Game Info
Year
2025
Players
2-4
Age
8+
Playtime
45 min
Collection
Your Tier
Loading…
Mechanic profile
Not enough video data yet
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description
A marine-naturalist area-control reimplementation of Maya, exploring expanding seagrass reefs as the rainforests of the sea.
Featured Videos
Playthrough
Seagrass - Teach & Playthrough
Ask a Rules Question
Images
GID0452953.jpg
GID0452953_thumb.jpg
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 7
This page: 7
Sentiment:
pos 6 ·
mix 0 ·
neu 0 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–7 of 7
Video pc_81XOiZAI
The Dice Tower Discussion at 15:42 sentiment: positive
video_pk 81705 · mention_pk 204080
Click to watch at 15:42 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Super adorable
- Really like what Bitewing does
- Looks good
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- Sea Creatures
Comparison games
- Gingham
- Arribada
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Pattern Building — Described as a "little tile laying pattern type games" where players try to get different patterns.
- tile laying — Mentioned as a "little tile laying pattern type games" where players draw and lay tiles onto a map.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- for a year we had to try and pronounce this until somebody announced that they were going to call it Mysterium
- This game made such a splash. Like I forgot that people for a year were importing copies of it because it was so different.
- It's actually pronounced Schüttel's. Like shirtless with an uh with that little uh Is that called an umlaut? Yeah. The the the little uh The the dots over the Yeah, the dots over the U. Yeah, but I'm still going to call it Schüttel's.
- You're rolling uh little gnomes out of a cup. You're trying to roll a Schüttel out of a cup.
- It's like basically a stock market game and depending on how many of the pawns you roll out of the cup, like that's number active.
- This one is really interesting in that it is nothing like the game it's based off of.
- This is Flamecraft Duels. I honestly wish they probably wouldn't have called it Flamecraft, maybe like Flame Duels or something like that would make more sense to me um because I don't think this one is anything like a two-player version of Flamecraft. This is a straight abstract game.
- It's got really great PVC cards with some crazy like metal clasp on it. Like the whole thing is overproduced, but it may it just brings to the uh it brings so much to the occasion when you're playing this game.
- It's a really cool abstract game with really cool puzzlingness and thinkingness uh connected with this just top-notch production.
- Is Transformers higher or lower than Wedding Crashers?
- The Bonfire of the Vanities from 1990. A hard-drinking journalist in ignites a scandal in New York City by reporting on a hit-and-run perpetrated by a Wall Street fat cat and his mistress.
- Is Baby Geniuses higher or lower than The Bonfire of the Vanities?
- Alien versus Captain America: The First Avenger. I mean, I know who'd win in a fight, but it's cuz Cap is undefeated.
- So, this We're going to do three in a row.
- I think that there is an unfair bias against Nick Cage.
- National Treasure was 46. Oh. And then Twilight was 49.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video pc_81XOiZAI
The Dice Tower Discussion at 15:42 sentiment: positive
video_pk 81705 · mention_pk 347260
Click to watch at 15:42 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Super adorable
- Really like what Bitewing does
- Looks good
Cons
none
Thematic elements
- Sea Creatures
Comparison games
- Gingham
- Arribada
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Pattern Building — Described as a "little tile laying pattern type games" where players try to get different patterns.
- tile laying — Mentioned as a "little tile laying pattern type games" where players draw and lay tiles onto a map.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- for a year we had to try and pronounce this until somebody announced that they were going to call it Mysterium
- This game made such a splash. Like I forgot that people for a year were importing copies of it because it was so different.
- It's actually pronounced Schüttel's. Like shirtless with an uh with that little uh Is that called an umlaut? Yeah. The the the little uh The the dots over the Yeah, the dots over the U. Yeah, but I'm still going to call it Schüttel's.
- You're rolling uh little gnomes out of a cup. You're trying to roll a Schüttel out of a cup.
- It's like basically a stock market game and depending on how many of the pawns you roll out of the cup, like that's number active.
- This one is really interesting in that it is nothing like the game it's based off of.
