Skip to main content

Honor's End

Game ID: GID0452139
Game Info
Year
2026
Players
1-4
Age
14+
Playtime
90 min
Collection
Rating
Mechanic profile
Not enough video data yet
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description

Cooperative deckbuilding adventure where knights choose paths of Valor Fortitude or Wisdom building decks to defeat enemies while managing Honor points

Description

Cooperative deckbuilding adventure where knights choose paths of Valor Fortitude or Wisdom building decks to defeat enemies while managing Honor points

Ask a Rules Question
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 4
This page: 4
Sentiment: pos 3 · mix 1 · neu 0 · neg 0
Mentions per page
Showing 1–4 of 4
Video _kbXT2oDQdQ Rules Teach at 0:06 sentiment: positive
video_pk 67773 · mention_pk 164035
Honor's End video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:06 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • The game "sings" with 2-4 players.
  • The inspiration dice mechanic is loved, providing bonus actions and flexibility.
  • The symbol-heavy design makes it accessible, especially for children.
  • The cooperative planning phase is well-executed, fostering teamwork.
  • The danger dice mechanic, where shielding misses is beneficial, is a unique and engaging feature.
  • The game offers a compelling puzzle-like experience through hand and action optimization.
  • The campaign structure provides a narrative drive.
Cons
  • The solo mode needs tweaking to be as good as multiplayer.
  • Chapter 1 felt a bit easier than expected, though later chapters are anticipated to be more challenging.
  • Iconography can be confusing, though the host hopes it will be changed.
  • The game is not a traditional deck builder; it's more about optimizing existing cards.
Thematic elements
  • a knightly quest involving rescuing individuals, fighting corrupted beings, and uncovering a larger conspiracy
  • a fantasy world with knights, corruption, and ancient threats like the Zoti
  • driven by a campaign book with story recaps and chapter-based progression
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • action chaining — Players can chain actions by playing cards that grant additional actions, allowing for complex turns.
  • Campaign play — The game is structured around a campaign with chapters and story progression, offering a narrative experience.
  • cooperative play — Designed for 1-4 players, with the host emphasizing that the game "sings" at 2-4 players, focusing on player interaction and shared decision-making.
  • Danger dice — A pool of dice with various symbols (wounds, honor loss, misses) that are rolled each round and must be managed, with shielding allowing for removal from the pool.
  • Deck building — Players start with basic cards and can acquire new ones, though the focus is on optimizing existing cards rather than constantly upgrading the deck with many new cards.
  • Inspiration dice — Special dice that can provide bonus actions, card draws, or be used as wilds, adding a layer of tactical flexibility.
  • Resource Management (Monarchy/Temple Tracks) — Players advance on temple and monarchy tracks to gain benefits like consumables or advanced action cards.
  • symbol-based actions — Cards primarily use symbols to convey effects, making the game visually intuitive and accessible, with minimal text.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Two player to four player is really where this game sings.
  • Don't forget this is a prototype. So rules can change, things can change, cards can be different.
  • This is a symbol heavy game. None of these cards that I've seen so far have any text. It's all symbols, which works quite well, actually, especially well with my kids.
  • Every hand is a puzzle.
  • I can't tell you how much I love that the danger dice have a miss, but you still want to shield that miss because otherwise you might have shields and you roll these misses and you go, 'Well, then these shields are useless.'
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video C5Tt2-24u94 Interview at 1:40:21 sentiment: positive
video_pk 66525 · mention_pk 162107
Honor's End video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:40:21 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
Very Positive
Pros
  • Solves the 'quarterback' problem in co-op games.
  • Cards offer multiple uses, making each turn a puzzle.
  • Satisfying deck building and strategic decisions.
Cons
  • Slightly delayed release due to design complexity.
Thematic elements
  • Campaign
Comparison games
  • Moonrakers
  • Luminor
  • Slay the Spire
  • Ascension
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • asymmetric roles — Players have different roles and abilities, contributing to the cooperative puzzle.
  • asymmetry — Players may have different puzzles to solve due to different roles or abilities, preventing quarterbacking.
  • Campaign — Features a narrative campaign with nine chapters.
  • Card tucking — A breakthrough mechanic where cards have bottom sections to power other cards.
  • Cooperative — Designed from the ground up as a cooperative game.
  • Cooperative deck building — A cooperative deck-building game that evolved from a digital companion to Moonrakers.
  • Deck building — Core mechanic, with a focus on card tucking.
  • Narrative Campaign — Features a nine-chapter narrative campaign where story elements and game mechanics evolve.
  • Simultaneous Play — Players play simultaneously, reducing the opportunity for one player to dominate decisions.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I think that the worst thing that we could possibly do is bore you.
  • We're going to make a game that a lot of people don't like and that is totally fine.
  • It's all about the tracks. Just like it's all about the cones. It's all about the tracks.
  • I think that anyone can be a game designer. And so a lot of times they're flexing those muscles that they don't know they have by telling you how to fix your game.
  • I love fusing two things that aren't aren't usually together. That's where you find new.
  • The skill ceiling is pretty high, which is kind of interesting given that it is a dice game and you'd think like, wow, the the variability in the dice rolling uh would make it super variable, but no, like Toby's just better at this game and he's going to beat me pretty often.
  • I want to be like thinking about something the whole time, you know? I want to be doing something.
  • He never wants somebody to mess to mess with his plans. In your games, people mess with plans, which I love.
  • We're really proud of where that ended up.
  • So, it's like, 'Oh, I can't spend I can't spend my coins anymore because that's points. I got to hold on to those.'
  • It's my favorite of our designs. I love it. I'm so happy that it is delivering.
