/pic7887130.jpg)
Collection Status
Your Rating
Description
As one of the leading scientific researchers in the galaxy, you're in high demand. You've spent the last two years on Alarria, a small terrestrial planet several light-years from Earth. You've been studying the diverse indigenous fauna, and your field research has already yielded some incredible results. However, your days as a simple scientific researcher are about to end.
An asteroid roughly the size of a small country has been picked up on radar hurtling towards Alarria — a planet killer. If something isn't done soon, the planet itself might cease to exist. Three distinct plans have been set into motion, each with a razor thin chance of succeeding:
A powerful laser is tracking the asteroid's approach and will fire as soon as it comes within range in hopes of reducing it to a mere pebble.
An energy shield might be just enough to deflect the approaching asteroid, altering its course and saving Alarria.
In a final desperate attempt to preserve some of the unique species of the planet, an evacuation plan has been ordered. The nearby forest moon, Fortuna, has been tested and can support life, and thankfully it's out of the blast zone. You just need to move as many of the species as possible before impact.
Your research work has been put on hold as the greatest minds on the planet have been recruited to develop the three plans. Time is running out as each second brings the asteroid closer to Alarria. Where will you focus your efforts? Which plan has the best chance to succeed? There's no time to waste...
How to Save a World is a worker-placement game with hand-building and resource management. Each turn, you assign workers to perform critical tasks or spend action cards to help advance your goals. At the end of each round, the projects will be assessed and the asteroid will move ever closer. Can you make the right decisions to avert disaster in this competitive science-fiction thrill ride for 2-4 players?
—description from publisher
Year Published
2025
Featured Videos
Review
How To Save A World
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 6
This page: 6
Sentiment:
pos 6 ·
mix 0 ·
neu 0 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–6 of 6
Video 64CuiU6sL0M
Unknown Channel general_discussion at 1:03 sentiment: positive
video_pk 62707 · mention_pk 155410
Click to watch at 1:03 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Deluxe components and complete insert add significant value
- Double-layer boards improve setup quality
- Layout is clear with strong color-coding and readability
- Polished production (metal asteroid centerpiece, high-quality tokens)
- Compact base box with a clever insert design
Cons
- Base game lacks an insert in the box (deluxe version includes one)
- Some acrylic tokens used instead of wooden tokens; wooden tokens preferred
- Player boards are thin and require care
- Deluxe upgrade pack is effectively an expansion that requires the base game; buying only the upgrade could be confusing
- Edition differences (German double-layer boards vs retail single-layer boards) may cause confusion
Thematic elements
- Planetary defense and potential evacuation
- Space/planet Allaria; asteroid threatening a colony
- Semi-cooperative with competitive elements
Comparison games
- Endeavor Deep Sea
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Asteroid track resolution — An asteroid advances toward the planet and triggers project resolution options
- Card pool / card-driven actions — Cards are drafted/added to a pool to advance defense projects
- end game bonuses — Complete one of three projects (laser, shield, evacuation) to defend the planet
- End-game project completion — Complete one of three projects (laser, shield, evacuation) to defend the planet
- Location-based action economy — Spend energy to move ships between planet and moon to access actions
- Resource management — Manage resources (batteries, brains, stones, gears, etc.) for actions
- worker placement — Players place workers on action spaces to gain resources and progress projects
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Look at this centerpiece here.
- This asteroid centerpiece here is crazy.
- Very interesting premise.
- They designed in such a way that they actually like fit in here with the shape.
- I'm quite positive that I could also like this one here.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Uq39vJFwWZc
Unknown Channel game_review at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 61407 · mention_pk 154083
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Engaging, heavy mid-weight design with accessible pacing
- Excellent solo mode that is easy to run and play
- Vibrant, cohesive color scheme that translates across all boards
- Three distinct project tracks with diverse endgame scoring
- Clear reference materials and a helpful solo deck
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- Planetary defense, resource management, and project-driven scoring in a race to mitigate asteroid threat.
- Space-based planetary defense where players defend Earth from an asteroid by advancing laser, shield, or evacuation projects.
- Procedural, outcome-driven with multiple end-game scoring directions; emphasis on planning and adaptation.
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Card varieties and card-driven effects — Three card types (blue boosts, yellow actions, and species) provide ongoing or one-off effects with endgame scoring implications.
- Combat: Deck/Hand — A dedicated solo deck guides solo play; reference cards help clarity and reduce setup.
- End-of-round and round reset — Project progress and resources reset/increase with each round, maintaining ongoing tension.
- Endgame scoring via project comparison and poll — A final poll determines the most successful project; points awarded for leadership and for close non-successful projects.
- Multi-use cards — Three card types (blue boosts, yellow actions, and species) provide ongoing or one-off effects with endgame scoring implications.
- Multiple project tracks and upgrades — Each player has three projects to advance along tracks, with upgrades and endgame scoring variations.
- Resource tracks and bag/draw system — Players move on tracks to gain resources; end-of-round draws pull cubes from a central bag, balancing risk of asteroid cubes.
- Shuttle between planetary locations — Some positions shuttle tokens between the Moon and Planet; end-of-round movement changes board state.
- Solo mode with a dedicated deck and reference cards — A dedicated solo deck guides solo play; reference cards help clarity and reduce setup.
- Track advancement — Each player has three projects to advance along tracks, with upgrades and endgame scoring variations.
- worker placement — Players place ships on action spaces to take actions; turns can be passed individually.
- Worker placement / action selection — Players place ships on action spaces to take actions; turns can be passed individually.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- this game is so fun.
- the solo is fantastic.
- everything is colorful, and all of the colors translate across all of the different boards.
- I love this game. I think it is fantastic.