- This is Flamecraft Duels. I honestly wish they probably wouldn't have called it Flamecraft, maybe like Flame Duels or something like that would make more sense to me um because I don't think this one is anything like a two-player version of Flamecraft. This is a straight abstract game.
- It's got really great PVC cards with some crazy like metal clasp on it. Like the whole thing is overproduced, but it may it just brings to the uh it brings so much to the occasion when you're playing this game.
- It's a really cool abstract game with really cool puzzlingness and thinkingness uh connected with this just top-notch production.
- Is Transformers higher or lower than Wedding Crashers?
- The Bonfire of the Vanities from 1990. A hard-drinking journalist in ignites a scandal in New York City by reporting on a hit-and-run perpetrated by a Wall Street fat cat and his mistress.
- Is Baby Geniuses higher or lower than The Bonfire of the Vanities?
- Alien versus Captain America: The First Avenger. I mean, I know who'd win in a fight, but it's cuz Cap is undefeated.
- So, this We're going to do three in a row.
- I think that there is an unfair bias against Nick Cage.
- National Treasure was 46. Oh. And then Twilight was 49.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video zPmQilVIEbc
Before You Play Playthrough
video_pk 70199 · mention_pk 167099
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
none
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- This is an abstract strategy tail lane game for two to four players that plays in about 30 to 60 minutes
- the reef scoring are quite large
- You cannot connect two reefs
- end of every player's turn, you're always going to check to see if a reef scores
- the discovery expansion that includes these tokens that match the different creatures
- this game is on Kickstarter right now
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video zPmQilVIEbc
Before You Play Playthrough at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 70199 · mention_pk 204965
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Core tile-laying and reef-scoring loop is straightforward yet offers substantial tactical depth
- Reef majority scoring is lucrative and drives aggressive expansion
- Special tiles add varied strategic options without overly complicating rules
- Two-player variant with restricted board regions creates clear head-to-head tension
- Endgame scoring is transparent enough to follow with careful counting
Cons
- The video discusses a prototype copy with tiles already changed from final product
- In two-player mode, the board regions are limited, which can constrain options early and affect flow
- Tiebreaker rules rely on unplayed tiles, which can be finicky to track in practice
- Some scoring decisions can be brittle if players mismanage the hand or timing
Thematic elements
- Array
- Ocean floor / underwater ecosystem
- Abstract/educational
Comparison games
- Aribata
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Area Majority — Reefs score based on which player surrounds the reef with more creatures; larger reefs yield bigger point values.
- Area Majority / Reef Scoring — Reefs score based on which player surrounds the reef with more creatures; larger reefs yield bigger point values.
- End Game Bonuses — The game ends when the last antler is placed or when a player runs out of tiles and cannot draw.
- endgame conditions — The game ends when the last antler is placed or when a player runs out of tiles and cannot draw.
- Hand Management — Players manage a hand of tiles with a draw mechanic that depends on actions and hand size limits.
- hidden scoring — Score tokens are kept hidden until end-of-round scoring, adding strategic ambiguity.
- Special Tiles / Set Rules — Four special creature tiles impose additional placement rules and strategic interactions.
- Take-That / Tile Removal — Certain tiles allow you to remove or place on top of opponent tiles, directly affecting their plans.
- Tile Placement — Players place one or more tiles from their hand into a single colony or reef area, building contiguous groups.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- This is an abstract strategy tail lane game for two to four players that plays in about 30 to 60 minutes
- the reef scoring are quite large
- You cannot connect two reefs
- end of every player's turn, you're always going to check to see if a reef scores
- the discovery expansion that includes these tokens that match the different creatures
- this game is on Kickstarter right now
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video zPmQilVIEbc
Before You Play Playthrough at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 70199 · mention_pk 335747
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Core tile-laying and reef-scoring loop is straightforward yet offers substantial tactical depth
- Reef majority scoring is lucrative and drives aggressive expansion
- Special tiles add varied strategic options without overly complicating rules
- Two-player variant with restricted board regions creates clear head-to-head tension
- Endgame scoring is transparent enough to follow with careful counting
Cons
- The video discusses a prototype copy with tiles already changed from final product
- In two-player mode, the board regions are limited, which can constrain options early and affect flow
- Tiebreaker rules rely on unplayed tiles, which can be finicky to track in practice
- Some scoring decisions can be brittle if players mismanage the hand or timing
Thematic elements
- Array
- Ocean floor / underwater ecosystem
- Abstract/educational
Comparison games
- Aribata
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Area Majority — Reefs score based on which player surrounds the reef with more creatures; larger reefs yield bigger point values.
