Skip to main content
Arcs box art

Arcs

Game ID: GID0028021
Game Info
Year
2024
Players
2-4
Age
14+
Playtime
120 min
Collection
Ratings
Expansions & Family
Arcs: The Blighted Reach Campaign Expansion
Mechanic profile
Percentile rank vs. all games
Vibe profile
How this game feels to play
Description

Arcs is a sharp, tactical space opera game, for 2–4 players, set in a dark yet silly universe. Players represent officials from a distant, decaying and neglectful Empire who are now free to vie for dominance whether through battle, gathering scarce resources or diplomatic intrigue. Ready yourself for dramatic twists and turns as you launch into this galactic struggle.

A deck of cards in 4 suits with ranks from 1-7 (2-6 for less than 4 players) defines the action selection system. These cards are played in a trick-taking adjacent system to select actions, take the initiative and declare Ambitions. The 3 declared Ambitions are what will score in that deal. Timing is everything. Bad hands must be mitigated by careful card play and benefitting from other players' card play.

Battles are resolved quickly with the attacker choosing their level of risk. The defenders must be prepared with adequate defensive ships and cards in their tableau.

Each game contains a hundred wooden ships and agents, 18 custom engraved dice, a beautiful six-panel board, and tons of cards with over 60 pieces of unique art. The base game may be played without the optional Leaders and Lore cards (for an easier teach) or with them for a richer, fuller and asymmetric game. It is also the core of the campaign game (requiring the Blighted Reach Expansion), which provides an epic, more thematic experience.

Description

Arcs is a sharp, tactical space opera game, for 2–4 players, set in a dark yet silly universe. Players represent officials from a distant, decaying and neglectful Empire who are now free to vie for dominance whether through battle, gathering scarce resources or diplomatic intrigue. Ready yourself for dramatic twists and turns as you launch into this galactic struggle.

A deck of cards in 4 suits with ranks from 1-7 (2-6 for less than 4 players) defines the action selection system. These cards are played in a trick-taking adjacent system to select actions, take the initiative and declare Ambitions. The 3 declared Ambitions are what will score in that deal. Timing is everything. Bad hands must be mitigated by careful card play and benefitting from other players' card play.

Battles are resolved quickly with the attacker choosing their level of risk. The defenders must be prepared with adequate defensive ships and cards in their tableau.

Each game contains a hundred wooden ships and agents, 18 custom engraved dice, a beautiful six-panel board, and tons of cards with over 60 pieces of unique art. The base game may be played without the optional Leaders and Lore cards (for an easier teach) or with them for a richer, fuller and asymmetric game. It is also the core of the campaign game (requiring the Blighted Reach Expansion), which provides an epic, more thematic experience.

Ask a Rules Question
All mentions
Browse transcript mentions, sentiments, pros/cons, mechanics, topics, quotes, and references.
Total mentions: 283
This page: 50
Sentiment: pos 45 · mix 3 · neu 0 · neg 0
Mentions per page
Showing 151–200 of 283
Video A0_IDdF31ro Board Game Critique Review at 0:00 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 62537 · mention_pk 155244
Board Game Critique - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • High agency and strategic depth; engaging four-player interactions; strong replayability
Cons
  • Complex to teach; heavy iconography; requires rule-checking and learning terms
Thematic elements
  • agency, initiative, scarcity, and strategic maneuvering in a competitive setting
  • space opera with retro sci-fi aesthetic; space fleets and colonies
  • emergent story through player choice and variable ambitions
Comparison games
  • The Old King's Crown
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Ambitions scoring — Round-by-round point declarations based on chosen ambitions.
  • dice system with recoil — Buckets of dice (attack, skirmish, raid) with a recoil option that risks own ships.
  • guild card engine — A deck engine that can generate passive points through card combos.
  • mulligan rule (two-player specific) — Discard and redraw to improve starting hand in 2-player games.
  • resource scarcity — Actions and resources are limited, forcing tough trade-offs.
  • Trick-Taking — Lead a card to determine available actions; players choose to follow, copy, or pivot to seize initiative.
  • trick-taking action selection — Lead a card to determine available actions; players choose to follow, copy, or pivot to seize initiative.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Arcs just flows.
  • In Arcs, the engine is this trick- taking action selection system.
  • The core is simultaneous blind bidding.
  • It's not just pictures. It's the vibe.
  • Beautiful tragedy.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video NCj0fWMw_Ic Board Game Critique Top List at 6:25 sentiment: positive
video_pk 62506 · mention_pk 155135
Board Game Critique - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 6:25 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Tight base game with a deep campaign option
  • Every game feels different due to card-driven tricks and ambitions
Cons
  • Campaign mode adds length and complexity for some groups
Thematic elements
  • ambitions-driven scoring; action tricks and trick-taking card play
  • Space opera with a 60-minute base game and a six-hour campaign
  • campaign depth in a compact box
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Ambitions and score declaration — Ambitions declared by the leader influence scoring and risk.
  • Campaign expansion — Blighted Reach adds a multi-session campaign with evolving rules.
  • Trick-Taking — Suit determines actions (aggression, construction, administration, mobilization).
  • Trick-taking card actions — Suit determines actions (aggression, construction, administration, mobilization).
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • It's approachable enough that new players can learn it in one session, but deep enough that you're still finding new strategies after 30 plays.
  • The expansions add modules instead of replacing the base game. So, you're building a collection, not cycling through versions.
  • It's Dune. That IP isn't going anywhere. As long as people are watching Dune movies, they're going to want to play Dune games.
  • The magic is in the gear shift mechanism.
  • It's creating a new genre, strategic deduction.
  • "No, you're a ghost now. You still matter."
  • "The objectives change every game."
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video xtBvBUaRJ1w Allies or Enemies Top List at 4:01 sentiment: positive
video_pk 61070 · mention_pk 153497
Allies or Enemies - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:01 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Smart trick-taking twist with shifting scoring decisions
  • Dense tactical decision-making even at two players
  • Campaign expansion potential hinted
Cons
  • Noted as best with more than two players; two-player experience is acceptable but not optimal
Thematic elements
  • Space combat with trick-taking flavor
  • Space-faring conflict with tactical fight elements
  • competitive but tactical
Comparison games
  • Trick-taking games with variable scoring
  • Other space strategy games
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Compound Scoring — Scoring options shift per round, introducing strategic tension
  • dynamic scoring choices — Scoring options shift per round, introducing strategic tension
  • Trick-Taking — Rounds determine scoring via selectable targets; players decide what to score each round
  • trick-taking with scoring emphasis — Rounds determine scoring via selectable targets; players decide what to score each round
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • "it's about windmills"
  • "the closest I've seen to Mario Kart as a board game"
  • "it's a very tight worker placement game"
  • "the biggest surprise of the year"
  • "this is my favorite game of the year so far"
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video JZi8xz5VUQU Tim Chuon Discussion at 21:19 sentiment: positive
video_pk 59634 · mention_pk 152166
Tim Chuon - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 21:19 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • No downtime; quick engagement and immediate action
  • High interactivity and psychological tactical decisions
Cons
  • Initial confusion about flow and resource generation
Thematic elements
  • Follow-the-lead style with action-dense decisions and strategic pacing
  • Spacefaring empire with a circular map and planet gates
  • Root/Fort-inspired space opera with direct player interaction
Comparison games
  • Root
  • Fort
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • June honestly was one of the best months in gaming because we had so many so many good games played.
  • Andromeda is so good.
  • I cannot wait to share more about ARs and about the one and only Andromeda.
