Skip to main content
The Vale of Eternity box art

The Vale of Eternity

Game ID: GID0351745
Game Info
Year
2023
Players
2-4
Age
14+
Playtime
40 min
Collection
Rating
Mechanic profile
Not enough video data yet
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description

In The Vale of Eternity, players are tamers who hunt various monsters and spirits to tame them as minions. In this fantasy world, numerous creatures are living in harmony. Among them, dragons are the most valuable and noble ones, and all tamers dream of taming dragons. The player who manages to tame the most outstanding minions wins.

In each round, a player has three phases:

Hunting phase: Draft two cards from the game board.
Action phase: Take various actions, including selling cards, taming, or summoning cards.
Resolution phase: Use the active effects of cards they have summoned.

Successive rounds are performed until the end of the game is triggered. The game includes cards of seventy creatures from myths all around the world.

—description from the publisher

Description

In The Vale of Eternity, players are tamers who hunt various monsters and spirits to tame them as minions. In this fantasy world, numerous creatures are living in harmony. Among them, dragons are the most valuable and noble ones, and all tamers dream of taming dragons. The player who manages to tame the most outstanding minions wins.

In each round, a player has three phases:

Hunting phase: Draft two cards from the game board.
Action phase: Take various actions, including selling cards, taming, or summoning cards.
Resolution phase: Use the active effects of cards they have summoned.

Successive rounds are performed until the end of the game is triggered. The game includes cards of seventy creatures from myths all around the world.

