How many players can play Moonrakers?

Moonrakers supports 1 to 5 players.

How long does a game of Moonrakers take?

A typical game of Moonrakers takes approximately 120 minutes.

What are the best video reviews of Moonrakers?

MindForge has curated 46 video reviews of Moonrakers from top board game content creators.

What type of game is Moonrakers?

Moonrakers features mechanics including Contracts, Deck Building, Negotiation, Risk Management.

Moonrakers - Board Game

Video dTWSEdVRDT8 Ryan and Bethany Board Game Reviews Shopping Guide at 17:57 sentiment: positive

video_pk 90016 · mention_pk 240011

Click to watch at 17:57 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Engaging for many players with negotiation
Rich thematic feel and replayability

Cons

Not ideal in two-player mode

Thematic elements

deck-building with negotiation
galactic/secret missions in a competitive economy
sci-fi heist vibes

Comparison games

Watergate

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Deck Building — acquire cards to complete missions and gain rewards
deck-building — acquire cards to complete missions and gain rewards
Negotiation — interact with other players to achieve goals
negotiation / alliances — interact with other players to achieve goals

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

it's so simple it's so slick our four-year-old can play it
this is crazy chaotic fun
this is a hilarious dexterity game
it's the most advanced but at the same time the rules themselves are easy
you can level it to your child
it's engaging for literally all ages
it's a game that can be played for players age like 4 to 99
love it it is a great one

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video bNT4pKZdXOE Getting Games Discussion at 20:20

video_pk 89691 · mention_pk 238616

Click to watch at 20:20 · YouTube ↗

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

this sounds really boring but essentially i built a database of all of the content that i've made over the last eight years
it's an incredible number i was shocked to see that
it's now publicly available to everybody you can go to johngetsgames.com/games and that'll take you right to a read-only version of it
these are essentially passion projects that i'm working in amongst the paying work that I do
this is essentially a 1.0 version of the junkets games database
it's possible at some point i will upgrade this into an actual website

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video pxsLWoiWBKY Getting Games Discussion at 14:39 sentiment: positive

video_pk 89623 · mention_pk 238346

Click to watch at 14:39 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

expansions planned via Kickstarter

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

deck-building with negotiation — deck-building plus negotiation mechanics

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

Space Station Phoenix: seven times played shows strong interest
kate may is a game that came out from thunder works games
there's going to be a Kickstarter campaign for that one going out in July

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video pxsLWoiWBKY Getting Games Discussion at 17:36 sentiment: neutral

video_pk 89623 · mention_pk 238344

Click to watch at 17:36 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

neutral

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

Space Station Phoenix: seven times played shows strong interest
kate may is a game that came out from thunder works games
there's going to be a Kickstarter campaign for that one going out in July

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video pzvi-qW-K0Q Board Game Coffee Discussion at 41:55 sentiment: positive

video_pk 89486 · mention_pk 237706

Click to watch at 41:55 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

Positive

Pros

Selling out quickly
Popular

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

boom without a print it's back they just brought it back with uh new art
basically one person picks up these three cards and they have like that's a certain type of person they're looking for
i found the trouble with those games like i think they're fun to play but i think it's kind of weird when you give one person the power to assign the points
i didn't it's not cool like i'm probably never gonna book another uh like demo with them again because it was like it's that's just not i don't think that's cool
power chord call of cthulhu look at this now board and dice do awesome games i love board and day stuff
scout is uh i i don't know what this is but it's a tiny little game and everybody's talking about it
no bad karma is great

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video vHufO7pzgLk All You Can Board Collection Roast at 35:25

video_pk 88127 · mention_pk 231572

Click to watch at 35:25 · YouTube ↗

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

I think if I had one word to describe this collection I think it would be precarious
Move Modern Art to the top of that stack so that you don't accidentally Crush that precious precious box
this shelf is failing like this shelf is going to spill
the best organized collection we've seen today
I love the shelves doing all the work

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video jzTZeuWLops Board Game Buzzz Top 10 List at 23:34 sentiment: positive

video_pk 86768 · mention_pk 225717

Click to watch at 23:34 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

10 out of 10 recommend all of these games for the gamers in your life

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video AV1jMqvf1nU Quackalope Discussion at 0:55

video_pk 86502 · mention_pk 223908

Click to watch at 0:55 · YouTube ↗

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

I want everyone to back your game. I also want no one who will not like your game to back your game.
If there's not a rule book that tells me there isn't a game.
Don't buy games for a future you're unwilling to build.
Games are work. It takes effort to prioritize the time, arrange the people coming together.
if you're going to be a hardcore Kickstarter backer you should be engaged in the campaigns you're backing.
The shortest campaign page I've probably ever seen was a slate spider sure there was almost no gameplay sure I backed it in a heartbeat because I love slave aspire
The number one way to not get your game that you spend a lot of money on is not filling out your pledge manager.
I'll never finish the. I have a calyx worth of games downstairs that I desperately want to play.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video iutNhskIy4o Quackalope Review at 1:20 sentiment: mixed

video_pk 86409 · mention_pk 223416

Click to watch at 1:20 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

mixed

Pros

Short-term alliances and negotiation are enjoyable.
Finding powerful synergies in deck building and ship customization.
Creating fun, seemingly unbalanced combinations through synergies.
The expansion 'Binding Ties' provides another currency to spend.
The expansion 'Overload' adds more cards and combinations.
The expansion 'Nomad' allows going for specific contracts your ship is built for.

Cons

The core game can feel underpowered.
Players can become isolated if others stop working with them.
The game can have an anticlimactic ending.
With expansions, it can be hard to find specific cards for a desired build if not playing with all expansions.
The expansion 'Exploration' introduces more elements requiring long-term strategy.
The expansion 'Binding Ties' and 'Exploration' add more elements requiring long-term strategy.
The expansion 'Overload' introduces upgraded base cards that might not be paid close attention to.

Thematic elements

Space pirates picking a new leader, completing contracts for prestige.
Space

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

contract fulfillment — Players work together to complete contracts to gain prestige or victory points.
Deck Building — The game involves building a deck with customizable pieces and abilities, including using 'trash cards' effectively.
Negotiation — Players negotiate and form short-term alliances to complete contracts.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

We're reviewing all of Ivy Studios games
I proposed doing a best and worst a uh unabridged Unapologetic on a bridge this I thought it was gonna be very abrasive they're slightly Abridged this is what I do like about your game okay one mechanic this is what I don't like about your game and I'm saying the same thing
So while this is review content this in itself is not sponsored uh but take everything we say with a slight grain of salt
And do you like the concept of sitting down next to a designer slash publisher and talking about the things that you like and don't like about their games
Whatever you do remember do the important thing put as many hamsters into your mouth as you can fit and then go to the movies trust me they'll enjoy the show

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video OL8VnO3vYOs The Cardboard Herald Interview at 0:33 sentiment: positive

video_pk 85235 · mention_pk 218040

Click to watch at 0:33 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Ambitious and original aesthetic
Unconventional ideas
Disruptive and bold stance
Player interaction and table talk in a deck builder

