/pic6601629.jpg)
Collection Status
Your Rating
Description
In John Company, players assume the roles of ambitious families attempting to use the British East India Company for personal gain. The game begins in the early eighteenth-century, when the Company has a weak foothold on the subcontinent. Over the course of the game, the Company might grow into the most powerful and insidious corporation in the world or collapse under the weight of its own ambition.
John Company is a game about state-sponsored trade monopoly. Unlike most economic games players often do not control their own firms. Instead, they will collectively guide the Company by securing positions of power, attempting to steer the Company’s fate in ways that benefit their own interests. However, the Company is an unwieldy thing. It is difficult to do anything alone, and players will often need to negotiate with one another. In John Company, most everything is up for negotiation.
Ultimately, this game isn’t about wealth; it’s about reputation. Each turn some of your family members may retire from their Company positions, giving them the opportunity to establish estates. Critically, players do not have full control over when these retirements happen. You will often need to borrow money from other players to make the best use for a chance of retirement. Players also gain victory points by competing in the London Season for prestige and securing fashionable properties.
John Company engages very seriously with its theme. It is meant as a frank portrait of an institution that was as dysfunctional as it was influential. Accordingly, the game wrestles many of the key themes of imperialism and globalization in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and how those developments were felt domestically. As such, this game might not be suitable for all players. Please make sure everyone in your group consents to this exploration before playing.
The second edition is extensively revised and is not a reprint.
—description from designer
Year Published
2022
Featured Videos
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 5
This page: 5
Sentiment:
pos 3 ·
mix 2 ·
neu 0 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–5 of 5
Video TCfi9k4Yv_s
Unknown Channel game_review at 1:52 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 60567 · mention_pk 152957
Click to watch at 1:52 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
- Novel mechanics around controlling shares and governance
- Interesting integration of colonial-era setting with corporate dynamics
- Ambitious scope and high thematic density
Cons
- Very heavy and complex rules
- Long playtime and potential for overwhelm
- Aesthetics and components may not engage all players
Thematic elements
- Array
- British India during the colonial era
- Negotiation-driven, political intrigue around corporate governance
Comparison games
- Twilight Imperium Fourth Edition
- Chinatown
- Bonanza
- Root
- Oath: Chronicles of Emergence
- Cedarial Confluence
- Cosby Encounter
- Cosmic Encounter
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- asymmetric player powers — Chairman with broad powers and other roles (governors, riders) shape outcomes.
- Economic/Share control — Players control shares, allocate funds, incur debt, and influence company direction.
- negotiation — Primary driver of outcomes, where players bargain to advance or hinder others' positions.
- Role-based power dynamics — Chairman with broad powers and other roles (governors, riders) shape outcomes.
- Thematic roleplay elements — Players simulate colonial administration and family retirement planning within a corporate setting.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- "John Company actually evokes the feeling of being a bunch of pompous jerks scheming around a company table for 3 to four hours, sending their family members to do odd jobs, seeing how they can most exploit the local populations while taking as much money as possible secretly."
- "There's not a lot of games with India in them, admittedly."
- "I was considering lowering my personal score to a 3 out of 10. But I have so much respect in how this game just breaks traditional board game structures that I'm going to leave it at a respectable 4 out of 10."
- "The whole aspect of this game being primarily negotiation as you try to be the most greedy and get the most money for yourself."
- "I respect the heck out of this game. And there's so many ideas in here I really appreciate."