—description from the publisher

Ask a Rules Question
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 11
This page: 11
Sentiment: pos 10 · mix 0 · neu 1 · neg 0
Mentions per page
Showing 1–11 of 11
Video k3rFpn55H0U Top List at 10:53 sentiment: positive
video_pk 69369 · mention_pk 165846
The Vale of Eternity video thumbnail
Click to watch at 10:53 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Big surprise of the year
  • Wonderfully designed
  • Great artwork
  • Easy to explain
  • Has tough decisions
Cons
  • Need to know what to sacrifice
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • card drafting — Using cards to claim money and buy other cards.
  • engine building — Building an engine of cards that synergize to score points.
  • Resource management — Acquiring money to buy cards.
  • tableau building — Building an engine of cards.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • hey everybody and welcome back to my top 100 board games of all time
  • This is the 2024 into 2025 edition of the list and we are continuing today by counting through games 40 up to number 31
  • I have a strong feeling that next year this game could break the top 20 because it is so unique and it's just kind of a masterpiece of design
  • so that is the veil of Eternity at number 31
  • if you have enjoyed the video please be sure to hit like And subscribe to the channel and check on my other content too
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video rgpPA-uder0 Analysis at 6:31 sentiment: positive
video_pk 69350 · mention_pk 165816
The Vale of Eternity video thumbnail
Click to watch at 6:31 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Great game
  • Adds new cards and interesting one-off abilities with the expansion
  • Expansion adds options for discarding cards for points
Cons
  • Expansion's personal discard pile mechanism feels tacked on
  • The base game is already perfectly designed and may not need expansion
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • card drafting — Implied by the engine building and acquisition of new cards.
  • engine building — A 'little engine building card game'.
  • hand management — Discussed in relation to discarding and holding cards.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's flawless I can't really find a single thing I don't like about this kind of bidding a little tile placement game
  • the economy is so fantastic as you are swapping meeples between all the players
  • one of the best auction games of all time by the great Dr Reiner Knizia
  • for me this is like Perfection
  • this one um it's a simple little uh root building Style game trying to connect things together
  • the game is so perfectly designed in terms of how clean it is
  • it's so lightning fast and you only looking at about 15 minutes to play this one at two which is a really good return on investment
  • it's actually a really cool racing game it's more on the familyfriendly end of the spectrum
  • I do like this game I definitely appreciate it maybe more than I like it
  • my only issue is that I think is a bit long and the pacing is a little bit off
  • the game seems to just delve into pure chaos where you can't really predict what anyone's going to do
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video PMHoKa9_j4o Review at 0:02 sentiment: positive
video_pk 67932 · mention_pk 164209
The Vale of Eternity video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:02 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Stone economy and limits on how many stones you can hold.
  • The action phase with choices on selling, adding to hand, and playing cards.
  • The drafting/hunting phase with interesting decisions and player interaction.
  • The card combos that can be achieved.
Cons
  • Luck of the draw, especially at lower player counts, can lead to big point swings.
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card Combos — Cards have abilities that earn stones, change their worth, or grant victory points, allowing for synergistic plays.
  • drafting — Players take turns grabbing cards for themselves.
  • engine building — Players sell cards to unlock special abilities, earn victory points, and get money to buy other cards.
  • set collection — Card families give different numbers of stones for selling them.
  • Variable player powers — Special powers can allow players to hold more than the usual limit of four stones.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • the drafting, the hunting phase, that's my number two, and it is a full-on pro because this phase is where the most interesting decisions are made in the game.
  • the card combos you can achieve in the game because a ton of the cards have either these end of round effects that trigger over and over or these ongoing effects give you bonuses for going after certain types of cards, spending certain types of stones, what have you.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video YtzHLTB6YJI Rules Teach at 0:09 sentiment: positive
video_pk 67933 · mention_pk 164210
The Vale of Eternity video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:09 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Enjoyable mix of drafting and engine building.
  • Provides good options and potential for combos in the solo variant with an expanded card pool.
  • Fun and quick engine builder.
  • The solo variant allows for a competitive experience against a bot that models hate-drafting.
Cons
  • The game can be swingy.
  • The bot in the solo variant can be very consistent with point gain, potentially making it difficult for the player.
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • card drafting — Players take turns selecting cards from a shared pool in a snake draft format.
