/pic1707205.jpg)
Collection Status
Your Rating
Description
Pixel Tactics is a head-to-head game of tactical combat for two players. Each player has an identical deck of 25 cards, from which they draft a leader. The leader's abilities alter vastly the strategy and playability of every other card in the deck, making the game playable in 25 different ways.
In the game, players take turns placing cards and attacking. Each card can activate in various ways, taking on offensive capabilities in the front rows of the unit, or support powers in the back rows. Cards can also be played as orders – powerful single-time effects that can turn the tide of battle.
Play continues until either player's leader is defeated. A typical game is best of three or five rounds.
Pixel Tactics takes place in the same world and uses many of the characters from Level 99 Games' BattleCON: War of Indines, but its game play is entirely unrelated.
Year Published
2012
Featured Videos
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 3
This page: 3
Sentiment:
pos 3 ·
mix 0 ·
neu 0 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–3 of 3
Video Og0A_96L2O0
Unknown Channel general_discussion at 0:03 sentiment: positive
video_pk 60852 · mention_pk 153288
Click to watch at 0:03 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Compact playtime (~30 minutes) fits two-player sessions well
- Strong tactical depth with layered mechanics (leaders, heroes, spells, orders)
- Intercept provides meaningful defense and positioning choices
- Corpse/space management adds strategic weeding of the board
- Clarified rules and playthrough examples help new players grasp core concepts
Cons
- Potentially high complexity for newcomers to grasp all interactions
- Corpse management can clutter the board and slow pace in longer sessions
- Numerous mechanics require careful reading and reference during play
Thematic elements
- Array
- Fantasy world
- Competitive tactical dueling
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Action economy — Each wave provides a limited number of actions (two per player per wave), with options to draw, recruit, move, etc.
- card drafting — Draft a leader from your hand at the start of play to determine your initial setup and abilities.
- Corpses / corpse management — Defeated heroes become corpses that occupy slots unless discarded, requiring tactical clearance for space.
- Deck/hand management — Players draw and manage a hand of cards, with a hard limit of five cards in hand.
- Grid-based combat / unit placement — Players place heroes into a 3x3 unit grid, with row-based positioning affecting abilities and play.
- Hidden Information — Some actions or cards (orders) are revealed only when played, creating hidden information dynamics.
- Intercept — Certain heroes have the intercept keyword to block attacks aimed at the leader.
- Orders and spells — Orders are played from hand to grant effects; spells are cast from units depending on their position.
- Ranged vs melee targeting — Attacks have range or melee defaults; positioning and intercept influence which targets can be attacked.
- Wave-based battlefield — The game uses waves ( Vanguard, Flank, Rear ) to structure turns and where actions occur.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Pixel Tactics... it's tactical.
- This is a two-player game.
- Heroes in this unit have intercept.
- intercept means it will block a melee or range attack that's going to target your leader.
- This knight will protect my Kadaf, my leader, because it has intercept.
- clear a corpse says discard a corpse in your unit.
- you only have up to five cards in your hand.
- I think it's it's basically an enhanced version of this game.
- Pixel Tactics. It's tactical.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video rS33UDwYvWo
Danielle playthrough at 0:04 sentiment: positive
video_pk 60851 · mention_pk 153287
Click to watch at 0:04 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Strategic depth from leader abilities and intercept mechanics
- Two-player setup with distinct color decks adds variety
- Clear, tactile combat using a grid and varied attack types
- Open discussion of rules demonstrates willingness to learn and adapt
Cons
- Rules are complex and prone to misinterpretation during playthrough
- Occasional production-side issues (camera shake) noted
- Need to frequently verify rule interactions indicates a learning curve
Thematic elements
- Array
- Fantasy
- live_lets_play
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Area Control — Each unit is placed on a 3x3 grid around the leader, affecting melee and ranged interactions.
- asymmetric player powers — Each leader provides unique stats and a special ability that influences play.
- card drafting — Players select a leader from a starting hand of five cards, shaping the initial setup.
- Casualties and End-of-Wave Resolution — Casualties are checked at the end of each wave; heroes with damage equal to or exceeding life are defeated.
- Damage tracking — Damage on leaders and heroes is tracked (in this playthrough) with dice tokens.
- draw and hand management — Players draw cards to start and manage hand size, with a maximum hand size of five.
- Grid-based Area Control — Each unit is placed on a 3x3 grid around the leader, affecting melee and ranged interactions.
- hand management — Players draw cards to start and manage hand size, with a maximum hand size of five.
- Intercept / Defensive Interactions — Some heroes have intercept to reduce incoming damage and influence target selection.
- Leader Abilities / Asymmetric Powers — Each leader provides unique stats and a special ability that influences play.
- Spells and Wave-based restrictions — Spells are cast as actions and, after corrections during play, are restricted to the current wave rather than any wave.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I will be using kind of the pinkish red deck and then Alex here will be using the blue deck
- This is a two-player game
- My heroes and leader take one less damage from attacks
- Spells can be used from any wave
- We check casualties after we each take actions
- You actually can only use spells that are in the current wave
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video EIiUSBj15xE
Jungles Games general_discussion at 31:51 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5382 · mention_pk 16010
Click to watch at 31:51 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Thinky, multi-use cards
- Compact engagement
Cons
- Not as expansive as larger titles
Thematic elements
- Duels with multi-use cards
- One-vs-one tactical duel game
- Thinky / card-driven
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- dueling mini-game — Two-player tactical skirmish using cards
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- it's a euro style game that plays up to six
- it's fully simultaneous
- Concordia Venus ... brings in team play and that lets you play two on two which is a four player game and it also lets you play two versus two which is a six player game
- not a euro game really it's more of a deduction style game where it's one versus many
- I started to work on that video and I'm hoping to make it happen
- Miniatures don't do anything for me
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–3 of 3