  • this is very, very initial early thoughts about this game and I still want to tell you about it
  • it's so fun this game is so good y'all
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 1dg1OIu899o Neon Gorilla Analysis at 0:00
video_pk 59532 · mention_pk 152097
Neon Gorilla - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Array
  • Array
  • Grotesque, survival-focused fantasy with themes of hunting, butchery, preparation, and ritualized combat using meat-hook and hunter-inspired gear
  • Array
  • A gritty survival/gauntlet of butcher-themed dungeon-crawl dynamics where players manage “baddies” on meat hooks, cook recipes, and optimize a range of grotesque, survival-oriented goals.
  • Array
  • Array
  • Array
  • mixed
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Everything to do with Carcass revolves around meat hooks.
  • My personal favorite is the taxidermist profession.
  • I frankly roll every single battle.
  • Carcass isn't my favorite gear lock I think he's super interesting.
  • Carcass has some real potential to put down a couple of really good hits.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video EE8uONPKAkI Board Gaming Ramblings Discussion at 11:04 sentiment: positive
video_pk 42801 · mention_pk 223860
Board Gaming Ramblings - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 11:04 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • fast rounds
  • easy to learn
Cons
  • card interplay can be simple
  • not a long, deep experience
Thematic elements
  • arctic animals
  • animal-themed card drafting
  • light, quick play
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card Drafting — players pick cards to build sequences of animals in stacks
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's a skin of a small little stacking game
  • unplayable game because it's so small
  • I like party games
  • it's a great party game
  • this is a very good party game
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video R3yRJm_fSZ0 The Board Gaming Doctor Top List at 8:20 sentiment: positive
video_pk 42463 · mention_pk 128960
The Board Gaming Doctor - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 8:20 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • campaign/story progression
  • narrative-driven arc-based gameplay
  • story-forward with arcs
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Campaign — arc-based campaign progression and evolving objectives
  • campaign mode — arc-based campaign progression and evolving objectives
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I think this game really shines with its thematic integration and the way that its mechanisms work
  • it's not perhaps the most replayable but it does or at least the most variable
  • the solo mode is very interesting and yeah just a very solid game by Rosenberg
  • I love the the depth that this game provides and I still enjoy playing this game over 50 times now
  • the player interaction is very awesome I love the simpleness of this game yet it's very reactive and hard to master
  • Age of Innovation I feel not as daunting to me for someone who hasn't put in the time
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video dOElwqyIi_I Board Stupid Top 10 List at 17:34 sentiment: positive
video_pk 42205 · mention_pk 128069
Board Stupid - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 17:34 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Deep, expansive gameplay
  • Innovative mini-games
Cons
  • Complex for newcomers
Thematic elements
  • space engine-building
  • space exploration and alien discovery
  • macro sci-fi
Comparison games
  • Terraforming Mars
  • Ark Nova
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Engine Building — build a powerful engine with multiple mini-games
  • engine-building — build a powerful engine with multiple mini-games
  • Set Collection — collect resources and mini-games for scoring
  • set_collection — collect resources and mini-games for scoring
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Two sides of the map for two different types of gamer.
  • This is one of the strongest games this year, especially for its simplicity with innovative twists.
  • Ethical production again Mighty Boards.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video tuM0wIk2fc8 Board Game Animal Review at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 41997 · mention_pk 127475
Board Game Animal - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Innovative use of trick-taking as an action engine
  • Deep, highly thematic with strong asymmetry
  • Excellent production quality and striking artwork
  • Outstanding player aids that distill complex rules
  • Extremely high replayability due to asymmetry and campaign potential
Cons
  • Steep learning curve; not a casual or quick teach
  • Heavy time commitment; may be challenging for lifestyle gamers
  • Complexity can be overwhelming without a dedicated group
Thematic elements
  • Space opera politics, exploration, and interstellar strategy
  • Distant future in which spacefaring factions develop planets, build fleets, and vie for control through political and military maneuvering.
  • campaign-driven with evolving objectives and a dynamic court/lore system
Comparison games
  • The Crew
  • Fox in the Forest
  • Cat in the Box
  • Skull King
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • ambitions and dynamic scoring — Ambitions create an evolving race to satisfy conditions while influencing how others pursue points.
  • asymmetry and leaders — Different factions and leaders provide unique abilities and paths to victory, creating varied strategic routes.
  • Compound Scoring — Ambitions create an evolving race to satisfy conditions while influencing how others pursue points.
  • prelude actions and pivoting — Early actions set up future options and require on-the-fly adaptation as the board state evolves.
  • Trick-Taking — Players use trick-taking as a mechanism to select actions from a shared pool, driving resource flow and scoring opportunities.
  • trick-taking action selection — Players use trick-taking as a mechanism to select actions from a shared pool, driving resource flow and scoring opportunities.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • arcs is immaculate it's one of those very few games that upon learning the rules I instantaneous thought oh this game is absolutely wonderful
  • I think the game is perfect a perfect ten
  • it's the Mary Poppins of games
  • final thoughts ... arcs is the Mary Poppins of games
  • Flawless design
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video tuM0wIk2fc8 Board Game Animal Review at 5:57 sentiment: positive
video_pk 41997 · mention_pk 151403
Board Game Animal - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 5:57 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Adds meaningful depth without unnecessarily overwhelming the base experience
  • Increases replayability and campaign breadth
  • Preserves the core feel of Arcs while expanding scope
Cons
  • Significantly more complex; may be overbearing for some players
  • Campaign length increases time commitment and planning requirements
Thematic elements
  • Epic sci-fi governance, interplanetary politics, and campaign-scale arcs
  • Expanded space opera setting with an extended three-game campaign, deepening politics and interstellar conflicts.
  • campaign expansion with additional content that intensifies decisions and outcomes
Comparison games
  • Arcs (base game)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • enhanced player aids and organization — Upgraded supports to help manage the added complexity and keep the campaign accessible.
  • expanded factions, crises, and politics — New leaders, factions, crises, and political mechanics increase depth and strategic variety.
  • three-game campaign structure — Turns Arcs into a longer, linked experience with escalating stakes and sustained strategies across scenarios.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • arcs is immaculate it's one of those very few games that upon learning the rules I instantaneous thought oh this game is absolutely wonderful
  • I think the game is perfect a perfect ten
  • it's the Mary Poppins of games
  • final thoughts ... arcs is the Mary Poppins of games
  • Flawless design
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video kLHwoaZX0aU Board Of It Top 10 List at 31:06 sentiment: positive
video_pk 41767 · mention_pk 126600
Board Of It - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 31:06 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Hybrid of Euro strategy and splashy space battle feel
  • Back-and-forth tension, especially at two players
  • Early- and late-game decision depth preserved at 2P
Cons
  • Campaign expansions can stratify the balance in longer plays
  • Higher player counts may slow down decision cycles
Thematic elements
  • Balanced space exploration and conflict via card-driven actions
  • Space empire-building with trick-taking flavor
  • Strategic, interactive, highly tactical
Comparison games
  • Root
  • Race for the Galaxy
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Area Control — Control planets and resources through timing and card effects.
  • Area control and space presence — Control planets and resources through timing and card effects.
  • Card-driven action selection — Actions come from a deck, with bottom-of-deck timing shaping scoring opportunities.
  • Trick-Taking — Leadership sets a scoring tempo; players play to surpass or match the leader's suit.
  • Trick-taking with leadership dynamics — Leadership sets a scoring tempo; players play to surpass or match the leader's suit.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • we absolutely loved it
  • it's very tense and very mean
  • it's a really brilliant game at any player count from two to five players
  • it's a terrific game to play at two players basically
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Z0oSBJX1skI Board Stupid Top List at 34:41 sentiment: positive
video_pk 41389 · mention_pk 125564
Board Stupid - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 34:41 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Pioneering a new system blend
  • strong sense of campaign evolution and evolution of stories
Cons
  • Unfamiliar to players used to strict euro or heavyAmeri
Thematic elements
  • unusual mechanics blended into a campaign system
  • Novel narrative arc in a campaign-driven world
  • literary, campaign-driven, emergent
Comparison games
  • Root
  • Oath
  • Gloomhaven
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Blended systems — Unusual mechanics combined to create unique experiences.