  • engine building — Players draft and play cards to create combos and generate resources or victory points.
  • hand management — Players decide whether to tame cards into their hand or sell them.
  • Resource management — Players manage 'magic stones' to pay for cards, with a strict limit on maximum capacity.
  • set collection — Implicitly present as certain cards provide bonuses based on the number or type of other cards in play.
  • Variable player powers — Cards have various ongoing, instant, or end-of-round powers that affect gameplay.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • It's got a mix of drafting and engine building.
  • But a key mechanic in the game is your max stone capacity is only four.
  • It's a really fun and quick engine builder with or without my solo variant.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video KEpRbmU_H6M Top List at 20:38 sentiment: positive
video_pk 66607 · mention_pk 162315
The Vale of Eternity video thumbnail
Click to watch at 20:38 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • So much fun
  • Creates different engines every game
  • Feels powerful and fun by the end
  • Fantastic game multiplayer
Cons
  • Has dropped a little on my top games list.
  • Has been a little bit since I've played this, and I do need to play it again.
  • Fan-made solo for it, but not the best things heard about it.
Thematic elements
Comparison games
  • Res Arcana
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • card drafting — You're like open drafting each round a card into your tableau and each round you're able to add one more card to your tableau.
  • engine building — Building up this tableau of cards that is your engine that then you are trying to use those cards in different ways.
  • set collection — Creating different engines every single game and like there's so many different cards in this game that the engines really never feel the same in any games.
  • tableau building — Building up this tableau of cards.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I really like to focus on games where the mechanism is really what makes that game shine and is a really big part of that game.
  • You don't often see that in tableau building games is when you're building up a tableau, but then you are also destroying it to then build it back up.
  • I forget where I put it in my like top 12 when I did those like top 12 mechanisms. I might actually go and go back through that and make another list of my favorite mechanisms cuz I feel like it has maybe changed.
  • More people need to play this game. I feel like this is on my list of games of like hidden gems that like no one talks about this game and it is so good.
  • I love that kind of problem in a game where you just want to play all of the cards into your tableau, but you have to make the decision of which ones do you want to prioritize.
  • Remember, you are somebody's reason to smile.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video gpjLi7SnyLU Meeple University Rules Teach at 0:05 sentiment: positive
video_pk 64298 · mention_pk 157755
Meeple University - The Vale of Eternity video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:05 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Rich card synergy and multiple combo possibilities.
  • Open draft mechanism highlighted as a key strategic element.
  • Thematic flavor with monsters, dragons, and minions.
Cons
  • Strict stone/resource limits and no exchange/refund options may constrain pacing.
  • Complexity implied by many interactions may be challenging for casual players.
Thematic elements
  • taming monsters to recruit as minions and commanding dragons
  • jungle and mountain caves
  • fantasy adventure with monsters and minions
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • combo_potential — There are many card interactions that create point income or special effects, enabling combos.
  • cost_to_play_cards — A card's cost is equal to the current round number, and cards placed in a player's area must not exceed the round number.
  • drafting — Players draft cards: select one card at a time, rotating from last to first, including open drafting and moving through rounds.
  • hand_management — Players manage cards in their hand, deciding when to play or discard to optimize combos.
  • resource_management — Magic stones serve as currency, with a hold limit of four and no exchanging between colors; no refunds on paying costs.
  • round_resolution — Resolution phase allows triggering timer effects on cards before the round ends.
  • scoring_and_end_conditions — Game ends after 10 rounds or when a player reaches 60 points; highest points determine winner.
  • set_collection — Players collect monsters and cards to achieve high point totals through combos.
  • special_cards — Dragon cards and Golems provide unique powers and interactions, affecting strategy.
  • taming — Playing monster cards to tame them and bring them into play later as minions.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • The game plays to four players with mechanics such as drafting hand management and set collection.
  • Maximum 10 rounds or one player reaches 60 points.
  • These magic stones are so magical and valuable and your pocket ain't deep enough.
  • There are many combos you can do; there are many possibilities to play your game.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 8qplrjK8ASY watch it played Rules Teach at 0:11 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 64019 · mention_pk 157523
watch it played - The Vale of Eternity video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:11 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
  • Clear, step-by-step rule teaching
  • Comprehensive explanation of phases and actions
  • Visible components and optional standee