Cons

Some people dislike the unconventional ideas

Thematic elements

Comparison games

Dominion
Carcassonne
Splendor
Galaxy Trucker
Cosmic Encounter
Star Wars Rebellion

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Cooperation — Discussed in the context of potential improvements, leading to cleaner order of operations.
Deck Building — Mentioned as a game that inspired them and as an example of a common mechanic.
player interaction — Desired in a deck builder, alongside table talk.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

We've been on a pretty wild journey.
We design games for us that we like, that we want to have on our shelves, that we don't have on our shelves, and that gets us to games that we like, and luckily, I think games that at least a few other people like.
It's just like, we start a game, we develop a theme, that theme starts to speak to mechanics, and then they all get and then all of a sudden we're having ideas based on the lore that we're writing, and then we'll have a new mechanic idea, and that'll influence the lore, and it hopefully ends in a very like tight-knit product at the end that like they all speak to each other.
It's just like, you know, what do we think that we can sell? What do you think people will be interested in?
It's just like most of our time 90% of our time is just like making a good game and then it's like all right now how can we stand out in people's minds? How can we stand out in their table? How can we leave them with a lasting like memory about their their tactile experience with our games?
But then there's just like there's there's the logistics side, which is just whole other thing that is like not sexy, but like needs to get done.
But I think the board game industry is not like other industries where it's like, you know, your literal competitors are telling you how to do the thing.
Um, and so I think I think there is just a spirit of camaraderie of like we all want to make cool things and we're all trying to get put out there.
It's hard enough to make a great game like it a game that's worth making.
And so like it it's in one sense it's tough but then the other sense is like there are games that come out that are just like I I wish we made that. Why didn't we think of that?
We want to spawn these small franchises that can h that have legs that feel like they're lived in that that feel like you want to sit down and spend at 90 minutes like we're asking you to like give a movie's amount of time to one of our games.
And so we want it to feel like it's worth stepping into a world that exists and and not only that, but then like is worth being a fan of like is is worth like dreaming about and like imagining yourself win and and I know that's a lot to like put on a board game, right?

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video 2LqXj_2M-1U Our Family Plays Games Interview at 5:40 sentiment: positive

video_pk 85054 · mention_pk 217231

Click to watch at 5:40 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

The host has a great fondness for the game and its mechanics.
High production value with features like metal coins.

Cons

none

Thematic elements

none

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Deck Building — The game was initially conceived as a deck-building game where players could act on other people's turns.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

The animation studio closed a couple right at the end of the pandemic. the animation studio didn't close and we switched to focus fulltime on board game
My least favorite part is watching other people play deck building games, right? Uh, and so Zach was like, 'Dude, can we come up with a game, a deck building game where you play on other people's turns?'
And Zach was like, I worked so hard on that and now it's just gone. I don't want to make the stuff advertising what someone else is doing. I want to make the stuff that people want.
And that that was like a big change for our company, a big shift for our company.
So, the the going for high level of production is a huge risk because if you go for that high level of production and you say this is what it's going to be and you don't fund very well, you will lose your shirt because it is very expensive.
In essence, to boil down Austin's answer, it's money, Reggie.
The magical part of what unlocked this one was that you don't know what is going to score at the beginning of the game. There's nothing scoring and the players through winning bids get to decide something on the map that is now scoring points.
We have um a a end of the year campaign that is going to be a co-op deck builder.
It's gotten jumbled and we're trying to fix time. Okay.
We have three games launching at Gen Con that I want to give y'all, which are three small box games.
My one question is, why isn't every publisher willing to or able to have IV Studios high level of production? Genuinely curious. Is it a money thing or a skill thing?
Do you have any contact with other companies that run kind of like you to have some exchange of experiences?
We saw you first. You know, I kind of bumped into you at your booth at Pack Show 2021 and we talked and that's when you gave us Moon Rakers and we now have the big Moon Rakers. We love I love Moon Rakers.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video WrPjklxa21o Board Game Buzzz Discussion at 13:04 sentiment: mixed

video_pk 84998 · mention_pk 216998

Click to watch at 13:04 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

mixed

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

Totally love this game. Okay, fantastic game.
This beautiful one, Nature just got sent in. Um, beautiful, beautiful game.
I am really excited about this one because it basically cuz they have um dice throne adventures, but missions is supposedly kind of a more approachable, easy way to play dice co-op, which I'm really excited to try out.
Final Girl I would normally classify that as black but I kind of need more red
This will be available at Gen Con.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video DorSUVOYYIw Quackalope Analysis at 1:33 sentiment: positive

video_pk 83816 · mention_pk 212077

Click to watch at 1:33 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Achieved a place of pride after overcoming initial doubts
Core theme of space adventures with friends is maintained
Collaborative design process led to success

Cons

Initial version was not fun and lacked player agency
Expansion ideas involving negative player interaction were rejected as not fitting the spirit of the game

Thematic elements

Going on space adventures with friends
space

Comparison games

Luminara

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

contract fulfillment — Players complete contracts, and even if a player didn't assist, they still receive their negotiated share upon completion.
player interaction — While not encouraged, players can betray each other, which is framed as a friend betraying a friend.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

You Gotta Kill Your Darlings sometime
Games are often in an artistic expression in the same way that novels and video games and and and paintings are
it's gonna suck until it doesn't
All of our games sucked until they didn't

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video 2QnBdlDBPoM Board Game Buzzz Top 100 List at 28:36 sentiment: positive

video_pk 83419 · mention_pk 210173

Click to watch at 28:36 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

strong player interaction in drafting and negotiation
engaging space theme with solid engine-building

Cons

can be heavy for casual players

Thematic elements

deck-building and contract fulfillment in space
space-themed negotiation and contracts
dynamic negotiation and engine-building

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Deck Building — build a deck to fulfill contract goals
deck_building — build a deck to fulfill contract goals
hand_to_board_engine — activate contracts by playing cards to meet requirements

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

it's suspenseful.
Push your luck.
it's quick, it's snappy, it fills it in everything for you.
I love this mechanism now.
I love the meadow.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video 2fPvDjtBODs UndeadVikingVideos Discussion at 1:41:50

video_pk 82011 · mention_pk 205563

Click to watch at 1:41:50 · YouTube ↗

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Movies, TV shows

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

I'm not an image guy.
Oh, my God, me and I look so freaking young.
We're innovators.
I don't know how to like talk about the game without like It's It's incredibly complicated.
I don't know how to win that game.
The raw and write is really good. Which is and it's really simple.
It's a trading card game where the sizzle is more than the steak there.
Harvest now, decrypt later.
I feel like I've talked about it for a long time.
You got to watch The Blues Brothers.
He's the second coolest guy of all time.
We're only on two We've only done two slides.
This is a super super deep cut.
I don't know what the name of this thing.
This is a movie that was on HBO or Cinemax all the time when we were kids.
My favorite movie of all time.
You don't know what you're talking about, man.
There's not that many laughs.
This is a deep deep deep deep cut.
We're trying to throw our goblins cuz like tossing goblins is the only thing I could think of.
It's it's a little it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh it's a little uh

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video lS0DedxtOLw Neon Gorilla Discussion at 1:20:02 sentiment: positive

video_pk 81355 · mention_pk 201541

Click to watch at 1:20:02 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

Positive

Pros

The first video the group made was a playthrough of this game.

