Game Info
Players
3-8
Age
10+
Playtime
25 min
Collection
Your Tier
Loading…
Mechanic profile
Not enough video data yet
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description
No description available.
Featured Videos
Ask a Rules Question
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 13
This page: 13
Sentiment:
pos 11 ·
mix 1 ·
neu 1 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–13 of 13
Video i_G3SiMqDhs
Grant Lyon News at 1:51 sentiment: positive
video_pk 82667 · mention_pk 207679
Click to watch at 1:51 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- great for casual party environments
- cleverness
- layers of interpretation
Cons
none
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Cooperative guessing — one player is the sort of active player, the guesser, and they know the category of something, but they don't know the actual answer of something. Everybody will write a clue one letter at a time. If I can guess it correctly, right, then the team gets a lot of points. But if I don't know what all that is for, then I say pass, and all of the clue boards get passed to the next player, and the next player writes a letter down, and so you're adding to the same word.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Cats Versus Cucumbers. Uh, this plays two to five players in 15 to 30 minutes and it is a lightweight game.
- A lot of the fun of this game is in the theme, right? You're trying to get different cats to put cats in boxes and that's going to score you points, but cucumbers, you can't reroll and they're going to scare your cat away, you know, because cats get scared of cucumbers.
- wombats uh poop square cubes.
- This is a they describe it as a bluffing game for two players, which intrigues me because I think bluffing games are oftentimes, you know, reserved for higher player counts.
- This is not a game about winning or losing or beating your partner. This is a game about getting closer to your partner.
- Uh, I've played Sea Scroll. Uh, some one, the art is awesome.
- this is a really quick playing game card game that like surprised me. I've really enjoyed my plays of Sea Scroll.
- It is a cooperative survival game, a campaign game that has a lot of different con content, a lot of different exploration.
- Soros is a pretty unique trick taking game because you're not doing trick taking with cards. You're doing them with these big chunky tiles They're kind of like domino tiles.
- looks really cool on the table. The table presence of hummingbirds is great
- which I love the title of that.
- This is a
- This is a dexterity style game.
- And it comes with those big emotional moments where you're like, 'Oh, no, it bounced off.' You know, or yes, it felt so good that it landed on there.
- Last Lantern was uh in my top five cooperative games of last year.
- And the cooperative polyomino is a thing I haven't seen before.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video l16Droi8oF0
Going Analog Discussion at 5:55 sentiment: positive
video_pk 82219 · mention_pk 206499
Click to watch at 5:55 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Very easy to teach
- Great for larger groups
- Strong cooperative team dynamic
Cons
- Clue quality can vary with players' knowledge
Thematic elements
- Cooperative word guessing and communication
- Abstract party setting
- None
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Cooperative guessing — One round per rotation where a guesser tries to identify a word from clues written by teammates; teammates give one-letter-at-a-time clues that build toward a successful guess.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- We're Grant's minions. We play all the games and they are good.
- our current favorite new party game, which is Bullseye.
- We ate a ton in Vegas. It was not healthy for that reason.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video dczcPFU6uD8
The Dice Tower Top List at 8:32 sentiment: positive
video_pk 81538 · mention_pk 203070
Click to watch at 8:32 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
Positive
Pros
- Works well.
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- Party Game
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Clue giving — Everyone is giving a clue to one person who knows the category but not the word. Everyone writes down one letter of a clue, and that person can guess or wait until more letters are written.
- passing — Passing clues around.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Fiction: Banned Books, this is from All Play. I really like the first Fiction, guessing a five-letter word. If you like things like Wordle, um this is a good sort of one versus others game because one person is trying to stop you from guessing the word cuz they lie they have to lie about a letter each time, but you know they lie, so they're picking the right time to lie. But this offer this adds some special powers and things to it, so it's slightly better than the first one, I think, if you care about the stuff. If not, you can still play it normally, so great little game.
- Got 5, a great deduction game for kids, wonderful components. Basically, um you everyone can see your numbers and you're guessing if this is higher or lower than your numbers and where they fit on a grid really works well for kids. There's a lot of good deduction games for kids these days. Another 8.5.
- And Catan on the Road, what a glorious card game version of Catan, one one few games that I am going to get a copy of this for my house because my kids and family liked it so much. We can play this with anybody. It takes Catan, it distills it down into 15 minutes. What a wonderful thing. Like it a lot.
- So, almost 15 minutes for 36 games.
- If you have thoughts on these games, you disagree, agree, whatever it might be, let us know in the comments.