  • I don't want to be that guy [the quarterback]. But I can't stop myself.
  • The fun part is is we don't lose the collaboration because there's literally a phase at the top of everything.
  • It solved another issue for me too, which is I am recognize this myself. I am a quarterback co-op player and I hate that about myself.
  • The breakthrough in that project was how do we make it not feel just like we we pasted this over top of Moonrakers.
  • So, there's there's a resource that literally is you can change the color or you can change the face of any of your dice and and that is a huge strategy and a huge part of winning is manipulating your dice at the right time and saving them for the right moments.
  • The skill ceiling is pretty high, which is kind of interesting given that it is a dice game...
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video VM7YTZU-V3c Board Game Garden Discussion at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 34897 · mention_pk 104070
Board Game Garden - Honor's End video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Two modes provide varied play experiences and replayability
  • Solo mode explicitly supported with dedicated components
  • Story mode progression unlocks additional components for ongoing play
  • Deck-building with distinct hero, wound, equipment, and consumable cards
  • Clear progression tracks (temple and monarchy) that influence deck quality and options
Cons
  • Prototype components and rules may change before final release
  • Rules complexity and component density may present a steep learning curve
  • Long playtime (90–120 minutes) could be intimidating for casual players
  • Not a traditional fully-cooperative deck-builder since each player maintains their own deck
Thematic elements
  • honor, chivalry, and ancient magic threatening the realm
  • Valora, a medieval kingdom
  • story-driven cooperative adventure with two distinct modes (story and adventure)
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • card chaining and tuck abilities — Cards can be played in chains, with tucked abilities, main actions, and ally abilities that influence teammates.
  • cooperative actions — Cards can be played in chains, with tucked abilities, main actions, and ally abilities that influence teammates.
  • Cooperative Game — Players work together to defeat enemies and advance a shared narrative, while managing personal decks and resources.
  • cooperative play — Players work together to defeat enemies and advance a shared narrative, while managing personal decks and resources.
  • Deck building — Each player builds and evolves their own deck, using cards to power actions and progress.
  • deck-building (individual decks) — Each player builds and evolves their own deck, using cards to power actions and progress.
  • dice pool and danger management — A shared pool of danger dice (and inspiration dice) enters play; players balance risk, shield dice, and gain or lose honor based on outcomes.
  • Track advancement — Temple and monarchy tracks drive deck growth and access to equipment/consumable cards, shaping strategic direction.
  • Track-based progression — Temple and monarchy tracks drive deck growth and access to equipment/consumable cards, shaping strategic direction.
  • two-mode structure — Story mode offers a narrative arc with progressive chapters and unlockable components; adventure mode is a repeatable one-shot against three enemies.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is a prototype and subject to change.
  • Honor's End is a cooperative deck building game.
  • There are two different modes in this game, the story mode as well as the adventure mode.
  • The story mode offers in-game expansions that add more components as you progress.
  • This is available now when this video goes up and will go up a few days after the campaign launches.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 0QrIH6MojN0 Solo Power Games Playthrough at 8:36 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 33094 · mention_pk 98184
Solo Power Games - Honor's End video thumbnail
Click to watch at 8:36 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • fast-paced due to simultaneous play
  • deep deck-building with chaining and tuck mechanics
  • solo mode with Squire Edmund adds depth
  • aesthetically appealing with clear card art and components
Cons
  • dice luck can be punishing in solo
  • large dice pools and multiple risk faces can overwhelm
  • loss conditions can feel harsh and grindy without perfect luck
  • early rounds demand tight balancing between offense and defense
Thematic elements
  • Monarchy, temple and key-track progression, dungeon-style monster encounters
  • Fantasy kingdom with monarchs, temples, and enemies; campaign-driven progression and story integration
  • Story-driven adventure with campaign unlocks and expansions-like pathways
Comparison games
  • Spooktacular
  • Tend
  • Legacy of You
  • Regisside
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • ally_squire_mechanic_in_solo — solo mode uses a Squire Edmund deck to simulate ally support, adding attack and draw options.
  • danger_dice_and_risk — danger dice (black and gray) introduce risk; wounds, dishonor, shields, and rerolls shape outcomes; some dice are permanent across rounds.
  • Deck building — start with a base deck, acquire new cards, tuck to trigger bottom-row actions; wounds clog the deck; discard and reshuffle mechanics.
  • deck-building — start with a base deck, acquire new cards, tuck to trigger bottom-row actions; wounds clog the deck; discard and reshuffle mechanics.
  • end_and_trait_card_rewards — defeating enemies yields trait cards with immediate effects and potential drawbacks that alter subsequent rounds.
  • Simultaneous Actions — cards are laid out and resolved in a flowing, multi-row system; arrows on cards allow chaining and expansion of actions.
  • simultaneous_action_and_chaining — cards are laid out and resolved in a flowing, multi-row system; arrows on cards allow chaining and expansion of actions.
  • Track advancement — multiple tracks including enemy health, threat, honor, temple, and monarchy govern progress, damage, and victory conditions.
  • track_and_resources_system — multiple tracks including enemy health, threat, honor, temple, and monarchy govern progress, damage, and victory conditions.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I thought it was a lot of fun and the simultaneous play made it brisk even at higher player counts.
  • I love love love deck building.
  • Solo seems so much harder than the Oh shoot.
  • The simultaneous play made it brisk.
  • I really have enjoyed it solo.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–4 of 4
Game Deep Dive
View on BoardGameGeek