Cons

none

Thematic elements

none

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

We're the best channel on YouTube. You should work with us.
I don't have a good filter. I just, you know, you get excited, right?
It's it's a representation of you. That's true.
So for me, the why is 100% just spending time with my friends.
It's it's a labor of love and it's just because we love board games and we love each other.
I want the soul to still be there. I still want it to be at its heart friends just having fun and playing games.
It's it's literally the thing that I put the most effort into ever, and it gave me the least amount of return.
The incentives on this are so backwards and drive me absolutely. No, for sure.
you know, like you said, you'll you'll put a lot of effort into a video and then it won't get a lot of views.
If I had like one piece of advice, there's a lot of channels that could improve their audio.
We never see you just naturally, right? which is hilarious because Ivy Studios is probably the most concerned with production across their videos, their playthroughs, their their actual games.
Not being afraid to be told no because like that's the worst that's gonna happen is they're gonna say no.
I want them to look up is there a Grove how to play on it. That's my that's my goal.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video _zNmEtjh3Zo The Discriminating Gamer Top 10 List at 7:10 sentiment: positive

video_pk 81307 · mention_pk 201064

Click to watch at 7:10 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

none

Cons

One of the expansions was not particularly liked.

Thematic elements

Taking on jobs in space
Space

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Deck Building — Players build their decks to take actions and upgrade their ships.
Negotiation — Players must negotiate with each other to complete jobs.
Push Your Luck — Negotiations can involve rolling danger dice for potential rewards.
Set Collection — Players aim to fulfill the needs of cards by upgrading their ships.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

My number 10 is Cthulhu Dark Providence from Kaman.
My number nine is a game that mechanically and and component-wise together I just don't know that I've seen anything like this.
My number eight is a game from uh GMT Games and it's a game I actually had my game day today for my students and I actually had this game out but we didn't have enough students so we couldn't play it and I was really bummed.
My number seven is a game that is a cooperative game but it's also kind of a hidden information game.
So my number six is a game that I played um kind of late last year.
My number five is a deck building game.
My number four is a great game.
My number three is also from GMT Games and it also takes place within a few decades of Versail 1919. This is Prime Minister.
My number two happens to be my wife's favorite game of all time and it is a good one.
My number one unique game of all time.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video w_7HhaM_RAs The Dice Tower Discussion at 2:25 sentiment: positive

video_pk 81138 · mention_pk 200044

Click to watch at 2:25 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

Space Invaders the board game

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

This game rips.
I wish my wallet was full of fat stacks like this.
So, we're going to be playing this game hypothetically.
My filming assignment was to capture the essence of sadness, and I did.
Tom, I will always travel with you and not with Eric Supper.
I don't know if that man has had a single flight not get canceled.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video iHO23Ay54vg Neon Gorilla Discussion at 0:20

video_pk 80829 · mention_pk 198173

Click to watch at 0:20 · YouTube ↗

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

You made Moonrakers out of the gates?

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video S6usinbUK4Y Board Game Critique Top List at 9:03 sentiment: positive

video_pk 80591 · mention_pk 196575

Click to watch at 9:03 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Most original thing in the medium tier.
Solves the problem with both pure negotiation games (static) and pure deck builders (solo puzzle).

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Outlaw mercenary factions racing to gain prestige.
Sci-fi

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

contract fulfillment — Players pick contracts that require specific cards and quantities.
Deck Building — Players build their decks to manage contracts.
hidden objectives — Players may have hidden objectives that reward them for failed missions.
Negotiation — Players negotiate how to split rewards before cards are played.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

The best move you make in a trading game isn't on the board. It's the face you make when someone slides an offer across the table.
A trading game lives or dies on the moment the table goes quiet.
It's not about rolling dice or placing tiles, it's about reading people.
Because that moment is the game. Everything else is just the box it comes in.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video zJPLzYNnjio Rules Teach at 0:05 sentiment: positive

video_pk 72707 · mention_pk 172137

Click to watch at 0:05 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Good player interaction
Bluffing
Backstabbing
Engine building
Tactical choices
Making alliances or trickery

Cons

none

Thematic elements

controlling a band of mercenaries called Moonrakers and aiming to be the sole leader
space

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

action selection — Players have a limited number of actions per turn, and playing cards often costs an action. Cards like 'reactor' can provide more actions.
Deck Building — Players start with a basic deck, draw cards, and use them to complete contracts. The deck is improved by buying upgrades and crew members.
Engine Building — Players can buy upgrades and crew members to improve their deck and abilities, creating an 'engine' to better complete contracts.
Negotiation — Players can negotiate with each other to help complete contracts, including how rewards and hazard dice will be split. This involves potential bluffing and the risk of being betrayed.
Set Collection — Completing contracts requires meeting specific requirements, likely involving collecting certain types of cards or resources.
Take That — Implied through the potential for allies to screw over the mission leader and the need to remove contracts that others can complete easily.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

The universe only has room for one Moonraker leader.
Allies can choose to not play what they offered and screw you over or help you and get the reward negotiated.
Moonraker is a tech building game with a good play interaction bluffing backstabbing and engine building making the choice of staying at the base to regroup and using those resources to up another player instead is key to winning the game.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video wxUWkoDf9z4 Review at 0:15 sentiment: positive

video_pk 72381 · mention_pk 170638

Click to watch at 0:15 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Adds an additional element to negotiation (reputation track).
More currencies to barter with is always a positive.
The expansion flourishes what makes the base game great.
Adds additional replayability with new cards.
Makes the game better if you like the base game.
Rule book is quick and clean.
Easy to digest and very fun.
Nice game trays for component organization.
Continues the fun graphical style.
No-brainer buy for fans of the base game.

Cons

Wishes the expansion could fit into the base game box.