- Area Majority / Reef Scoring — Reefs score based on which player surrounds the reef with more creatures; larger reefs yield bigger point values.
- End Game Bonuses — The game ends when the last antler is placed or when a player runs out of tiles and cannot draw.
- endgame conditions — The game ends when the last antler is placed or when a player runs out of tiles and cannot draw.
- Hand Management — Players manage a hand of tiles with a draw mechanic that depends on actions and hand size limits.
- hidden scoring — Score tokens are kept hidden until end-of-round scoring, adding strategic ambiguity.
- Special Tiles / Set Rules — Four special creature tiles impose additional placement rules and strategic interactions.
- Take-That / Tile Removal — Certain tiles allow you to remove or place on top of opponent tiles, directly affecting their plans.
- Tile Placement — Players place one or more tiles from their hand into a single colony or reef area, building contiguous groups.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- This is an abstract strategy tail lane game for two to four players that plays in about 30 to 60 minutes
- the reef scoring are quite large
- You cannot connect two reefs
- end of every player's turn, you're always going to check to see if a reef scores
- the discovery expansion that includes these tokens that match the different creatures
- this game is on Kickstarter right now
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video HKVKX58R2zs
The Cardboard Herald Review at 4:08 sentiment: positive
video_pk 62569 · mention_pk 155289
Click to watch at 4:08 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Strong player interaction and board awareness
- Adds depth with mini expansion and special creatures
- Accessible entry with clever constraints
Cons
- Replayability may be limited for some players
- May not have long-term variety compared to heavier games
Thematic elements
- Array
- Coral reef
- Abstract
Comparison games
- Arribada
- Maya
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Area Control — expand reefs to touch more of your animals and fewer of opponents and score when reef is surrounded
- Area Control / Surrounding Reef — expand reefs to touch more of your animals and fewer of opponents and score when reef is surrounded
- Hand Management — draw new tiles after expanding a reef to maintain hand size
- special abilities — special animal tiles grant one-use rule-bending effects
- Tile Placement — play animal tiles or reef tiles onto the board
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Oh my god, look how adorable this case is. It's a turtle, but also a board game.
- Arribada is a math-based competitive puzzle.
- If you are looking for a game in that genre, I highly recommend checking it out, and especially if you want a board game with a turtle as the box, I think it's worth taking a look at.
- I really like how this game encourages you to be aware of what's going on around the table instead of just looking down at your pieces.
- I haven't gotten bored of Seagrass yet, but I feel in my stomach that if you are looking for a game with a lot of replayability, Seagrass might not be able to deliver.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video gZP3QKm3aoE
Meeple Mountain Discussion at 2:56 sentiment: positive
video_pk 42277 · mention_pk 247139
Click to watch at 2:56 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- family-friendly feel
- strong water-park aesthetic and mechanics
- easy for a casual crowd
Cons
- rule complexity for younger players may creep in
- unknown publisher/designer details
Thematic elements
- sliding, cooperative-ish competitive slide-building
- Water park themed family game
- light, family-friendly
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- bump/bonus tokens — helps or bonuses are awarded when slides affect other players
- collision avoidance — players cannot collide into each other on the slide path
- tile/board interaction — builds longest slide using tile placement similar to a park layout
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- it's a game where the second Mouse gets the cheese
- it's a pure bluffing mechanism
- you move a bit like Chinese checkers
- each player selects a character on the board without telling anyone
- the twist of the game is that each player selects a character on the board without telling anyone
- the goal of the game is actually to build the longest slide
- no slider can collide into each other
- it's a pattern matching game
- in 3d you have Rubik's Cube-like sense of solving
- adrenaline driven it's all about dice rolling
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–7 of 7