Game Info
Year
2025
Players
1-4
Age
14+
Playtime
30 min
Complexity
3.5/5
Collection
Your Tier
Loading…
Mechanic profile
Not enough video data yet
Vibe profile
Not enough video data yet
Description
A cooperative campaign game with 25 encounters set in the fantasy world of Chorus using the tactical system from the original solo game Rove
Featured Videos
Ask a Rules Question
Images
GID0453850.jpg
GID0453850_thumb.jpg
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 3
This page: 3
Sentiment:
pos 2 ·
mix 1 ·
neu 0 ·
neg 0
Showing 1–3 of 3
Video eoC1n5l9kf0
Quackalope Playthrough at 3:52 sentiment: positive
video_pk 99160 · mention_pk 275902
Click to watch at 3:52 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Efficient setup and teardown
- Interesting card mechanics
- Good entry-level campaign game
- Unique world and environment
Cons
- Nearly lost tutorial scenarios
- High difficulty in later scenarios
Thematic elements
- final test for rovers
- a training environment in a mountain city
Comparison games
- Gloomhaven
- Crimson Scales
- Final Girl
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- action selection — Players take two standard actions, neither of which can be taken twice in a turn. Special ability cards offer more powerful options.
- card flipping — When a card is played, it flips to another side, offering different abilities and requiring players to manage resources and positioning.
- Combat (tactical) — A tactical combat system involving heroes, enemies, and environmental elements like traps and obstacles.
- Resource Management — Players need to gain resources (like ether) and position themselves correctly while avoiding damage.
- scenario-based campaign — The game is played scenario by scenario, with easy transitions between them, and can be played as a standalone campaign entry.
- Tableau Building — The card mechanics create a 'tableau ebb and flow' and a puzzle to put together.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- There's some whispers happening in the board game space that I'm uh uh anticipating, excited about.
- They've done an excellent job in terms of creating not only a unique world, unique environment, unique campaign with some very interesting card mechanics that give you a kind of tableau eb and flow, a puzzle to put together, but also they probably have the single most efficient cycle and setup time I've seen in a large box or I guess now small box campaign.
- This is not a sponsored video. Nothing we're doing for Addex Games or Rove is sponsored.
- The Havens of Gloom. Uh we've got stacks of that behind us. We've done some gameplay of that. So, they come with a pedigree.
- So, he is the Vader to our Obi-Wan.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video W_6b-NG1geE
Board Game Critique Review at 0:00 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 83855 · mention_pk 212188
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
- exceptional instructional design with a five-scenario tutorial that requires no rulebook at the table
- streamlined production and setup leading to quick play sessions
- rich tactical depth and meaningful decisions without heavy monster management
- character asymmetry provides replay value and distinct playstyles
- high-quality components and accessible iconography
Cons
- card flipping overhead and mental bookkeeping can slow momentum
- solo play requires multi-character control; not true solo
- tuck boxes are fragile under heavy use; durability concerns for long campaigns
- late campaign momentum and content progression are unverified based on available footage
- emergent chaos and narrative surprises are reduced due to deterministic enemy behavior
Thematic elements
- cooperative strategy, character progression, and resource management
- Fantasy dungeon-crawl campaign with branching scenarios
- branching, procedurally guided but with limited emergent storytelling
Comparison games
- Gloomhaven
- Jaws of the Line
- Descent: Legends of the Dark
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- asymmetrical characters — distinct characters with different rhythms (e.g., Pudge as mobile assassin vs Thermofflux with blaze/freeze states) affecting tactics
- Campaign progression — persistence across scenarios with progression and branching consequences
- card flipping puzzle — skill cards are double-sided (Rally and Rove) and flip to cycle through the hand, requiring planning over turns
- core turn structure — two basic actions per character followed by playing a skill card; basic actions remain available to avoid dead cards
- enemy activation via dice — enemies have visible stat cards and a die determines which ability activates, reducing hidden information but preserving uncertainty
- ether resource system — each character has an ether pool with capacity; spending ether moves to an infused pool and cycles back; enables coordinated combos via token transfer
- Resource Management — each character has an ether pool with capacity; spending ether moves to an infused pool and cycles back; enables coordinated combos via token transfer
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- The campaign has roughly 3 weeks left with stretch goals still unlocking.
- If you thrive on transparent systems and tactical optimization and character mastery, this could be your absolute favorite campaign experience.
- Anchor Point won't be everyone's perfect campaign game. But for the right group, it could become a favorite they replay regularly.
- The tutorial execution is legitimately exceptional.
- You're getting Gloom Haven level tactical depth without spending half your game night managing monster decks.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video y3rXMXG_UF8
The Dungeon Dive Analysis at 2:08 sentiment: positive
video_pk 83807 · mention_pk 212057
Click to watch at 2:08 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
- Easier setup and takedown compared to Gloom Haven due to map books and tuck boxes.
- Streamlined component organization and storage.
- Well-presented information, with rules and stats easily accessible.
- Interactive terrain that significantly impacts gameplay.
- Branching campaign offers replayability.
- Diverse character playstyles and team compositions.
- Visually appealing with a unique and vibrant art style.
- More condensed and easier to digest than Rove Core.
Cons
- Can lead to analysis paralysis due to the number of choices.
- May not appeal to players looking for simpler games or those focused on exploration and mystery.
- Campaign text could be more concise.
Thematic elements
- branching narrative
Comparison games
- Gloom Haven
- Gloom Haven: Jaws of the Lion
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
- Adversary AI book — Adversaries' actions (AI) are presented in a book, simplifying reference during gameplay.
- branching campaign — The campaign features a branching narrative where players make choices at the end of missions, leading to replayability.
- character abilities — Characters have innate abilities that dictate movement, basic attacks, and other actions. These can be upgraded as characters gain experience.
- Equipment System — Players can gain currency to unlock new gear, including weapons, armor, and utility items from different decks.
- Ether dice — Dice rolls can generate ether, which is a currency used to trigger additional powers and abilities.
- Mapbook scenarios — The game uses a book of maps for scenarios, with hex grids, different terrain types, and special rules associated with each map.
- Skill cards — Characters have skill cards used to generate ether, perform attacks, or react to battlefield changes. These cards are double-sided and chosen each turn.
- Terrain interaction — Terrain on the battle maps is interactive, featuring elements like traps, obstacles to jump over, and areas to push or pull combatants into.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
- Rove Anchorpoint is basically Rove's version of Gloom Haven: Jaws of the Lion. It's smaller. It's more condensed. It's more compact. It's in a much much smaller box. And I think it's pretty cool.
- I could see some people falling into analysis paralysis, especially if you're playing with a group of highly skilled players who want to do really well. You could see some turns being slowed down by people always wanting to choose the single most optimum move to do.
- This game has a lot of tactics. It's very strategic and so people who are into those kind of those kinds of highly tuned uh skirmish games I think will get a lot out of this game.
- In general, I'm a pretty big fan of games that use mapbooks instead of tiles, especially for these kinds of skirmish games where the focus is on tactical combat and not so much on exploration.
- So, Rogue is a little bit out of my wheelhouse. And I think that's why I do appreciate Anchor Point a little more than uh the big game, the big Rove core. It gives that same kind of Rove experience, but it's just more compact. It's just easier to digest.
- So, Rove is almost entirely focused on the skirmish aspects, but it knows what it is and it focuses on that and doesn't try to really dabble in things that it's not focused on.
- The fact that everything is well laid out, everything is on the page that you are currently looking at. So you don't have to go flipping through a bunch of books or a bunch of cards in order to find the information that you are looking for.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 1–3 of 3