Thematic elements

Space exploration and mission completion

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Deck Building — It's a deck building game, you're making your ship, you're getting components for it.
Negotiation — The secret sauce of the game is the negotiating that happens at the table and how you negotiate trading prestige and coins and parts.
reputation tracking — Binding Ties adds an additional element where every player is going to have a reputation track where they keep track of their reputation with the other players at the table.
Set Collection — The ability to spend reputation to gain additional victory points for the game.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

The short pitch is it is a deck building game you're making your ship you're getting components for it but you have to do missions and missions are tough and usually you're going to have to work with your competitors you're going to have to collaborate and wheel and deal on how you want to split the loot or the bonus or the pay from whatever job you're trying to do on your turn
A lot of the game the fun the secret sauce of the game is the negotiating that happens at the table and how you negotiate trading prestige and coins and parts and all the things that you can potentially trade for their assistance on your turn
Binding ties adds an additional element to that where every player is going to have a reputation track where they keep track of their reputation with the other players at the table
More currencies to barter with is always a positive.
It becomes another layer to the beautiful negotiation and table talk that happens in a great game of Moonrakers
I really feel like this expansion just builds on and expounds on the things that I loved about the base game right like you have a great formula a great game but it really flourishes what makes it bloom and look amazing and feel amazing is when a table is negotiating and driving these hard bargains and having these wheeling and dealing arguments and discussions about how they want to split up any particular mission that's on the table and who they should take and who they shouldn't
This expansion is not insanely deep or coming up with just these amazingly new concepts but it adds a really fun feature that I think just makes the game better.
The only critique I really have is I just wish I could fit it into the base game somehow and I just can't make that happen so multiple boxes it is
Binding ties is a no-brainer buy for sure because it is going to make that game just better.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video W7fPWqdqDuw Meeple University Game Preview

video_pk 70179 · mention_pk 167081

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

none

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

All players negotiate their involvement
The fog of uncertainty clouds any agreement
The first player to reach ten prestige points will win the game
The game will appeal broadly to fans of negotiation games
Moonrakers is about to be launched on Kickstarter
this video we're showing you a prototype copy of the game so the art rules and components may not be final
Moonrakers will also come with modified rules to enable two-player mode as well as solo play

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video W7fPWqdqDuw Meeple University Game Preview at 1:07

video_pk 70179 · mention_pk 245372

Click to watch at 1:07 · YouTube ↗

Pros

Strong negotiation framework that rewards deal-making and alliance-building
Secret objectives add strategic variance and endgame surprises
Two-player and solo options provide flexible play
Clear deck-building foundation with card-driven actions

Cons

Prototype nature of the copy may not reflect final art or components
Contracts can be too large for a single player and require table-wide cooperation, which may slow play or create chaos
Fog of uncertainty can hinder reliable negotiations

Thematic elements

negotiation, contracts, and ship upgrades
galactic space setting with mercenary crews
competition through alliance-building and deals

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

contract_completion — contracts require sets of differently colored cards to complete and grant rewards (prestige, money, upgrades)
Contracts — contracts require sets of differently colored cards to complete and grant rewards (prestige, money, upgrades)
Deck Building — players hold five cards, play cards towards contracts, and draw more with yellow cards; upgrades and crew cards are purchased from supplies
deck-building — players hold five cards, play cards towards contracts, and draw more with yellow cards; upgrades and crew cards are purchased from supplies
endgame_scoring — first to reach 10 prestige points wins; ties resolved by negotiated endgame outcomes
hazard_dice — hazard icons rolled with a hazard die; some icons cannot be blocked by shields and cause prestige loss
Hidden Victory Points — secret objective cards grant bonus prestige points when completed in a specific way
money_spend_and_upgrades — money is used to purchase ship upgrades or crew cards from face-up or facedown pools
Negotiation — after selecting a contract, players negotiate how rewards and penalties are split among those involved
negotiation_and_distribution — after selecting a contract, players negotiate how rewards and penalties are split among those involved
secret_objectives — secret objective cards grant bonus prestige points when completed in a specific way
Shields — green shield cards mitigate damage during contract execution
two_player_and_solo_variants — the game includes rules for two-player and solo play modes

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

All players negotiate their involvement
The fog of uncertainty clouds any agreement
The first player to reach ten prestige points will win the game
The game will appeal broadly to fans of negotiation games
Moonrakers is about to be launched on Kickstarter
this video we're showing you a prototype copy of the game so the art rules and components may not be final
Moonrakers will also come with modified rules to enable two-player mode as well as solo play

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video D61oz5Hin3o Discussion at 0:17 sentiment: positive

video_pk 66688 · mention_pk 162483

Click to watch at 0:17 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

Space Invaders the board game

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

what is your single pick? If you're to say anyone here should pick up a game.
Oh man, it's so hard because you know, there are just so many games out there. It's really hard for me to pick a favorite board game. I don't really know what that would be.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video 7QZJG9sALDs Discussion at 0:06

video_pk 66520 · mention_pk 162094

Click to watch at 0:06 · YouTube ↗

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

the the hope for Moon rollers was to emulate some of the feelings of a heavier game, which is Moon rakers, and and feel like you're still negotiating, even though it's not a negotiation game at all, but you're like, "Hey, you have to finish that card, so that Max doesn't finish that card, or he's going to end the game, and neither of us want the game to end right now."
And there's like that that kind of thing happening around the table, and then obviously it looks like Moon rakers.
And so for that one specifically, it was like we want it to feel more like it's bigger brother than a very light small box game.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video C5Tt2-24u94 Interview at 8:10 sentiment: positive

video_pk 66525 · mention_pk 162100

Click to watch at 8:10 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

More player interaction than Dominion
Fun to design
Allows for negotiation and cooperation

Cons

Original version was not fun
Enemies had their own decks and played against you, feeling like an autotoma

Thematic elements

missions in space with friends
space

Comparison games

Dominion

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Deck Building — Originally designed with a deck builder concept, it shifted from fighting enemies to a contract system.
player interaction — Designed to have more player interaction than games like Dominion, allowing for negotiation and cooperation.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

I think that the worst thing that we could possibly do is bore you.
We're going to make a game that a lot of people don't like and that is totally fine.
It's all about the tracks. Just like it's all about the cones. It's all about the tracks.
I think that anyone can be a game designer. And so a lot of times they're flexing those muscles that they don't know they have by telling you how to fix your game.
I love fusing two things that aren't aren't usually together. That's where you find new.
The skill ceiling is pretty high, which is kind of interesting given that it is a dice game and you'd think like, wow, the the variability in the dice rolling uh would make it super variable, but no, like Toby's just better at this game and he's going to beat me pretty often.
I want to be like thinking about something the whole time, you know? I want to be doing something.
He never wants somebody to mess to mess with his plans. In your games, people mess with plans, which I love.
We're really proud of where that ended up.
So, it's like, 'Oh, I can't spend I can't spend my coins anymore because that's points. I got to hold on to those.'
It's my favorite of our designs. I love it. I'm so happy that it is delivering.
I don't want to be that guy [the quarterback]. But I can't stop myself.
The fun part is is we don't lose the collaboration because there's literally a phase at the top of everything.
It solved another issue for me too, which is I am recognize this myself. I am a quarterback co-op player and I hate that about myself.
The breakthrough in that project was how do we make it not feel just like we we pasted this over top of Moonrakers.
So, there's there's a resource that literally is you can change the color or you can change the face of any of your dice and and that is a huge strategy and a huge part of winning is manipulating your dice at the right time and saving them for the right moments.
The skill ceiling is pretty high, which is kind of interesting given that it is a dice game...