- the colors on this are just gorgeous.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Uvnfg6xO5iw
Game Boy Geek top_10_list at 6:31 sentiment: positive
video_pk 35440 · mention_pk 105790
Click to watch at 6:31 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- strong combination of worker placement and deck-building
- production is noted as beautiful
Cons
- potentially complex rule set for new players
Thematic elements
- collaborative strategy with global stakes
- world-saving theme with a hopeful, epic scope
- thematic and aspirational
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Compound Scoring — scoring influenced by in-game events and decisions
- Deck building — draw and play cards to fuel engine and actions
- endgame scoring variability — scoring influenced by in-game events and decisions
- worker placement — place workers to perform actions and progress goals
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Origins Game Fair is right around the corner and I am pumped
- legacy games, I love a great legacy experience
- The ancient Greek theme is right up my alley
- it's kind of like Crokinol meets engine building
- I love beigeos. It's what I live for
- the central track that drives your action, and it combos with other stuff on the board
- these expansions are number one on my list
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 0fGZtTIpusE
The Dice Tower general_discussion at 3:49 sentiment: positive
video_pk 7626 · mention_pk 22590
Click to watch at 3:49 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- neat worker placement with player-driven outcomes
- interactive decisions shape the end state
Cons
- could use more clarity in rules or setup
Thematic elements
- cooperative/competitive conflict over resources
- space / moon and planet defense against an asteroid
- player-driven, emergent
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- worker placement — two-part board gameplay with moon and planet areas
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- This is a two-player head-to-head game set in the world of Gatsby, kind of. And you are, it's kind of a tug-of-war over three different areas. It's very abstract.
- Moonrise part is the sideboard with tiles that fill up and then they go to one of the players for victory points and then there's just more buildings.
- I recommend it for anybody who plays the game a lot. Though, again, the game is sort of the kind of game you buy at Target.
- This is a neat worker placement game played over two parts of the board on the moon and on the planet. You're trying to blast an asteroid coming.
- the cursing was a little over the top and unnecessary. It didn't really bring anything to the table.
- Star Trek Captain's Chair. Wow, what a game. Nine out of 10. This game takes Imperium, a deck building game, adds a Star Trek theme to it, and does a really good job in that regard.
- Very mass market kind of racing game. You're playing out cards whether you're moving your own ships or your opponent's ships.
- I came in at a six on this game. Ultimately, I did enjoy this as a trivia game. It's a marriage of trivia and blackjack, right?
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video h7i1CBcR5O0
Unknown Channel rules teach at 0:03 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5866 · mention_pk 17371
Click to watch at 0:03 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Three action tracks provide a clear strategic focus and a sense of pivoting toward the endgame
- Multiple action options per turn create meaningful decision space
- Rich resource and card system with tags and endgame scoring via species cards
- Two-world setup and project-driven engine add depth and replayability
Cons
- Prototype components not final; art and pieces may change
- High complexity with many resources, tags, and card types, which may be challenging for casual players
- Two-player pacing can be slowed by site occupancy rules
- Endgame scoring hinges on the pivotal project, which may require careful tallying
Thematic elements
- Planetary defense, scientific exploration, resource management, and crisis response
- Planet Araria and its Moon Fortuna; scientists aim to avert an asteroid impact while studying Advanced life forms
- Crisis-driven, track-based progression with endgame scoring centered on a pivotal project
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Asteroid threat and bag draw — End-of-round asteroid advances; cubes are drawn from a bag to progress tracks, influencing endgame timing and rewards.
- Card system — Three card types (Action, Boost, Species) with distinct costs and effects; purchased cards go to hand immediately and can be reused.
- Resource management — Track five resources (Energy, Knowledge, Minerals, Organics, Ingenuity) and spend them to take actions or buy cards; Ingenuity acts as a wild substitute.
- Tech Lab upgrades — Each player has a Tech Lab with upgrades that can unlock ongoing abilities or modify costs; upgrades interact with knowledge and tags.
- Three project tracks — Lasers, Shields, and Evacuation tracks determine endgame scoring and rewards; progress advances via actions and tag spending, with a pivotal project determining the winner.
- Two-world flow — Actions can move Landers between Araria and Fortuna via markers or Express Shuttle; some spaces cause landers to swap worlds automatically.
- worker placement — Landers are placed on sites/locations on Araria and Fortuna to gain resources and trigger space effects; some sites are limited to one Lander while others are unlimited.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- a game for one to four players that features worker placement and resource management
- three plans of action that correspond to these three tracks on the board
- the end of the game you'll score points depending on how far along each of these tracks you were
- this game is currently on Kickstarter
- prototype copy
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video iwLHFUamP0U
Dice Tower top_list at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 4766 · mention_pk 13936
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- innovative fusion of worker placement and deck building
- unique deck building mechanic
- excellent theme integration
- multi-use card system
- flexible strategy system
- radically different from traditional deck builders
- first-time designer creation
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- sci-fi
- alien world
- comet
- survival
- environmental
- hopeful future
Comparison games
- Lost Runes of Arnac
- Dune Imperium
- Endless Winter
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- hey everybody this month's Roundup is brought to you by Arcane wonders
- April was a fantastic month J and I played 15 really great games
- turning out is arguably a game of the year
- if anybody can make a traditional pickup and deliver palatable for me and Jen it's going to be Dev
- as a longtime Die Hard Gloom fan gloomy is my top five games of all time this thing is amazing
- one of the most um um thematically strong worker placement games I've ever seen
- I love everything about this game and I haven't even told you about the really cool way
- this is such a fun puzzly game and not for nothing a gorgeous game too
- a rising tide floats all boats
- 10,000 times better than the original castles of Mad King Ludwick
- Daybreak just broke in to my number one spot for best game of 2023
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–6 of 6