Collection Status
Your Rating
Description
June, 1944: Through the D-Day landings, the Allies have seized a foothold on the beaches of Normandy. Now you must lead your troops forward as you push deeper into France and drive the German forces back. You will face intense resistance, machine gun fire, and mortar bombardment, but a great commander can turn the situation to their advantage!
Undaunted: Normandy is a deck-building game that places you and your opponent in command of American or German forces, fighting through a series of missions critical to the outcome of World War II. Use your cards to seize the initiative, bolster your forces, or control your troops on the battlefield. Strong leadership can turn the tide of battle in your favor, but reckless decisions could prove catastrophic as every casualty you take removes a card from your deck. Take charge amidst the chaos of battle, hold fast in the face of opposition, and remain undaunted.
—description from the publisher
Year Published
2019
Featured Videos
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 12
This page: 12
Sentiment:
pos 11 ·
mix 1 ·
neu 0 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–12 of 12
Video sqUVZmEgMjg
Board Stupid top_40_list at 4:50 sentiment: positive
video_pk 59344 · mention_pk 151934
Click to watch at 4:50 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- tight two-player interaction
- historical flavor and tactical depth
- pacing suits short sessions
Cons
- learning curve for new players
Thematic elements
- historical tactical warfare with a two-player focus
- World War II Europe, Normandy 1944
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Deck building — Each player builds a small deck representing unit capabilities and actions
- deck-building — Each player builds a small deck representing unit capabilities and actions
- dice/combat resolution — Combat outcomes are resolved with dice influenced by cards and situational modifiers
- hand management — Players choose and manage cards to perform actions and resolve combats
- hand-management — Players choose and manage cards to perform actions and resolve combats
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- it's a war game for all intents
- Love Letter is the game I think I've probably played the most
- Cascadia is a fantastic game
- Heat is amazing
- Undaunted is fabulous
- It's pure fun
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video cJXWL10DVvs
Board Stupid top_40_list at 35:55 sentiment: positive
video_pk 36261 · mention_pk 150781
Click to watch at 35:55 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- tight, tense firefights
- great balance of luck and strategy
- compact footprint for a war game
Cons
- theme may be edgy for some players
- can be unforgiving in early plays
Thematic elements
- Deck-building tactical skirmishes
- World War II small-unit engagements
- Scenario-driven, mission-based
Comparison games
- Undaunted Normandy
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- deck_building — build a deck that determines actions and initiative
- Scenario / Mission / Campaign Game — campaign-style missions with varying goals
- scenario_based_play — campaign-style missions with varying goals
- tile_movement_and_combat — move and fight in tactical skirmishes with unit cards
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- It's a Space Opera you go in with your race
- the production is fantastic
- the best two-player game to win the YIS
- Cascadia is fantastic game, I love it
- Western Legends is the best Western game you can buy
- Undaunted Normandy or North Africa if you've played those a lot
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video iJNxPRfs2kM
Rolling Dice and Taking Names interview at 37:38 sentiment: positive
video_pk 13770 · mention_pk 40235
Click to watch at 37:38 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Tightly designed with accessible rules
- Solid two-player head-to-head experience
Cons
- Learning curve for deck-building mechanics
- Scenario balance can require careful tuning
Thematic elements
- deck-building, scenario-based tactical engagements
- World War II Normandy; infantry and operations
- campaign-like scenarios with evolving decks
Comparison games
- Undaunted: North Africa
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- deck-building — Players build and optimize a hand of unit/action cards.