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video C5Tt2-24u94 Interview at 1:39:29

video_pk 66525 · mention_pk 162117

Click to watch at 1:39:29 · YouTube ↗

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

none

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Deck Building — Core mechanic.
Semi-Cooperative — Has elements of cooperation.
table interaction — Implied through discussion of allying and player actions.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

I think that the worst thing that we could possibly do is bore you.
We're going to make a game that a lot of people don't like and that is totally fine.
It's all about the tracks. Just like it's all about the cones. It's all about the tracks.
I think that anyone can be a game designer. And so a lot of times they're flexing those muscles that they don't know they have by telling you how to fix your game.
I love fusing two things that aren't aren't usually together. That's where you find new.
The skill ceiling is pretty high, which is kind of interesting given that it is a dice game and you'd think like, wow, the the variability in the dice rolling uh would make it super variable, but no, like Toby's just better at this game and he's going to beat me pretty often.
I want to be like thinking about something the whole time, you know? I want to be doing something.
He never wants somebody to mess to mess with his plans. In your games, people mess with plans, which I love.
We're really proud of where that ended up.
So, it's like, 'Oh, I can't spend I can't spend my coins anymore because that's points. I got to hold on to those.'
It's my favorite of our designs. I love it. I'm so happy that it is delivering.
I don't want to be that guy [the quarterback]. But I can't stop myself.
The fun part is is we don't lose the collaboration because there's literally a phase at the top of everything.
It solved another issue for me too, which is I am recognize this myself. I am a quarterback co-op player and I hate that about myself.
The breakthrough in that project was how do we make it not feel just like we we pasted this over top of Moonrakers.
So, there's there's a resource that literally is you can change the color or you can change the face of any of your dice and and that is a huge strategy and a huge part of winning is manipulating your dice at the right time and saving them for the right moments.
The skill ceiling is pretty high, which is kind of interesting given that it is a dice game...

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video M3T-gjnmkqg All You Can Board Discussion at 6:46 sentiment: mixed

video_pk 66233 · mention_pk 161086

Click to watch at 6:46 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

mixed

Pros

strong negotiation mechanic
interesting tension and multiple strategic levers

Cons

lengthy for a session; can drag
risk of grind near end due to trading dynamics

Thematic elements

Comparison games

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Deck Building — negotiation around contract cards; ship parts and crew to enhance deck-building and scoring
deck-building — negotiation around contract cards; ship parts and crew to enhance deck-building and scoring
Negotiation — players negotiate around who gets points and cards, with rewards negotiable
negotiation / alliance-drafting — players negotiate around who gets points and cards, with rewards negotiable

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

I really liked it first of all I had a really good time with the White Castle
I was blown away by Scout
Earth is my favorite out of all four of those games so far
it's pure Mayhem

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video _-JDaHvM174 The Board Game Garden Discussion at 14:51 sentiment: positive

video_pk 41718 · mention_pk 126407

Click to watch at 14:51 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

engaging negotiation core
expansions add depth and content
solo mode available

Cons

negotiation learning curve can be challenging for new players

Thematic elements

negotiation-driven contract fulfillment
Sci-fi negotiation and outreach in a shared universe
space opera with collaborative goals

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Card Drafting — Draft and play cards to execute actions and effects
card drafting / hand management — Draft and play cards to execute actions and effects
Cooperative Game — Players cooperate to achieve contracts while competing for resources
Cooperative with competition — Players cooperate to achieve contracts while competing for resources
Negotiation — Players negotiate to complete missions and contracts

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

I am indecisive and cannot pick favorites.
I can't get enough of this game.
Negotiation is definitely not as bad as I thought it was.
Cascadia is one of my favorite games this year.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video WX9EACaSWR0 Jenna's Cozy Corner Discussion at 5:56 sentiment: positive

video_pk 36959 · mention_pk 110946

Click to watch at 5:56 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Engaging negotiation dynamics
Strong visual presentation and components
Fits well with a social-muntime group

Cons

Steep learning curve for new players
Long playtime can be punishing in some sessions

Thematic elements

Negotiation-driven quest completion and factional interplay
Futuristic space opera with corporate factions
Competitive, with escalating objectives and player-driven deals

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Deck Building — Players acquire and manage cards to execute actions and meet quest requirements.
deck-building — Players acquire and manage cards to execute actions and meet quest requirements.
Negotiation — Players bargain and trade resources or terms to advance quests and scoring.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

I actually really enjoyed Moonrakers.
I did not enjoy Steam Up very much.
I really really enjoyed Haven.
Dale of merchants has been on the Shelf of opportunity for a while.
Dwellings of Elder Vale I freaking love.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video Xil_Hhm-YXg Meeple Mountain Review at 0:14 sentiment: positive

video_pk 36731 · mention_pk 110262

Click to watch at 0:14 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Accessible and easy to teach, enabling quick onboarding for players of various experience levels.
A rich, emergent depth that comes from negotiation, betrayal, and strategic alliances rather than heavy rulebooks.
Excellent table presence with a thematic, sci-fi aesthetic that makes components feel meaningful and upgrades feel impactful.
Short-to-middling playtime (roughly 45 minutes to an hour) that scales well with player count, keeping sessions lively.
Distinct asymmetry created by varied crew and ship components that alter play patterns and open multiple viable strategies.
The endgame tension created by secret objectives adds a persistent layer of strategic diversification, encouraging players to shift focus mid-game.

Cons

The social deduction and negotiation aspects require a table of players who enjoy bluffing and strategic deception; groups who prefer straightforward, transparent play may find this less appealing.
Negotiation can sometimes stall the game, especially with large groups or players who over-negotiate, leading to long downtimes between decisive actions.
While rules are accessible, the depth is ultimately driven by player interaction; those seeking dense mechanistic complexity may find it lighter in that regard.
The treacherous element—betrayal and backstabbing—can alienate players who value consistent cooperation or fair play, potentially limiting its audience to certain groups.

Thematic elements

The core thematic concept centers on competitive ambition, diplomacy, and deception within a dynamic factional landscape. Players seek prestige by completing contracts and achieving secret objectives, all while negotiating with and sometimes betraying captains around the table to maximize their own standing. The game leverages an atmosphere of treachery, negotiation, and risk management as central experiences.
In a sprawling, near-future space opera, a faction called the Moonrakers is made up of fragmented groups and splintered factions vying for leadership, influence, and prestige within a galactic market. The setting blends high-tech ship design with political maneuvering, corporate intrigue, and a volatile alliance ecosystem where trust is scarce and every contract could shift the balance of power.
Procedural and outcome-driven, Moonrakers emphasizes tactical decision-making and social interaction rather than a fixed linear story. The narrative emerges from players’ choices around contracts, alliances, and the tactical use of crew, ship parts, and hazard mitigation. The storytelling is emergent, shaped by negotiation dynamics, hidden objectives, and the evolving table politics.