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • dragons and creature taming
  • a world of monsters, spirits and gods
  • fantasy with mythic elements and card-driven abilities
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Active effects resolution — Resolve active effects in a chosen order during the resolution phase.
  • Card effects categories — Instant, victory-point, permanent, and active effects on cards.
  • End-of-round scoring and round progression — Check for 60 points or end of round 10; advance round markers; pass first player.
  • Limited Points — Check for 60 points or end of round 10; advance round markers; pass first player.
  • Magic stones management — Manage up to four stones; spending or discarding stones is required; no change is given when paying.
  • Phase structure — A hunting phase, an action phase, and a final resolution/end phase within rounds.
  • Remove a card — Remove a summoned card from your area by paying a cost in magic stones.
  • Resource management — Manage up to four stones; spending or discarding stones is required; no change is given when paying.
  • Sell a card — Discard a card under your marker to gain magic stones from the zone the card is in.
  • Summon a card — Pay the card's cost in magic stones to place it face up in your area.
  • Tame a card — Take the marker back from a card and add the card to your hand/area as a tamed creature.
  • Variable Phase Order — A hunting phase, an action phase, and a final resolution/end phase within rounds.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • in a world of monsters spirits and gods you're a humble Tamer with ambitious goals
  • join me at the table and let's learn how to play
  • the four actions: sell a card that has your marker on it, tame a card that has your marker on it, summon a card from your hand or remove a card from your area
  • you can't end your turn as long as you have any of your markers on a card
  • we'll assume we have three players
  • if you have any questions about anything you saw here feel free to put them in the comments below
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video oK6i01pBVDg The Board Game Garden Top List at 5:10 sentiment: positive
video_pk 40870 · mention_pk 123957
The Board Game Garden - The Vale of Eternity video thumbnail
Click to watch at 5:10 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • high variability in engine combos
  • unique rules around tableau size
  • thematic and tactical depth
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • card tableau drafting and engine-building
  • fantasy realm with engines and tableau
  • fantasy/engine-building
Comparison games
  • Hadrian's Wall
  • Lost Ruins of Arnak
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • card drafting — draft and arrange cards into a growing tableau
  • engine building — build a card-based engine to generate actions and points
  • engine-building — build a card-based engine to generate actions and points
  • tableau building — manage a personal tableau to trigger chained effects
  • tableau construction — manage a personal tableau to trigger chained effects
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Cascadia is my number 10, it is a fantastic puzzly tiling game
  • the veil of Eternity this game is so good
  • Twist on Hadrian's Wall in Paladins feels similar but fresh
  • Wayfarers of the South Tigress, carvan mechanic is one of my favorite things in a game
  • Castles of Burgundy is my number one game of all time
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video j2vb2MFZBQE Stonemaier Games Top List at 11:09 sentiment: positive
video_pk 39765 · mention_pk 120031
Stonemaier Games - The Vale of Eternity video thumbnail
Click to watch at 11:09 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Multiple ways to gain discounts via different card subsets
  • Rich variety of discount triggers provides replayability
Cons
  • Could be too cliquey for players who dislike heavy reliance on card combos
Thematic elements
  • Utilizing card-type and color-based discounts to optimize plays
  • Fantasy card-driven strategy with color/type subsets.
  • Highly strategic with modular card interactions
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Discounts tied to card subsets and types — Various cards grant ongoing discounts for specific subsets (colors/types).
  • Multi-use cards — Various cards grant ongoing discounts for specific subsets (colors/types).
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Skyler: My favorite game featuring ongoing discounts is Flamecraft.
  • Dylan: This is my favorite of the West Kingdom trilogy, and managing ongoing discounts is a major key to success in the game.
  • Aaron: Space the final frontier. These are the voyages of whatever you name your ship.
  • Caitlyn: In Ark Nova, you can claim partner zoos in four of the five continents. And whenever you play an animal into your zoo that matches one of your partner zoos, you get a three credit discount on the animals cost.
  • Skyler: This creates a very low conflict environment where everyone helps to improve the town, making it awesome for families.
  • Jamie: Lord of the Rings Duel for Middle-earth really got me thinking about the decision space of do I spend money on a card now or wait to get the resource that a card provides so I don't have to pay it in the future.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 28xwbn2EKQ4 Chairman of the Board Review at 0:02 sentiment: positive
video_pk 9853 · mention_pk 95414
Chairman of the Board - The Vale of Eternity video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:02 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Simple core rules that still enable deep strategic planning through card interactions and sequencing.
  • High interaction and meaningful tension generated by drafting, blocking, and end-of-round choices.