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video woTwnf784S8
bard of it top_10_list at 52:35 sentiment: positive
video_pk 35496 · mention_pk 105960
Click to watch at 52:35 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- deep, thematic negotiation
- excellent table talk
Cons
- high teaching barrier
- asymmetric factions may hinder two-player
Thematic elements
- economic diplomacy, politics, and governance
- East India Company from multiple families' perspectives
- role-playing with table talk
Comparison games
- Prado
- Game of Thrones: The Board Game
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- co-op negotiation — players coordinate to run the company for victory points
- family management — manage retirees, funding, and positions with political dynamics
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- it's a really nice concise little game
- it's like playing a movie to me
- the art style is gorgeous and the mechanism is clever
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ss_BzP6WzNo
One Stop Co-Op Shop top_20_list at 1:50 sentiment: positive
video_pk 12914 · mention_pk 37789
Click to watch at 1:50 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- innovative solo negotiation system
- strong design work in solo mode
- interesting balance of randomness and control
Cons
- heavier game, longer playtime than some groups enjoy
- may be challenging for casual players
Thematic elements
- economic strategy and social maneuvering
- historical negotiation and corporate power in a colonial context
- heavy, negotiation-driven play with cube-pool mechanics to influence AI and events
Comparison games
- Negotiation games in general
- Gloomhaven (solo narrative leaning games)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- negotiation and cube-control — players influence the AI and other players using cubes to grant favors or extract benefits
- role variety and negotiation-driven control — different roles interact with asymmetric objectives and shifting power dynamics
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- there's basically like a little tactical game you have these varied factions that like hugely vary the game
- the solo mode is very complicated I'm super impressed
- this is an amazing one in a small package for a small price
- the story grabbed me and would not let go
- the racing is the smoothest solo racer I've ever played by far
- it's an emotional ending—the most emotional game experience I've had this year
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 4XEIvKaCRYg
Kickstarter Critique analysis at 0:37 sentiment: positive
video_pk 9453 · mention_pk 87358
Click to watch at 0:37 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Deep, well-researched historical theme
- High replayability with nuanced systems
- Thematic components and artifacts contribute flavor
Cons
- Complex rules can be challenging for newcomers
- Long playtime may deter lighter-weight players
Thematic elements
- colonial administration, empire-building, governance and economic power
- British East India Company era, 18th-century colonial capitalism
- historical analysis with political economy emphasis
Comparison games
- Twilight Struggle
- Infamous Traffic
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Auction / Bidding — players bid political influence to shape colonial governance and outcomes.
- bidding — players bid political influence to shape colonial governance and outcomes.
- worker placement — workers are allocated to actions influencing colonial policy and story progression.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- The steak is just it could be so much wasted steak.
- An intense exercise in empathy.
- This is the smarty farty crowd
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video dq5esCuzhKY
Bots Delights playthrough at 0:00 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 3764 · mention_pk 105802
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
- Deep strategic depth combining economic, political, and diplomatic gameplay
- Private firm mechanic adds a robust engine and risk management
- Engaging solo AI Crown with dynamic decision making
- Lucrative trading turns with potential high profits
- Tense state of play with events like rebellions and storms
Cons
- High complexity and learning curve
- Rule and reference sheet heavy; potential for confusion
- Volatile game state with high risk of losing officers or regions
Thematic elements
- Corporate power, intrigue, governance, and expansion
- Colonial India under the East India Company in the 18th century
- solo playthrough with AI Crown and strategic private firms
Comparison games
- 1813
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Asset management (ships, workshops, offices) — Fitting, buying, and trading ships; managing offices and workshop investments within a private firm.
- Crown-AI interaction — Solo mode uses an AI Crown with reference sheets to influence the game.
- Invasions, crises, and rebellions — Regions can be invaded or cause crises; leaders and governors influence outcomes.
- Investment — Players form a private firm using workshops and company shares; profits and points accrue via dividends and retirements.
- Parliamentary policy voting — The Crown scenario involves votes on laws (e.g., deregulation) that affect income and stability.
- Private firm formation and investment — Players form a private firm using workshops and company shares; profits and points accrue via dividends and retirements.
- Trade and ship management — Acquire and fit ships, manage shipping routes, and conduct trade to generate income.
- Trading — Acquire and fit ships, manage shipping routes, and conduct trade to generate income.
- Treasury management and dividends — Managing London and India treasuries, paying expenses, and distributing dividends to improve standing.
- Voting — The Crown scenario involves votes on laws (e.g., deregulation) that affect income and stability.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- we're playing John Company Second Edition
- we're playing solo and we're going to play the 1758 scenario
- Deregulation is now in effect
- The Crown plays the game
- it's not a rule book
- this isn't just your shares this is anybody's shares
- in the solo game the crown will never create a private firm
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–5 of 5