/pic6669791.png)
Collection Status
Your Rating
Description
Space Station Phoenix is a worker-placement and resource management game set in one of Earth’s possible futures. The players are representatives of the Galactic Council, sent to Earth to build space stations to observe and perhaps interact with humanity.
Players begin the game with nine ships and a station hub. These ships act as action spaces that players use to gather resources, explore the nearby planets, and build their stations. Turns are fast and straightforward; either take ship action or take income.
Many games start players off with a small resource engine which they build up to a bigger one. In Space Station Phoenix, players start with the best production engine they will ever have and proceed to break it down part by part. As the game progresses, their actions get more efficient, but the number of ways to take those actions starts to diminish.
Space Station Phoenix also features deep re-playability with millions of possible starting positions and station parts combinations.
—description from the publisher
Year Published
2022
Featured Videos
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 3
This page: 3
Sentiment:
pos 3 ·
mix 0 ·
neu 0 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–3 of 3
Video BywFtiWazw8
Allies or Enemies game_review at 0:04 sentiment: positive
video_pk 61152 · mention_pk 153694
Click to watch at 0:04 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Extreme variability thanks to 24 hubs and 72 sectors, yielding many distinct setups and end-game goals.
- Clear iconography and usable components; cards and station pieces are sturdy and legible at the table.
- Solid integration of engine-building with dexterous diplomacy and action-card interaction.
- Smooth overall run with a focus on puzzle-like decisions rather than overly abstract mechanics.
- Good fit for mid-weight Euro players who enjoy planning and long-term strategy with some interaction.
Cons
- Not particularly beginner-friendly; can be daunting for new gamers or players who struggle with balancing short-term moves against long-term planning.
- Some thematic visuals (alien shapes and sector colors) could be more distinct to avoid setup/readability confusion.
- Pace and feel can vary significantly with player count, which may frustrate groups seeking a consistently fast or consistently slow rhythm.
Thematic elements
- engine-building, resource management, diplomacy, and fleet/space station construction within a competitive multi-actor environment.
- A competitive space-era scenario focused on constructing and optimizing a modular space station, amid ship-teardown and resource competition.
- mechanics-first Euro with light thematic flavor; puzzle-driven planning rather than cinematic storytelling.
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Card interaction and theft — Action cards on shuttle cards can be played by paying their costs; players can dismantle or steal opponents' actions, creating dynamic counterplay.
- Crystal payment and card-specific costs — Actions are paid with crystals; if paying for your own card you pay the higher cost, and if paying for an opponent's card you pay both the higher cost to the card and the lower cost to the owner as a tax.
- Diplomacy tracks and bonuses — A diplomacy board provides tracks where leading moves yield bonuses (gems, points, resources) whenever others perform certain actions.
- end game bonuses — The game ends when a player passes 40 points, finishes their space station, or there are four or fewer aliens remaining.
- end-game triggers — The game ends when a player passes 40 points, finishes their space station, or there are four or fewer aliens remaining.
- Engine-building via ship cards and station components — Players draft and/or acquire ship cards and space station parts to assemble and upgrade their hub; destroying action cards yields metal to fund building.
- High variability (hubs, sectors, and ship cards) — The game ships with 24 hubs and 72 sectors across colors, creating a wide matrix of setups and goals that shift each game.
- Resource management — Gaining resources via cards or dice and using them to recruit alien residents to the station, with diplomacy track progress providing bonuses.
- Resource management and aliens — Gaining resources via cards or dice and using them to recruit alien residents to the station, with diplomacy track progress providing bonuses.
- Turn structure: action vs income — On each turn players choose either take an action (build, gain resources, manipulate cards) or take income to refresh resources and reset card options.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Space Station Phoenix is very much a Euro game the theme is there and you will feel it to an extent but for the most part this is mechanics first which is not at all a knock it just means the sort of players that are gonna most enjoy this game will be those that like solving those Euro puzzles rather than those that want a real space themed experience as far as that puzzle goes.
- Space Station Phoenix certainly gives you a lot of stuff in the box and for the most part it is pretty good.
- The game ends when someone is either past 40 points or finished their space station or there are four or fewer aliens remaining.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 5QRR3ANR0TY
Allies or Enemies top_22_list at 15:03 sentiment: positive
video_pk 61145 · mention_pk 153669
Click to watch at 15:03 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- rich engine-building feel
- opponent's cards can be used to disrupt others
Cons
- complex setup for new players
Thematic elements
- resource management via action cards
- space station construction
- engine-building in space
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- card crafting — destroy/remove actions to obtain the metals needed for construction.
- card destruction to acquire resources — destroy/remove actions to obtain the metals needed for construction.
- engine building — build a scalable space station by selecting cards that trigger actions.
- engine-building with cards — build a scalable space station by selecting cards that trigger actions.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- it's such a good Gateway game
- the art on the cards looks fantastic
- it's one of those simple flip and write games that you just want to play again and again
- the lazy Susan is genius
- Planet Unknown just knocks our socks off
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video EIiUSBj15xE
Jungles Games general_discussion at 4:40 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5382 · mention_pk 16002
Click to watch at 4:40 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Very consistent enjoyment across plays
- Strong core experience
Cons
- Highs can be more stable than explosive
Thematic elements
- Engineering, space infrastructure
- Space station building and resource management in a sci-fi setting
- Mechanistic / consistent gameplay
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- engine building — Actions provide ongoing benefits across turns
- Engine-building style actions — Actions provide ongoing benefits across turns
- Resource management — Players gather and allocate resources to achieve objectives
- Resource management with set collection — Players gather and allocate resources to achieve objectives
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- it's a euro style game that plays up to six
- it's fully simultaneous
- Concordia Venus ... brings in team play and that lets you play two on two which is a four player game and it also lets you play two versus two which is a six player game
- not a euro game really it's more of a deduction style game where it's one versus many
- I started to work on that video and I'm hoping to make it happen
- Miniatures don't do anything for me
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–3 of 3