  • Crystal-clear card text and well-structured mechanics reduce teach-to-play friction and help early players ramp quickly.
  • Strong replayability driven by a large variety of card synergies and the endless permutations of engine builds.
  • Good scalability across 2-4 players with robust component quality and bright, accessible production values.
  • The game rewards careful planning, experimentation with different card families, and adaptation to the evolving card pool each round.
Cons
  • Take-that mechanics can be a turn-off for players who prefer purely engine-focused play without interference.
  • Art direction is cartoony and bright, which some players may find garish or incongruent with a serious engine-builder vibe.
  • In a four-player game, the drafting phase and snaking order can slow down pace and increase downtime, potentially reducing engagement for some groups.
  • Expansion content is discussed as a possibility but remains hypothetical; without new content, longevity rests on the richness of the core deck and the depth of combos already present.
Thematic elements
  • Elemental factions vie for dominance through a shaping of their power engines; momentum is built card by card, and victory is earned via a delicate balance of tempo, resource management, and strategic card synergies.
  • A fantasy-inspired realm where elemental factions clash and mythical creatures populate a polyhedral cadence of power and prestige.
  • Emergent, modular storytelling driven by card interactions; the game narrative is not a single linear tale but a tapestry formed by the combination of cards drawn, reserved, and resolved each round.
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • drafting — At the start of each round, a set of cards is laid out for bidding and selection. Players choose one card to secure, and in reverse order (snake draft) the last player to pick goes first in the next step. This creates tension, signaling to players not only which card they covet but also how much agency they have to influence the choices available to others in future rounds. The design emphasizes forecast, strategic blocking, and anticipation as a core engine for ongoing decisions rather than rote picking. The mechanic scales with player count because the number of cards and the complexity of interactions increases as more options appear in the pool, while the round pacing remains approachable due to the constrained number of rounds and currency management embedded in the system.
  • Drafting (snaking) — At the start of each round, a set of cards is laid out for bidding and selection. Players choose one card to secure, and in reverse order (snake draft) the last player to pick goes first in the next step. This creates tension, signaling to players not only which card they covet but also how much agency they have to influence the choices available to others in future rounds. The design emphasizes forecast, strategic blocking, and anticipation as a core engine for ongoing decisions rather than rote picking. The mechanic scales with player count because the number of cards and the complexity of interactions increases as more options appear in the pool, while the round pacing remains approachable due to the constrained number of rounds and currency management embedded in the system.
  • end game bonuses — Many cards activate at round end, providing points, currency, or other incentives as the round concludes. Timing matters; you might hold back on using certain effects until you’ve resolved relevant end-of-round actions or until you’ve aligned your tableau to maximize the payoff. The presence of end-of-round triggers increases the importance of sequencing and planning several moves ahead, since you can influence not just what happens this turn, but how the next round's opportunities unfold based on your end-of-round choices.
  • End-of-round abilities — Many cards activate at round end, providing points, currency, or other incentives as the round concludes. Timing matters; you might hold back on using certain effects until you’ve resolved relevant end-of-round actions or until you’ve aligned your tableau to maximize the payoff. The presence of end-of-round triggers increases the importance of sequencing and planning several moves ahead, since you can influence not just what happens this turn, but how the next round's opportunities unfold based on your end-of-round choices.
  • engine building — Each card you acquire becomes an active or end-of-round contributing component in your personal tableau. Some cards provide one-time bonuses when played, while others grant ongoing or permanent boosts (e.g., coins, victory points, or enhanced values). The core thrill is chaining these cards together so that one card’s effect amplifies another, creating a domino effect of synergies. The system is designed so that the value of a card is highly contextual, depending on the current board state, the cards you hold in hand, and the end-of-round triggers that reward particular patterns. The engine feeling comes from incremental improvements rather than giant leaps, which makes the game both approachable and deeply strategic as players refine their engines over successive rounds.
  • engine-building tableau — Each card you acquire becomes an active or end-of-round contributing component in your personal tableau. Some cards provide one-time bonuses when played, while others grant ongoing or permanent boosts (e.g., coins, victory points, or enhanced values). The core thrill is chaining these cards together so that one card’s effect amplifies another, creating a domino effect of synergies. The system is designed so that the value of a card is highly contextual, depending on the current board state, the cards you hold in hand, and the end-of-round triggers that reward particular patterns. The engine feeling comes from incremental improvements rather than giant leaps, which makes the game both approachable and deeply strategic as players refine their engines over successive rounds.
