn rules per deck.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Sebastian, who's been focusing on the graphic design and the clarity and the rule book and all that stuff, has done a fantastic job trying to lay everything out in such a much clearer way for players.
  • The deck is always 15 cards.
  • You're pirating up your Deca through its deck, his deck of 15 cards.
  • It's a real multi-dimensional game.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video g2UDvKFMsbs One Stop Co-op Shop Top List at 1:24 sentiment: positive
video_pk 10169 · mention_pk 29911
One Stop Co-op Shop - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:24 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Unstoppable is my number one of 2025.
  • Is it as good as Exceed? Heck no. But it's good enough that we'll play it sometimes.
  • The core card play is so good. The combos and cooperation are great.
  • My son and I have really enjoyed the 1v1 mode in Yomi 2.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 4m8x9i7xxHg BigPasti Analysis at 6:25 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 10187 · mention_pk 119852
BigPasti - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 6:25 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
  • quick plays
  • easy entry for new players
Cons
  • limited depth
  • predictable decisions
Thematic elements
  • simple capture and piece advancement
  • abstract strategy
  • minimalistic
Comparison games
  • Chess
  • Go
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • simple capture rules — forced capture and simple movement
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Candyland there is no depth there really isn't even a game
  • it's a real puzzle that can be optimized
  • the depth is nine out of ten Blood on the Clock Tower is extremely deep and becomes progressively more skill dependent
  • Twilight Imperium is a big freaking game; it's got 25 factions
  • Dune Imperium Uprising pulls from a lot of prerequisite game knowledge which makes it something more complex than Settlers or Katan
  • Root is an excellent game it's deeply strategic and emergent
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video gEgJ6nG5z4g Board Game Hangover Discussion at 1:31 sentiment: positive
video_pk 9384 · mention_pk 27671
Board Game Hangover - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:31 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Cooperative mechanics
  • Deck building
  • Compact package
Cons
  • Visually unpleasing board design
  • Empty/sparse aesthetics
Thematic elements
  • Hackers infiltrating computer systems
  • Digital/Hacking
  • Thematic
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • cooperative gameplay — Players work together as team of hackers
  • Deck building — Tech building to hack into systems
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • We're back from SL with one of the biggest board game holes we have ever had
  • hottest Euro game of the fair
  • engine building and playing out cards and taking them back
  • racing game without racing
  • one of the best covers illustrations
  • really thinky game
  • This is a really fun and simple game
  • don't judge board games from their cover
  • makes your turn feel great if you have great cards
  • they're actually really, really good
  • don't know what's going on in that game right now
  • There aren't a lot of good pirate games out there
  • I'm always a sucker for cool historical themes
  • unique twist to the already known detective genre
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video jck3n4dY11c BoardGameGeek Top List at 4:07 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5955 · mention_pk 17641
BoardGameGeek - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:07 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • timely cyberpunk premise with an evolving system tension as AI/friction increases
  • avatar/identity mechanic adds thematic flavor
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • corporate cybersecurity battles in a sci-fi world
  • futuristic, cyberpunk hacking scenario
  • story-driven hacking perspective with avatars
Comparison games
  • generic cyberpunk hacking games
  • Ark Nova-style team coordination (not explicit in text, but implied by team play)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • cooperative card-driven hacking — players collaborate to hack into a central system via cards
  • identity-based abilities — the persona you assume during a hack grants unique bonuses
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Look at this cover. For that reason alone, I immediately went, 'Cool. That's my most anticipated game from Essen.'
  • I'm judging a game by its cover, but your cover is massive real estate. Don't tell me to not judge games by their cover because it is important.
  • Oh my gosh, this is that game at Essen every year that I'm immediately just like, do I pay someone to buy it at Essen and then ship it to me? I shouldn't.
  • Sanctuary is kind of a smaller version of Ark Nova. I really, really like Ark Nova, but this is... a tile-based version that's quicker to table.
  • This feels kind of like a Terramystica kind of game because there are four tracks and you invest to boost different aspects.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 29nDnSsIbjc The Broken Meeple Review at 1:46 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 3472 · mention_pk 10295
The Broken Meeple - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:46 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • Good production quality for the price (~30 pounds).