- scenario-based play — Each scenario defines objectives and victory conditions.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- bam that's a quote, baby, quotable
- it's one of those things that you should always feel like there's no chance for you to win on both sides simultaneously
- easy like sunday morning
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video pW2gmCJDImM
Paula Deming top_10_list at 4:21 sentiment: positive
video_pk 12996 · mention_pk 105868
Click to watch at 4:21 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- approachable WWII wargame for newcomers
- flexible scenarios that scale with players
Cons
- luck can influence outcomes
- can become lengthy with extended campaigns
Thematic elements
- campaign-like scenarios with deck-building elements
- World War II tactical warfare
- historical and cinematic
Comparison games
- Memoir 44
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Combat: Dice — combat resolution via dice with probability trade-offs
- Deck building — build a deck of units and actions to execute orders
- deck-building — build a deck of units and actions to execute orders
- Dice combat — combat resolution via dice with probability trade-offs
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- it's a really good two-player game
- the production value of this game is so good
- it's a tight game that feels tense especially with the drafting
- this game can be quite mean because you're going to be blocking each other a lot
- it's the kind of game that stresses me out like in a good way
- it's got a lot of luck it's not too heavy
- it's another game of historical World War II simulations
- sometimes the dice just aren't on your side
- it's a brain burner
- it's that time you killed me
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 9_NcqaHe2hA
Adam Porter's Board Game Channel analysis at 10:33:20 sentiment: positive
video_pk 12785 · mention_pk 37303
Click to watch at 10:33:20 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Fresh approach to unit control
- Deck building provides meaningful decision-making for unit actions
- Integrates combat mechanics seamlessly
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- Military combat and strategy
- World War II - Normandy landing
- Thematic simulation
Comparison games
- Undaunted: North Africa
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Deck building — Deck building mechanics control movement and actions of military units on a board without traditional card play or dice
- Deck building driving action — Deck building mechanics control movement and actions of military units on a board without traditional card play or dice
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- that sense of destruction sheer destruction of the playing space and you don't get that much in board games
- i think that's a really nice level of interaction in games because it's not mean spirited it's not vindictive but it still means you've got to constantly keep thinking
- i've got my own deck that alone is exciting and different to the vast majority of games that i had played in the past
- the deck is created as we play we're buying cards from a central pool
- everybody's got a bit of the same information a bit of different information and it makes the game really really intriguing
- everybody's running around a table shouting over each other trying to find the people with the same card
- i've played it with my german family and my english family who can't speak to each other because i don't speak the same language but they could all play happy salmon together
- everyone's got their own set of poker dice and they're rolling them all at the same time you're not having to wait for somebody else
- these are just the most fantastic little components that i've i've found in games i absolutely love them
- it takes six minutes to play which is three rounds of drawing one minutes each and three rounds of guessing one minute each
- it's so frustrating it just gets in the way it's not fun
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video XuPWRQopS-U
The Cardboard Herald game_review at 0:06 sentiment: positive
video_pk 11581 · mention_pk 34030
Click to watch at 0:06 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
extremely_positive
Pros
- Excellent balance between approachability and depth
- Accessible compared to other historical war games
- Simple but powerful attack system with meaningful decisions
- Small hand size creates high-stakes card selection
- Brilliant initiative mechanic that creates tactical depth
- Thematic integration of deck building with casualty system
- Asymmetric scenarios with viable strategic alternatives
- 12 progressively complex scenarios for learning curve
- No sequential campaign requirement - play any scenario
- Rich, authentic experience without feeling dumbed down
Cons
- Heavy conflict theme with World War II violence may not appeal to all players
- Two-player only gameplay limitation
Thematic elements
- World War II
- Historical Skirmish
- Allied vs Nazis
- Military Strategy
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Card Play Action Resolution
- Combat System
- Combat: Damage Based
- Deck building
- Initiative system
- scenario-based play
- Tile-based movement
- Tile/Map Shifting
- two-player head-to-head
- Unit Management
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
No quotes stored for this video.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 4d4YyI4miY8
Adam Porter top_10_list at 1:43 sentiment: positive
video_pk 10119 · mention_pk 102969
Click to watch at 1:43 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- art style from Osprey
- clever combination of deck-building with tactical movement and attacks
- well-realized design
Cons
- war theme may be less appealing to non-war-game players
Thematic elements
- deck-building with tactical movement and attacks
- World War II, Normandy operations
- clever, tightly realized military tactics
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Deck building — players build and optimize a deck to perform actions
- deck-building — players build and optimize a deck to perform actions
- tactical_movement_and_attacks — maneuver and engage enemies using efficient card play
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- it's my favorite Legacy experience so far
- the product design is immaculate with great presentation and it's an exemplar of diversity and inclusion to boot
- this is not a game which you're going to play to show off your economic Wilds
- I don't play many war games but this one really connected with me
- the rules are super simple and clear, the artwork was always of a high standard, but this fresh coat of paint is much more modern and appealing
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ret2atPVYv8
Rolling Dice and Taking Names general_discussion at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5289 · mention_pk 118449
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
highly_positive
Pros
- merges deck building with wargame mechanics
- deck building drives unit activation
- strong thematic implementation
- personal connection to historical location
- tactical depth
- part of larger series with multiple theaters
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- World War II
- Normandy invasion
- military operations
- historical warfare
Comparison games
- Undaunted North Africa
- Other wargames
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Deck building
- Measurement Movement
- tactical positioning
