Collection Status
Your Rating
Description
The Flatiron Building, originally known as the Fuller Building, is a historic 22-story skyscraper located in Manhattan, New York. It is known for its distinctive triangular shape reminiscent of an old-fashioned clothes iron. Since its construction in 1902, it has become one of the most recognizable icons on the New York City skyline, situated at the intersection of Fifth Avenue with Broadway, East 22nd Street, and East 23rd Street.
In Flatiron, you will be transported to the Big Apple to participate in the construction of this iconic building. Both you and your opponent will need to develop your companies by adding new cards to your personal board, thereby allowing you to perform more and better actions on each of the surrounding streets. The ultimate goal is to earn more points than your opponent, primarily by undertaking construction tasks but also by maintaining an impeccable public image and adhering to the decrees of the New York City Council. When the roof is placed, and everything is ready for the grand opening, the game ends. Victory and recognition will go only to the player who has accumulated the most points.
-description from publisher
Year Published
2024
Featured Videos
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 7
This page: 7
Sentiment:
pos 5 ·
mix 0 ·
neu 2 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–7 of 7
Video N4W2xLh-I1k
top_10_list at 9:08 sentiment: positive
video_pk 62526 · mention_pk 155228
Click to watch at 9:08 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- two-player only with tightly aligned action spaces
- clear, tense decisions around timing
Cons
- may be too short or abstract for some players
- only for two players
Thematic elements
- architectural development and space optimization
- New York City's Flat Iron Building, two-player engine-building
- clinical, design-forward
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- engine building — Play cards and slot them into a personal board to customize actions.
- engine-building — Play cards and slot them into a personal board to customize actions.
- resource flow and placement — Acquire materials, build pillars, and complete floors to score.
- Resource management — Acquire materials, build pillars, and complete floors to score.
- timing and interaction — The third pillar completes the floor, scoring big regardless of who placed the first two.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- No patchwork, no Seven Wonders Duel, just genuinely underrated games that deserve a spot on your shelf.
- Buy this if you want something quick, portable, and full of meaningful decisions.
- That swing was massive.
- You can plan ahead because you know what your opponent might take and how it affects the board.
- The app is brilliant. It actually enhances the experience rather than feeling tacked on.
- The brilliance is in the timing and indirect interaction.
- Buy Tether if you want something that teaches in 2 minutes, but reveals depth of a repeated place.
- Buy Lacuna if you want something beautiful and tactile.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video XjMYW3YztUw
game_review at 0:06 sentiment: positive
video_pk 61518 · mention_pk 154167
Click to watch at 0:06 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- deep, puzzly engine-building gameplay
- high replayability from two-sided boards and variable powers
- visually appealing components and table presence
- tight two-player interaction with strategic blocking
Cons
- solo-opponent AI is tricky and can be challenging
- designed for two players, not suitable for larger groups
- may be heavy for casual players seeking lighter experiences
Thematic elements
- engine-building, city-building, stacking floors and columns
- New York City, Flatiron Building (thematic setting around a NYC engine-building structure)
- abstract puzzle with thematic flavor
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- card purchasing and placement — Visit streets to buy cards and place them on your board, choosing top or bottom placement for different effects.
- city hall actions — City Hall board provides actions like drawing money or floors, adding strategic depth.
- color-constrained placement — Place columns in four colors with the rule that the same color cannot appear more than once on a single floor.
- endgame scoring and blocking — Endgame scoring based on how streets end and the ability to block opponents from running engines.
- engine building — Acquire and activate cards to grow a personal production engine across streets and floors.
- engine-building — Acquire and activate cards to grow a personal production engine across streets and floors.
- variable powers and replayability — Two-sided boards and variable abilities create different power layouts for each game.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- this brain burner of a game
- puzzly game
- I love this game
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Cg9eFHHckqA
Allies or Enemies top_3_list at 12:26 sentiment: positive
video_pk 61035 · mention_pk 153443
Click to watch at 12:26 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- a striking Art Deco aesthetic with sturdy, 3D components
- dense, strategic engine-building with meaningful blocking
- layered strategic choices across early setup and late game
Cons
- heavier two-player experience that may deter lighter players
- iconography can require rulebook reference on rare cards
Thematic elements
- urban development, pillars and floors
- Art Deco New York, Flatiron Building-inspired
- engine-building with 3D building progression
Comparison games
- White Castle
- Fields of Arl
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Blocking and competition — deny or impede your opponent from accessing key streets to prevent their next floor
- end game bonuses — decree cards provide major endgame scoring and strategy paths
- endgame decrees — decree cards provide major endgame scoring and strategy paths
- engine building — build and optimize a sequence of actions across streets to unlock stronger actions
- engine-building — build and optimize a sequence of actions across streets to unlock stronger actions
- pillar/tower stacking — place pillars to support floors and unlock floor-level bonuses
- worker placement — visit streets to buy cards and trigger column activations
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- it's not paralyzing in terms of the decision you're making.
- there are a lot of different routes you can go.
- the first twist is that you're kind of playing tic-tac-toe in the middle.
- this is just a really great game for anyone who likes tile placement, but wants just like a little bit more thinking to it.
