Skip to main content
In a Grove box art

In a Grove

Game ID: GID0166948
Game Info
Year
2010
Players
2-5
Age
9+
Playtime
20 min
Collection
Your Tier
Loading…
Mechanic profile
Not enough video data yet
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description

In a Grove — a.k.a. 藪の中, Yabunonaka, and Hattari — is a game of bluffing and deduction, and the player who makes too many false accusations loses the game.

The game is played in rounds. Each round, each player receives one of the eight silhouettes (which are numbered 2-8 with one blank), while three silhouettes are placed in the center of the table as suspects and the final silhouette is dubbed the victim. (With three players, the #2 is removed from the game.) You have to determine which suspect is the culprit, either to accuse him or to lure the other players into accusing someone who's innocent!

All players secretly look at their silhouettes, then pass them right, then look at the new silhouette they received. The first player of the round secretly looks at two of the three suspects, optionally swapping the victim for one of these suspects. This player then places a colored accusation marker below one of the suspects. The next player looks at the two suspects not just marked with an accusation marker, then places a colored accusation marker of their own, covering any markers already beneath that suspect. This continues until all four players have placed an accusation marker, with each player not being allowed to look at the suspect just accused.

The round ends, and players reveal the suspects. Who's the culprit? The suspect bearing the highest number – except if the #5 is among the suspects, in which case the suspect with the lowest number is guilty. (The suspect with no number is always innocent.) Anyone who has accused the correct suspect receives their accusation marker back. Any markers incorrectly placed are flipped colored-side down and given to the player who owns the marker on top of the stack. The first player token rotates clockwise, then a new round begins.

At the end of a turn if a player has eight or more tokens — or has no tokens — then the game ends, and that player loses.

Earlier editions of In a Grove supported 3-4 players, while the 2021 edition contains slight changes to the rules and components to allow for play with 2-5 people.

Description

In a Grove — a.k.a. 藪の中, Yabunonaka, and Hattari — is a game of bluffing and deduction, and the player who makes too many false accusations loses the game.

The game is played in rounds. Each round, each player receives one of the eight silhouettes (which are numbered 2-8 with one blank), while three silhouettes are placed in the center of the table as suspects and the final silhouette is dubbed the victim. (With three players, the #2 is removed from the game.) You have to determine which suspect is the culprit, either to accuse him or to lure the other players into accusing someone who's innocent!

All players secretly look at their silhouettes, then pass them right, then look at the new silhouette they received. The first player of the round secretly looks at two of the three suspects, optionally swapping the victim for one of these suspects. This player then places a colored accusation marker below one of the suspects. The next player looks at the two suspects not just marked with an accusation marker, then places a colored accusation marker of their own, covering any markers already beneath that suspect. This continues until all four players have placed an accusation marker, with each player not being allowed to look at the suspect just accused.

The round ends, and players reveal the suspects. Who's the culprit? The suspect bearing the highest number – except if the #5 is among the suspects, in which case the suspect with the lowest number is guilty. (The suspect with no number is always innocent.) Anyone who has accused the correct suspect receives their accusation marker back. Any markers incorrectly placed are flipped colored-side down and given to the player who owns the marker on top of the stack. The first player token rotates clockwise, then a new round begins.

At the end of a turn if a player has eight or more tokens — or has no tokens — then the game ends, and that player loses.

Earlier editions of In a Grove supported 3-4 players, while the 2021 edition contains slight changes to the rules and components to allow for play with 2-5 people.

Ask a Rules Question
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 3
This page: 3
Sentiment: pos 2 · mix 1 · neu 0 · neg 0
Mentions per page
Showing 1–3 of 3
Video PDuiLeAa4qo Grant Lyon Listicle at 16:25 sentiment: positive
video_pk 89794 · mention_pk 239108
Grant Lyon - In a Grove video thumbnail
Click to watch at 16:25 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • New edition has slight rule changes
  • Component changes allow play with 2-5 players (up from 4)
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Murder
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • bluffing — A game of bluffing and deduction where players try to identify a murderer.
  • Deduction — Players must deduce who is the killer among suspects.
  • Social Deduction — Involves social deduction elements.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I'm Grant with Grant's gamerex back with my monthly video on the best games coming to retail uh this is the month of March 20122
  • I guarantee I pronounce that wrong but I did my best okay founders of taakan
  • You know so you can play you can play how our Health Care system is flawed here in America hey we want to treat patients but we want to make money doing it we don't care if you're healed if we don't make money so do you want to be frustrated by America's Health Care System then play Clinic
  • if you've never played flux it is a small card game that is wacky and wild and always changing and that is the point of the game
  • so if you're looking for a sort of Stone Age theme uh that involves a bunch of luck but is very accessible to all family members then check out fire and Stone from Pegasus
  • it's sort of a murder mystery mixed with an escape room Style game
  • this is actually a revised version of a game that came out in 2012 and a lot has changed here it is not the same game that came out in 2012
  • they are educational publisher they publish educational games but they don't feel like educational games the whole you know the point of the game is to be a good game and to have a fun game and to have interesting gameplay all while educating you on a particular theme
  • I love the community of board games and we help each other find good games
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video XrM2u1434vY UndeadVikingVideos Discussion at 1:47:02 sentiment: positive
video_pk 84777 · mention_pk 215989
UndeadVikingVideos - In a Grove video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:47:02 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
Positive but complex
Pros
  • Good game
  • Tricky to play
  • Has an interesting idea
Cons
  • Difficult to know if playing correctly
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Deduction — A deduction game where players try to figure out something.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Wrigle roulette is like a little bag draw game. Kind of fun.
  • the better game is Dying Message, which is like a you're the last you're basically it's the last moments before you die and they have this whole thing where you're supposed to like set up a crime scene and play dead on it and then they people are supposed to take a picture of you.
  • I'm working on this right now.
  • If Matt, if you get it, you win. If Evan gets it, you Matt wins. If Chad gets it, Matt wins.
  • Stolen base is correct. Well done.
  • It's just it's it's the stupid Minecraft duck all Minecraft chicken thing all over again.
  • randomized double blind placebo control study in adults to test the efficacy of mitoquinone mitoquinol mass methylate as postexposure prophylaxis for SARS COVID v V2 co SARS co V2.
  • So, um, you know, I mean, like the some of the complaints about it is just so dumb like they're like, "Oh, I can't believe like he had his own children like playing the roles in the in the in in in the movie or whatever."
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video nGDOEwXKLqc Board Gaming Ramblings Discussion at 2:41 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 38426 · mention_pk 115701
Board Gaming Ramblings - In a Grove video thumbnail
Click to watch at 2:41 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • engaging table interaction
  • short playtime
Cons
  • abstract, not universally appealing
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • abstract deduction / table interaction — players deduce which suspect is the killer based on abstract points and limited information
  • Deduction — players deduce which suspect is the killer based on abstract points and limited information
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • three suspects and you only get to look at two
  • it's called a little like programming
  • it's an escape room game so it doesn't really make sense
  • it's a fun game
  • it's a tiny version of maple circus
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Top
Showing 1–3 of 3
View on BoardGameGeek