/pic8548587.jpg)
Collection Status
Your Rating
Description
In Loot, players send out their pirates to attack and defend trading ships in order to get the most gold coins. The game box contains 78 cards consisting of trading ships, pirate ships, captains, and an admiral. Players send out a trading ship on a voyage in which it must survive a round of attacks from other player's pirate ships. You defend your traders with your own pirates and collect the spoils of your attacks elsewhere. The game ends once the draw deck is depleted and one player is out of cards. The player with the most gold coins wins.
Description for the Heidelberger release:
Essen release, 2002. In the nice small black box, with embossed lettering. This game has 25 Trade ships worth different amounts of gold (from 2 to 8), 48 Pirate ships, 12 each in 4 colors. The Pirate ships are worth 1-4 skulls (the player with the most skulls played on a trade ship captures it if the lead is kept for one full pass around the table). There are 4 Pirate Captains (1 of each color) to help win the battles and 1 Admiral to help defend the trade ships. The game is playable with 2-5 players individually. With partners it can be played with up to 6 or 8.
Year Published
1992
Featured Videos
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 14
This page: 14
Sentiment:
pos 11 ·
mix 2 ·
neu 1 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–14 of 14
Video jB2pMqGAr3E
Allies or Enemies game_review at 0:16 sentiment: positive
video_pk 61061 · mention_pk 153478
Click to watch at 0:16 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- easy to learn and teach
- quick playtime (2p ~20-30m, 4p ~60m)
- high interaction on a shared board
- strong puzzle with multiple viable strategies
- excellent component quality and clear icons
- good replayability with four double-sided boards
Cons
- some randomness (long ship tiles score unknown until flipped)
- component misinterpretation: rocks look like fish (gold) causing confusion
- balance changes with player count (2p vs 4p) can affect pacing and strategy
- the need to plan around token availability for 4p games (special bonus tokens)
Thematic elements
- resource management via tile drafting and building to fulfill goals
- Viking-era land with resources, towers, castles
- abstract puzzle
Comparison games
- Calico
- King Domino
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- End-game trigger — game ends when all Vikings are placed on the board
- pattern scoring via flipping tiles — flip completed tiles to score; long ships scoring, trophies scoring, end-game penalties for incomplete ships
- tile drafting / drafting by placement — choose tiles by placing Vikings on a shared board, influencing what you can take
- tile placement — place resources and tiles adjacent to construction sites, long ships, houses, towers, castles
- tile placement and building — place resources and tiles adjacent to construction sites, long ships, houses, towers, castles
- worker placement — place Vikings on a shared board to collect resources and adjacent tiles
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- The rule book is four pages long and it's pretty easy to explain
- There is a huge amount of interaction because you've got that middle board and those two things bouncing off each other at the same time
- Loot is a fun name to say
- It's a lighter quicker game that you can teach to new gamers
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video XOZocFzVoc8
Unknown Channel rules teach at 0:00 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 42422 · mention_pk 128782
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
- Fast, satisfying tile-laying puzzle
- Quick turns and smooth pacing
- Clear tension between planning and adaptation
Cons
- Punishing endgame scoring if one building is missing
- Not forgiving for mistakes
- Abstract theme may not appeal to all players
Thematic elements
- Resource gathering and tile-based territory development
- Viking-era raiding and settlement construction
- Abstract, puzzle-driven theme
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Area Control — Navigate nearby placements to optimize tile acquisitions and build sets.
- area_control-lite — Navigate nearby placements to optimize tile acquisitions and build sets.
- set collection — Collect resource tiles by placing next to spaces and buildings; longer-term planning to complete long ships for endgame scoring.
- set_collection — Collect resource tiles by placing next to spaces and buildings; longer-term planning to complete long ships for endgame scoring.
- tile placement — Place Viking tiles and resource/building tiles to meet endgame requirements and gain points.
- tile_placement — Place Viking tiles and resource/building tiles to meet endgame requirements and gain points.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Loot is a fun, fast puzzle that feels great when everything clicks.
- Turns are quick and smooth, and the tile laying puzzle is genuinely satisfying.
- But scoring can be brutal.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video TRgodMW6XeY
Stonemire Games top_10_list at 4:44 sentiment: positive
video_pk 32915 · mention_pk 97521
Click to watch at 4:44 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- tight turn economy with meaningful decisions on every placement
- three different reward streams per action
Cons
- downtime can appear in larger player counts
- scoring can feel fiddly for newcomers
Thematic elements
- spatial/resource collection and placement
- shared map with working elements and tiles
- abstract, spatial puzzle
Comparison games
- Wingspan
- Sagrada
- Orleans
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- multi-path resource gain — each placement yields 1-3 benefits and can unlock tiles
- shared map worker placement — place workers on a map to gain benefits and resources
- tile placement — scoring tied to tile placement and spatial requirements
- tile-based scoring and spatial positioning — scoring tied to tile placement and spatial requirements
- worker placement — place workers on a map to gain benefits and resources
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- These aren't necessarily sprawling long games or even complex complicated games, but they're games where you feel like you've accomplished something fairly big over the course of the game despite having a small number of turns.