  • Three-act campaign structure — A boxed campaign with evolving storytelling across acts.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Exploding Kittens was raised $8 million on Kickstarter for many years. It opened the floodgates for other publishers to look at Kickstarter as a viable medium.
  • I don't think we'd have Gloomhaven without Exploding Kittens.
  • Blood on the Clock Tower is the de facto social deduction game taking shape.
  • It's a beautiful game about nature reserves.
  • ARCs has done very very well and other games in the leader lineup as well as the sister company.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 4eef-gZdEeg Board Game Animal Top 10 List at 2:13 sentiment: positive
video_pk 40250 · mention_pk 230861
Board Game Animal - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 2:13 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Excitement for an asymmetric space title from Leader Games
Cons
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I included Thunder Road Vendetta maximum Chrome and I know that's a 2023 game but we're excited because it was one of our favorite games of 2023
  • Heat Heavy Rain heat pedal to the metal has been one of the most successful games in our game group
  • Ezra and Nehemiah because it's been described a bit as a greatest hits of some of the other mechanisms and features of the other Garfield games
  • our number one game specifically would be rockard 1977
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video hNEAyACOq64 The Board Gaming Doctor Top List at 17:12 sentiment: positive
video_pk 39437 · mention_pk 119049
The Board Gaming Doctor - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 17:12 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • deep, asymmetric play akin to Root in feel and ambition
  • campaign mode provides long-term engagement
  • variety of factions and strategic depth
Cons
  • learning curve is non-trivial
  • rule complexity can be intimidating
Thematic elements
  • space-faring civilization with asymmetric factions and campaigns
  • space exploration and colonization
  • campaign-driven, with evolving asymmetry
Comparison games
  • Root
  • Oath: Chronicles of Empire and Exile
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Campaign — three-game arcs with different factions
  • campaign mode — three-game arcs with different factions
  • card purchasing with effects — buying cards to gain one-time or ongoing benefits
  • Trick-Taking — cards combine trick-taking with actions on a shared board
  • trick-taking with spatial/board overlay — cards combine trick-taking with actions on a shared board
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Newford is my favorite game from 2024.
  • I genuinely like this game more than Black Forest.
  • Castle Combo is a really quick and short Tableau building game.
  • 21 actions to seemingly do the impossible.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video n6xtw4GCNdQ Unknown Channel Top 10 List at 17:45 sentiment: positive
video_pk 39172 · mention_pk 118048
Unknown Channel - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 17:45 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Engaging, dramatic space-opera tone
  • High replayability through evolving campaigns
  • Strong escalation and consequence presence
Cons
  • Complex rules and heavy interface may deter some players
  • Requires dedicated group for full experience
Thematic elements
  • interstellar conflict, diplomacy, and faction dynamics
  • Space opera with galactic empire-building
  • deliberately messy and cinematic
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • campaign system — Ongoing identity and outcomes carry forward across games
  • dice-based combat with risk management — Strategic choice in combat with potential overreach
  • Multi-Use Cards — Cards drive fleets, wars, resources, and councils
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Sky Team is a cooperative two-player game where you and your partner are pilots trying to land a commercial aircraft safely, guiding planes through different airports and conditions as you roll dice, manage flaps, adjust thrusts, and engage in an endless stream of disastrous non-verbal communication.
  • What makes Sky Team brilliant is how perfectly it captures real teamwork in such a short period of time.
  • Thunder Road is gleefully and unapologetically loud, dumb, and brilliantly fun.
  • Hegemony is an asymmetric political economic game where each player controls a different social class in a modern country pushing their own agendas through laws, markets, and a lot of very loud table arguing.
  • Arcs and the Blood Reach tells this like super messy and overly dramatic space opera that you will remember far longer than how many points you scored in the latest euro.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video n6xtw4GCNdQ Unknown Channel Top 10 List at 18:20 sentiment: positive
video_pk 39172 · mention_pk 118045
Unknown Channel - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 18:20 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Rich, interactive space opera feel
  • Dynamic combat with evolving narratives
  • Longevity through campaign design
Cons
  • Complex, may intimidate new players
  • Niche audience for heavy space-conflict games
Thematic elements
  • dramatic space conflict and interstellar diplomacy
  • Space opera of galactic empire-building, fleets, and politics
  • messy, highly interactive campaign storytelling
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Campaign progression — Outcomes persist and identities evolve across sessions
  • Combat: Dice — Dice choice and timing shape battles and stories
  • dice-driven combat with risk management — Dice choice and timing shape battles and stories
  • Multi-Use Cards — Cards move fleets, wage wars, sway councils, and manage resources
  • Track Advancement — Outcomes persist and identities evolve across sessions
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Sky Team is a cooperative two-player game where you and your partner are pilots trying to land a commercial aircraft safely, guiding planes through different airports and conditions as you roll dice, manage flaps, adjust thrusts, and engage in an endless stream of disastrous non-verbal communication.
  • What makes Sky Team brilliant is how perfectly it captures real teamwork in such a short period of time.
  • Thunder Road is gleefully and unapologetically loud, dumb, and brilliantly fun.
  • Hegemony is an asymmetric political economic game where each player controls a different social class in a modern country pushing their own agendas through laws, markets, and a lot of very loud table arguing.
  • Arcs and the Blood Reach tells this like super messy and overly dramatic space opera that you will remember far longer than how many points you scored in the latest euro.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 7Au-00LhP8E Board Of It Review at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 38659 · mention_pk 116515
Board Of It - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Tightly integrated action economy that is fast and tactical
  • Elegant core card system that serves many purposes
  • Strong player interaction and comeback mechanisms
  • Expansion adds replayability and novelty
  • High tension and strategic depth that rewards skill
Cons
  • Mean-spirited interaction can create harsh play experiences
  • Rules interpretations can lead to disputes and debate
  • Steep learning curve and potential perception of luck due to card draw
Thematic elements
  • 4X conquest blended with card-driven, trick-taking inspired actions
  • Space empire; fleets, planets, and city-building across planets
  • Emergent, tense strategic gameplay with evolving state across chapters
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Agents, court cards, and confrontation — Agents on court cards compete for control; having more agents than others allows you to seize cards and potentially gain powerful abilities.
  • Ambitions and secure scoring — Ambitions provide points; players place tokens on Ambitions based on abilities and timing, influencing end-game scoring.
  • Combat: Dice — Combat uses dice sets selected by the attacker; outcomes can steal resources or cards, creating dramatic swings.
  • Endgame conditions and victory point race — Game ends when a VP threshold is reached or after a chapter; highest VP wins, driving tense late-game play.
  • Expansion via Leaders and Law — An asymmetric mini-expansion introduces Leaders and Law cards that tweak base rules and add replayability.
  • Lead card trick-taking inspired actions — The lead player plays a card that sets the suit and grants multiple actions; other players respond using those actions with Pivot, Copy, or Surpass options as described by the lead card.
  • Raid dice and combat resolution — Combat uses dice sets selected by the attacker; outcomes can steal resources or cards, creating dramatic swings.
  • Resource Management — You tax resources on planets to gain tokens; resources are scarce and must be managed against what opponents hold.
  • Resource taxation and planet-based resources — You tax resources on planets to gain tokens; resources are scarce and must be managed against what opponents hold.