- Like I said, you can find more information about most of these games on the Dice Tower channel or you will hear more about them in the future.
- Hey everybody, thanks for watching another video from the Dice Tower.
- Do you want to learn more about us, communicate with us? We have a Facebook group. We have a Discord channel. Lots of different ways to get involved with the Dice Tower.
- You can find that in our Linktree link below. So, just click that, it will take you and you can communicate with us on Facebook, join our Facebook groups. There's lots of cool things that you can find and become part of the Dice Tower.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video s7rQD5xq2d0
Review at 0:24 sentiment: positive
video_pk 79864 · mention_pk 193454
Click to watch at 0:24 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Genuinely feels different from other word guessing games.
- Creates hilarious moments through mind-reading teammates.
- Incredibly easy to scale difficulty by choosing the word.
- Bright, clean, and inviting graphic design.
- Quick, funny, and easy to teach.
- Will likely be even better with a full table.
Cons
- Can be frustrating when inheriting arrows with multiple letters and having no idea what the original clue giver was thinking.
- Might not land well if the group gets frustrated when clues don't make sense.
- Not a good fit for people who mostly play at two.
- Probably better options for those who prefer strategy games or don't enjoy interpreting other people's clues.
Thematic elements
- word guessing
Comparison games
- Codenames
- Just One
- So Clover
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Category Selection — The game provides categories, and the group chooses the actual word within that category.
- Clue giving — Clue givers write only the first letter of their clue, and subsequent players add letters to continue the clue.
- variable player count — Plays three to eight players.
- word guessing — One player is the guesser while others write clues.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Most word games ask you to think of the perfect clue. Bullseye asks you to finish someone else's, and that's where the chaos begins.
- That simple twist completely changes the experience.
- Trying to read your teammates' minds creates hilarious moments that wouldn't exist in a traditional clue game.
- If your group laughs those moments off, it's fantastic. If your group gets frustrated when clues don't make sense, this might not land quite as well.
- Bullseye ended up being one of our surprise hits.
- If you're looking for a party game that feels familiar, but still brings something new to the genre, Bullseye is definitely worth checking out.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 6cOObB-EVBA
Review at 0:06 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 79617 · mention_pk 193157
Click to watch at 0:06 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
- Nice component quality for a party game.
- Excellent and broad categories that appeal to various age groups.
- Engaging gameplay where everyone is involved.
- Cooperative nature encourages teamwork and helpful clue-giving.
- The two-stage guessing system adds interesting depth.
- Scoring system with a 'safety net' makes it more relaxed.
- Unique word game mechanics.
Cons
- Tended to go longer than expected for a party game.
- The group would gravitate towards other word association games.
- Felt a little lukewarm to the gaming group.
Thematic elements
- archery
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Clue giving — Players write down letters that form words to help the archer guess a target word.
- cooperative play — All players work together towards a common goal of having the archer guess the word.
- Set Collection — Players draw two category cards and choose one, giving them some control over the round's theme.
- variable player count — The number of times each player acts as the archer varies based on player count.
- Word Game — The core gameplay revolves around giving and guessing words within categories.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- So, I think that also the ability to choose two, or you know, you're drawing two of those uh category cards and choosing one of them, kind of helps give you a little bit of a focus, too.
- Everybody's really engaged the whole game as well.
- So you can laugh a whole bunch and have fun with it without worrying about every single round needing to be perfect.
- it just was a little lukewarm in our in our gaming group.
- I like that there was that kind of the two stages to the guesses too as you're all kind of help help the archer.
- super unique word game that I thought was people are going to enjoy if they like that second-tier level of thinking in their word games.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video rpAsTOG8Njw
Top List at 1:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 67123 · mention_pk 163100
Click to watch at 1:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- clever
- funny
Cons
none
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Board passing — you're not just writing out the letters. You're also passing your clue boards.
- Clue giving — You want one player to guess a secret word and you're giving them a clue one letter at a time.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- These are my top five board games of February.
- Elevation is a trick-taking card game that has some fun twists on the genre that I haven't seen before.
- Glimmer Deep is a really thinky engine-building game. You'll be getting resources and using those resources to buy cards, but you then you're going to use those cards to convert other resources to both more resources and other points. By the end of the game you're like, "Ooh, I got to do this and this and this and this and this and I'm about to score so many points and it's really satisfying."
- Hummingbirds is a 10-minute game that tests your internal clock.