- the order of operations puzzle is what you're really thinking about on your turn
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video -gLOG096tC8
board game Garden general_discussion at 9:58 sentiment: positive
video_pk 29591 · mention_pk 86924
Click to watch at 9:58 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral to positive with uncertainty
Pros
- Potentially engaging due to familiar cover art
- Interest sparked by similarities to another title
Cons
- No concrete details available in vlog
- Ambiguity about exact edition
Thematic elements
- loop mechanics (same cover motif as two girls)
- Unspecified loop-themed concept
- ambiguous, exploratory
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Loop-based mechanic (unclear from video) — Mentioned in passing; exact rules not clarified
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Pixies I have played a few times on BGA and I have really really enjoyed it
- I think it's the cutest thing
- milk curo it is very cool looking trick taking game where cards actually have two ends either the black side or the white side
- Harvest ... plays one to six players so does play solo and that is this game right here
- Loop has the same two girls on it but it's purple
- I'm looking for Nana Christmas
- I picked up Nana for my friend Aiden
- this is one that I've really wanted and it is on the board game bliss website
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video pgYSsH9FQx8
Game Night game_review at 0:59 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 13794 · mention_pk 40301
Click to watch at 0:59 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
- Good tile-laying mechanic
- Nice mix of personal player board and competitive placement
- Quick gameplay (45 minutes or less)
- Cool theme and art
- Competitive interaction without being unnecessarily mean
Cons
- Can be cutthroat depending on player group
- Randomization of tiles can make some objectives difficult or impossible
- Some luck elements in tile distribution
Thematic elements
- Viking exploration and resource collection
- Islands where Vikings land to raid and trade
- Tile-laying exploration
Comparison games
- Rebirth (Cania game)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- player interaction — Competitive placement and resource blocking on main board
- set collection — Connecting locations or surrounding them to collect towers or castles
- Tile-laying — Building out from the shore to collect resources
- worker placement — Competing for location control
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Multiplayer blackjack in two words.
- It's infectious fun and almost everybody enjoys it.
- They just have to be mean sometimes to get what you want.
- It's a really cool idea in a fairly standard game.
- I really think Endeavor is amazing.
- You so want to do so much and you cannot do everything each turn.
- I could play Flip Seven with my entire family from age 7 to 87.
- The reverse scoring is fantastic and brilliant.
- I love the whole theme. I love the exploration. I love going deeper.
- If you bring this to the US, give it a new name.
- It's not approachable for casual family gaming.
- The jury preferences have changed - they're not easy to predict.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video rujLg6Xp5WQ
Stonemire Games top_25_list at 12:43 sentiment: positive
video_pk 12595 · mention_pk 36742
Click to watch at 12:43 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Spatial expansion feels intuitive and tactical
Cons
- Older design; may skew toward mid-weight players
Thematic elements
- Resource gathering with spatial goals
- Spatial worker placement where placement expands future options
- Strategic, spatially aware planning
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Spatial worker placement — Workers placed adjacent to existing workers open more options.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Actions always succeed in Vantage; the challenge is how much time, morale, and health you lose along the way.
- the limited information of I can see something that you can't see and how that encourages communication and cooperation.
- one player is playing a card and that card has instructions that the other player must follow or you lose.
- if you roll seven bells on your turn, you just instantly win.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video s07DjA7BDUI
Going Analog Podcast general_discussion at 14:20 sentiment: positive
video_pk 12596 · mention_pk 36750
Click to watch at 14:20 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Strong production quality and art
- Flexible play modes add replayability
Cons
- Rules can be a bit dense on first play
- Theme and mechanics feel loosely integrated for some players
Thematic elements
- multi-mode trick-taking/speculation with bidding-like elements
- mythic treasure-hunting with Viking-tinged aesthetic
- abstract with thematic flavor
Comparison games
- Bottle Imp
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Hidden-value card interaction — Different card types interact with price dynamics to score points
- multi-mode play — Includes free-for-all, team play, and two-bottle modes for varied play
- Trick-taking with an innovative price element — A central price track (bottle-like) sets a price; players may bid under the price to win tricks
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- it's a very strange game
- it's also really cool if you're watching this on YouTube
- the look as we said was really great
- this game might be my favorite Red Raven game to date
- simultaneous turns the dice placement and the races for scoring
- the rules are pretty intuitive
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video AC0OZsvhWXg
Foster the Meepolo top_10_list at 9:14 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 8303 · mention_pk 24353
Click to watch at 9:14 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
none
Cons
- Haven't played any of the Dice Masters
Thematic elements
- Dice building
- Marvel universe
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- dice building
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- We love trick taking games
- This game is so much freaking fun
- I adore GMT games, they are becoming one of my favorite game publishers
- If you remember Vast Crystal Caverns is in my top five games of all time
- We bloody love it
- We can't stop playing
- It's a blimp game not a train game
- That's just work
- I don't think I want to play it
- I'll get it eventually
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video p3NYaG8kFgA
Carbo Rhino game_preview at 0:22 sentiment: positive
video_pk 7572 · mention_pk 107818
Click to watch at 0:22 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Unique concept
- Deep social commentary
- High replayability
- Interesting art style
- Educational elements about behavioral economics
Cons
- Potentially complex economic mechanics
- Tight money management
Thematic elements
- Life cycle of work, consumption, and pursuit of happiness
- Modern consumerist society
- Social commentary
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Career selection — Players choose different careers with unique abilities
- Favor trading — Players can request and trade favors with each other
- Resource management — Managing money, materials, and happiness
- Trading — Players can request and trade favors with each other
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Are you capable of breaking the loop?
