Game Info
Collection
Your Tier
Loading…
Mechanic profile
Not enough video data yet
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description
No description available.
Featured Videos
Ask a Rules Question
Images
GID0453164.jpg
GID0453164_thumb.jpg
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 5
This page: 5
Sentiment:
pos 2 ·
mix 1 ·
neu 1 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–5 of 5
Video 0kjvqZ2z2VQ
Meeple University Analysis at 3:53 sentiment: positive
video_pk 90849 · mention_pk 243178
Click to watch at 3:53 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
none
Cons
- the cooperative bit of it was so much harder than we expected
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- semi-cooperative it's a word that's thrown around quite a lot and we're going to talk about what it means and the different things it can mean coming up
- for me i think when i think semi-cooperative my first instinct is a game that has a common lose condition for all players where the players need to do some sort of some level of cooperative work or some level of work which doesn't necessarily benefit their game that much to make sure that someone can win
- for it for me for it to work as a semi-co-op it needs to be not that hard to cooperatively win the game like if you were to play the game cooperatively it should be too easy
- it's not strictly a traitor game but it's it kind of plays like that that's the other yeah like that there's also a game where it's it's cooperative but then there's a point or something system that if you reach the most point then you win or you know i can't think of a game i have played it i just can't think of it
- you can have a game with a semi-cooperative element but it doesn't make it semi-cooperative
- they're a tough balance there's definitely i've had a lot of bad experiences playing semi-co-ops that just didn't balance right
- unless you know how competitively to play it where does where to be on the spectrum of co-op and competitive um you could just not have the experience that the game was intended to be at all
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video oKdb5nmmGgA
Meeple University Playthrough at 8:08 sentiment: positive
video_pk 90854 · mention_pk 243196
Click to watch at 8:08 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- clever semi-cooperative/competitive structure that rewards both cooperation and strategic conflict
- distinctive minis with high table presence (seven dwarf designs and varied monsters)
- music-card mechanic adds a unique cooperative layer to simultaneous resolution
- scaling and replay potential with different monster/disaster sequences
Cons
- the flow between cooperative and competitive phases can be tricky to navigate
- requires careful tracking of actions and placements; the players note a desire for an action tracker
Thematic elements
- defense of a dwarven realm against monsters and disasters; semi-cooperative-to-competitive shift
- a dwarven kingdom with a castle in the center, surrounded by mines, forests, and farms, during a seven-week winter
- board-state driven with monster and disaster events shaping the play
Comparison games
- Pandemic Season Zero
- Dinosaur World
- Dinosaur Island
- Seventh Continent
- Seventh Citadel
- Spirit Island
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Compound Scoring — points are gained for killing monsters, solving disasters, buying cards, hoarding resources, and restoring dwarves
- dwarf placement and movement — seven dwarves are placed on the board; dwarves move and battle monsters, with one per location rule
- first-player selection — first player is determined by a rock-paper-scissors style contest
- monster and disaster management — monsters attack and disasters unfold each round; if not defeated or resolved, players lose
- music/instrument system — cards have instruments; players choose an instrument to resolve all cards of that instrument for both players
- Resource Management — resources include dwarves, wood, apples, stone, and gold used to defeat monsters and solve disasters
- Semi-Cooperative — game operates with cooperative elements at first and transitions to competitive scoring
- semi-cooperative gameplay — game operates with cooperative elements at first and transitions to competitive scoring
- turn structure and scoring — points are gained for killing monsters, solving disasters, buying cards, hoarding resources, and restoring dwarves
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- This is a semi-cooperative game.
- Seven weeks of winter.
- If a monster ends a turn on the castle and we haven't defeated it we lose.
- We pick a certain instrument and then both players get to resolve all cards in their hands that have that instrument.
- We won the game.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video vrD3sMWbJzQ
Review
video_pk 70685 · mention_pk 167694
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
none
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- released in 2018 via Kickstarter
- semi cooperative defense game with a deck building element
- the central unique mechanism in this game accounting for a large part of the interplay and cooperative strategy
- play music action chooses one of those four instruments to activate all players
- the player with the highest score wins
- solo mode
- seven weeks
- if the kingdom falls all players lose the game
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video vrD3sMWbJzQ
Review at 0:04 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 70685 · mention_pk 185734
Click to watch at 0:04 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
- Central music mechanism drives cooperative interplay and strategic depth.
- Standalone game that does not require knowledge of other titles in the series.
- Solo mode provides balance for single-player play.
Cons
- Difficult to win; requires strong coordination and timing.
- Threats and disasters impose penalties that can hinder progress.
- Some players may not benefit equally from the music action.
Thematic elements
- cooperative/semicooperative defense against threats with resource management
- Winter in a kingdom defended by dwarves against monsters and disasters
Comparison games
- Dwarf Fall
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- action_selection_and_pool — Each player chooses five actions from a hand of seven dwarf cards per round.
- defeating_threats_by_recruiting_and_removing_dwarves — Players gather a sufficient group of dwarves at threats, spend resources, and remove dwarves to defeat monsters or disasters.
- dwarf_cards_and_instruments — Each dwarf card is tied to one of four instruments, which governs activation when music is played.
- music_action_and_instrument_activation — Playing music activates all players' cards that match a chosen instrument, driving cooperative and strategic play.
- Resource Management — Wharf cards provide or trade resources and can grant movement, forming a central resource flow.
- resource_production_and_trade_with_wharf_cards — Wharf cards provide or trade resources and can grant movement, forming a central resource flow.
- territory_spread_and_timing — Dwarves must be spread across terrain spaces to produce resources, with timing of the cooperative hand music playing crucial.
- win_condition_and_scoring — Win by surviving seven rounds and scoring points for both cooperative goals and private objectives.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- released in 2018 via Kickstarter
- semi cooperative defense game with a deck building element
- the central unique mechanism in this game accounting for a large part of the interplay and cooperative strategy
- play music action chooses one of those four instruments to activate all players
- the player with the highest score wins
- solo mode
- seven weeks
- if the kingdom falls all players lose the game
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video xReZuCCJK0A
it will university Rules Teach at 2:27 sentiment: neutral
video_pk 70140 · mention_pk 185736
Click to watch at 2:27 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
neutral
Pros
- high interaction between players
- varied strategies improve replayability
Cons
- hand-size limit can constrain early play
Thematic elements
- kingdom-building and resource management
- shared universe with Dwarf Fall (same universe as the series)
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- dwarf placement and movement — place a dwarf, move a dwarf.
- interactions with other players — cards can be played in opponents' kingdoms to disadvantage them, and other interaction options exist.
- kingdom card placement — placing the kingdom card on the common area (paralleled from the previous game).
- Positive Player Interaction — cards can be played in opponents' kingdoms to disadvantage them, and other interaction options exist.
- Resource collection and scoring — points are gained from various sources like mines and markets, with access constraints.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- the game has high interaction between players
- there are different ways and strategies that make the game place different each time
- you start with nine cards
- you can only have maximum nine
- mines to mine the gems they are dragon and frost giant cards that can be played in the opponent's kingdom to disadvantage them slightly
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–5 of 5