- Honeypot is a really social card game. You'll be building a dossier of cards and then giving it to your opponents. Your opponent can check the cards two at a time and either decide to keep them or burn them to look at other cards. You are trying to stick them with bad cards, so it's all about the mind games of how you stack things.
- Bull's Eye is a party game that's both clever and funny. You want one player to guess a secret word and you're giving them a clue one letter at a time, but you're not just writing out the letters. You're also passing your clue boards. So, I have to think about what clue I'm giving, but also what clue are you trying to give?
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video EAqWcEip7uQ
Rules Teach at 1:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 66805 · mention_pk 162610
Click to watch at 1:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Good for a party game
- More 'thinky' than typical party games
- Quick rounds are possible
- Good points are achievable
Cons
- Three-player variant rules were unclear
- Clues can be difficult to decipher
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Category Selection — An archer chooses a category from drawn cards, which determines the theme for the target word or phrase.
- Clue giving — Players write single letters on arrows to form clues for a target word or phrase, passing them to teammates to continue.
- Deduction — The archer must guess the target word or phrase based on the evolving clues provided by other players.
- passing — Arrows with clues are passed clockwise to other players, who then add to the clue.
- Set Collection — Points are scored based on how many spaces are filled on the arrows when a correct guess is made.
- variant rules — A three-player variant is discussed, involving multiple arrows and different passing mechanics.
- Word Building — Clues are built letter by letter on dry erase boards, with a limit of five spaces on the arrow.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- The twist is that before you add another letter to the clue, everyone passes their clue clockwise.
- It's a little bit more um thinky, which I like.
- It's a collaborative game and I think we're all just having a fun time, so.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video RVi2T214UQc
DaniCha Review at 0:01 sentiment: positive
video_pk 64290 · mention_pk 157740
Click to watch at 0:01 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Easy to learn with light rules
- High replayability due to many categories and potential for custom word lists
- Engaging and playful interaction as clues evolve
- Word-guessing mechanic is unique and entertaining
Cons
- Mechanics rely on players recalling prior clues, which can be confusing for some
- May feel less satisfying with very small groups or when category word lists run dry
- Potentially weaker scaling beyond 8 players due to setup/readability
Thematic elements
- word guessing with clue fragments
- family/game night around a table
- light, humorous, observational
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Arrow passing (turn order) — Turns (and the associated clue-writing) pass to the next player around the circle.
- Category-driven target word — Rounds are framed by a category card that sets context for the target word.
- Clue evolution and pass-along — Clues are rewritten by subsequent players without direct communication about prior clues; a word can drift as letters are changed.
- Partial clue letters — Players write the first letter of each clue word, revealing only initial letters to the guesser.
- Tags — Rounds are framed by a category card that sets context for the target word.
- Turn-based guessing with scoring by round — Guessers attempt to deduce the target word within a few rounds; points accrue per round based on when guessed correctly.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I really enjoyed playing it with my family.
- It's a very easy game to get going.
- I really find this to be interesting.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video PXWnWjFGwVo
Let's Table It Review at 0:16 sentiment: positive
video_pk 61776 · mention_pk 154423
Click to watch at 0:16 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- engages all players and maintains involvement
- easy to teach and quick to pick up
- works well with large groups
- thematic alignment with bullseye archer concept
- high re-playability due to word/phrase variability
Cons
- quality depends on players' familiarity with each other
- clue quality varies with group dynamics
- may be less appealing for very small groups
Thematic elements
- word-guessing and clue-drafting centered on a bullseye scoring motif
- modern tabletop party setting with a round table of players
- light-hearted, cooperative-competitive, fast-paced
Comparison games
- Just One
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- category-based targeting — archer draws a category to guide the word/phrase choice
- clue drafting — clue givers create partial clues and pass their boards around the table
- Hidden Information — the archer must guess with only partial clues shown to them
- pass-and-add — players pass their clue boards and append the next letters in sequence
- scoring on central bullseye board — points are awarded on a target ring based on progress and accuracy
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- "This is a great party game for those who, like me, usually don't like party games, but just once in a while, you know, you get one of the ones that you like to play"
- "The big twist in this is that before you add another letter to your clue, you will pass your board and write the next letter on the clue that someone else started."
- "It's a game where everyone is guessing."
- "It isn't too complicated. It's like one of those ideas that you're like, 'Dang, I wish I would have thought of that because it just makes sense to play a game like this.'"
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video JxeOIYd_Bw8
Jamie, Tabletoptiktok Review at 0:03 sentiment: positive
video_pk 61351 · mention_pk 154018
Click to watch at 0:03 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Cooperative party game with a word-guessing focus.