Comparison games

Secret Hitler
Werewolf

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

contract-driven scoring — Contracts provide the bulk of the action economy and scoring in Moonrakers. They are color-coded by type (orange kill contracts, blue exploration, green rescue, and gold delivery) and come with specific card requirements and hazard costs. Completing contracts yields prestige and credits, with rewards sometimes including bonus cards that can further enhance a player’s deck. Some contracts are so demanding that they virtually require or strongly incentivize partnering with other players to accomplish them.
crew and ship components — Crew cards and ship components form the engine that drives deck customization and in-game power. Crew cards provide bespoke actions when played, including trashing unwanted cards to sculpt the deck, or generating credits and actions. Ship components slot onto a player’s ship and grant powerful activated abilities; each piece has prerequisites and costs, and players can own up to four active components at a time. The choices around which components to install, when to upgrade, and how to configure the ship for anticipated contracts are central to optimizing performance.
Deck Building — Moonrakers begins with each player possessing a basic starting deck. Throughout the game, players draw five cards each turn and can acquire new action cards, crew, and ship components to upgrade their deck. Cards come in five primary types (misses, reactors, thrusters, damage, shields) plus crew cards with unique abilities. The core loop encourages balancing short-term card plays with long-term deck upgrades, as better cards enable meeting more demanding contract requirements and unlocking stronger components.
deck-building — Moonrakers begins with each player possessing a basic starting deck. Throughout the game, players draw five cards each turn and can acquire new action cards, crew, and ship components to upgrade their deck. Cards come in five primary types (misses, reactors, thrusters, damage, shields) plus crew cards with unique abilities. The core loop encourages balancing short-term card plays with long-term deck upgrades, as better cards enable meeting more demanding contract requirements and unlocking stronger components.
Hazard dice and risk management — Hazard dice introduce a probabilistic element to missions. The level of the contract dictates how many hazard dice must be rolled, and the result can cause prestige loss if hazards are not blocked by shields. Shields, then, serve as a critical resource to mitigate risk. The negotiation over who bears risk, how hazards are split, and which shields are allocated becomes another strategic axis at the table.
hidden objectives — In addition to visible contracts, players have secret objectives that contribute to endgame scoring. These objectives add depth and strategic uncertainty, as players must balance pursuing contractual prestige with pursuing personal goals that may require withholding or misdirecting information. The tension between short-term gains and meeting a concealed win condition contributes to the game’s replayability.
Negotiation — A central pillar of Moonrakers is table negotiation. Players continually propose and counter offers to cooperate on contracts. Allies can help fulfill requirements, share rewards, or enable access to powerful cards from another player’s hand. Alliances are not guaranteed and can be fragile: allies may decide to withhold help, demand favorable terms, or pivot to another deal if it better serves their own interests. The negotiation phase drives the pacing of the game and creates dramatic swings in advantage.
Negotiation and alliances — A central pillar of Moonrakers is table negotiation. Players continually propose and counter offers to cooperate on contracts. Allies can help fulfill requirements, share rewards, or enable access to powerful cards from another player’s hand. Alliances are not guaranteed and can be fragile: allies may decide to withhold help, demand favorable terms, or pivot to another deal if it better serves their own interests. The negotiation phase drives the pacing of the game and creates dramatic swings in advantage.
Risk Management — Hazard dice introduce a probabilistic element to missions. The level of the contract dictates how many hazard dice must be rolled, and the result can cause prestige loss if hazards are not blocked by shields. Shields, then, serve as a critical resource to mitigate risk. The negotiation over who bears risk, how hazards are split, and which shields are allocated becomes another strategic axis at the table.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

Moonrakers is a competitive victory point collection game
Moonrakers is composed of players building up their ship through various components that will upgrade how they play
I'm a sucker for deck builders
the treachery and the backstabbiness is actually really engaging
if you're into those types of games if you like deck builders then moonrakers is an easy insta buy for you
Moonrakers is accessible
I think it pops on the table and it's really really fun
with the right group this game is a treasure and a blast to play

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video TLi_Q5bDoZw Board Gaming Ramblings Discussion at 0:23 sentiment: mixed

video_pk 32105 · mention_pk 94776

Click to watch at 0:23 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

mixed

Pros

Beautiful art and components
Interesting concept blending deck-building with negotiation
Deluxe insert and well-presented components
Whimsical ship crew and card artwork

Cons

Long playtime around 2 hours
Slow pacing with limited meaningful decisions
Too much randomness and weak interaction for some groups
Two-player games not ideal

Thematic elements

Negotiation plus deck-building; faction-driven resource management
Space opera with corporate factions and starship contracts
Euro-style mechanics with thematic space work

Comparison games

Cosmic Encounter

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

contract fulfillment — Complete contracts by contributing cards and coordinating with others
Contracts — Complete contracts by contributing cards and coordinating with others
Deck Building — Acquire crew and ship upgrade cards to improve your deck
deck-building — Acquire crew and ship upgrade cards to improve your deck
Engine Building — Upgrade ship parts to gain unique abilities and synergies
Engine-building / ship upgrades — Upgrade ship parts to gain unique abilities and synergies
hazard dice — Roll hazard dice that may impose penalties or alter momentum
Negotiation — Negotiate contracts, share or withhold resources and points

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

the biggest problem is that it feels like a slog
it's so long two hours
there's nothing that drags me into it
I would not recommend this as a deck builder to anyone
the cards you have in your hand is what you're going to score at the end of the game
it's very fast
it's not very deep, super simple to teach
the cards are really nice and colorful

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video NOU-ERNNNdg The Board Game Garden Top List at 9:57 sentiment: positive

video_pk 27918 · mention_pk 148625

Click to watch at 9:57 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

strong balance between interactive negotiation and euro mechanics
expansions add variety and depth

Cons

negotiation can be lengthy or heavy for some groups

Thematic elements

deck-building with negotiation and economy
spacefaring / negotiation-focused
interactive, negotiation-forward Euro with thematic flair

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Deck Building — build a deck to optimize actions and combos
deck-building — build a deck to optimize actions and combos
Negotiation — players negotiate trades/alliances to fulfill missions
Tableau Building — use cards to create a layered action economy

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

"Miabi is one of my favorite polyomino games it is number 70 here on the list"
"Seas of strife is absolutely fantastic it is such a fun game"
"Merchants Cove I do think that if I played this one more it actually can play solo as well"
"The Search for Planet X is my number 65"
"Parks is my number 62"
"Boku is my number 61"

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video mrmyW9PMW5s Heavy Cardboard Discussion at 55:56

video_pk 13160 · mention_pk 38489

Click to watch at 55:56 · YouTube ↗

Pros

none

Cons

none

Thematic elements

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Mechanics unknown.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

