Skip to main content

Borealis: Arctic Expeditions

Game ID: GID0452170
Game Info
Year
2025
Players
2-4
Age
10+
Playtime
45 min
Complexity
2/5
Collection
Your Tier
Loading…
Mechanic profile
Not enough video data yet
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description

Arctic wildlife photography game where scientific teams venture into uncharted territories playing cards to snap photos and arrange animals in patterns

Description

Arctic wildlife photography game where scientific teams venture into uncharted territories playing cards to snap photos and arrange animals in patterns

Ask a Rules Question
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 12
This page: 12
Sentiment: pos 10 · mix 0 · neu 2 · neg 0
Mentions per page
Showing 1–12 of 12
Video J5Kw8JDxCPk The Dice Tower Discussion at 2:53 sentiment: positive
video_pk 92850 · mention_pk 249686
The Dice Tower - Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 2:53 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Lovely little game
  • Wonderful family-style game
  • Can teach to just about anybody
  • Pleasant
  • Easy to approach
  • Easy to teach
  • Easy to enjoy
  • Skill levels aren't punishing
Cons
  • Very unassuming look
  • Very unassuming gameplay
Thematic elements
  • Expeditions
  • Arctic
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • scoring — Players score for a few different things, but everything's kind of simple.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • And then Wild Blooms, a game in which you have these flowers that you're collecting. A nice a nice game. Uh you collect a flower, and it activates everybody else. Interesting ideas in it, seven out of 10.
  • Uh Morty Morty, which is nominated for the Spiel des Jahres. And at this point, you know if it's won or not. I don't know if it's won or not. But at the we didn't like it at all. I gave it a five out of 10.
  • And then King of Tokyo Godzilla, what a great breath of fresh air, great themeing, really cool. I like King of Tokyo anyway. This is the best version since I played, a nine out of 10.
  • Hey folks, thanks for watching another one of our videos. If you like our videos, if you like our channel, if you would love to game with us at one of our conventions, check out Dice Tower Cruise, Dice Tower East, and Dice Tower West.
  • False Logic Puzzles by Norman D. Willis. I haven't read a good book in a while, and I'm afraid that trend is going to continue here.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video x6Hvuuv_E70 The Dice Tower Unboxing at 4:07 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 81050 · mention_pk 199330
The Dice Tower - Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:07 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Expeditions
  • Arctic
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Hey everybody, I'm Tom Vassel. Welcome to the most boring unboxings on the planet Earth as we take a look at stuff that comes in a dice tower and we see what it is.
  • This may be the biggest box we've ever gotten for a single game.
  • Completely unnecessary.
  • I cannot wait till this particular um motif is done. There are other ways to do cards.
  • Thanks so much for watching.
  • I'm Tom Vassel and this has been the most boring unboxing in the world on the Dice Hour.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video GkXYX2T7-ms Review at 0:12 sentiment: positive
video_pk 79561 · mention_pk 193054
Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:12 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Incredibly smooth, clean, and simple rules with no rough edges
  • Gorgeous art and highly distinguishable colors
  • Fast play time, moving even quicker than the 45-minute box estimate
  • Highly approachable and easy to teach to non-gamers and gamers alike
  • Satisfying and rewarding 'regroup' reset action
Cons
  • The title 'Boreal Arctic Expeditions' is a bit of a mouthful
  • The physical movement of colors/scientists makes very little thematic sense
  • Possibility of feeling a little samey if played excessively
Thematic elements
  • Observing animals on an Arctic expedition
  • Arctic
Comparison games
  • Reef
  • In the Footsteps of Darwin
  • Elysium
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Action Selection / Regrouping — Players can choose to take a regroup action to reset their hand, gather scientists, and score victory points based on signs in their camps.
  • Card Drafting — Players draft face-up cards into their hand, with the option to spend victory points to flush and refresh the card pool.
  • Grid Movement / Character Relocation — Playing cards triggers the physical movement of scientist characters to different locations or camps.
  • Hand Management — Players play animal cards from their hand based on the availability of scientist characters in their play area.
  • Set Collection — Players aim to match identical animal types across different locations for scoring.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • They don't really make games like this anymore so much. This game has kind of an old soul about it.
  • In the 90s, this would have been nominated for the Spiel des Jahres.
  • There are no rough edges on this thing. It is butter, right?