  • Thoughtful storage design with tuck boxes and organized inserts.
  • High replay value: ten deckers, varied objectives, and upgrade options.
  • Strong thematic artwork and cohesive cyberpunk aesthetic.
Cons
  • Steep learning curve from a 27-page rulebook and heavy wall-of-text explanations.
  • Rulebook is dense; learning to play can take multiple sessions.
  • Two big random elements (card draws and upgrade availability) can drastically impact outcomes.
  • Starter scenario is punishing and not beginner-friendly.
  • Limited time to upgrade cards; not enough opportunities to diversify decks in a typical game.
  • Dice introduce a notable luck factor in key actions like infecting guardians.
Thematic elements
  • Cyberpunk hacking and program management
  • Cyberpunk network/server hacking scenario
  • Procedural, objective-driven puzzle
Comparison games
  • Civolution
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • area influence / push and ghosting — Colored programs influence movement, push enemies, or ghost actions from different positions on the board.
  • Combat: Dice — Red and other colored dice resolve attempts to defeat or disable enemy defenses/guardians.
  • Deck building — Each player uses a personal deck of cards to perform actions by spending symbols on cards; upgrading cards gradually changes options.
  • deck-building / card drafting — Each player uses a personal deck of cards to perform actions by spending symbols on cards; upgrading cards gradually changes options.
  • dice-based combat for defenses — Red and other colored dice resolve attempts to defeat or disable enemy defenses/guardians.
  • Gold/Silver/Bronze Scoring — Gold objective is mandatory to win; silver and bronze are optional bonuses that mitigate negatives or grant rewards.
  • grid / token placement on a server map — Players move an avatar and manipulate programs on a randomized server layout while defending against mainframe defenses.
  • objective-driven puzzle structure with tiered objectives — Gold objective is mandatory to win; silver and bronze are optional bonuses that mitigate negatives or grant rewards.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • The gameplay loop with the puzzle is pretty intriguing and a good little bit of fun.
  • Massochist game where the difficulty setting from the get-go is already set to hard.
  • If you want a challenge this one will give it to you, but if you're looking for something that's more of a 50/50 win rate, you're not going to get that here.
  • The starter scenario punches you in the face.
  • This is a solo puzzle and it's not a massive negative.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video JZK_zPsacRM BoardGameGeek Top List at 1:04:20 sentiment: positive
video_pk 621 · mention_pk 1816
BoardGameGeek - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:04:20 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Stylish production and accessible rules
  • Support for solo play and varied modes
Cons
  • Can feel similar to other cyberpunk card/board hybrids
Thematic elements
  • Salvage and competition in a server world
  • Cyberpunk servers and digital heists
  • Loose theme integrated with mechanical play
Comparison games
  • Renegade
  • Netrunner
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Cooperative/competitive play — Can be played solo or in teams; decision space adapts to player count
  • Tile/map-based server spaces — Modular board or map elements representing networks
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Three years. That's just crazy to me.
  • It's always a challenge looking through the preview list to pick out games for this.
  • You can definitely feel the excitement for Spiel Essen 2025.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 1TVpJ_ujsaU Board Game Hangover Top List at 3:54 sentiment: positive
video_pk 400 · mention_pk 1190
Board Game Hangover - Deckers video thumbnail
Click to watch at 3:54 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • tough cooperative puzzle with meaningful choices
  • progression feels rewarding as you improve
Cons
  • crunchy puzzle with some luck elements
  • hard on newcomers to grasp depth
Thematic elements
  • cooperative hacking thriller
  • cyberpunk-hacking scenario against an AI overlord
  • deck-building progression with strategic planning
Comparison games
  • Primal the Awakening
  • Horrified
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card-driven actions — cards enable movement, attacks, and system interactions
  • deck-building — build and play cards to advance objectives
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's my turn. The thing is that it is also one of the worst things about this game cuz sometimes you'll be waiting forever to take your turn.
  • I really love this set because I love Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
  • This stands out because it's a very tough cooperative board game with tons of choices and you most likely will lose a few times before figuring it out.
  • This game is freaking fantastic.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–22 of 22
Game Deep Dive
View on BoardGameGeek