I'm vocalizing what's going on in my head.
Gen Con is not a convention that I ever foresee myself going back to.
This is going to be a very long stream if I'm going to take this much time going through each of these.
We are going to do a BG auction cuz I imagine everybody that watches this is on BGG.
The designer is going to send it to you. He's going to pay the shipping and y'all are going to pay us and we get to keep the money.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video Opyn7B4Xfcs Board Game Spotlight Discussion at 11:11 sentiment: positive

video_pk 12805 · mention_pk 37365

Click to watch at 11:11 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

engaging deck-building and negotiation loop
strong core mechanic with expansions that increase cooperation
high replayability with evolving alliances

Cons

potentially long discussions/negotiation
rules complexity can overwhelm new players

Thematic elements

corporate espionage, faction negotiation
space-faction intrigue in a sci-fi galaxy
story-driven negotiation with deck interaction

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

deck-building — build a personal engine by drafting and playing cards
Negotiation — form alliances, barter, and influence others to achieve goals
world/spaceship faction interaction — players operate within rival factions and complete co-op/competitive tasks

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

it's the easiest thing in the world i should just get better at my job
"the storyteller's job isn't for either side to wins almost like a dm in a dnd session; their goal is to make for an epic conclusion"
i'm elbow deep in bloodstone tidal blades 2 banner festival
you're basically space Uber or space lift
cash grab means that you put no or little effort into a product and then you over price it

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video 4X2sQYDig5w Board Game Spotlight Playthrough at 0:00 sentiment: positive

video_pk 11791 · mention_pk 34570

Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Expansions introduce meaningful incentives to cooperate rather than soloing
New contracts (head-to-head and flex contracts) add varied strategic options
Binding Ties board and reputation mechanics add tangible, flexible reward systems
Aesthetic and component design with bold, retro-futuristic art
Solo and cooperative possibilities supported by upcoming Kickstarter content

Cons

Expansion complexity can increase the learning curve
Negotiation-heavy play can feel chaotic in larger player counts without clear orchestration
Rules references for some new symbols require checking the rulebook occasionally

Thematic elements

Interstellar piloting, faction politics, and reputation-driven cooperation versus competition
Spacefaring corporate setting with negotiation and contracts aboard a space-themed environment
Competitive negotiation with asymmetric contract types and escalating diplomacy

Comparison games

Foundations of Rome
Sorrow (as a reference for thematic discussion)

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

deck-building — Players acquire and assemble ship parts, crew, and action cards to optimize their engine and options.
hand-management — Players manage a hand of action cards and resources, sequencing plays to maximize actions and effects.
Negotiation — Contracts are negotiated between players with reputation and faction mechanics influencing outcomes and rewards.
resource-management — Credits, faction reputation, shields, and other resources are spent to complete contracts and upgrade ships.
set-collection / engine-building elements — Acquiring specific card types and ship parts enables ongoing combinations and boosts through the game.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

this expansion takes away you can still play solo if you want to and try to complete contracts on your own
the aesthetic of it like the colors... it's got a very unique color scheme to it which really helps it stand like an 80s type
i drew my whole deck in one turn... this is insane
the cool part is that you can pay any amount of symbols to accomplish a flex contract
this deck is one of my favorite deck builders because all of these crew members are just crazy fun

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video _zTBevjBYEo Beyond Solitaire Interview at 57:19 sentiment: neutral

video_pk 11489 · mention_pk 33802

Click to watch at 57:19 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

neutral

Pros

engaging combat mechanics
varied strategic paths

Cons

complex for newcomers

Thematic elements

space-adventure with competitive drafting
galactic exploration with deck-building twists
tabletop narrative through play

Comparison games

Star Realms
Dune: Imperium

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

deck-building with asymmetric elements — Players build decks to optimize actions and combat outcomes.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

Nostalgia doesn't sell the game. Nostalgia will capture your heart and interest, but we sell the game based on the merits of the game as a modern product in today's market.
Every game deserves another turn.
Transparency and connecting with our fan base is one of our core values.
Awareness is the number one barrier.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video 5_NxlO4dB0o No Rolls Barred Playthrough at 0:00 sentiment: positive

video_pk 10693 · mention_pk 31571

Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Engaging deck-building arc with a tangible sense of power growth
Rich, interactive negotiation that drives memorable micro-drama
Gorgeous production and ship/board components
Strong sense of tension and payoff as contracts resolve

Cons

Can be long and chaotic due to heavy negotiation
Reliance on luck with hazard dice and draws, which can swing outcomes
Alliances can feel brittle or opportunistic, leading to misgivings among players

Thematic elements

Negotiation, alliance-building, and deck-based progression
Spacefaring factional conflict with ship upgrades and contracts
Competitive, player-driven negotiation within a deck-building engine

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Action tree / multi-card resolution — On each contract, players lay out a tree of card plays to fulfill contract requirements.
contract-based objectives — Contracts specify required card types and actions; success yields prestige and money, failure punishes points.
Contracts — Contracts specify required card types and actions; success yields prestige and money, failure punishes points.
Deck Building — Players build and upgrade their deck of ships, crew, and equipment to fulfill contracts.
deck-building — Players build and upgrade their deck of ships, crew, and equipment to fulfill contracts.
Hazard dice risk management — Contracts come with hazard dice; players must shield or mitigate against hazards to avoid penalties.
Negotiation — Players bargain and form temporary alliances to complete contracts and maximize rewards.
negotiation / alliances — Players bargain and form temporary alliances to complete contracts and maximize rewards.
Resource and point economy — Money and prestige are earned to upgrade ships and win the race to 10 prestige points.
Risk Management — Contracts come with hazard dice; players must shield or mitigate against hazards to avoid penalties.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

it's a deck building negotiation game
Moonrakers is part of negotiation part Deck Builder and all
I love the Arc of a deck building game, it's absolutely tremendous
Moonrakers and deck builders in general is you start the game feeling like tiny like an insignificant little fish

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video ZIrGCfvxekY The Broken Meeple Analysis at 3:00 sentiment: positive

video_pk 9799 · mention_pk 28897

Click to watch at 3:00 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Excellent deck building and negotiation mechanics
High player interaction
Engaging expansions with reputation track
Colorful and spacey artwork
Well-received by other creators
1-2 hours playtime adequate for mid-weight game
Solo play option available
Can be played with 1-2 players

Cons

Very expensive total cost approximately 200 pounds
Shipping and VAT add additional cost
High price for mainly a card game
Components beyond cards are limited

Thematic elements

Space-based trading and negotiation
Space - mining and negotiation
Co-operative mission gameplay

Comparison games

Sushi Go Party
Stephen Wonders

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Deck Building — Core mechanic allowing players to build their decks
Mission system — Players undertake missions and projects requiring specific colored cards
Negotiation — Players negotiate with others to help on missions in exchange for points and credits
reputation track — New expansion mechanic tracking player reputation and faction interactions