- token movement
- wargame mechanics
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Gen Con is back baby
- y'all we recorded an entire episode 301... and then we go into the process of sending the files to each other and it's only happened what maybe one other time Tony in 300 episodes where we didn't have the recorded file
- please do not wear a backpack that's juts out about 16 to 24 inches from your back
- when you land on one of those letters your opponents will draw a card
- nobody feels out of the game or you don't have a chance
- this game a seller game for me is that it's no fun if there's no way to win the game
- so I'm wondering if the convention center if they would move it to the field
- we went by there every day there was one or two gentlemen there that we just almost became friends with
- games of the con I loved this game
- I've played over three four thousand games on the iPad
- go back to the roots that maybe started this whole deck building system
- as tyrants of the underdark first time I played that game I thought wow this is a really brilliantly well done
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video PSzTR09lch8
Beyond Solitaire top_10_list at 23:01 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5169 · mention_pk 15300
Click to watch at 23:01 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- strong solo implementation with reinforcements expansion
Cons
- system split between Normandy and North Africa may confuse new players
Thematic elements
- tactics and campaign-level decisions
- World War II Normandy landings
- skirmish wargame with campaign flavor
Comparison games
- Pavlov's House
- Pavlov's House expansion series
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Campaign progression — scenario-to-scenario development with reinforcement rules
- deck-building/command — cards drive actions and reinforcements
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- we together are the horsemen of the apocalypse
- the solo mode is the same rules you're just using one bot
- Concordia solitaire is so good you can play it with any map and any expansion
- the expansion for Star Wars Outer Rim tweaked the solo mode nicely
- Baseball Highlights 2045 I freaking love baseball
- Final Girl is ultimately going to be the more palatable one
- I love root solo; it's a bear but worth it
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video XJfXjv7SBFA
Adam Porter top_10_list at 0:55 sentiment: positive
video_pk 4019 · mention_pk 81495
Click to watch at 0:55 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- art style from Osprey
- clever combination of deck-building with tactical movement and attacks
- well realized
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- deck-building with tactical movement and attacks
- WWII Normandy
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Deck building — build a deck to perform actions; tactical movement and attacks
- deck-building — build a deck to perform actions; tactical movement and attacks
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I did a deep dive into this one a couple of weeks ago
- please let me know your thoughts on this list and which games would make your own top 10 of the year
- I'm Adam Porter I design games and I review them on this channel
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video dyw2fzTLkSo
Beyond Solitaire general_discussion at 0:31 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 2928 · mention_pk 83303
Click to watch at 0:31 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
- Excellent, adaptive solo AI that works across many scenarios
- Fast, snappy decision-making at the core of the deck-building loop
- Reinforcements expansion adds vehicles and new mechanics that expand solo play
- Clear structure for running solo through flow-chart style guidance
Cons
- High upfront cost and deep investment to play solo well (need multiple boxes)
- Solo mode relies on multiple rulebooks and flowcharts, increasing setup complexity
- AI consistency varies by scenario; some missions feel more favorable to one side
Thematic elements
- deck-building war game with asymmetric forces
- World War II Normandy campaign, squad-level skirmishes
- scenario-driven missions that evolve as you progress
Comparison games
- Hoplomachus Victorum
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- asymmetric AI / solo mode — solo play uses a flow-chart driven AI that simulates the German force; initiative and card interactions guide enemy behavior.
- Deck building — players assemble a fleet of unit and action cards, drawing from a personal deck to perform actions.
- deck-building — players assemble a fleet of unit and action cards, drawing from a personal deck to perform actions.
- hand management — players must choose and time actions from a limited hand, balancing initiative and casualties.
- hand-management — players must choose and time actions from a limited hand, balancing initiative and casualties.
- Scenario / Mission / Campaign Game — each box includes multiple scenarios with unique objectives, enemies, and setups.
- scenario-based play — each box includes multiple scenarios with unique objectives, enemies, and setups.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I am so impressed that David Digby went through all these scenarios and distilled that into the card flow charts.
- There is a lot of love and attention that goes into a solo mode like that.
- The amount of investment that it takes to get multiple boxes and all the stuff—the solo system is not cheap.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video VFTbtFi9S1M
Unknown Channel game_review at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 382 · mention_pk 86314
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Extremely compact footprint that fits in a tiny box
- Effective hybridization of board game and wargame mechanics
- Robust solo play option with a competent bot
- Expansion (reinforcements) adds tanks and enhances replayability
- Strong deck-building mechanics integrated with tactical decisions
Cons
- Dice-based combat introduces randomness that may affect outcome perception
- Component count is still fairly modest, which could limit expansion depth for some players
Thematic elements
- Squad-based tactical combat with deck-building elements, small-footprint war gaming
- World War II Normandy, platoon-level skirmishes between Allied and Axis forces
- Historical scenario-driven engagements emphasizing tactical decisions and resource management
Comparison games
- Bolt Action (genre)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- deck-building for squads — Players manage a deck that represents squad capabilities, drawing and playing cards to activate actions and resolve encounters
- Dice-based combat — Combat resolution relies on dice to determine hit outcomes and damage, introducing probabilistic variability into engagements
- small-scale, platoon-level engagement in a compact box — Game uses a modular, box-size footprint while simulating platoon-scale actions, allowing for quick setup and portability
- solo play with AI bot — Rules and components support solo play against a competent bot, enabling asymmetric or head-to-head scenarios without a human opponent
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Undaunted Normandy is the best game I've played in months.
- This is the small-scale bolt action game I've been looking for since 2017.
- It's terrific.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–12 of 12