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video APfl1lINH8c Playthrough at 0:09 sentiment: positive
video_pk 72290 · mention_pk 170504
Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:09 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • cozy, approachable puzzle vibe that remains engaging in solo play
  • solid integration of spatial placement with linear endgame goals
  • compact playtime that feels complete without overstaying its welcome
  • solo adaptation that preserves core gameplay while offering a clear challenge curve
  • thematic flavor comes through even in abstract placement through animal types and arctic setting
  • predictable and clear scoring structure that invites strategic planning and optimization
Cons
  • the base game lacks an official solo mode; the solo variant relies on house rules or host-adjusted parameters
  • early-market and card-draw variability can create feels-bad moments if the market alignment is unfriendly
  • some players may want more explicit guidance on optimal strategies for the solo variant, since it changes endgame timing
  • the reliance on dice to manipulate market introduces a luck element that can feel at odds with tightly designed puzzle decisions for some players
Thematic elements
  • animal observation, cooperative-leaning puzzle management, and location-control with endgame scoring tied to biodiversity and camp staffing
  • Arctic exploration conducted by a small team of scientists and explorers, attempting to observe wildlife and collect meaningful data while navigating a grid-based puzzle world.
  • procedural and observational; the emphasis is on solving spatial-placement puzzles with a light narrative thread of exploration and discovery rather than cinematic storytelling
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • camp_mechanics_and_science_resources — scientists gathered at camps act as a resource that contributes to endgame scoring. Managing where scientists end up and how many survive a given turn becomes a meaningful subsystem within the broader placement puzzle.
  • endgame_scoring — two distinct endgame goals offer strategic pressure: (a) locations with two animals of the same species yield points, and (b) scientists in camps contribute points. Both add tension to midgame placement decisions and reward spatial clustering and diversification of species.
  • market_dice — a die is rolled to influence market card availability: a low result tends to reveal more cards, while a high roll can reset the market. This introduces a probabilistic texture to card drafting that players must adapt to, especially in a solo context where control is limited.
  • placement — players place animals into predefined locations on a board, shaping how nearby locations become viable and triggering shifts in active constraints (e.g., vehicle alignment and camp placement). This drives a chain of decisions about which animals to deploy and where to position them to maximize endgame scoring opportunities.
  • regroup_action — on a regroup, players discard unwanted cards and collect scientists from the board. The regroup step becomes a key moment to pivot strategy, move toward or away from endgame goals, and refresh options in preparation for the next round.
  • solo_variant_adjustment — the solo variant condenses the standard multiplayer end condition from seven animals in a location to five, creating a tighter puzzle and a faster cadence. It preserves the core mechanisms but scales the challenge to a solo format, encouraging different risk calculations and timing.
  • species_discovery_and_multiplicity — scoring and placement revolve around acquiring multiple species and balancing the count of each species across locations. This encourages players to think about biodiversity in a spatially distributed way rather than simply maximizing item counts.
  • Speed Matching — each animal placement is tied to a vehicle among the top two available options. The chosen vehicle determines which directions the team’s marker (the flag) moves, integrating a simple but impactful constraint that guides planning and risk-reward calculations.
  • vehicle_matching — each animal placement is tied to a vehicle among the top two available options. The chosen vehicle determines which directions the team’s marker (the flag) moves, integrating a simple but impactful constraint that guides planning and risk-reward calculations.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Hi everybody and welcome to a new playthrough video.
  • Today we're going to be playing Borealis Arctic Expedition.
  • First off, let me say a huge thank you to Lucky Duck Games for sending me a copy of this game.
  • Um, I'm very excited.
  • The game is very puzzly, very cozy, puzzly, really up my alley.
  • there isn't a solo mode for this game, so I couldn't play it solo.
  • it's I think I can for this game I can make a solo mode to try.
  • So, I've changed basically nothing, but um, I changed a little bit to be able to play it solo.
  • We're going to just try that today.
  • This is the setup for the game. It's basically the same as the multiplayer.
  • The dice is just going to remove cards from the open market
  • The game play itself is exactly the same.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video NlChePd7Pgo Board Game Buzz Review at 0:14 sentiment: positive
video_pk 67944 · mention_pk 164233
Board Game Buzz - Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:14 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Easy to set up and teach with a thin, well-explained rulebook
  • Deep crunch and optimization opportunities through sequencing and scoring options
  • Variety of end-game objectives and scoring consequences add replay value
  • Good compatibility with a wide player count and accessible for new players
Cons
  • Limited thematic depth and relatively abstract feel
  • Interaction between players is minimal, leading to a multiplayer solitaire vibe
  • No solo mode included, limiting solitary play options
  • Replayability concerns for some players once novelty wears off
Thematic elements
  • optimization/puzzle-driven processing of scientists and vehicles to maximize end-game points
  • Arctic expedition to study and photograph animals
  • abstract/engine-building feel with minimal thematic storytelling
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • camp system for scientists — Scientists are allocated to camps and can be re-deployed, yielding additional points and enabling different placements.