- the game moves very quickly.
- it's best when you play it with the same person a bunch of times because the mind games of this game is where the fun really is.
- there is a lot of metagaming and it is interesting.
- it's just straight up meanness
- this is easily the biggest of the three that we're talking about
- there's definitely a lot to consider
- on the B side mixes it up just a little bit more
- it's a heavier two-player game
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video CfUjiUl6yHA
Cape Fear Games general_discussion at 5:58 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 29033 · mention_pk 152411
Click to watch at 5:58 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- 1920s New York
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- action selection
- Cooperative Game
- two-player competition
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I'm intimidated to get started with it.
- You're building outposts and in order to increase your trade routes.
- the artwork here is quite lovely
- I'm not super into Political themes.
- it's a dexterity game where you are building up power towers on the island of nikima
- Arctic scavengers I picked this up because I know nothing about it
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video SVG-JP8JJXs
Bored with Steve top_10_list at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 10200 · mention_pk 113951
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- tight decision space with only five worker spots
- asymmetrical action spots create high interaction
- clear blocking strategies that influence tempo
- efficient play that rewards planning and timing
Cons
- potential learning curve for new players
- reliance on optimal blocking can feel unforgiving at times
Thematic elements
- urban development and architectural construction
- New York City, industrial era, focusing on the Flat Iron Building project
- strategy-forward, mechanically driven
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- area/spot control pressure — Blocking and timing create direct interaction and competition for limited build opportunities.
- asymmetry / blocking — Each player has different action options; blocking is central to control and tempo.
- engine building — Actions and placements feed a local engine to complete construction tasks on the Flat Iron Building.
- engine-building — Actions and placements feed a local engine to complete construction tasks on the Flat Iron Building.
- worker placement — Two-player-only layout with five spots that drive core actions; spots are asymmetrical between players.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Blocking becomes super important because you can only build roofs and pillars so many times during the game.
- There's a ton of mind games involved in this game.
- The dice rolls affect everybody equally. So, we both have to work with the same puzzle.
- It's tense, it's brainy, and it's super satisfying.
- I don't understand why it's not up there with the likes of Brass, Terrammystica, Bough Island, even a bunch of other big strategic games.
- For me, it is Magnum Opus and it deserves all the credit in the universe.
- This is my favorite co-op game of all time and I believe it's the best two-player co-op experience ever.
- There are multiple ways to win and the exploration of discovering new scoring methods is thrilling.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video omXaszSx33E
Unknown Channel game_review at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 8476 · mention_pk 104430
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Elegant engine-building within a compact two-player euro-style game
- Distinct feel from typical head-to-head games
- Flexible strategies via card-driven customization and floor effects
- Tight, quick play around 45 minutes with depth
Cons
- Potential complexity for casual players due to multiple floor rules and thumbs up/down mechanic
- Two-player only limits audience; may not have broad multiplayer appeal
- Endgame scoring can be swingy if not managed carefully
Thematic elements
- construction, engine-building via column placement
- New York City, building the Flatiron Building
- engine-building with color-based floor columns and flow
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- card drafting — Draft cards that are tucked under your personal board to modify future actions and unlock effects.
- card drafting / deck building — Draft cards that are tucked under your personal board to modify future actions and unlock effects.
- dynamic rule tweaks via floors — Building new floors introduces new in-game rules that alter how the game is played.
- Economy management — Money is tight; players optimize income and spending to avoid wasted turns.
- end game bonuses — Each location has a thumbs up/down rating from powerful engine cards; endgame scoring rewards players with favorable ratings.
- end-game scoring cards — A separate location allows spending money to acquire endgame scoring cards with various point bonuses.
- endgame scoring via thumbs up/down — Each location has a thumbs up/down rating from powerful engine cards; endgame scoring rewards players with favorable ratings.
- engine building — Drafted cards and board abilities enable improving income and gain from actions.
- engine-building — Drafted cards and board abilities enable improving income and gain from actions.
- floor/column placement with color constraints — Each floor requires different colored columns; building a column restricts the opponent from that color in future.
- Resource management — Money is tight; players optimize income and spending to avoid wasted turns.
- two-player area movement / placement — Players move to five locations on a board and block the opponent from occupying the same spot.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- This one feels more like a traditional Euro, I suppose, but it is very tight and compact.
- The framework of the game is actually rather simple. Again, just move somewhere and take the action.
- I'm looking forward to playing it some more and seeing how those combos or those cards come together.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video wHyiKj0DeFM
Peaky Boardgamer rules_teach at 0:30 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 2838 · mention_pk 8293
Click to watch at 0:30 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
- Unique thematic concept
- Interesting action selection mechanism
- Multiple ways to score points
Cons
- Complex rule set
- Requires strategic planning
Thematic elements
- Architectural construction of the Flatiron Building
- Manhattan, New York
- Players as competing architectural companies
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- action selection — Players move architect pawn and choose actions on streets or city hall
- Resource management — Managing money and pillars to construct building
- tableau building — Players collect and place cards in street columns
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Players are participating in the construction of one of the most recognizable icons on New York - the Flatiron building
- When the roof is constructed, the game ends
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–7 of 7