- Broad and varied category prompts lead to diverse clues.
- Unique one-letter clue mechanic adds a fresh twist to party games.
- Accessible at different player counts and quick to teach.
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- Communication, word association, and clue deduction in a cooperative round-based format.
- Abstract word-guessing in a party-game context; no specific in-game world setting.
- Cooperative, turn-based clue-giving with passing arrows and letter-based hints.
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Category-based word selection — A guesser selects a category by drawing top cards to determine the word's theme (e.g., retail store).
- Collaborative deduction and scoring — The team collaborates to guess the word; points are awarded based on performance per round.
- Letter-based clue writing — Clue givers write a single letter on their arrow to hint at the target word.
- Passing clues (arrow mechanism) — Arrows (with letters) are passed around; the guesser must interpret the letters to deduce the word.
- Word Deciphering — Clue givers write a single letter on their arrow to hint at the target word.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- this is one of the coolest party games I have played in a long time
- I really like it
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video zw7GfHsLspM
The Dice Tower Unboxing at 4:30 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 38943 · mention_pk 117401
Click to watch at 4:30 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
- Wide range of category-based clues
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- Clue-like guessing with wordplay
- Target-based deduction
- casual party game
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Hey everybody, I'm Tom Vassel. Welcome to the most boring unboxings in the world as I take a look at what comes into the dice tower.
- We'll see you next time on the Dice Tower.
- I'm Tom Vassel. Thanks for watching this video. Check out our channel.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video tS2a-RVQ3i8
Our Family Plays Games Discussion at 42:48 sentiment: positive
video_pk 36737 · mention_pk 110284
Click to watch at 42:48 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Strong group collaboration aspect
Cons
- May be less engaging for non-party-game players
Thematic elements
- Group problem solving
- Cooperative word-clue deduction
- Casual, cooperative party game
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Cooperative Game — Players work together to build clues.
- cooperative_play — Players work together to build clues.
- word_guessing — Guess the target word from evolving clues.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- This is our happy place.
- The house always wins.
- One needs tweetment and the other needs oinkment.
- Tea Garden is gorgeous; I want to check it out.
- I'm already in love with it.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video OSbFNji8k8Y
The Dice Tower Review at 0:15 sentiment: positive
video_pk 33883 · mention_pk 100900
Click to watch at 0:15 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Unique combination of letter-based clues with a physical archer mechanic
- Fun social interaction and visible player frustration/fun, which is entertaining to watch
- Quality cover art and graphic design that fits the theme
- Category variety adds replayability and keeps gameplay fresh for different groups
- Accessible and quick to learn, scalable to different player counts
Cons
- Score-based mechanics can feel anti-climactic when someone hits 20 early
- Some categories can be small or difficult, which may frustrate players
- Not a wholly unique concept; similar word games exist, which may reduce novelty for experienced players
Thematic elements
- word/clue guessing through letter-by-letter contributions within category prompts
- A social party game session with an archery-range style mechanism and a rotating archer, where players collaboratively encode clues around a target word.
- informal, review-centric demonstration with live-play commentary
Comparison games
- Talking Tango
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Category selection and cycling — Categories provide the clues (e.g., capital city, state, singer, horror movie). Players may choose between two categories, with discards and redraws if neither is known.
- letter-by-letter clue writing — Each non-archer writes a single letter (or underscore) that could help identify the target word, which is then revealed to the archer for guessing.
- Limited information and go/no-go guessing — The archer can guess from a single letter; a correct guess scores points, while a miss adds to the 'miss' track.
- Limited Points — A correct guess earns 20 points on the track; misses are tracked on the outside, and rounds end when a miss occurs.
- Pass-the-arrow mechanic — After each round, the arrow (the archer role) passes to the next player, continuing the cycle for multiple rounds.
- Rotating archer and clue cards — One player acts as the archer each round, drawing two clue cards and establishing a target word to be guessed by others.
- Scoring with a 20-point hit — A correct guess earns 20 points on the track; misses are tracked on the outside, and rounds end when a miss occurs.
- Word Deciphering — Each non-archer writes a single letter (or underscore) that could help identify the target word, which is then revealed to the archer for guessing.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- This is not a particularly unique game.
- The combinations of things are unique, but there are other games where you spell out letters.
- You might get it and have no idea what it is.
- Getting a 20 also kind of takes away some of the most fun part of the game, which is seeing people write that second letter.
- I'm going to give it a 7 out of 10.
- Very interesting style game.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–13 of 13