  • card placement into rows with cost — Players select a card from their hand and place it into one of three rows, paying with scientists by moving them to adjacent regions.
  • end-game scoring tracks — Animals placed advance along scoring tracks, increasing point potential the deeper you go.
  • Engine Building — Each placement affects future options by reconfiguring where workers sit and which animals can be played next, creating a planning puzzle.
  • engine-building / sequencing — Each placement affects future options by reconfiguring where workers sit and which animals can be played next, creating a planning puzzle.
  • Multi-Use Cards — Players select a card from their hand and place it into one of three rows, paying with scientists by moving them to adjacent regions.
  • objective cards and set collection — Objective cards provide end-game scoring goals that everyone can race to complete; various scoring conditions add strategic layers.
  • regroup / refresh mechanic — Discarding and drawing to refresh the hand and restructure available options; redistributing scientists via camps during regroup.
  • Worker Placement — Scientists (workers) are moved and managed to enable placements and to push scoring opportunities.
  • Worker placement / resource management — Scientists (workers) are moved and managed to enable placements and to push scoring opportunities.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is a very thin rule book. A rulebook which is actually very well thought out. It's very well planned out.
  • There's not a lot of theme in this game. There's really not. It is very abstract but it does it really well.
  • The crunch is there in this game.
  • I absolutely love games where I really do have to think ahead and try to set myself up for future moves.
  • This is a multiplayer solitaire game.
  • I'm shocked that it doesn't have a solo mode.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video BMQcg3Mr7x0 Rules Teach at 0:04 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 67757 · mention_pk 163977
Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:04 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • observing wildlife and taking photographs with a team of scientists
  • Arctic, wildlife expedition
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • end-game and tie-break rules — Game ends when a player places seven cards in a location; final scoring with tie-breakers by furthest down track and point tokens.
  • exploration track advancement — Advancing on the exploration tracks provides points; flags on locations determine end-game scoring path.
  • objectives and token scoring — Reveal objective cards; claim five-point tokens when completed; first/last turn order affects eligibility.
  • observe an animal — Choose a card from hand, place it in a location with matching scientists, move the scientist along arrows, and resolve vehicle and flag advancement; draw a new card or replace up to four cards; can do this once per turn.
  • regroup — Discard any number of animal cards to draw back to four; end turn with four cards; gain a victory point for each scientist in a camp; move all scientists from both camps to a single location.
  • set collection and photography scoring — Score for sets of same species in a location and for photographs, combined with track advancement and scoring cards.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • And that's Borealis Arctic Expedition.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video VQAacoiw-v4 Review at 0:01 sentiment: positive
video_pk 66479 · mention_pk 162005
Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:01 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Art is very cutesy and the cards are genuinely cute.
  • Incredibly light teach, can get people up and running in five minutes.
  • Satisfying 40 to 45 minute game.
  • Surprisingly crunchy scoring and opportunity cost of actions.
  • Great amount of decision space and variability from the goals.
  • Simple yet crunchy with variability.
  • Easy to teach and pretty on the eyes.
Cons
  • Players can rush the end game.
  • Game direction is a little samey outside of the variable goals.
  • Can be AP-prone (analysis paralysis) with a few long turns.
  • Sometimes you're stuck with no good plays for what you're trying to do, due to luck.
  • Core engine is straightforward and samey.
Thematic elements
  • Collecting sets of animals
  • Arctic
Comparison games
  • Cascadia
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card Play — playing animal cards in two lanes on your personal player board.
  • End game trigger — Playing seven cards in a column triggers the end of the round. Triggers the end of the game.
  • Push Your Luck — Do you want to go all the way to seven? How are you playing that?
  • Set Collection — collecting sets of animals while trying to balance multiple scoring criteria
  • variable goals — There's going to be a bunch of variable goals.
  • Worker Placement — scientist movement is necessary for the card. In this case, I'm going to move a pink scientist that way and a blue scientist that way.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This game surprised me. I was not expecting a lot from this.
  • This game is surprisingly crunchy as far as weighing up the opportunity cost of everything you do because everything is fun.
  • So, this game ends up being very crunchy while being very simple as far as how it actually plays.