  • Trick-Taking — The lead player plays a card that sets the suit and grants multiple actions; other players respond using those actions with Pivot, Copy, or Surpass options as described by the lead card.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Initiative is everything in ARS it lets you declare the Ambitions you want to declare it also allows you more actions than the other players usually and it most importantly lets you set the tempo of the game
  • we played this game 13 times in the first week
  • it's brutal and unforgiving and mean ARS is a game of swings and roundabouts of reversals
  • there's so much design elegance on show here with the core cards being a prime example
  • Indescribable there's tension there's Fury there's celebrations there's a lot of loss of time
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video rMfymDdQUwc The Board Gaming Doctor Discussion at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 38333 · mention_pk 115435
The Board Gaming Doctor - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Relatively easy to teach for a Worley game
  • Flexible and game-changing trick-taking that supports creative play
  • Strong narrative potential through campaign and asymmetry
  • Asymmetric factions and leader/lore powers add variety
  • Streamlined compared to other Worley titles, with a clear engine
  • Good replayability with leaders, lore, and campaign options
  • Three-player interaction balance can enhance tension
Cons
  • Trick-taking can feel restrictive when not leading, limiting actions
  • Luck of the draw can be frustrating in longer sessions
  • Not a traditional 4X; more Euro with some 4X vibes
  • Mastery requires habitual play; base game can feel shallow without leaders/LS
  • Campaign/module complexity may overwhelm new players
Thematic elements
  • Ambition, empire-building, and tactical manipulation
  • Space opera spanning multiple factions and chapters in a sci-fi setting
  • campaign-driven with narrative arcs and leader/lore asymmetry
Comparison games
  • Root
  • Oath
  • Pax Premier Second Edition
  • Pax Renaissance
  • Newsford
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Ambitions and scoring — Ambitions provide per-chapter scoring opportunities and are tracked with markers; end-of-chapter goals influence play.
  • Asymmetric leaders and lore cards — Eight leaders and fourteen lore cards create variability and unique powers, contributing to asymmetry.
  • Attacks and captivity — Opponents can capture agents or resources, influencing scoring opportunities and adding interaction during battles.
  • Campaign — Campaigns offer three games back-to-back with varying leaders, lore, and events to intensify narrative and complexity.
  • Campaign mode and events — Campaigns offer three games back-to-back with varying leaders, lore, and events to intensify narrative and complexity.
  • Combat: Dice — Battles are resolved with dice, with different dice types enabling various tactical options.
  • Dice-based combat — Battles are resolved with dice, with different dice types enabling various tactical options.
  • Resource Management — Resources are limited and used to score Ambitions, acquire cards, and can be stolen during battles; placed on a personal tableau.
  • Resource management and tableau — Resources are limited and used to score Ambitions, acquire cards, and can be stolen during battles; placed on a personal tableau.
  • Trick-Taking — Players play color-coded cards to gain actions and initiate rounds; lead card determines initiative; follow-up cards provide limited alternatives.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • The Crux of this game does rely on how you play these cards not only for actions but also to gain the ability to do extra actions as well
  • a lot of tension that revolves around how you play these cards
  • so I think arcs would for me personally take more precedence than those other games based off of how easy it is to play and teach
  • I would love to dive into this game even more
  • the teach and the play was streamlined
  • I think this game will shine most at three players
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video iRy8E5cRF2w Board Stupid Discussion at 0:12 sentiment: positive
video_pk 38265 · mention_pk 115133
Board Stupid - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:12 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Identified as a top pick in the arc of current revival trend
Cons
  • Limited information on mechanics or gameplay details in the transcript
Thematic elements
  • Ambiguous core theme due to lack of detail in transcript; not explicitly sci-fi
  • Board game convention previews and announcements; discussion of upcoming titles
  • informal interview-style preview discussion
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • unknown — Not described in the transcript
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • what the hell do I even see at a place
  • it's going to be arcs
  • From the Moon
  • a game called From the Moon
  • there's been kind of a trend in the last few years to take some games from the '90s early 2000s
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video pHS7KY0IbZI Board Stupid Review at 1:23 sentiment: positive
video_pk 38089 · mention_pk 114517
Board Stupid - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:23 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Innovative blend of trick-taking with space opera and area control
  • Tense, high-interaction gameplay with meaningful risk and reward decisions
  • Combat system is stylish, mitigated, and feels modern and satisfying
  • Public scoring and Ambitions create dramatic, memorable moments
  • Excellent production quality and strong card art that enhances flavor
Cons
  • Aggressive, unforgiving design that may deter casual players
  • Steep learning curve; strategic value is often chapter-limited and can be frustrating for newcomers
  • First-time games can leave players feeling crushed by veterans due to lack of catch-up mechanisms
  • Board readability can suffer from a dark palette and small symbols
  • Some production choices (e.g., non-screen-printed components) may be a turn-off for some buyers
Thematic elements
  • Ambition, conquest, and political maneuvering within a space empire; public scoring of ambitions drives competition.
  • A condensed space opera in a galactic setting for two to four players, featuring interstellar conflict, planetary control, and faction influence.
  • Tense, aggressive, and high-stakes with frequent shifts in power and visible scoring.
Comparison games
  • Twilight Imperium
  • Eclipse: Second Dawn
  • Root
  • John Company
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Ambitions and scoring — Ambitions are public conditions announced when leading; up to three points per chapter can be earned by meeting them.
  • Area Control — Control of systems and space on the map to exert influence, gain rewards, and restrict opponents.
  • area control / majorities — Control of systems and space on the map to exert influence, gain rewards, and restrict opponents.
  • combat dice system — Three dice types (blue, red, orange) determine space battles with varying risk/reward profiles and mitigation options.
  • Combat: Dice — Three dice types (blue, red, orange) determine space battles with varying risk/reward profiles and mitigation options.
  • leading vs pivoting — The lead card sets the flow; pivoting copies or changes the action but reduces balance by not winning the trick.
  • movement and map control — Ship movement is constrained by cards and certain ports; advancing across the galaxy is a tactical consideration.
  • resource taxation and open market influence — Cards allow tax actions and influence on the council/open market, impacting resource flow and to whom cards eventually belong.
  • Trick-Taking — Leading a card determines the action you perform; winning the trick grants initiative and advantage in the next round.
  • Trick-taking as action selection — Leading a card determines the action you perform; winning the trick grants initiative and advantage in the next round.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Arcs is a condensed Space Opera for two to four players that plays in up to 120 Minutes.
  • it's the person with the most power or victory points that will be the winner.
  • it's not forgiving.
  • this is one of the most agro games I've played in ages.
  • the production is perfectly adequate for something that's all cardboard and wood.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Q6GeNOtOfoQ The Board Game Garden Discussion at 37:48 sentiment: positive
video_pk 38094 · mention_pk 114539
The Board Game Garden - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 37:48 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • appeals to those who love hand-management and totem themes
  • pretty cards
Cons
  • 2-4 players; solo mode not universal
Thematic elements
  • totem animal management and hand management
  • pack ice and polar exploration
  • card-hand management with thematic clock
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • card hand management — diverse animal powers are used via hand cards
  • Hand Management — diverse animal powers are used via hand cards
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • remember you are somebody's reason to smile
  • these three are in here already I have really high hopes for solo play
  • I am so excited for the future content on the Channel
  • open Season is one that I really want to play again
  • I really want to do a full office make over
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video EWJlDds62TA Board Game Garden Top 10 List at 4:46 sentiment: positive
video_pk 37509 · mention_pk 112703
Board Game Garden - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:46 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • clever use of multi-use cards creates varied, satisfying decisions
  • has tangible, tactile stack-building moments with thematic animal types
  • secret tokens add a layer of personal strategy without forcing direct interaction
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • multispecies wildlife tableau-building with set collection flavor
  • animal-themed arctic environment with a focus on stacking and collection
  • light, thematic, family-friendly
Comparison games
  • Far Away
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Layer Building — players add selected cards to a personal pile to shape end-game scoring.
  • Multi-Use Cards — cards serve multiple purposes, driving both card play and scoring options.
  • penalty/punishment dynamics — misplays can push points into a penalty area, creating risk-reward decisions about what to add to the pile.
  • pile-building / stacking — players add selected cards to a personal pile to shape end-game scoring.
  • secret animal token and track advancement — each player has a hidden objective token and a track influence that guides scoring and play tension.