- Money is a little bit tight in this game but don't worry you can just get a credit card
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video BmNUbt9iSW8
Tabletop Turtle year_in_review at 0:39 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5909 · mention_pk 17510
Click to watch at 0:39 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Clever game design
- Quick gameplay
- Allows player interaction
- Unique puzzle-like experience
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- Viking conquest
- Viking raids
- Competitive raiding
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Area Control — Players block opponents and capture resources
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I spent an entire year preparing for this video to make this list
- I think this has been a pretty good year
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video NllpLe1iBq4
Getting Games update_vlog at 11:23 sentiment: positive
video_pk 3422 · mention_pk 10154
Click to watch at 11:23 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Engaging dual-board interaction
- visual appeal
Cons
- Not revisited frequently
Thematic elements
- score optimization via tableau
- Viking-themed dual-board puzzle
- strategic, interdependent
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Dual-board placement / tableau building — Interact with a communal board and build on personal board
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I had so much anxiety about making this change for months and months, arguably years if you watch the last update, but people really took to it.
- You mean Getting Games? That just that really sealed the deal.
- It's just a fun thing to consider.
- I'm really looking forward to it as opposed to putting these things off and like stressing about them.
- recording my opinions episodes live as well as other vlogs. I did a 2024 favorites video talking about all my favorite games from last year.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video kTU-_4ieokQ
Steve's Board Games Channel top_23_list at 14:49 sentiment: positive
video_pk 2710 · mention_pk 7967
Click to watch at 14:49 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- highly interactive and antagonistic
- tactical and satisfying when you score
Cons
- can feel unforgiving when opponents block you
Thematic elements
- tile drafting with blocking and competition
- medieval town-building
- accessible, competitive, social
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- meeple adjacency scoring — tiles score when placed adjacent to meeples—yours or others.
- tile placement with blocking — place tiles to build your town and block others from optimal spots.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Starting off with the two-player game, Agent Avenue.
- It's a boatload of fun and it's another game which I've just brought out and it just never misses.
- This is another two-player abstract game that I can't stop playing and that's Zenith.
- Rival Cities takes Tug of War to another level.
- The production on Shackleton Base is through the roof.
- Ponzi scheme is one of the most stressful games you'll ever play and it's brilliant.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video dRW7ojgbzxA
Game Night playthrough at 0:54 sentiment: positive
video_pk 1639 · mention_pk 4770
Click to watch at 0:54 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Engaging, accessible core rules
- Asymmetry creates varied strategies
- Tactically tense due to token values and space management
- Enjoyable theme of recycling Vikings
Cons
- Can be mean due to blocking and snatching spaces
- Tower/castle stack rules require mental overhead
- Tile availability can feel random
- Board state can be unforgiving on first plays
Thematic elements
- Viking exploration and resource recycling
- Islands with Viking clans, ecological twist: Vikings recycle material to build structures
- abstracted euro-style puzzle
Comparison games
- Looney Quest
- Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- asymmetrical boards/starting buildings — Each player starts with different buildings and bonuses
- resource collection — Tokens from board provide resources used to build buildings and gain points
- set collection/collection upgrades — Tokens and enhancements modify values and end-game scoring
- simultaneous decision and timing — End of turn choices and tokens that modify values require planning ahead
- tile placement — Place Vikings adjacent to longboats to collect tokens and build buildings
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- We are PC Vikings. We are recycle Vikings.
- This game can be extremely mean and not because someone is playing against you.
- the little card times two makes you get double the resources but only one of the four resources, not the buildings.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video zkJvr_GUo8Y
Tabletop Turtle game_review sentiment: positive
video_pk 703 · mention_pk 2032
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Simple to learn
- Depth of strategy
- Flexible play styles
- Quick gameplay (under 30 minutes)
- Optional player interaction
- Variety in each playthrough
Cons
- Element of luck in tile drawing
- Potential for unbalanced boat tile draws
Thematic elements
- Viking conquest and resource gathering
- Viking raids on mainland
- Competitive resource acquisition
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Area Control — Players place Vikings to capture buildings and resources
- contract fulfillment — Complete boat contracts by surrounding specific structures
- tile placement — Players place pillaged tiles on personal board
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Light doesn't necessarily mean shallow or too simple
- The important part of making a light game is to provide players with as many choices as possible without giving them too much rules overhead
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–14 of 14