  • I'm going to give it a four out of five. It's simple yet crunchy with variability from the goals.
  • It's the kind of thing that I do wonder if that score might go up over time.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video d7AzAjMdv5E Allies Arene Enemies Review at 0:06 sentiment: positive
video_pk 66050 · mention_pk 160546
Allies Arene Enemies - Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:06 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Adorable theme and art: the pastel parkas and cute scientists are a major selling point and set a welcoming tone.
  • Visually appealing components and icons: despite diverse art styles, clear icons differentiate functions effectively.
  • Accessible entry point: described as a gateway game that can be explained quickly (2 minutes), with a light puzzle suitable for casual players.
  • Multiple victory paths and variable scoring: scoring cards and objectives provide replayability and diverse strategies.
  • Compact, fast-playing feel: presented as a quick, moving puzzle that remains engaging without heavy downtime.
Cons
  • Limited player interaction: most action is solitaire-like with only some interaction around racing for goals and card selection.
  • Potential repetitiveness: described as potentially samey from turn to turn, especially for players seeking deeper variety.
  • Playtime discrepancy: the box claims 45 minutes, but two-player sessions have tended to run longer in practice.
  • Perfectionist concerns: players who want to accomplish everything may feel overwhelmed by the number of options and must concede partial goals.
  • Visual variety can complicate play: art from multiple artists can require reliance on icons to differentiate card effects.
Thematic elements
  • Array
  • Arctic expedition
  • Informational review with descriptive praise and caveats
Comparison games
  • Azul
  • Splendor
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card Play — On your turn, you play a card by choosing a location to place it and then move the depicted scientists according to the card.
  • Compound Scoring — Players use a mix of scoring cards and objectives that create different scoring conditions each game.
  • End Game Trigger via Location Load — The game ends as soon as a player has seven cards at one location, triggering final scoring across multiple tracks and bonuses.
  • Movement — Movement of scientists and expedition tokens is driven by the card played, including advancing along the expedition track and triggering new card draws when icons align.
  • Race — There is a race to complete the objective cards; finishing first grants advantages within scoring.
  • Racing to Objectives — There is a race to complete the objective cards; finishing first grants advantages within scoring.
  • Set Collection — Goal to group and maximize the same animals within a single location for scoring and objective fulfillment.
  • variable scoring via scoring cards — Players use a mix of scoring cards and objectives that create different scoring conditions each game.
  • Worker Placement — Placing a scientist at a location to enable placement-movement actions dictated by the card.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is a gateway game. It can be explained in 2 minutes.
  • The heart of the puzzle is planning.
  • The art and presentation is really inviting.
  • This is a fastmoving, nice, light game with some puzzle to consider, a cute theme, and some of the most adorable scientists we've ever seen.
  • Almost no interaction other than racing for goals and taking cards from the market.
  • There are different paths.
  • You have to be okay with not doing everything because there are so many things to consider.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video gunhg0zN9eY The Board Game Garden Discussion at 9:22 sentiment: positive
video_pk 42907 · mention_pk 130435
The Board Game Garden - Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 9:22 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • cute art and theme
  • potential strong solo mode
Cons
  • may be light for heavy gamers
Thematic elements
  • puzzly, compact micro-game with charm
  • Arctic exploration with cozy, animal-art visuals
  • light, approachable puzzle
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • puzzle/set-collection — collects and resolves cute animal-themed challenges
  • Set Collection — collects and resolves cute animal-themed challenges
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I'm so excited to get there and hang out and see everyone.
  • This is the cozy season that we're moving into—winter, holidays, cozy solo and multiplayer gaming.
  • I love the board game community—it's so nice, kind, welcoming, and easy to start conversations.
  • Tend is probably one of my favorite games from 2025. I love it so much, both multiplayer as well as solo.
  • Cozy Stickerville... I cannot wait for this game. It is bringing two worlds together that I just love so much.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 74tFVzwIWbg Grant Lyon Retail Release Overview at 23:06 sentiment: positive
video_pk 39179 · mention_pk 118075
Grant Lyon - Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 23:06 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Beautiful artwork; evocative theme.
  • Multiple layers of scoring provide depth without heavy length.
Cons
  • Requires table space for the board and meeples.
  • Some players may want more direct objective clarity earlier in play.
Thematic elements
  • Penguins, boreal scenery; cold-weather exploration with puzzle depth.
  • Arctic exploration with card-driven actions and meeples on multiple locations.