  • Set Collection — players aim to maximize point value by collecting specific animal types and completing color/type sets.
  • set collection and scoring by type — players aim to maximize point value by collecting specific animal types and completing color/type sets.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • remember you are somebody's reason to smile
  • I have played this game the most out of all of these games that I've showed you today
  • it's easy to teach easy to play game
  • each round has a rule card that completely changes the rules
  • the art and theming are strong and the components are gorgeous
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video QZFjfFdlka8 The Board Game Garden Discussion at 49:49 sentiment: positive
video_pk 37437 · mention_pk 213512
The Board Game Garden - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 49:49 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Brain-burning and thematic
  • Beautiful art and elegant components
Cons
  • Complex for casual players
Thematic elements
  • daily life and ritual-based tableau
  • Altar-building involving surrounding individuals
  • dramatic, world-building with objective-driven placement
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • End Game Bonuses — Surrounding and placement objectives to trigger scoring.
  • end-game objectives — Surrounding and placement objectives to trigger scoring.
  • Tile Placement — Draft tiles that influence altar layout and scoring.
  • tile placement / drafting — Draft tiles that influence altar layout and scoring.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This game looks absolutely beautiful.
  • I freaking love the art in all of the charming games.
  • The galactic cruise is huge and fantastic.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 8NM2Shp8YHw The Board Game Garden Top 10 List at 26:50 sentiment: positive
video_pk 37068 · mention_pk 111292
The Board Game Garden - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 26:50 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Cool trick-taking mechanism with combat-like tension
  • Engaging scoring system and competitive play
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Trick-taking with combat elements
  • Conflict-prone space/faction-based world
  • Strategic conflict with card-driven actions
Comparison games
  • Moon Rakers (comparison context mentioned by peers)
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Battle/score through tricks — Score is driven by trick outcomes and end-of-round objectives
  • Trick-Taking — Start player leads a trick with a card; others can respond or copy with limitations
  • Trick-taking with start-player advantage — Start player leads a trick with a card; others can respond or copy with limitations
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's basically like a cottage board game relaxation weekend
  • I love bumping tracks it's a good time
  • I love multi-use cards
  • Evenfall is my number one
  • I cannot wait to play this one again
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 8W3WVJeq6bE Board Gaming Ramblings Discussion at 4:55 sentiment: positive
video_pk 36905 · mention_pk 110814
Board Gaming Ramblings - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:55 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
Cons
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • there's a 100 people watching us doing this right now
  • it's amazing that we are here
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video lS32d8E1I1g Board Game Animal Unboxing at 0:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 36730 · mention_pk 110260
Board Game Animal - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Stunning board and bold artwork
  • Vibrant color palette and consistent art style
  • Readable dice symbols and satisfying physical components
  • Beautiful ship designs that fit well on the board
Cons
  • Base game length can be long for a single session
  • Expansion content may increase complexity and setup time
Thematic elements
  • Trick-taking mechanics within a space empire framework
  • Outer space / space opera
  • Bold sci-fi color palette with a strong graphic identity
Comparison games
  • Root
  • Oath
  • Fort
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Area Control — Ships/tokens placed on a board to influence control and scoring
  • Area control / spatial placement — Ships/tokens placed on a board to influence control and scoring
  • Resource/board component integration — Custom dice and varied components integrated into the play flow
  • Trick-Taking — Card-driven rounds where suits/values influence actions and set round rules
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I think this is probably the, for me personally, one of the best looking games of the year so far if not the best
  • I am a sucker for custom dice in any game but I specifically love this color palette of arcs
  • this is a stunning board for arcs
  • Kyle Fren's artwork... can draw just about anything and it retains his style
  • this is going to be a board to open
  • we strongly recommend you play at least one game of single session arcs before the campaign
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video AwTAUkPnBHw Board Stupid Event Coverage at 8:30 sentiment: positive
video_pk 36548 · mention_pk 109673
Board Stupid - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 8:30 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Innovative use of trick-taking in a space opera euro
  • High production values and thematic clarity
  • Strong anticipation from the hosts as a new title from Le Games
Cons
  • Potential delays noted in development or delivery timelines
  • Complexity may be a barrier for new players
Thematic elements
  • Space exploration, alliance-building, and epic multi-stage narrative
  • Epic space opera; large-scale interstellar setting with ongoing campaigns
  • Long-form space epic with evolving narrative through a three-stage campaign
Comparison games
  • Twilight Imperium
  • Blood Rage
  • Rising Sun
  • Inish
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Campaign — A campaign structure that progresses from beginning to end across multiple sessions, shaping strategic decisions.
  • Resource Management — Players manage resources and coordinate with or against others to support their faction’s goals.
  • Resource/ faction coordination — Players manage resources and coordinate with or against others to support their faction’s goals.
  • Three-stage campaign — A campaign structure that progresses from beginning to end across multiple sessions, shaping strategic decisions.
  • Trick-Taking — A space-themed trick-taking card mechanic used to drive actions and determine outcomes within a campaign frame.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's the new game from the same publisher Le Games
  • this is the first time where we actually can play the game
  • I absolutely cannot wait to see arcs okay let's go for number two
  • it's the same designer so you should be excited
  • I think it's going to retail after that
  • the ultimate version of what is already a Legendary game by Bruno Cathala
  • the field of view kind of token to like replicate where you're pointing your camera
  • production looks amazing
  • we would love it if you did come along and say hello
  • the tip of the iceberg at UK Games Expo
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video Wz4QqgGXHlk Board Of It Top 10 List at 59:40 sentiment: positive
video_pk 36432 · mention_pk 225050
Board Of It - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 59:40 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • highly innovative action system with deep strategic depth
  • strong design showcase; clever use of cards as actions
  • excellent for players who enjoy planning and counterplay
Cons
  • not as accessible to casual players due to complexity
  • debates about balance and card interaction in some groups
  • thematic flavor may be buried under heavy mechanics
Thematic elements
  • procedural, crunchy tactical engine-building in a head-to-head format
  • Abstract, heavy strategy game with a trig/taking system for action resolution
  • tactical warfare framed by card and action economy decisions
Comparison games
  • Root
  • Dune Uprising
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • action selection system — Players choose actions with a trig-like mechanic to determine who can act and when.
  • card‑driven engine — Cards control both resources and potential actions, shaping long-term strategy.
  • head-to-head resource management — Competitive balance hinges on careful timing and card management.
  • highly asymmetric play — Civilizations or factions have different abilities, promoting varied playstyles.
  • Resource Management — Competitive balance hinges on careful timing and card management.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Undaunted is an incredible system that we love.
  • it's a two-player head-to-head game and it is tense and stressful but a real testament that it's always come very close to who's won.
  • Worm Span is the new reimplementation of Wingspan with worms or dragons.
  • Pampero has everything I love: big chunky euro, heavy energy production.
  • Sweet Lands is a prototype that exists somewhere; it could be transformative if it becomes a real game.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video c9bV4ezLwhE Board Game Dad Analysis at 0:00
video_pk 36155 · mention_pk 108251
Board Game Dad - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Pros
  • Clear core mechanics that bridge to a broader collection of games
  • Stealing initiative adds a meaningful strategic power move
  • Campaign variants extend replayability and depth
  • Accessible gateway into a later, richer catalog of games
  • Scoring decisions are player-driven, enhancing negotiation and planning
Cons
  • May be complex for new players due to scoring and lead mechanics
  • Reliant on understanding trick-taking-like structure, which could deter some audiences
Thematic elements
  • Strategic control through lead selection and scoring direction; core tension between immediate action and cumulative end-game scoring.
  • Abstract strategic card-led game focused on hand management and round-by-round power dynamics; players influence scoring by selecting leads and actions, with room for bluff, timing, and risk/reward tradeoffs.
  • Array
  • positive
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • The advantage of leading is not just choosing the suit and the action for the next round but also choosing how the round will be scored.
