Skip to main content
Intrigue box art

Intrigue

Game ID: GID0170364
Game Info
Year
1994
Collection
Rating
Mechanic profile
Not enough video data yet
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description

This pure negotiation game pits the players as Renaissance era families that are engaging in rampant nepotism. Players are seeking positions in the other families' businesses, and to further that pursuit players offer bribes. However, once accepting a bribe, the 'bought' player is under absolutely no obligation to honor the highest briber or any other verbal deal. In a word, this game is vicious.

The new AMIGO edition came out in 2005.

The main difference between the F.X. Schmid and the AMIGO versions are that the the F.X. Schmid version uses five houses/buildings per player, with values of 1,2,3,5, and 10, but the AMIGO version uses four buildings/houses per player, with values of 1,3,6, and 10. Accordingly, the F.X. Schmid version has five professions - knight, merchant, lawyer, writer, and clergy - but the AMIGO version retains only clergy and writer, and adds chemist and doctor.

Description

This pure negotiation game pits the players as Renaissance era families that are engaging in rampant nepotism. Players are seeking positions in the other families' businesses, and to further that pursuit players offer bribes. However, once accepting a bribe, the 'bought' player is under absolutely no obligation to honor the highest briber or any other verbal deal. In a word, this game is vicious.

The new AMIGO edition came out in 2005.

The main difference between the F.X. Schmid and the AMIGO versions are that the the F.X. Schmid version uses five houses/buildings per player, with values of 1,2,3,5, and 10, but the AMIGO version uses four buildings/houses per player, with values of 1,3,6, and 10. Accordingly, the F.X. Schmid version has five professions - knight, merchant, lawyer, writer, and clergy - but the AMIGO version retains only clergy and writer, and adds chemist and doctor.

Ask a Rules Question
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 1
This page: 1
Sentiment: pos 0 · mix 0 · neu 0 · neg 1
Mentions per page
Showing 1–1 of 1
Video XC2Vg_1L9ZE Analysis at 11:27 sentiment: negative
video_pk 66536 · mention_pk 162165
Intrigue video thumbnail
Click to watch at 11:27 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
negative
Pros
  • Mean by explicit architectural design.
Cons
  • No agreement is binding.
  • There is no penalty for breaking the agreement.
  • The game strips negotiation down to its most mercenary possible level.
Thematic elements
  • Wealthy families placing scholars at palaces to generate income
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Bribery — The mechanism for deciding who gets placed where is bribery and promises.
  • negotiation — Players offer in-game money to secure placement of their scholars.
  • take that — Players receiving bribes can take the money and place whoever they want.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • There is a specific kind of silence that falls over a game table when somebody realizes they have just been completely, deliberately, and systematically destroyed by somebody they trusted.
  • Mean games are a genre unto themselves.
  • The person sitting across from them smiled, played their cards just right, and had been planning it for three rounds.
  • The sea serpent player maintained eye contact and smiled the whole time.
  • You were never trying to save us.
  • I was always trying to save myself.
  • That is a different thing. It is, in fact, exactly what Nemesis is designed to produce.
  • Everything is negotiable.
  • The elected pope controlled by a player can excommunicate opponents.
  • The traitor system is the knife at the game's heart.
  • I held that card for two hours.
  • That is why you committed everything.
  • It is the meanest game ever designed because it is the only major board game where the primary mechanic is human trust and the primary strategy is its violation.
  • Attack the east on this move and I will allow you three supply centers.
  • That is diplomacy.
  • This is showing me things about markets I did not want to understand.
  • Since round one.
  • The worst part was understanding that it had never been a competition. It had been a lesson on a schedule the teacher set before the first card was played.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–1 of 1
View on BoardGameGeek