/pic4060782.jpg)
Game Info
Year
2018
Players
3-6
Age
14+
Playtime
240 min
Collection
Ratings
Creator Score
Mechanic profile
Not enough video data yet
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description
Who Goes There? is a cooperative game of growing paranoia. At the beginning of the game, all players are human and there is no reason not to trust each other completely, but as the temperature drops and mistakes are made, players start doubting everything and everyone around them.
You must build, trade, and upgrade to prepare yourself for the Antarctic Terrain, rabid dog attacks, crazed madmen...and most importantly, the alien entity that is now loose in the camp. Everything you build and upgrade has one purpose...keeping you alive and human! During the entire game, you will want to trade with other players and help each other build stronger weapons and better equipment, while also passing food and med kits around. Although, make sure your trust them, since trade is a huge opportunity for The Thing.
Staying inside may keep you from freezing to Death, but it won't help you or your fellow humans win. The only way to secure victory is by venturing out of the camp! The problem with that is, being away from camp is the number one way to come across The Thing...leaving you vulnerable and exposed to infection. Whether fixing the boiler, repairing the door, or fighting the frigid temperatures outside, you will all need one another to survive. But trust is a hard thing to come by when you must be wary of...Who Goes There?
Featured Videos
Ask a Rules Question
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 6
This page: 6
Sentiment:
pos 3 ·
mix 1 ·
neu 2 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–6 of 6
Video Fbsbg2gjf5I
The Mill Discussion at 5:33 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 91829 · mention_pk 246532
Click to watch at 5:33 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- alien/hidden traitor
- based on The Thing
- hidden role hidden traitor
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Hidden role — hidden traitor element
- Hidden Roles — hidden traitor element
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- exclusive first footage of Project Peregrine here it is
- what is missing in the stone Meyer library in your opinion
- I appreciate you guys watching
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video M-sWVuc9VYU
Rules Teach at 0:11 sentiment: positive
video_pk 79805 · mention_pk 193364
Click to watch at 0:11 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Cooperative gameplay
- Dice rolling and hand management mechanics
Cons
- Player elimination if strikes accumulate
- Potential for infection to cause loss
Thematic elements
- Surviving outside and potential infection
- Antarctic research team
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Action Point Allowance — Players use action cubes to perform various actions.
- cooperative play — Players work together to achieve a common goal.
- Dice Rolling — Used for actions, stamina, XP, and resolving events.
- Hand Management — Players manage cards from workshop, storage, and specialty decks.
- hidden traitor — The possibility of players being infected introduces a hidden traitor element.
- Player Elimination — Accumulating three strikes results in character death and removal from the game.
- Set Collection — Bonfire contributes to a pile that needs to reach a certain size to be lit.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- who goes there it's a three to six player cooperative dice rolling hand management game where we take the role of one of the Antarctic research team members trying to survive by venturing outside by building items and upgrading our character
- if you remain human the entire game then you've got to board the helicopter and have a bonus equal to or higher than the helicopter total
- if you become infected you need to board the helicopter and then the humans bonus has to be lower than the helicopter total
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video nBrEP-tZHG0
Unboxing at 0:09 sentiment: positive
video_pk 79742 · mention_pk 193301
Click to watch at 0:09 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Updated components for the new edition
- New character boards and miniatures
- Foldable player aids
- Improved box organization for re-boxing
- Deeper second edition box that fits on a Kallax shelf
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- Survival horror
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Card Drafting — Implied through the discussion of updated workshop, camp event, storage, and character decks.
- Dice Rolling — Mentioned in relation to 'locker dice' and 'action dice' for characters.
- Modular Board — Referenced by the 'camp door board' and 'boiler room board' which have updated rules.
- Resource Management — Indicated by 'stamina cubes' and 'xp gems'.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- welcome today we're going to be unboxing and re-boxing the deluxe box for who goes there
- thank you for watching this unboxing and re-boxing video
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video jfb6z0b0-qo
cardboardrhino Top List at 0:34 sentiment: positive
video_pk 6198 · mention_pk 106839
Click to watch at 0:34 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Cooperative framework with a strong paranoia theme
- Immersive Antarctic setting that reinforces tension
- Trade and upgrade mechanics create meaningful decisions
Cons
- Paranoia can slow down group cohesion
- Playtime of 90 minutes to 2 hours may deter lighter gamers
Thematic elements
- cooperative survival under growing paranoia with an alien threat
- Antarctic research camp
- cozy-to-tense survival with an emergent paranoia mechanic
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- cooperative play — Players work together to stay alive and maintain humanity in a hostile environment.
- Resource Management — Trade, upgrade items, and allocate scarce food and supplies to survive.
- Role deduction / paranoia — As the game progresses, players may suspect others of not being who they seem.
- Thematic threats & events — An alien presence and environmental hazards drive tense decision making.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- a co-op strategy game
- stay alive and stay human
- an alien thing that is loose in the camp
- strategy game of resource management and land control
- the game board is variable and constructed by a randomizer bull deck
- it's light quick and featuring some funny card illustrations
- you take the role of raccoons going through trash cans looking for food and shiny objects
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video KwM02RDzHXI
Board Game Coffee Discussion at 11:17 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 4624 · mention_pk 109326
Click to watch at 11:17 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
- Original game the Thing games are based on
Cons
- Mark never played it
Thematic elements
- alien infiltration
- Arctic
Comparison games
- The Thing
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Hidden role — hidden traitor mechanic
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- I got this for Christmas I have no idea how to play this
- I remember liking it I I I don't remember not liking it
- if you like dachshunds or if you like which is like the hot dog dogs
- I liked the first two times I played I was like oh that's fun and then the more you play just kind of grates on you
- Brittany said that if you ever play this with me again I will burn down this house
- I will never get over it it's done
- you could play it like one to 100 players
- my brain is exhausted I feel like this is one of those games gets you the gears going your head
- I have no idea what this game is but how cool is that art
- this is just chess but it's like shot glasses
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video QK16eeZSmZU
Board to Death TV - Board Game Reviews Review at 3:52 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 4107 · mention_pk 12020
Click to watch at 3:52 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
- Beautifully captured theme and story evolution with every action
- Strong artistic and graphic design that reinforces the thematic setting
- Paranoia atmosphere is effectively conveyed through vulnerable cards and events
Cons
- Infected players do not behave differently from humans, reducing deduction opportunities
- Deduction relies on luck and card draws more than player strategy or signaling
- Overall luck element due to dice and card draw components
Thematic elements
- Survival, paranoia, infection and distrust
- Antarctic research station during a blizzard
- Story-driven, action-influenced evolution of tension
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Door/search actions — Searching doors and storage to obtain items such as food, medicine, or parts
- Escape objective and helicopter points — Accumulate helicopter points to trigger escape; at least one human must survive
- Event cards and round phases — Phases introduce new events and temperature shifts, driving tension and choices
- Infection and trading — Infection can spread via trading cards and events; affects player status and decisions
- Movement and area exploration — Players move between spaces to reach helicopter points and gather resources
- Resource Management — Managing food, medicine, and parts to build items and sustain stamina
- Stamina and dice resolution — Stamina management affects the number of dice rolled for actions and encounters
- Vulnerability deck — Top cards from a vulnerability deck determine infection risk and other setbacks
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- The theme and Who Goes There? is beautifully captured and the story evolves with every action you do.
- The great components are both artistic style and graphic design also lend themselves in cementing the theme.
- There is a sense of paranoia captured extremely well with the vulnerable cards.
- What I think this game lacks is the deduction part; it's partly due to two faults...
- Scores an inconspicuous 7 out of 10.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–6 of 6