/pic5241774.png)
Collection Status
Your Rating
Description
The Sherpa people are known for their exquisite mountaineering skills and often use that knowledge to be effective guides to explorers on mountaineering expeditions. In Nanga Parbat, you are a member of the Sherpa community that is establishing base camps on Nanga Parbat for foreign explorers. While there, you will also trap animals for food and clothing.
In this two-player game, players take turns placing hikers on the mountain where they can capture animals and build base camps. Five times during the game, a player may either trade in their animals or build a base camp for victory points.
On a turn, a player must place their hiker in the region containing the guide, who then moves based on the placement of the hiker, thereby forcing the opponent to place their hiker in a new region. However, players may spend their captured animals to perform special actions.
After 15 turns for each player, the game ends and the player with the most points wins.
—description from designer
Year Published
2021
Featured Videos
Transcript Analysis
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 5
This page: 5
Sentiment:
pos 4 ·
mix 0 ·
neu 1 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–5 of 5
Video 3I7tY75mbgE
The Hunger Gamer game_review at 0:12 sentiment: positive
video_pk 62445 · mention_pk 154964
Click to watch at 0:12 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- quick, fast play
- excellent for two players
- clean, portable design
- tight, focused rule set that executes set collection well
- accessible and easy to teach
Cons
- theme feels underwhelming or not strongly tied to Sherpa culture for some players
- not a deep, highly replayable or long-form experience
- some players may crave more thematic depth or variety
Thematic elements
- mountaineering, animal collection, resource trading
- Himalayan mountains, climbing Nanga Parbat, sherpa culture
- abstract thematic veneer emphasizing quick play and head-to-head competition
Comparison games
- School of Sorcery
- Mining Colony
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- dynamic track/board progression — placing meeples moves the active section of the board, shifting available options on subsequent turns
- meeple placement — on each turn, a player places a meeple to activate actions and influence the board state
- set collection — players collect animal tokens, turning them in as sets to score points
- two-player head-to-head competition — the design centers on direct competition to deny the opponent and maximize personal scoring opportunities
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- this is a game about set collection
- it's fast it's quick it's easy to learn
- two players play quickly have a conversation while you do it over coffee
- this is another example of it
- if you're looking for a game that just does something simply but does it really well
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video _t2PPz3H15Y
Peaky Boardgamer rules_teach at 0:29 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 12208 · mention_pk 35673
Click to watch at 0:29 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
- Described as simple to learn and play, making it accessible for quick play sessions.
- Two-player focus with a clear end condition for efficient head-to-head play.
- Diverse scoring options (camps, trading by type, trading by mix) provide strategic depth without overcomplicating rules.
- Hidden objective cards add a layer of personal strategy and tension.
Cons
- End-game scoring can be complex due to three different scoring tracks and proximity bonuses, which may require careful study for new players.
- Component limits and the need to manage multiple trackables could slow pacing if players overthink sequences.
Thematic elements
- Exploration, expedition logistics, and competitive scoring through set-building, trading, and positional play on a shared map.
- A mountainous expedition setting inspired by the Himalayan region around Nanga Parbat, represented on a six-region board with 6 sub-sections per region. Players deploy hikers and animals to score points and interact via a moving guide pawn.
- Instructional, example-driven rule explanation presented by the host with step-by-step demonstrations.
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- area control / region advancement — The board is divided into six regions (each with six sections). Players move a guide pawn between regions, place markers, and attempt to maximize scoring opportunities in favored regions.
- multiple scoring modes — Three distinct scoring options exist: building camps from adjacent hikers, trading different types of animals, and trading same-type animals; each requires different conditions to maximize points.
- one-time powers per animal — Each animal type carries a special power that can be used once during a player's turn to alter positioning or trigger effects, adding strategic depth to sequencing.
- resource and marker management — Players manage scoring cubes, camps, hikers, and markers with a limited supply, deciding when to invest resources for points and when to hold back.
- secret objective cards — Objective cards are shuffled and dealt secretly to each player, providing private scoring targets that influence regional checks at end of play.
- set collection — Players gather hikers and animals to form scoring opportunities; sets can be formed on the board and via the personal boards, with points awarded for grouped pieces.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- this one's only for two players, plays in 30 minutes and is called Nanga Parbat.
- the game is fairly simple.
- all animals have a specific power that can be used only once during a player's turn to spice things up.
- the pink player has a group of five adjacent hikers
- you acquire a red panda if you are behind (or tied) in the score, you score one victory point immediately.
- the game ends immediately in two different ways.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video uxs29t1EL-g
Gaming with Edo interview at 10:05 sentiment: positive
video_pk 11332 · mention_pk 33327
Click to watch at 10:05 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Strong two-player design with depth
Cons
- Specific data about publisher/designer is unclear in transcript
Thematic elements
- Strategic ascent with mutual constraint and choice
- Two-player strategic exploration (Himalayan ascent theme)
- Abstract strategy with thematic framing
Comparison games
- Jaipur
- Lost Cities
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Two-player abstract/duel — Competitive head-to-head with limited actions each turn
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- i decided i was going to do a lot of promoting of other people's products
- the energy that i can give to a product
- we're a team we're a great team
- just do it man just do it
- the next ones we're gonna loosen it up attack too hard
- you make content here that's it and when i joined man vs meeple i was very clear
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 7F1sKaa1KHc
Gaming with Edo top_10_list at 7:58 sentiment: positive
video_pk 6829 · mention_pk 20256
Click to watch at 7:58 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- beautiful production
- tight two-player head-to-head feel
Cons
- not fully described as the author’s best, but highly regarded
Thematic elements
- area control with strategic camp placement
- Two-player mountain-climbing and camp-building contest
- elegant, tactically rich
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- area control / route planning — players select regions to gain control and advance up the mountain
- tic-tac-toe-inspired region sequencing — regions chosen determine future placement and strategy
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Kickstarter has been a really emergent space ... more and more two-player games more and more single-player games are coming out first on Kickstarter
- art production is fantastic
- it's fast fun
- two-player head-to-head is a satisfying format when done well
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video -mHD78iG2MI
Let's Talk Board Game general_discussion at 5:11 sentiment: positive
video_pk 5240 · mention_pk 124754
Click to watch at 5:11 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- clever two-player design with asymmetry
- high replayability due to animal abilities and encampment scoring
- approachable rules and family-friendly playtime
Cons
- some sameness after repeated plays
- may not offer deep long-term crunch for some players
Thematic elements
- expedition and mountain management
- sherpa community base camps on six mountains; animal-trapping theme
- light thematic framing around sherpa expeditions and animal bonuses
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- area/encampment scoring — score by building base camps on adjacent spaces to form larger encampments
- Compound Scoring — score by building base camps on adjacent spaces to form larger encampments
- movement and hiker mechanics — move a 'yellow hiker' marker to reflect taken animal locations
- set collection — different animals provide unique bonuses; collecting multiples matters
- set collection / animal abilities — different animals provide unique bonuses; collecting multiples matters
- turn-based action with immediate scoring — take animals, then potentially trigger immediate scoring on your board
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- the four player game is extremely chaotic
- it's really a fantastic abstract
- a nice kind of versatile game ... about 30 minutes
- I really love War Chest
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–5 of 5