  • Hand/board size scaling by round — The game imposes a progressive cap on the number of active cards you can have in front of you, rising with each round. This design choice slows the initial, tighter phase and allows for a more expansive late game where your engine can become highly developed. It also helps new players manage cognitive load by gradually expanding their tableau, making the game accessible to a broad audience while preserving depth for veteran players as rounds accumulate.
  • Resource management — Playing cards requires spending currency tokens. The game uses a token economy with three denominations, and there is no change given for spends, which invites precise budgeting and value optimization. Tokens are constrained by the current round, which means early rounds force players to be economical and plan ahead for mid-to-late rounds when more expensive or more valuable cards become accessible. This mechanic fosters a rhythm where you must decide whether to invest early for long-term payoff or conserve resources for a bigger payoff on a later turn. It also creates a visible pacing constraint that communicates progress to all players and helps prevent analysis paralysis from spiraling into unmanageable decision trees.
  • Resource management (currency tokens) — Playing cards requires spending currency tokens. The game uses a token economy with three denominations, and there is no change given for spends, which invites precise budgeting and value optimization. Tokens are constrained by the current round, which means early rounds force players to be economical and plan ahead for mid-to-late rounds when more expensive or more valuable cards become accessible. This mechanic fosters a rhythm where you must decide whether to invest early for long-term payoff or conserve resources for a bigger payoff on a later turn. It also creates a visible pacing constraint that communicates progress to all players and helps prevent analysis paralysis from spiraling into unmanageable decision trees.
  • take that — A subset of cards in the deck can disrupt opponents by forcing discards or altering their tableau. While not ubiquitous, these tools add a competitive edge and a social dimension to decisions, since you must gauge not only your own engine but also how best to impede rivals who threaten to outpace you. The price of these effects tends to be high (resource-intensive or restricted in use), creating a trade-off between offense, defense, and engine progression.
  • Take-that / disruption options — A subset of cards in the deck can disrupt opponents by forcing discards or altering their tableau. While not ubiquitous, these tools add a competitive edge and a social dimension to decisions, since you must gauge not only your own engine but also how best to impede rivals who threaten to outpace you. The price of these effects tends to be high (resource-intensive or restricted in use), creating a trade-off between offense, defense, and engine progression.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • this game is ultra simple all the gameplay is however inbuilt into the cards
  • it's quite remarkable how these cards interact with each other and the different Paths of victory that you can try to take
  • the order in which you resolve the cards is important
  • I think this game is absolutely phenomenal
  • the sky really is the limit to this game
  • lots of tough choices to make in a simple system here
  • the engagement of the game is Just brilliant throughout
  • there are so many choices within the choices because even when you build up your Tableau it can become a bit of an efficiency puzzle
  • the production for this game is pretty excellent nice and bright
  • I pulled a few cards here out not particular ones just to show you some examples of the abilities on these cards
  • the card anatomy and the way everything is worded it is pretty much immaculate
  • this is one of the best games probably a top three game maybe even a number one game of 2023
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video oTJimwO3Tuo Chairman of the Board Top List at 11:59 sentiment: positive
video_pk 7842 · mention_pk 87852
Chairman of the Board - The Vale of Eternity video thumbnail
Click to watch at 11:59 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
highly positive
Pros
  • Mind-blowing combinations and powerful synergies
  • Elegant currency system and deep strategic depth
Cons
  • Complexity may deter lighter gamers
Thematic elements
  • creatures and characters with evolving powers
  • combo-rific tableau-building
  • synergy-driven, highly strategic
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card synergies and action efficiency — Combo-driven play with card interactions and efficient action use.
  • cooperative actions — Combo-driven play with card interactions and efficient action use.
  • Tableau-building with currency management — Build a growing tableau of cards; manage a four-piece currency pool.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I think out of all of these videos that I've done this is probably the highest quality list that I've done in terms of game recommendations
  • gorgeous production I mean the pieces here are absolutely lovely on the table
  • one of my favorite deduction games of all time if not my favorite game
  • I like how pure and simple it is
  • it's criminally underrated
  • this one is an absolute absolute belter
  • I could not recommend it enough
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–11 of 11
Game Deep Dive
View on BoardGameGeek