  • Stealing initiative is a real power move.
  • Additional content in a campaign variant adds hours of replayability.
  • Arcs is an accessible gateway into later's rich collection of games.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video q29C0PNF500 The Board Game Garden Discussion at 29:22 sentiment: positive
video_pk 35663 · mention_pk 217365
The Board Game Garden - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 29:22 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Stunning visual design
  • Satisfying puzzle of placing cards and achieving objectives
Cons
  • Hard to perfect a perfect setup
Thematic elements
  • Day of the Dead-inspired altar building
  • altar/tribute-themed drafting
  • puzzle-focused, with adjacency/objective synergy
Comparison games
  • Sagani
  • Framework
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • adjacency-based objectives — objectives depend on surrounding cards and placements
  • Card Drafting — draft cards and place onto an altar, with objectives on each card
  • card/draft with tile placement — draft cards and place onto an altar, with objectives on each card
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • It's going to be a long one because I have a lot of games to talk about.
  • I really enjoyed Sir Ocelot's Cave.
  • Faeya's Swamp is fantastic.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video aDhSkqZGOpQ Quackalope Discussion at 15:34 sentiment: positive
video_pk 35328 · mention_pk 105437
Quackalope - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 15:34 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Potentially strong narrative drive
Cons
  • Unclear fit with the recipient's exact tastes
Thematic elements
  • mythic/arc-based storytelling
Comparison games
  • Vindication
  • Fractured Sky
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • arc-based progression — Players progress along a track or arc to unlock abilities and paths.
  • Track Advancement — Players progress along a track or arc to unlock abilities and paths.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I could send him resurgence.
  • Resurgence is a lovely bag building Euro game.
  • Cosmic Frog could really fit on his shelf.
  • I would be sad to see it go.
  • If there's enough interest, if there's like half a dozen people out there that are like, I'd join a book club.
  • What do you think I should send? I'm not going to make a final decision, and I might not even choose what I hear the most of down in the comments, but I do want your advice.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video rv8VQ7SpZdI Board Game Garden Top 10 List at 8:20 sentiment: positive
video_pk 35161 · mention_pk 180241
Board Game Garden - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 8:20 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • art style is appealing
  • compact, easy-to-teach
  • two-to-four players
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Animal-themed microgame in a cold Arctic setting
  • Two to four player card game with animal art
  • sketch-art aesthetic
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card Drafting — draw and play cards to place and score points
  • card-drafting / placement — draw and play cards to place and score points
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I am so excited for this game
  • this polyomino game... I love polyomino games
  • I cannot tell you guys how excited I am to play this one
  • the cover of this game I love it so much
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video UaX0paWH3uE Board Gaming Ramblings Top 20 List at 10:17 sentiment: positive
video_pk 34826 · mention_pk 103800
Board Gaming Ramblings - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 10:17 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Very interactive
  • Engaging mechanisms
Cons
  • Very long and punishing
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Euro-style event actions / worker placement — Complex event-driven worker placement with heavy interaction.
  • Worker Placement — Complex event-driven worker placement with heavy interaction.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's such an amazing experience, the story that we were in and explored.
  • I think one of the heaviest game experiences I've ever had, but it's so so good.
  • it's a heavy game to master, but the experience is worth it.
  • it's the quintessential economic Euro game.
  • this is such a good game, the White Castle is a perfect jam for me.
  • you need everything and you need to plan ahead, and it's intense.
  • the balance of high dice and low dice in Bora Bora is really interesting.
  • Nations is the nicer Euro version of Through the Ages.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video cXk4iF2D8U4 Board Of It Review at 0:05 sentiment: positive
video_pk 34525 · mention_pk 227955
Board Of It - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:05 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Endlessly replayable due to 24 distinct Fates and multi-act interactions
  • Emergent narratives and drama from Fate interactions
  • Deep, thematic content that expands strategic options
  • Fails-forward design that converts missteps into new goals
  • Rich variety of new rules and cards (crises, edicts, Summits)
Cons
  • High complexity and learning curve; not for casual players
  • Longer playtime and potential for tedious Summit/negotiation sequences
  • Some Fate goals unbalanced in two-player games
  • Campaign can feel like an extended game rather than a true campaign; board state persists
  • Negotiation can feel slow or underutilized
Thematic elements
  • asymmetric roles, fate-driven goals, political intrigue, and emergent narrative
  • A dying empire amid a blighted cosmos where factions contend across sectors in a three-act campaign.
  • fate-driven, campaign-based, emergent
Comparison games
  • Oath
  • Root
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Asymmetric Player Powers — Each player has a unique role deck with bespoke abilities and objectives.
  • Asymmetric roles per player — Each player has a unique role deck with bespoke abilities and objectives.
  • Blight as an enemy — Blight occupies sectors, requires two hits to defeat, and slows movement.
  • Court deck, law cards, and new edicts — Adds court and law cards that alter rules and influence all players.
  • Crisis and Edicts — Event-driven crises and edicts affect all players and shift strategy.
  • Event cards that copy actions with added consequences — Lead-card actions can be copied at a risk of triggering crises or edicts.
  • Events — Event-driven crises and edicts affect all players and shift strategy.
  • Negotiation — Summits allow negotiation and trading of pieces, ships, cities, and captives, often with obscure actions.
  • New Empire mechanics (tax, ships, outlaw transitions) — Empire-based actions including taxation, ship usage, and potential outlaw status.
  • Summits and negotiation — Summits allow negotiation and trading of pieces, ships, cities, and captives, often with obscure actions.
  • Three-act campaign with evolving Fate mechanics — Campaign structure where acts influence goals, cards, and victory conditions.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Arc is quite a sharp clean Snappy design
  • Blighted Reach is slower kind of dense complex messy
  • it's exceptional how diverse they are and what excellent designers on show
  • it's also quite exceptional in the way that they all interact with each other as you begin to see the different Fates
  • Blighted Reach is exactly what an expansion should be
  • we wouldn't recommend this to everyone
  • Blighted Reach in many ways feels like a different game than Arc's
  • endlessly replayable experience
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video AHCSgvrf3nY The Board Gaming Doctor Discussion at 5:44 sentiment: positive
video_pk 34315 · mention_pk 102200
The Board Gaming Doctor - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 5:44 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Light and accessible, good for casual gamers
  • Quick to teach and learn with approachable depth
Cons
  • Limited direct interaction
  • May feel solitaire-like to some players
Thematic elements
  • animal collection and sequence building
  • arctic/remote landscape
  • light, card-based engine with thematic scoring
Comparison games
  • Jaipur
  • Tokaido
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Card Drafting — Draft animal cards to form sequences and optimize scoring.
  • Queue/sequence timing — Arrange plays to maximize scoring opportunities and disrupt opponents.
  • Set Collection — Collect diverse animals to maximize points via sequences.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Harvest feels lighter than viticulture, but intriguing for quicker play.
  • Castle Combo has quick play and surprising depth for a fast 3x3 card grid game.
  • I think this game would play a lot better with more players because that way you would be able to move these highway men a lot faster and they would serve to be more of an impediment.