  • Cerebral, puzzle-forward with strong visuals.
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card placement / location-based scoring — Play cards to three locations; track vehicles and meeple movement to score.
  • Meeple movement and track interaction — Vehicles on cards drive movement along scoring tracks.
  • Set collection / multi-location scoring — Objectives influence scoring, with cards chosen to unlock different point paths.
  • Tile Placement — Play cards to three locations; track vehicles and meeple movement to score.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • the perfect type of game to play at a bar or a restaurant while you're waiting for your food
  • it's a game full of luck
  • looks incredible on the table. It has wonderful table presents
  • this gets me into the holiday spirit for sure
  • I am here for it. I definitely want to try Trombone Champ
  • it's a silly thematic lightweight card game
  • this is a game of communication. You're basically using phrases from Simish
  • I think it's really fun and one of the things that I would say about Mad Kala is that it's more fun every single time I play it
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video _g0XbOriCW8 Watch It Played Rules Teach at 0:13 sentiment: positive
video_pk 38109 · mention_pk 114609
Watch It Played - Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:13 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Clear instructional narrative with step-by-step setup and playthrough
  • Engaging demonstration of actions and decision points
  • Thematic flavor of Arctic exploration and wildlife photography
  • Well-covered rules with emphasis on legal plays and mistakes to avoid
Cons
  • Rules can be dense for newcomers
  • Setup and component count may be intimidating to beginners
Thematic elements
  • Exploration and wildlife photography under polar exploration conditions
  • Uncharted boreal territories in the Arctic, wildlife observation and photography.
  • Card-driven, with scientists moving between locations and camps to observe animals
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • card play and placement — Play cards to a location by matching the scientists shown on the card with those in the target location, then move the corresponding scientists along arrows.
  • Compound Scoring — Complete randomized objectives that require positioning and collecting tokens, scoring points when fulfilled within a round.
  • Deck and pool management — Maintain a pool of available cards and a separate draw deck; draw from pool or top of deck; manage replenishment via token actions.
  • Dice Placement — Play cards to a location by matching the scientists shown on the card with those in the target location, then move the corresponding scientists along arrows.
  • End Game Bonuses — Points are tallied based on locations, flags, animal types, and scoring cards; the round ends after all players have taken a turn, and the end condition triggers final scoring.
  • end-of-round and end-game scoring — Points are tallied based on locations, flags, animal types, and scoring cards; the round ends after all players have taken a turn, and the end condition triggers final scoring.
  • Objective-based scoring — Complete randomized objectives that require positioning and collecting tokens, scoring points when fulfilled within a round.
  • Token economy and scoring tokens — Scoring tokens used to replace the pool or claim tokens from objectives; tokens provide dynamic scoring options across rounds.
  • Worker Placement — Move your scientists to locations and camps as you play cards; scientists in camps cannot be moved by future observe actions.
  • Worker placement / movement — Move your scientists to locations and camps as you play cards; scientists in camps cannot be moved by future observe actions.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • In Borealis Arctic Expeditions, you and the other players will be competing to move your scientists to various locations deeper and deeper into uncharted territory, where you'll capture photos of various animals and attempt to complete objectives.
  • The player with the most points at the end of the game wins.
  • Each will have a requirement that players can work to fulfill.
  • This would be an illegal card play because putting this animal here requires having both a yellow and blue scientist.
  • And if there's still a tie, well, the players are just going to have to live with the fact that they won't know who is better at the game this time.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video q29C0PNF500 The Board Game Garden Discussion at 26:13 sentiment: positive
video_pk 35663 · mention_pk 106624
The Board Game Garden - Borealis: Arctic Expeditions video thumbnail
Click to watch at 26:13 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Distinctive worker-distribution mechanism
  • Beautiful animal art
Cons
  • No solo mode in that initial release
Thematic elements
  • puzzle-like card-distribution and vehicle/track mechanics
  • arctic wildlife photography theme
  • cute, family-friendly table presence
Comparison games
  • Calico
  • Cascadia
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Track Advancement — matching vehicle icons progresses tracks for points
  • vehicle track progression — matching vehicle icons progresses tracks for points
  • Worker Placement — place colored workers to trigger column actions and push mechanics
  • worker placement distribution — place colored workers to trigger column actions and push mechanics
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • It's going to be a long one because I have a lot of games to talk about.
  • I really enjoyed Sir Ocelot's Cave.
  • Faeya's Swamp is fantastic.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–12 of 12
Game Deep Dive
View on BoardGameGeek