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

the whole concept of it is like the well as titled with the series the fear of missing out which is oh this is a really cool game oh i should totally buy it
i don't want to generate artificial hype for kickstarters and that because the whole concept of it is like the well as titled with the series the fear of missing out
at 200 pound this just seems very very pricey and i'm curious as to what is generating that money
i really enjoyed this i got into the theme i that i thought it was very thematic i thought it was well produced it was a great little puzzle
i'm tempted to back this and but yeah i mean that's 200 bucks i'm not even including add-ons
but to know that i've gotta find a second player which is not easy because i live alone that's the problem
it's only a game whether it's retail or kickstarter expensive or cheap take care bye for now

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video hVyViVvSOA4 Board Game Spotlight Discussion at 32:16 sentiment: positive

video_pk 9483 · mention_pk 28048

Click to watch at 32:16 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

dynamic negotiation at multiple player turns
cards are powerful and meaningful

Cons

learning curve on optimal buys
cutthroat interaction may not suit all players

Thematic elements

corporate intrigue and contract contracts in space
space‑themed deck building with negotiation
glossy sci‑fi with high‑theory negotiations

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

deck-building — players acquire cards to improve their deck and engine.
Negotiation — players negotiate to trade resources and favors for contracts.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

it's a really neat blend of deck building and negotiation
Veiled Fate is a social deduction game that i end up loving as well
Arc Nova is a heavy game
it's gorgeous, the pagoda is integrated into the game
Cascadia is the perfect kind of game for me to introduce to my son

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video NBkGiZXxd4M Good Time Society Playthrough at 0:10 sentiment: positive

video_pk 4830 · mention_pk 14192

Click to watch at 0:10 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Interesting expansion mechanics
Strategic deck-building
Varied contract options
Interactive player interactions

Cons

Complex rule set
Requires careful strategy

Thematic elements

Space bounty hunting
Space
Competitive deck-building

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Action Management — Limited actions per turn, with ways to gain additional actions
contract fulfillment — Players complete various space-themed contracts
Contracts — Players complete various space-themed contracts
Deck Building — Players build and improve their deck of cards throughout the game

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

You're a professional winner
Teamwork makes the dream work
All war all the time

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video wlfWy-OzmFc Might I Suggest A Game Top List at 1:05 sentiment: positive

video_pk 4125 · mention_pk 12075

Click to watch at 1:05 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

high player interaction
thematic sci-fi flavor
dense strategic choices

Cons

can be confrontational
ramped play may be long for newcomers

Thematic elements

deck-building with high player interaction
Sci-fi corporate intrigue in a competitive galaxy
competitive negotiation with asymmetric powers

Comparison games

Canvas

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

area control / hand-attack interaction — players influence opponents’ positions and objectives through actions
deck-building — players draft and play from a deck to gain resources and abilities

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

Canvas is a really cool hand management set collection game with these really awesome transparent painting type cards that you layer on top of one another to score points
the art is just absolutely amazing
Wingspan continues to be one of my favorite games of all time
this game is perfect for anyone who's interested in escape rooms or ciphers and puzzles
it's really easy to get to the table which is one of the reasons why we played it so often

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video -TytZ4mhilE 3 Minute Board Games Review at 0:11 sentiment: positive

video_pk 3812 · mention_pk 11222

Click to watch at 0:11 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Engaging negotiation adds depth beyond traditional deck-builders
Stylish art and unique ship/crew customization
Solo play option and expansions (Overload, Open Missions) enhance content
Banter-friendly group play with good synergy

Cons

One nagging player can derail the experience if not managed
Time can bloat due to prolonged negotiations
End-game can be anticlimactic if deals stall
Expansions may feel like cut content relative to core game

Thematic elements

deck-building and negotiation-driven missions to gain Prestige
Mercenary space captains negotiating and completing contracts in a sci-fi space setting
mercenary-for-hire space opera with player alliances and deals

Comparison games

Dominion
Starship Captains

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

Action economy via reactor/crew cards — Actions come from playing reactor cards to gain more actions.
Deck Building — Start with a basic set of cards and add more throughout the game.
Hazard dice risk management — Hazard dice introduce risk with potential hits and prestige loss.
Mission-based objectives — Complete missions with color-coded icons, hazards, and resource requirements.
Negotiation — Players negotiate deals, trade points/credits for rewards and to manage hazards.
Risk Management — Hazard dice introduce risk with potential hits and prestige loss.

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

Moonrakers takes the fun of a basic Dominion style Deck Builder and gives it an entire new code of paint by turning the core gameplay into negotiation
The best thing about this game is building ships out in different roles I love being a helper that makes every Mission smoother
Moonrakers, with overload it's a gold medal game

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video dN0qa2iQkrU Our Family Plays Games Discussion at 1:12 sentiment: positive

video_pk 3491 · mention_pk 10347

Click to watch at 1:12 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

Deep, interactive negotiation and alliance dynamics
Engaging deck-building core
Strong thematic immersion and art
High replayability with multiple alliances and objectives

Cons

Can be harsh and competitive; not co-op
Complex for new players
Requires 3-5 players for ideal experience

Thematic elements

Corporate negotiation, alliance, betrayal and deck-building
Space moon base with competing factions seeking to become leader by completing contracts
Competitive, player-driven power struggle with backstabbing and alliance-building

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

contract-based objectives — Complete contracts to gain prestige and credits
deck-building — Build and optimize action decks to fulfill contracts
Negotiation and alliances — Alliances allow combined actions and rewards, with potential backstabbing
Resource Management — Gain credits and reputation to upgrade ships and crew
upgrade engine-building — Upgrade ships and hire crew to improve capabilities

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

is a deck building game in which players
it's a deck building game
it's a cool deck builder
this ain't no co-op no no it's there's no code wow
it's very competitive
you want to negotiate
the art is really cool and the production value
the binding ties really binds you to really make you allies
they encourage you to really ally
you want to ally with people to try to help you meet your objectives

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Video GQTTk53Ow8M Our Family Plays Games Discussion at 16:09 sentiment: positive

video_pk 2965 · mention_pk 8648

Click to watch at 16:09 · YouTube ↗

Overall sentiment (raw)

positive

Pros

rich components
solid core mechanics

Cons

none

Thematic elements

deck-building, mission-based space conflicts
spacefaring factions vying for control
semi-cooperative with competitive edges

Comparison games

none

Mechanics (from transcript analysis)

deck-building — assemble a deck to perform actions and gain power
engine-building — progressively improve capabilities through cards

Video topics + discussion points

No key topics recorded for this video.

Quotes (from this video)

We love you and we will always love you.
these are games your family will enjoy.
I love Unmatched.

References (from this video)

No references stored for this video.

Moonrakers

Board Game Designer Rates His Own Games from WORST to BEST!

Moonrakers Board Game Preview

Moonrakers Titan: Nomad & Overload Expansions Playthrough | Gameplay'd with Becca, Ruel, Amy, Shea

Moonrakers

Board Game Designer Rates His Own Games from WORST to BEST!

Moonrakers Board Game Preview

Moonrakers Titan: Nomad & Overload Expansions Playthrough | Gameplay'd with Becca, Ruel, Amy, Shea

Welcome Friend

Create a New Guild