  • Memoir 44 is a classic thanks to its approachable yet tactical WWII battles.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video lf1a1aTJqnM Board Stupid Top 5 List at 6:26 sentiment: positive
video_pk 33738 · mention_pk 100324
Board Stupid - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 6:26 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • From the Root/Oath design lineage
  • Standalone option plus multi-arc structure
  • Strong artwork and thematic cohesion
Cons
  • Can be complex for new players
  • Release timing details not stated
Thematic elements
  • Sci-fi space strategy with trick-taking twist
  • Space-based strategy
  • Standalone or three-arc campaign; evolving narrative
Comparison games
  • Root
  • Oath
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • 4X deconstruction — Reimagines space 4X concepts with new rules
  • Branching Narrative — Choices affect progression and outcomes
  • Narrative Choice — Choices affect progression and outcomes
  • standalone/arc structure — Play as standalone or as part of an arc trilogy
  • Tech Trees — Progression and upgrades across arcs
  • Trick-Taking — Space-themed trick-taking core mechanic
  • upgrading civilizations — Progression and upgrades across arcs
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • we're excited about all of the new board games coming out in 2024
  • every month we're going to bring you five games that we really looking forward to playing
  • this is series it's not like the top five games are going to come out this year
  • please do so Matt let's dig into our next choice
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video wMPrzJZxzhQ Board Game Dad Review at 0:00 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 33243 · mention_pk 98688
Board Game Dad - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 0:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • Innovative hybrid of 4X and trick-taking mechanics
  • Engaging decision-making around initiative and ambitions
  • Court cards add meaningful interaction
  • Dice combat offers balance and risk management
  • Optional following-suit adds strategic flexibility
  • Ambition-driven scoring creates dynamic end-game choices
Cons
  • Heavy battle/dice resolution may not suit players who dislike combat
  • Card hand size can limit options and feel constraining
  • Ambition availability can be restricted when icons don't appear on your cards
  • Not a traditional 4X experience; may disappoint players seeking a classic 4X
  • Court-card chaos can be unsettling for Euro-game purists
  • Not designed with channel-friendly content in mind
Thematic elements
  • Ambition-driven scoring, initiative control, and court-card powers
  • Space empire-space exploration with 4X ambitions and trick-taking combat
  • Analytical review with personal impressions and strategic discussion
Comparison games
  • Cosmic Encounter
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Action Following — Following suit is optional, enabling strategic off-suit plays with limited pip value when off-suit
  • Ambition scoring and selective criteria — At the end of each round, players choose up to three scoring criteria and must declare an ambition matching icons on their cards to score
  • Ambition-driven action diversity — Ambitions influence end-of-round scoring and lead to diverse end-game strategies depending on icon availability
  • Combat: Dice — Three colors of dice give attacker-choice with balanced results; outcomes depend on dice faces with defense responses
  • Compound Scoring — At the end of each round, players choose up to three scoring criteria and must declare an ambition matching icons on their cards to score
  • Court cards with actions — Court cards confer powers such as attacking, stealing, or immunity, adding interaction and variability
  • dice-based combat resolution — Three colors of dice give attacker-choice with balanced results; outcomes depend on dice faces with defense responses
  • Hand Management — A six-card hand constrains options, requiring planning and sometimes sacrificing to steal initiative
  • Hand management and card-driven actions — A six-card hand constrains options, requiring planning and sometimes sacrificing to steal initiative
  • Icon-based ambition requirement — Ambitions can only be declared if you have a card with the corresponding icon; otherwise you must wait or hope for icons to appear
  • Initiative and lead strategy — The highest-valued card in the lead suit wins the trick, granting the next lead and the possibility to declare an ambition
  • Optional following suit — Following suit is optional, enabling strategic off-suit plays with limited pip value when off-suit
  • Trick-Taking — Cards have suits that map to actions and a value that maps to power; higher value can win initiative in a lead suit
  • Trick-taking with suit and value — Cards have suits that map to actions and a value that maps to power; higher value can win initiative in a lead suit
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • arcs is not the kind of game I would normally play
  • I'm not a huge fan of 4X style games
  • Forex is short for explore expand exploit and exterminate
  • The initiative would be equivalent to winning a trick
  • the court cards add a great deal of interaction
  • I was won over by this game
  • if you want to play a 4X game you will hate this because it doesn't play like a 4X game
  • Cosmic Encounter reminds me of that game
  • Yes I liked ARS quite a bit
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video clfZwJLJaQs Game Night Picks - Pair Of Dice Paradise Analysis at 2:37 sentiment: positive
video_pk 32557 · mention_pk 96355
Game Night Picks - Pair Of Dice Paradise - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 2:37 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Unique combination of mechanics
  • Strong critical reception
Cons
  • Complex to learn
  • Can be fiddly to track multiple effects
Thematic elements
  • Strategy through trick-taking and area control
  • Abstract space-themed competition
  • Hybrid thematic flavor with multiple scoring paths
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Area Control — Control regions on the board to score.
  • Engine Building — Develop engine for efficiency and actions.
  • engine-building — Develop engine for efficiency and actions.
  • Trick-Taking — Players play cards to take tricks with special effects.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • It's awards season. Oh, awards season.
  • We're going to put them into a bracket. In fact, we're going to do an extra special two-part episode where this episode we are going to introduce the 16 competitors in alphabetical order.
  • This is going to be head-to-head brackets. Ooh, fancy tournament style.
  • So, without further ado, I believe it is time for us to meet the competitors.
  • we will actually have the bracket where we will whittle them down until we have just one game standing.
  • Ooh, exciting.
  • The next time we'll be back with a randomly seated tournament bracket.
  • So, prepare your picks and let us know down in the comments.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video X0yGkRLBzgk Tabletop Tokki Discussion at 8:54 sentiment: positive
video_pk 32522 · mention_pk 215768
Tabletop Tokki - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 8:54 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Fun, active guessing activity
  • Strategy in how to position elements for visibility
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • drawing and guesswork
  • unknown
  • party/drawing game
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • draw-and-guess with tiles — drawings are covered, tiles removed to shape the guess
  • Drawing — drawings are covered, tiles removed to shape the guess
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Message from the Stars was a really fun, fresh take on this with determining specific letters.
  • If you're a fan of word puzzles like Wordle or things like that, this would definitely be one to check out.
  • This one gets a high recommendation from me.
  • I really enjoyed this one at four players.
  • I really love the puzzle of this one.
  • Sphinx is a one to four player tile manipulation game. I was really let down.
  • Are You a Robot? This is a super quick two to three player deduction game.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video n_XZRWVH3wE Tabletop Tokki Review at 4:50 sentiment: mixed
video_pk 32312 · mention_pk 209656
Tabletop Tokki - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 4:50 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
mixed
Pros
  • thematic ideas with round-based scoring
Cons
  • hard to manage drafting at lower player counts
  • rules complexity and perceived luck can undercut design
Thematic elements
  • mystical crafting and placement of cards into aphrenda
  • pattern-building drafting with death-adjacency scoring
  • thematic but abstracted
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Adjacency Scoring — placement order and adjacency influence scoring regions
  • Card Drafting — draft cards with scoring objectives to place in your aphrenda
  • Compound Scoring — placement order and adjacency influence scoring regions
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Two Win was a sleeper hit for me.
  • Park Ranger was a delightful little solo treat that really stood out for me.
  • I really enjoyed it. It is a quick, concise puzzle
  • This one was too long, and I did not enjoy the take that element.
  • Flower Fields hit a really nice intersection of being clean, easy to learn, easy to teach, but also having just enough going on that it felt like it has a little bit of a competitive edge.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video B4AcZGIHvdk BoardGameCo Top 15 List at 5:11 sentiment: positive
video_pk 32264 · mention_pk 95374
BoardGameCo - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 5:11 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Critically strong hype; widely regarded by the community
  • Complex, multi-layered gameplay with engine-building flavor
Cons
  • High complexity could deter lighter-game players
Thematic elements
  • multi-mechanic engine with arc-based growth
  • fantasy arc/region control
  • hybrid strategy with thematic framing
Comparison games
  • Root
  • Other Leader Games titles
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Area Control — territory influence across a map
  • Trick-Taking — competitive card play with area influence
  • Unique Player Powers — different factions/characters with unique abilities
  • Variable player powers — different factions/characters with unique abilities
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • It's 2026 now, which means it's time for that thing that I like to do every single year
  • I want to play 30 of the 35 games I set out for myself
  • Three games a month would make it doable
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video eUoRKGoEZOs The Board Gaming Doctor Top 10 List at 12:25 sentiment: positive
video_pk 32315 · mention_pk 95535
The Board Gaming Doctor - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 12:25 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • innovative mechanism with a forex-like structure
  • intricate and elegant card system
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • space exploration and forex-like resource management
  • space-themed strategy with trick-taking influences
  • intricate, space-themed
Comparison games
  • Fromage
  • SEI
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • The Lord of the Rings Duel for Middle Earth is better than A Just Robin Hood in my view.
  • Leviathan Wilds is the easiest to get into and play, and the spiral-bound notebook helps a lot.
  • The Fellowship plays quicker than Slay the Spire, and it still has that new-game feel.
  • Arcs is the most innovative in this category.
  • Fromage does a great job; it’s mechanically and thematically innovative.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video XDMk5jXPiUc Board Game Animal Top 10 List at 1:04 sentiment: positive
video_pk 30395 · mention_pk 223184
Board Game Animal - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 1:04 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • expansion is a tremendous accomplishment
  • adds depth and new content
Cons
  • scope can be large; may be time-consuming to explore fully
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • new content integration — expansion adds new content while preserving base game mechanics; increases depth but can be large in scope.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • this is really just a tremendous accomplishment of an expansion
  • everything that came out this year was excellent and held the high standards that I have for Dominion
  • more of a good thing is a good thing expansion which I Define as a situation where you already love the base game and what comes in the expansion is just essentially more of the base game to love
  • more sets are good is kind of like saying that the pizza is good from your favorite pizza place every time you order it
  • it's not increasing the size of the game or complexity but just giving more to love
  • Carnival of chaos fantastic get it
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video 4GpCaK_uSOU Board Of It Top 10 List at 13:22 sentiment: positive
video_pk 30448 · mention_pk 89647
Board Of It - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 13:22 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • ambitious, widely lauded as a potential best game of 2024
  • high replayability with expansions
Cons
  • complex and lengthy
  • steep learning curve for new players
Thematic elements
  • empire-building in a new format
  • twist on a classic 4X game
  • grand strategy with deep rules
Comparison games
  • Root
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • 4X mechanics — eXplore, eXpand, eXploit, eXterminate in a new twist
  • Tile Placement — placing tiles to build your empire on a shared map
  • tile/board placement — placing tiles to build your empire on a shared map
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • it's basically you're kind of competing to make Trails out of little cards and you're connecting different types of trails together
  • we played the entire campaign
  • it's a two-player game but we swapped sides for the 9th play
  • there's not a lot of well, at least at two players a lot of time investment needed; but it's quick to set up and play
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ABl6MlFkR2o Board Of It Top 10 List at 15:15 sentiment: positive
video_pk 30334 · mention_pk 89321
Board Of It - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 15:15 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Strong fan-favorite from the year
  • Campaign mode adds replayability
Cons
  • High play time and complexity
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • campaign/reactive campaign — Campaign-driven experience with base and campaign modes.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Very interesting. I put at number 10 the Imperium series.
  • I stand by it.
  • This is it was my favorite kind of main Undaunted game. I just thought what it did uh was very interesting to me.
  • I think it's fair placement. I do really like Worms Span.
  • Just One. I absolutely love just one.
  • Pamperro. And I completely stick by this.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ABl6MlFkR2o Board Of It Top 10 List at 17:00 sentiment: positive
video_pk 30334 · mention_pk 211725
Board Of It - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 17:00 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • Strong campaign mechanics
  • Leads to memorable play sessions
Cons
  • Requires commitment to run campaigns
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Campaign — React campaign mode with alternate paths and scenarios.
  • Campaign replayability — React campaign mode with alternate paths and scenarios.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Very interesting. I put at number 10 the Imperium series.
  • I stand by it.
  • This is it was my favorite kind of main Undaunted game. I just thought what it did uh was very interesting to me.
  • I think it's fair placement. I do really like Worms Span.
  • Just One. I absolutely love just one.
  • Pamperro. And I completely stick by this.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video MXAzfHTNKxU Board Game Hangover Top 12 List at 3:19 sentiment: positive
video_pk 29602 · mention_pk 86942
Board Game Hangover - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 3:19 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • high interaction and conflict
  • epic scale for a compact game
  • card-driven decisions create tension
Cons
  • pace can feel variable due to card sequencing
  • may require careful balancing to avoid overpowering cards
Thematic elements
  • faction-based, space warfare with card-driven actions
  • space conflict with ship fleets and planetary control
  • epic space opera with multiple chapters
Comparison games
  • Roth
  • Heat
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Asymmetric Player Powers — power cards grant unique abilities that impact strategy and interaction.
  • asymmetric power cards — power cards grant unique abilities that impact strategy and interaction.
  • Card-driven actions — cards determine available actions and turn order.
  • Ship building and movement — players build and move ships to attack and gain strategic advantages.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • This is the most colorful area control game that you will be able to find anywhere.
  • We love those, but this time it didn't click.
  • This is a space game, but a weird one.
  • It's the hands down the best racing game ever.
  • This is the most thematical trick taking game ever made.
  • The artwork is gorgeous. It’s one of those games that looks amazing on the table.
  • I haven't played it; I hope it has more content in the update.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video TYtr85sqqe4 The Board Game Garden Discussion at 6:22 sentiment: positive
video_pk 28795 · mention_pk 84493
The Board Game Garden - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 6:22 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • integrates trick-taking with novel round structure
  • appealing theme and production cues
Cons
none
Thematic elements
  • Trick-taking with evolving rounds
Comparison games
  • Drau
  • Kings Trick Takers
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • Trick-Taking — Players play cards in tricks to win rounds; strategic signaling and draw from decks.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Let's Get Cozy and play some board games
  • I get very socially anxious
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video bTO5JBZ-dOQ The Board Gaming Doctor Top 10 List at 7:39 sentiment: positive
video_pk 28351 · mention_pk 83234
The Board Gaming Doctor - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 7:39 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
  • strong first impression with unique trick-taking mechanics
  • space theming adds flair to a card-driven experience
Cons
  • expansions like leaders and campaigns are not yet explored in depth
Thematic elements
  • space exploration expressed through card-driven tricks
  • space-themed adventure with arc-based concepts
  • thematic but abstract trick-taking
Comparison games
  • Ark Nova
  • Terraforming Mars
  • Wingspan
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
  • tableau and card-driven scoring — cards impact actions and scoring in evolving ways.
  • Trick-Taking — core mechanic based on trick-taking with strategic hand management.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • Rise and Fall has risen for me and not fallen.
  • This is a very strong year of games.
  • I would rather play Rise and Fall over Black Forest.
  • I remember one of the last games I played where everyone was taking a completely different route.
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Video ZWyioC6pAoc Game Night Picks - Pair Of Dice Paradise Discussion at 11:12 sentiment: positive
video_pk 27689 · mention_pk 80871
Game Night Picks - Pair Of Dice Paradise - Arcs video thumbnail
Click to watch at 11:12 · YouTube ↗
Overall sentiment (raw)
positive
Pros
none
Cons
none
Thematic elements
Comparison games
none
Mechanics (from transcript analysis)
Mechanics unknown.
Video topics + discussion points
No key topics recorded for this video.
Quotes (from this video)
  • I think that is a Feast for Odin
  • it's season two though
  • Clank that's yep I was opening my mouth I just didn't blurt fast enough
  • it's paladins of the West kingdom
  • Underwater Cities is that the name of that game
  • Scout I'm quick at blurting
  • tital blades Banner Festival
  • Kaleidoscope the board game is the best guess I have at this point is there an actual board game called cope
  • harmonies there you go what a strange filter yes for sure also love the game
  • it's a space game called arcs it is I can see it now yep I think you're right
  • my favorite game in the west kingdom series is architects of the West Kingdom
  • revive y nicely done
References (from this video)
No references stored for this video.
Transcript Navigation
Showing 151–200 of 283
Game Deep Dive